National Trauma Data Standard: Everything you’ve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask! N. Clay Mann, PhD, MS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

INJURY PREVENTION Presented by The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma © ACS 1999.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2009 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide Percent of Hospitals Submitting Data to NTDB by State and.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2010 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide National Trauma Data Bank 2010 Annual Report.
Reforming State Long-Term Care Services and Supports Through Participant Direction NASHP State Health Policy Conference October 2010 Suzanne Crisp Director.
INTRODUCTION TO TBI DATABASE RESEARCH Juan Carlos Arango, Ph.D Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center.
Three Options Direct hospital participation Third party submits data for hospitals according to new policies.
1 State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network December 2004 Molly O’Neill State Director, Network Steering Board Environmental Council of the.
Kansas Trauma System Advisory Committee on Trauma
NEMSIS Compliance National Database Implementation National EMS Reports.
Ginger Floerchinger-Franks, Dr.P.H Director, Idaho Trauma Registry.
Bledsoe et al., Essentials of Paramedic Care: Division 1II © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Division 3 Trauma Emergencies.
Bledsoe et al., Paramedic Care Principles & Practice Volume 4: Trauma © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Paramedic Care: Principles.
Briefing Book Slides on SAMHSA/CSAT 2011 GAIN Summary Analytic File: All Grantees GAIN Coordinating Center (11/21/2012). Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems.
United States Department of Health & Human Services Office of the Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) 0 Washington State Hospital Association.
EVALUATION OF WISCONSIN STATE TRAUMA REGISTRY DATA LAURA D. CASSIDY, MS, PHD E. BROOKE LERNER, PHD MELISSA CHRISTENSEN AUGUST 8,
Robert W. Pinner, M.D. June 4, 2012 Update on ELR in the U.S CSTE Annual Conference Omaha, Nebraska.
State Of Wisconsin Trauma Registry
What’s New from NCHS International Collaborative Effort (ICE) on Injury Statistics-Cuernavaca, June ‘05 Measuring injury severity Injury Mortality Diagnosis.
NEMSIS Update Status of the Technical Assistance Center Compliance Information Data Element Wiki New Format to Receive State Data Reporting Using National.
California Stroke Registry Right Care Initiative Meeting August 13, 2012.
Studying Injuries Using the National Hospital Discharge Survey Marni Hall, Ph.D. Hospital Care Statistics Branch, Division of Health Care Statistics.
Data Quality of New Birth Certificate Items: Like a Fine Wine, Does it Improve with Time? Marina O. Matthew, RHIA Pennsylvania Department of Health Bureau.
Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries.
SHSP Progress and Future Federal Perspective Beth Alicandri Office of Safety 2011 SHSP Peer Exchange June 14 – 15, 2011 Crown Plaza Hotel, Austin, Texas.
Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
Percent of adults ages 19–64 Exhibit 1. More Than Half of Adults in Florida and Texas Were Uninsured or Underinsured in 2012 Uninsured during the year*
Step Therapy State Legislation Update AK HI CA AZ NV OR MT MN NE SD ND ID WY OK KS CO UT TX NM SC FL GAALMS LA AR MO IA VA NC TN IN KY IL MI.
This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
Trauma Quality Improvement Program
NEMSIS Version2  NEMSIS Version 3. Purpose of NEMSIS Version 3 Improve Data Quality  –Schematron Enhance performance assessment  – Incorporation of.
Texas EMS & Trauma Registries Hospital Committee September 18, 2015.
Trauma Quality Improvement Program
Data completeness % (quantity)
GEORGIA TQIP State collaborative data validation project
Update on Mission: Lifeline Boston University Medical Center
National EMS Dashboard: Traffic Crashes
Presented by The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) Impact Survey Analysis
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
National Core Indicators
Bureau of Justice Statistics
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Rebecca Snead Executive Vice President & CEO NASPA
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Trauma Data Elements Recommended by RSWG for Inclusion into the Texas Trauma Registry Stakeholder Webinar.
ACNM Affiliates Open-Agenda Webinar/ Teleconference
Stakeholder Update Building A New Trauma Registry
Presentation transcript:

National Trauma Data Standard: Everything you’ve wanted to know but have been afraid to ask! N. Clay Mann, PhD, MS

Objectives Need for a National Registry The State of State Registries Variability in Data Quality Development of the NTDS Implementation of NTDS

Need for a National Registry Provide a national resource for clinical benchmarking, process improvement, and patient safety Characterize all patient care Provide baseline measures for enhancing disaster preparedness Develop better injury scoring and outcome measures This is not necessarily surveillance

States with Statewide Registries Planning – CA, DC, ID, KY, LA, ME, MA, MI, NE, NM, TN, WV, WI No Plans – HI, IN, NH, NJ, RI, VT Technical Difficulties – ND, SD

States with Registries 27/32 require hospitals to report –11 states…all acute care hospitals –15 states…only designated centers –1 state…only participating hospitals 5/32 request hospitals report –2 states…all acute care hospitals –1 state…only designated centers –2 states…partial registries

Variation in Case Acquisition

Threats to Data Integrity Mandatory/elective Submission –Completeness of Case Capture Difference in Case Definition Difference in Coding Conventions

Are Registries Comparable?

