MabThera ® and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Intergroup Randomised Trial of Rituximab versus a Watch & Wait Approach in Patients with Advanced Stage, Asymptomatic, Non-bulky Follicular Lymphoma.
Advertisements

Ravi Vij MD Associate Professor Section of BMT and Leukemia
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
1. 2 Lenalidomide in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Clinical Update EHA 2010 DR. OUSSAMA JRADI.
Supervisor: Vs 楊慕華醫師 Presenter: CR 周益聖醫師 N Engl J Med 2012;367:
CORAL: COllaborative trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma R-ICE versus R-DHAP in relapsed patients with CD20 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) followed.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Novel Agents for Indolent Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma Stephen Ansell, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic.
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: High Risk Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma: Ginna G. Laport, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Division of Blood &
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas-definition and epidemiology
Update: Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma ICML 2008: Update on non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma  Improved outcome of elderly patients.
Eastern cooperative oncology group E1496: ECOG and CALGB Cyclophosphamide/Fludarabine (CF) with or without Maintenance Rituximab (MR) in Advanced Indolent.
FDG-PET Adapted Sequential Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin and Augmented ICE Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin.
MabThera® for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
Follicular & Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas. Five-year TTF and Response Duration (RD) According to FLIPI Risk Group R-CHOPCHOPP value TTF Low-risk
Treatment of Non- Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Precursor B cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia Remission induction with combination therapy Consolidation phase: –High.
MANAGEMENT OF MANTLE CELL LYMPHOMA IN TUNISIA R BEN LAKHAL, L KAMMOUN, K ZAHRA, S KEFI Sousse 25 MAY 2012.
Rituximab efficacy in other haematological malignancies Christian Buske.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Sequential Dose-Dense R-CHOP Followed by ICE Consolidation (MSKCC Protocol ) without Radiotherapy for Patients with Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell.
Continued Late Conversion to Complete Remission and Durability of Remission in Patients with B-cell Follicular Lymphoma (FL) Treated with Rituximab Followed.
Consolidation treatment with Y 90 Ibritumomab Tiuxetan after R-CHOP induction in high-risk patients with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) (GOTEL-FL1LC): a multicentric,
Radioimmunotherapy as Consolidation in MCL (Mantle Cell Lymphoma) — 8 Years Follow-Up of a Prospective Phase 2 Polish Lymphoma Research Group Study Jurczak.
Alternating Courses of CHOP and DHAP Plus Rituximab (R) Followed by a High-Dose Cytarabine Regimen and ASCT is Superior to Six Courses of CHOP Plus R Followed.
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Reduced-Intensity Conditioning (RIC) and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-SCT) for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) in the Brentuximab.
Maintenance Therapy in Myeloma Myeloma Canada National Conference Donna E. Reece, M.D. Princess Margaret Hospital 24 September 2011.
Rituximab maintenance for the treatment of indolent NHL Dr Christian Buske.
Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Extended Follow-Up of the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Collection of peripheral blood stem cells Dr Kacem Karima Department of clinical haematology -HAO CMH - 26/05/2012.
A phase III trial comparing R-CHOP 14 and R-CHOP 21 for the treatment of newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma Results from a UK NCRI Lymphoma.
Bortezomib (VELCADE), Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone (VRCD) combination therapy in front-line low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LG-NHL) is active.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
Rituximab plus Lenalidomide Improves the Complete Remission Rate in Comparison with Rituximab Monotherapy in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma Patients in.
Optimal use of rituximab in aggressive NHL
1 Flinn I et al. Proc ICML 2013;Abstract 084.
Frontline Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) Shows Superior Efficacy in Comparison to Bendamustine.
Inotuzumab Ozogamicin (IO; CMC544), a CD22 Monoclonal Antibody Attached to Calicheamycin, Produces Complete Response (CR) plus Complete Marrow Response.
What is the best approach for a follicular lymphoma patient who achieves CR after frontline chemoimmunotherapy? Radioimmunotherapy! Matthew Matasar,
Randomized Phase III US/Canadian Intergroup Trial (SWOG S9704) Comparing CHOP ± R for Eight Cycles to CHOP ± R for Six Cycles Followed by Autotransplant.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Ibrutinib in Combination with Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Durable Remissions in Patients with High- Risk Chronic Lymphocytic.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Daunorubicin VS Mitoxantrone VS Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups.
Treatment of non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Campos M et al. Proc EHA 2013;Abstract B2009.
A Phase III Randomized Intergroup Trial (SWOG S0016) of CHOP Chemotherapy plus Rituximab vs CHOP Chemotherapy plus Iodine-131-Tositumomab for the Treatment.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Phase III EMN02/HO95 MM Trial: Upfront ASCT Prolongs PFS vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed MM CCO Independent Conference Coverage*
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Fowler NH et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8036.
R-CHOP Stem Cell Transplantation for Follicular Lymphoma
Ferrajoli A et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 1395.
Jonathan W. Friedberg M.D., M.M.Sc.
What is the optimal management of a 43-year-old man with high-risk FL not in CR after R-chemo? Answer: Radioimmunotherapy Peter Martin, M.D. The Charles,
What is the best frontline regimen for CLL patients
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Boccadoro M et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8020.
Presentation transcript:

MabThera ® and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)

ASCT: Protocol Debulking/ Mobilization Regimen BM/Stem Cell Harvest and “Purging” High-Dose Chemoradiotherapy Stem Cell Transplant

ASCT for Relapsed NHL Higher response and survival rates than with chemotherapy alone –Aggressive NHL – PARMA Study EFS 45% vs 12% –Indolent NHL – CUP trial: PFS 63% vs 33% (P=0.004) 40%-70% relapse rate after ASCT –Possible explanations  Residual lymphoma in patient  Reintroduction of malignant cells with transplant after ex vivo purging

MabThera ® + HDT/ASCT for Relapsed NHL: Rationale In vivo purging agent Ex vivo purging agent Combination with conditioning therapy Post-transplant adjuvant immunotherapy

In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Protocol Buckstein et al. Semin Oncol. 1999;26(5 suppl 14):115; Mangel et al. Blood. 2000;96(suppl 1):383a. Abstract CBVLeukapheresis MabThera  G-CSF * Stem cell transplant Weeks * Days

In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Median PB CD34+ Cell Count Day 5Day 4Baseline CD34+ x 10 6 /L No MabThera ® MabThera ® purging Buckstein et al. Semin Oncol. 1999;26:115; Mangel et al. Blood. 2000;96(suppl 1):383a. Abstract 1655.

In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Response Clinical100 CR38 CRu 63 Molecular* (6 mo post-transplant)100 % of Patients (N=16) * Among the 7 patients who presented with the bcl-2 rearrangement. Response Buckstein et al. Semin Oncol. 1999;26:115. Mangel et al. Blood. 2000;96(suppl 1):383a. Abstract 1655.

In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Toxicity Lung toxicity 63 Interstitial pneumonitis38 Symptomatic hypoxia (hospitalization required) 13 No significant difference in times to neutrophil engraftment or platelet independence between MabThera ® and control groups % of Patients (N=16) Buckstein et al. Semin Oncol. 1999;26:115; Mangel et al. Blood. 2000;96(suppl 1):383a. Abstract 1655.

MabThera ® In Vivo Purging and Maintenance after HDT/ASCT in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma: Protocol Buckstein et al. Blood. 2002;100:647a. Abstract * 3 MU/m 2 t.i.w.; † 375 mg/m 2 Study 1 No purgeHDT IFN maintenance* for 2 years Study 2 HDT MabThera ® maintenance † weekly x 4 at 2 and 6 months Study 3 HDT IFN maintenance* for 2 years + MabThera ® maintenance † weekly x 6 at 3 months MabThera ® in vivo purge †

MabThera ® In Vivo Purging and Maintenance after HDT/ASCT in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma: Patient Characteristics Buckstein et al. Blood. 2002;100:647a. Abstract 2547.

MabThera ® In Vivo Purging and Maintenance after HDT/ASCT in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma: Results Buckstein et al. Blood. 2002;100:647a. Abstract * Only 10 evaluable patients

MabThera ® In Vivo Purging and Maintenance after HDT/ASCT in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma: Molecular and Clinical Responses 10/12 MabThera ® patients had durable molecular remissions at last follow-up (18-34 months) Clinical relapse in 6/10 patients was preceded by detection of MRD Median RFS has not been reached for the MabThera ® and MabThera ® -IFN cohorts compared with 3.3 years for IFN Buckstein et al. Blood. 2002;100:647a. Abstract 2547.

MabThera ® In Vivo Purging and Maintenance after HDT/ASCT in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma: Event-free Survival Buckstein et al. Blood. 2002;100:647a. Abstract Patients Event-free (%) Months Interferon MabThera ® / Interferon MabThera ® P=0.12

MabThera ® In Vivo Purging and Maintenance after HDT/ASCT in Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma: Summary HDT/ASCT with MabThera ® in vivo purge and maintenance –Produces high rates of complete clinical remission of up to 90% –Reduces stem cell graft contamination –Achieves PCR-negativity in virtually all patients by 9 months post-ASCT Buckstein et al. Blood. 2002;100:647a. Abstract 2547.

High-dose MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Relapsed B-Cell Lymphoma: Protocol Khouri et al. Blood. 2002;100:645a. Abstract Schema 1 (n=27) MabThera ® 375 mg/m 2 Cyclophosphamide 4-7 g/m 2 Day MabThera ® 1,000 mg/m 2 Day MabThera ® 375 mg/m 2 MabThera ® 1,000 mg/m 2 Ifosfamide 3.33 g/m 2 Etoposide 300 mg/m 2 Schema 2 (n=15) GM-CSF 250 µg/m 2 G-CSF 10 µg/kg G-CSF 6 µg/kg b.i.d

High-dose MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Relapsed B-Cell Lymphoma: Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Age  65 years CD20 + lymphoid malignancies beyond first remission Marrow involvement reduced to  5% with pretransplant salvage chemotherapy ECOG performance status 0-2 Left ventricular ejection fraction  50% Pulmonary function test  50% Exclusion Hepatitis HIV-positive Khouri et al. Blood. 2002;100:645a. Abstract 2538.

High-dose MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Relapsed B-Cell Lymphoma: Patient Characteristics No. of patients42 Median age in years 51 (range) (20-65) HistologyAggressive86% Follicular14% IPI score 0-171% CR post-salvage chemotherapy45% Median prior treatments 2 Khouri et al. Blood. 2002;100:645a. Abstract 2538.

High-dose MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Relapsed B-Cell Lymphoma: Overall and Disease-free Survival 91% 1-year disease-free survival 93% 1-year overall survival Khouri et al. Blood. 2002;100:645a. Abstract Months Post-transplant Cumulative Proportion Surviving OS DFS n=42

High-dose MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Relapsed B-Cell Lymphoma: Tolerability Khouri et al. Blood. 2002;100:645a. Abstract 2538.

High-dose MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Relapsed B-Cell Lymphoma: Summary MabThera ® in vivo purging and consolidation achieved –1-year OS of 93% –1-year DFS of 91% No additional risk of toxicity or infection Comparison of high-dose vs standard MabThera ® purging is warranted Khouri et al. Blood. 2002;100:645a. Abstract 2538.

Magni et al. Blood. 2000;96:864. Cyclophosphamide Cytarabine MabThera  Melphalan Mitoxantrone + melphalan Weeks 0369 *** * Stem cell transplant In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Protocol

Magni et al. Blood. 2000;96:864. Age (y)Median 4346 (range) (34-58)(36-53) HistologyFL47%70% MCL 47%30% MALT 6%— StageIII27%10% IV 73%90% Bulky disease>10 cm — 30% Sites of involvementNodal93%100% Extranodal 13%30% BM100% 100% PB40% 30% HDT (n=10) M + HDT (n=15) In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Patient Characteristics

In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : PCR-Negative Harvests Magni et al. Blood. 2000;96:864. Post- Cyclophosphamide Patients With PCR- Negative Harvests (%) Post- Cytarabine (P=0.007) M + HDT HDT

Clinical70100 Molecular70100 % of Patients Response HDT (n=10) M + HDT (n=14)* In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Response Magni et al. Blood. 2000;96:864. * Evaluable patients.

In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Protocol Flinn et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:628. Preparative Regimen Day 1: MabThera  Day 4: Cyclophosphamide Day 5+: G-CSF Leukapheresis HDT Cyclophosphamide Total body irradiation Stem Cell Transplant Post-transplant Therapy MabThera  G-CSF

No. of patients25 Age (y)Median 51 (range) (33-67) HistologyFL (center)44% MCL28% CLL/SLL20% Lymphoplasmacytic4% Marginal zone4% No. of prior Median1 treatments (range) (1-3) Remission status 1 st complete 48% (at baseline) 1 st partial 24% 2 nd partial20% 3 rd partial8% In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Patient Characteristics Flinn et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:628.

