RESEARCH IN THE SERVICE OF CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Heidi Unruh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MAPP Process & Outcome Evaluation
Advertisements

© Pathways Forward Transitional Ministry Consulting 2010 An Introduction to Transitional Ministry A Resource for Churches in Transition.
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Revised criteria for the Order of the Ministry. The personThe work  Qualifications ◦ 10 qualities anticipated in persons engaged in ministry in the CCDOC.
ESRC/DfID Poverty Alleviation Conference 9/9/14
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Theory of Change, Impact Monitoring, and Most Significant Change EWB-UK Away Weekend – March 23, 2013.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Introducing the Pastoral Spiral
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Historical Research.
Problem Analysis Intelligence Step 2 - Problem Analysis Developing solutions to complex population nutrition problems (such as obesity or food insecurity)
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Virginia Li - Photovoice - 10 Nov 2008 Photovoice: Beyond Visual Anthropology Caroline Wang, DrPH, Program Director Public Health Institute, Berkley, California.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Community Capacity Building Program Strategic Planning
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
School Development Planning Initiative “An initiative for schools by schools” Self-Evaluation of Learning and Teaching Self-Evaluation of Learning and.
Development of Competence Profile Quality managers in VET-institutions Project no: PL1-LEO This publication [communication] reflects the.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
PROGRAM PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION & EVALUATION The Service Delivery Model Link Brenda Thompson Jamerson, Chair Services to Youth Facet May 8-12, 2013.
1 Vision-Based Mission Planning Monson, Krejci and Associates.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
The Evaluation Plan.
 Community Coaching for Planning, Action, and Evaluation A CYFERnet-Community Online Workshop May 18, 2011 Laura Laumatia University of Idaho Susan Jakes.
 “…the systematic collection, review, and use of information about educational programs undertaken for the purpose of improving student learning and.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Education for Sustainable Development Network Alona Rauckiene Lithuania 2009 Visby.
Route to Success: What are the keys to creating system change? 2006 NACDD Conference Pittsburgh, PA.
January28, 2012 Steve Court, Superintendent Southern Hills District Please silence your cell phone.
Quantitative Research Qualitative Research? A type of educational research in which the researcher decides what to study. A type of educational research.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
The Process of Conducting Research
LIBERIA THE BIG PICTURE Can the Agency tell the truth about results? Can the participants tell the truth about results?
Based upon a presentation by Dr. Rob Weinberg Director, Experiment in Congregational Education Thinking, Planning, and Acting Systemically in Communities.
Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
TOPIC 12 STAKEHOLDERS AND SUSTAINABILITY. Introduction to Agenda 21 The Earth Summit held in Rio De Janerio, Brazil was attended by 178 country leaders.
CHAPTER 1 Understanding RESEARCH
Journeying toward a USA National Conference An Overview.
Using a Logic Model to Plan and Evaluate Your Technology Leadership Development Program Chad Green, Program Analyst Lynn McNally, Technology Resource Supervisor.
Qualitative Research January 19, Selecting A Topic Trying to be original while balancing need to be realistic—so you can master a reasonable amount.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
111 CINDI PMER Workshop March, 2007 By Simon Opolot © 2007 Office of the Premier, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Private Bag X9037 Telecom House, 2nd Floor,
Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24,
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Vision, Values and Virtues Church School Leaders 19 th November 2015.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Making it Count! Program Evaluation For Youth-Led Initiatives.
Quantitative and Qualitative research
Assessment Workshop 2 Developing Student Learning Outcomes.
Advancing learning through service Tamara Thorpe Trainer | Coach | Consultant Region 2 NAFSA Albuquerque, NM.
MU Core Revision Proposal The Atom Visual Structure Please read information provided in each slide as well as the notes under each slide.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Strategic Planning. Agenda Icebreaker Welcome and Introductions Agenda Review What is Strategic Planning Types of Strategic Planning Planning to Plan.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Strategic Planning. What is Strategic Planning Used by community groups, government departments, organizations and businesses to develop blueprint for.
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
Action Research for School Leaders by Dr. Paul A. Rodríguez.
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
2017 symposium faith formation with a new generation
Introduction to Program Evaluation
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Quality Framework Overview
Presentation transcript:

RESEARCH IN THE SERVICE OF CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Heidi Unruh

"May your love abound more and more in knowledge and depth of insight, so that we may be … filled with the fruit of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ." (Philippians 1:9-11) Ultimate Goal of Research

UNDERSTANDING RESEARCH

WORKSHOP AGENDA Understanding research Why research Research methods Research models The “work” in “workshop”: Case studies

What is research? Research is the systematic gathering of valid information for use in problem-solving, decision- making, or progress toward a goal. to help answer a question, address a problem or move toward a goal Types of research: –quantitative / qualitative –academic / action

What is research? Stages of research: –posing the question –gathering data –organizing data –analyzing data –disseminating findings –applying / acting on findings

Dynamics of research Intellectual: expand our base of knowledge about God's world and our role in it Practical: inform effective action, generate support for action Ethical: collect and use information in a valid way – minimize potential for abuse Relational: empower the community by engaging stakeholders as co-learners Spiritual: connect what's happening "on earth" with God's will "in heaven"

Research Ethics?