Variability in Case Definition Inclusion Criteria Number Exclusion Criteria Number Abuse 4 Abuse 3Blisters, contusions, abrasions 3 abrasions 11 Drowning 13 Drowning 15 Smoke inhalation 7Smoke inhalation 2 Foreign bodies 5Foreign bodies 17 High altitude sickness 0High altitude sickness 1 Lightning 5Lightning 0 Same level fall 2Same level fall 18 Poisoning 2 Poisoning 13

Variability in Case Definition Variability in “same-level fall” exclusion –Same level fall AND age > 55 yrs old –Same level fall AND age > 65 yrs old –Same level fall AND isolated hip fracture (ICD-9 820) –Same level fall AND fracture of the vertebral column (ICD-9 805) –Same Level fall AND isolated fracture of the pelvis (ICD ) –Same level fall AND superficial injury (ICD ) –Same level fall AND age > 65 yrs old AND isolated hip fracture (ICD-9 820) –Same level fall AND age > 65 yrs old AND isolated extremity fracture (no ICD-9 codes listed)

Variability in Coding Conventions 15 states………..……initial GCS 8 states……..initial and last GCS 1 state………………...worst GCS 1 state………………… best GCS 1 state……..initial and worst GCS Glasgow Coma Score in ED

Variability in Coding Conventions Coding Convention Number of States Report “Not documented” 10 Report EMS dispatch time 8 Report 5 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time 2 Report 15 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time 1 Report 5 to 20 minutes prior to EMS dispatch time depending on call location and general scene info 1 Report EMS dispatch time only if MVC§ 1 Report EMS arrival time 1 Report in categories (< 1 hour, 1-6 hours, 7-12 hours, hours, or >24 hours) 1 Time of Injury

Data Needs for Registries All States with Trauma Registries Complete Data Capture Common Subset of Variables Uniform Data Definitions and Values Standardized Coding Conventions Common Definition of Injury Uniform Inclusion Criteria

Existing National Registry  Annual Report  NTDB Pediatric Report  NTDB Slide Kits  Hospital Benchmark Reports  Trauma Center Data Report Cards  ACS Bulletin Articles

2007  NTDB contains over 2.7 million records  From 900 US trauma centers  Annual Report Version 7.0 released

National Trauma Data Standard 2.2

The “Bank” The “Currency”

 Standard Inclusion Criteria  Standard Data Definitions  Standard Source Hierarchy  Standard Comorbidities  Pediatric specific additions  Auto-Calculated Fields  Edit Checks  The “ Validator” National Trauma Data Standard

Ensuring Common Variables Common Subset of Variables –Evaluate variable frequency across registries –Consider importance at national level –Seek consensus from experts

Variable Schema Primary Variable Supportive Variable Autogenerated Variable Secondary Variable

Auto-generated Variables FIPS - like code (location code) Trauma Type (blunt, penetrating, burn) Injury Intentionality (using CDC matrix) Total EMS Response Time Total EMS Scene Time Total EMS Time Revised Trauma Score in the Prehospital Setting (adult and pediatric) Revised Trauma Score in ED (adult and pediatric) Abbreviated Injury Scale (six body regions) Injury Severity Score International Classification Injury Severity Score Functional Capacity Index Total ED Time Total Length of Hospital Stay

Choosing Inclusion Criteria Uniform Inclusion Criteria –Collect all state inclusion/exclusion criteria –Assess criteria for commonalities –Look for least common denominator? States Criterion

NTDS Inclusion Criteria

Improving Data Quality

NTDS Edit Checks

Development of the Validator

National Trauma Data Standard THE “VALIDATOR” “Hasta La Vista Bad Data”

Benefit of a Common XML Benefit of a Common XML NTDBNEMSIS External Server Outcomes NTDS “Validator”

Improving Data Usability

On Line Data Submission

Facility Demographics Expanded Facility information screens –Hospital type –Hospital teaching status –Verification level –Bed Inventory –Inclusion criteria –Transfers in or out –Age of pediatric patients –Comorbidities and complications –Number of registrars –Number of surgeons –Software product utilized

Verification Requirement  Annual NTDB participation  Officially in effect with new green book  Centers received waivers in 2007 as needed  Year round data submission started in 2008

Data Submission

Call for Data 2008  First NTDB call for data based on NTDS version 1.2  Map current registry fields to the new standard 2009  Second NTDB call for data based on NTDS version 1.2  Updated software from vendors that incorporates all the new data fields and allows for direct data entry.

We need your support! National Trauma Data Standard will: –Allow for seamless participation in NTDB –Describe severe trauma nationally –Characterize treatment and outcome –Assess trauma systems attributes –Link to standardized EMS data Vendors are also interested in your commitment!

Tasks Seem Overwhelming?

Technical Assistance Visit the website –Join the NTDS Google Group Talk with your software vendors Utilize resources at the ACS and NEMSIS TAC

Join the NTDS Google Group!

For More Information…

Additional Questions Contact –N. Clay Mann (801) –Melanie Neal (312)

How do we get here from there?

Questions