In Vivo Purging With MabThera ® : Response Flinn et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:628. Successful mobilization 92 (N=25;  2.0 x 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg) Clinical* (n=11) CR55 PR 27 Stable disease18 Molecular † (after in vivo purging; n=7) 86 % of PatientsResponse * Response was evaluated in 11 of the 12 patients who did not have CRs at trial entry. † Prior to in vivo purging, 7 patients had t(11:14) or t(14:18) detectable by PCR.

Gianni et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29(suppl 1):10–13. MabThera ® In Vivo Purging in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Protocol Days Reinfusion MabThera ® CyclophosphamideCytarabineMelphalan Mitoxantrone + melphalan Collection 1 2 3

No. of patients28 Age (y)Median 49 Ann Arbor stageIII7% IV93% IPI score1–275% 314% 4–511% Molecular rearrangement bcl-1 46% IgH36% Probe N/A18% B symptoms Yes 38% Size of mass >10 cm 29% LDH level Abnormal 36% MabThera ® In Vivo Purging in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Patient Characteristics Gianni et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29(suppl 1):10–13.

Clinical96 (n=27*) Molecular100 (n=20) % of Patients Response MabThera ® In Vivo Purging in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Response *Evaluable patients Gianni et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29(suppl 1):10–13.

MabThera ® In Vivo Purging in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: 3-Year Survival OS MabThera ® + sHDT (n=28) 100 Years Percent EFS Historical controls (n=39)* OS *CHOP-like regimen Percent Years EFS Gianni et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;29(suppl 1):10–13.

MabThera ® after HDT/ASCT in Follicular and Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Protocol 6 x VACOP-B VIPEVIPE VIPEVIPE TBI/Cy 12 Gy/120 mg/kg 4 x MabThera ® 375 mg/m 2 /week CD34+ selection NR/PD off study Or equivalent treatment (e.g., CHOP) Week – Brugger et al. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(suppl 2):38. Abstract 113.

MabThera ® after HDT/ASCT in Follicular and Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Patient Characteristics No of patients*30 Age (y) Median 49 (range) (31–59) SexMale53% Female47% HistologyFollicular lymphoma67% Stage III45% Stage IV55% Mantle cell lymphoma33% Stage III/IV30% Stage IV70% Brugger et al. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(suppl 2):38. Abstract 113. * Evaluable patients

Total157 Lymphopenia 56 Thrombocytopenia–1 Nausea 1– Infection 6– Neurologic pain 1– Thyroiditis 1– Other 1– Grade 4Grade 3 MabThera ® after HDT/ASCT in Follicular and Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Grade 3/4 Adverse Events Brugger et al. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(suppl 2):38. Abstract 113.

Before TBI/Cy13 After TBI/Cy47 After MabThera ® 50 6 months59 9 months74 12 months91 24 months91 % of Patients in CR MabThera ® after HDT/ASCT in Follicular and Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Response Brugger et al. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(suppl 2):38. Abstract 113.

MabThera ® after HDT/ASCT in Follicular and Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Response Brugger et al. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(suppl 2):38. Abstract 113. PCR-negative (%) * ** *P=0.0077; **P<0.001 P= Pre-HDTPost-HDTPost-6 months MabThera ® post-HDT

MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + Maintenance with HDT/ASCT in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Protocol **CBV HDT CHOP x 4–8 cycles *R G-CSF Day 0 Weeks 8–11 Weeks 24–27 Collection Immunotherapy (two courses of MabThera ® ) *In vivo purge (R) MabThera ® 375 mg/m 2 day 5 G-CSF 10 µg/kg/day, days 4, 3, 2, 1, 0 Stem cell collection day 0 (1, 2) **HDT Cyclophosphamide 1, 8 g/m 2 days 6–3 Carmustine 500 mg/m 2 day 2 Etoposide 2.4 g/m 2 36 hour CI day 7 Mangel et al. Blood. 2001;98(suppl 1):677a. Abstract Reinfusion

MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + Maintenance with HDT/ASCT in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Patient Characteristics No. of patients14 Age (y)Median52 (range)(41–65) SexMale50% Female50% ECOG PS 0–1100% Stage IV (BM involvement)86% Low/low-intermediate IPI score93% B Symptoms21% LDH (IU/l)Median 195 (range) (144–402) Cycles induction chemotherapyMedian6 (range)(4–8) Mangel et al. Blood. 2001;98(suppl 1):677a. Abstract 2833.

% after% after% after inductionASCTMabThera ® * ORR CR CRu PR MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + Maintenance with HDT/ASCT in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Clinical Response * Based on 12 of 14 patients who had completed maintenance MabThera ® therapy 15-month median follow-up from transplantation Mangel et al. Blood. 2001;98(suppl 1):677a. Abstract 2833.

MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + Maintenance with HDT/ASCT in Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Response Nine patients PCR-informative –Molecular remission achieved in seven/nine patients Five patients PCR-negative at last follow-up –Three of five at 18-month follow-up CHOP induction followed by MabThera ® + ASCT achieves high CRs in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma Molecular remission achieved in majority of patients Mangel et al. Blood. 2001;98(suppl 1):677a. Abstract 2833.

MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Protocol 18 adult patients with relapsed or untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia 4 cycles of MabThera ® -Flu*/Cy † Mobilization ESHAP BEAM Trneny et al. Blood. 2002;100:804a. Abstract Harvest ASCT *Fludarabine 3 x 25 mg/m 2 † Cyclophosphamide 3 x 300 mg/m 2

MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Response Full protocol completed by 8 patients –CR achieved in 7 patients (88%) –PCR negativity achieved in 7 patients (88%) Trneny et al. Blood. 2002;100:804a. Abstract 3176.

MabThera ® In Vivo Purge + HDT/ASCT in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Summary Combination of MabThera ®, in vivo purge and HDT/ASCT leads to a high clinical and molecular complete remission rate MabThera ® does not add significantly to the toxicity of HDT/ASCT Trneny et al. Blood. 2002;100:804a. Abstract 3176.

MabThera ® EBMT LYM1 Trial: Protocol * 375 mg/m 2 every 2 months x 4, 30 days post-transplant Patients: relapsed follicular lymphoma in 2nd/3rd CR or VGPR after any treatment RANDOMIZATION MOBILIZATION + PBSC COLLECTION HDT: BEAM + PBSC INFUSION Group B: Observation Group C: MabThera ® maintenance* Group D: Observation Group A: MabThera ® in vivo purging (375 mg/m 2 weekly x 4) Group C: No purging Group B: MabThera ® in vivo purging ( 375 mg/m 2 weekly x 4) Group D: No purging Group A: MabThera ® maintenance*

MabThera ® EBMTLYM1 Trial: Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Relapsed follicular B-cell lymphoma WHO PS 0-1 Platelets >100 x 10 9 /L after induction therapy  18 years CD20 + Exclusion Impaired renal/hepatic/cardiac and pulmonary function Histologic transformation to high grade Previous radiotherapy to >30% BM CNS involvement >3 chemotherapy regimens for NHL (including re-induction chemotherapy) Previous transplant Pregnant/lactating HIV, HepB, and HepC positivity Previous malignancy <5 years

MabThera ® + ASCT: Summary CR and molecular response rates up to 100% Higher yield of PCR-negative stem cells with MabThera ® + HDT vs HDT alone Toxicity related to MabThera ® mild and transient Flinn et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2000;6:628.

MabThera ® for B-PTLD: Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Age 1-75 years Histologically or cytologically confirmed mono- or polymorphic PTLD with  10% CD20 + lymphoma B-cells High EBV viral load after SCT ECOG performance status  3 Choquet et al. Blood. 2002;100:467a. Abstract Exclusion CNS involvement

MabThera ® for B-PTLD: Patient Characteristics Choquet et al. Blood. 2002;100:467a. Abstract SOT = solid organ transplant SCT = stem cell transplant

MabThera ® for B-PTLD: Response Choquet et al. Blood. 2002;100:467a. Abstract 1811.

MabThera ® for B-PTLD: Summary MabThera ® was effective (ORR 45%) and well tolerated This study is ongoing, and a longer follow-up is awaited Choquet et al. Blood. 2002;100:467a. Abstract 1811.