Research terminology Investigative framework: Larger context or narrative in which research question is framed Objective: What you hope to learn – often involves testing a hypothesis Measurement: Units of change or qualities being compared Standard: External baseline or control group against which subjects of investigation are measured Stakeholders: All who have an interest in or are affected by the research

How a missional theology informs research Investigative framework: Connecting the Biblical story and our story Objective: Informed, contextually appropriate participation in God’s mission Measurement: Seeing the world and our role in it through God’s eyes Standard: “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven” – prophetic imagination Stakeholders: Community of God’s children – loved, redeemed and called by God

WHY RESEARCH

How research can inform ministry Applications of research to CCD goals: Context – "exegete community“; discern social / cultural / historical / spiritual dynamics Problem – define what needs to be done Resources – discover assets in church and community Priorities – narrow the focus of ministry efforts Methodology – best way to use resources to meet missional goals in your context Impact – are we solving the problem or meeting our goals? Program – process of evaluation and growth (assess / learn / plan / respond) Vision – what are our goals? How do we define success? Relationships - who will work toward a shared vision?

Key ministry research questions: 1. "What's really going on here?" ~How do we discover and strengthen what is vital, true and good in our culture, community and organization? ~What are the main concerns, assets and dreams in our community? ~How does the unseen affect what is seen: what systems, power structures, cultural influences, historical trends and spiritual forces influence the current situation?

Key ministry research questions: 2. "Who's involved?" ~Who are the stakeholders and what are their perceptions of the situation? ~How can stakeholders be involved collaboratively in the solution? ~Who else has worked or is working on a similar or connected concern?

Key ministry research questions: 3. "What do we do about it?" ~What are priority ministry goals for our organization, in relation to other stakeholders and partners? ~What are best practices (programs, policies, organizing strategies, etc.) to achieve a particular ministry goal, given our context? ~How do we share the gospel and promote wholeness in contextually appropriate ways?

Key ministry research questions: 4. "How are we doing?" ~Is our ministry having an impact? How do we make it better? ~How do we connect the biblical model with our observations of the world? ~Are we being faithful to God's mission for the church in general, and our organization in particular?

Naming your research question: What do you want to learn? 1."What's really going on here?" 2."Who's involved?" 3."What do we do about it?" 4."How are we doing?"

METHODS OF RESEARCH

Methods for gathering information: Ask people Gather documents Make observations Count things Collect measurements Use instruments Employ 3rd party

Connect with existing research: Universities, colleges, seminaries Government offices Civic groups Census data (quickfacts.census.gov) Foundations Denominational / ecumenical research offices and commissions Research organizations / policy institutes Research consultants / professional evaluators

Methods for analyzing information: Clustering / hexagoning Flowcharts Spreadsheets Correlations Statistical analysis Theme analysis

Methods for sharing information: Tables & charts Maps Reports Stories (case studies) Multi-media Roundtable Seminars / workshops

Methods for sharing information: Tables & charts Maps Reports Stories (case studies) Multi-media Roundtable Seminars / workshops

Identifying your methods: How will you get and use information? 1.Identifying existing research 2.Methods for gathering new information 3.Methods for analyzing information 4.Methods for sharing information

RESEARCH MODELS (a framework for gathering and making sense of information)

Logic Model Can be used for any of the research questions, but particularly useful for “How are we doing” (evaluation) questions Visual representation of the link between inputs / results

Logic Model (S + P)  I (+ E)  O  R S = Situation (needs, strengths, symptoms, causes, stakeholders) P = Priorities (mission, values) I = Inputs (resources – what we invest) E = External factors – environmental influences) O = Outputs (activities – what we do; participation – who we reach) R = Outcomes (Results – impact in short-, medium-, long-term)

Indicators "Something that helps you understand where you are, which way you are going and how far you are from where you want to be" (sustainablemeasures.com) Help us frame a vision for ministry: what would our community look like if the kingdom of God were realized here as it is in heaven? World Vision indicators: "Transformational development seeks to restore and enable wholeness of life with dignity, justice, peace, and hope." (transformational-development.org)

Indicators Identify sustainable measures of success Particularly helpful model for “What’s going on here?” and “What do we do about it?”

Indicators Compass of indicators (optimalniche.com, © AtKisson.com): N = Nature E = Economy S = Society W = individual well-being Center = Spiritual condition Outer circle = Built environment

Participatory Action Research Not really a methodology but a guiding approach “A reflective process of progressive problem solving lead by individuals working with others in teams or as part of a “community of practice” to improve the way they address issues and solve problems.” (Wikipedia) Can apply to various models and research questions

Participatory Action Research Qualities of PAR: –Participatory: clients, informants, and other stakeholders are involved as active participants in the research process –Qualitative: more interested in subjective data and descriptive measures than objective data and numerical indicators; can be “fuzzy” –Reflective: includes critical reflection on the process and outcomes of research –Emergent: involves multiple, open-ended research cycles; good for contexts in flux or where research question is not yet clear

Participatory Action Research Cyclic process in 4 basic phases: –Engage (identify stakeholders and plan participation in research question) –Look (gather information about the research question) –Think (interpret and analyze information in real time, involving stakeholder feedback) –Act (plan and implement actions based on the research, leading to change Initiate new cycle

Participatory Action Research Observation / data gathering Reflection / critical analysis Planning & action See materials on Action Learning and Action Research, edited by Bob Dick,

Other research models: Experimental / quasi-experimental model Outcome evaluation Congregational assessment Community assessment Appreciative inquiry Vision search

Choosing your model What model or framework will guide your research process?

Want to learn more …? Join the research track at SCUPE! April 15-18, 2008 Chicago For more information: