TM Project web site www.arl.org/libqual/ Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
Advertisements

1 What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Years of CUL LibQUAL Data Liane O’Brien, Linda Miller, Xin Li May 21, 2008.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
Using Assessment Data to Improve Library Services Christopher Stewart Dean of Libraries, Illinois Institute of Technology Charles Uth, Head of Collection.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
TM Project web site Invited Address October, 2004 South Africa.
Glasgow, Scottland May 24, 2010 ITEM SAMPLING IN SERVICE QUALITY ASSESSMENT SURVEYS TO IMPROVE RESPONSE RATES AND REDUCE RESPONDENT BURDEN: THE “LibQUAL+®
Asia Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education and Practice (A-LIEP) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore April 4, 2006 Bruce Thompson.
Customer Perceptions of Quality and Customer Satisfaction
TM Project web site Results Colleen Cook Fred Heath April 2, 2003 Texas Library Association Houston :
UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
 Large-scale, web-based, user-centered assessment of library service effectiveness across multiple universities.  Co-developed by ARL and Texas A&M University,
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Project URL – TM LibQUAL+ ™ Introduction Seattle / London January, 2007 Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson.
The AAHSL/ARL Partnership in Exploring Outcomes Assessment through LibQUAL+
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results American Library Association (ALA) Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 14, 2008 Martha Kyrillidou, Director Statistics.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Project URL – TM QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE Philadelphia January, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson.
Project URL – TM Score Norms 17 th Greek Academic Libraries Conference 24 September, 2008 Presented by: Bruce Thompson, M. Kyrillidou.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
TM Project web site Report Meeting Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Martha Kyrillidou July 28, 2003 Durham United Kingdom.
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
Project web site old.libqual.org TM November 12, 2002 San Francisco, CA Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson AAHSL Spring 2002 Results Results.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
5-1 The Customer Gap. 5-2 The Customer Gap What a customer believes should or will happen Subjective assessments of actual service experiences (reality.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
1 Project web site Evaluating Library Service Quality: Use of LibQUAL+  IATUL Kansas City, MO June 2002 Julia Blixrud Association.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
TM Project web site: Bruce Thompson Colleen Cook Martha Kyrillidou Glasgow January 19-20, 2004 Quantitative Grounding “22 Items.
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Project URL – TM QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE Washington, DC June, 2007 Presented by: Colleen Cook.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA.
TM Project web site Report Meeting Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Martha Kyrillidou Jonathan Sousa June 21, 2003 ALA Toronto CANADA.
Project URL – TM QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE Auckland, NZ April 5, 2005 Presented by: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson.
TM Project web site New Ways of Listening to Users: Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson Consuella Askew Waller April 10-13, 2003 ACRL 11 th.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
Service Quality Assessment in a Digital Library Environment
Using LibQUAL+® as a Foundation for the Library’s Support of
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
QUANTITATIVE EVIDENCE
Presentation transcript:

TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January 26-27, 2003 ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia

Dimensions of Library Service Quality

LibQUAL+  Core Questions Y1 _____________________________________________________________________________ Factor_______ _ No. I II III IVItem Core _____________________________________________________________________________ Willingness to help users Giving users individual attention Employees deal with users caring fashion Employees who are consistently courteous Employees have knowledge answer questions Employees understand needs of users Readiness to respond to users' questions Employees who instill confidence in users Dependability handling service problems A haven for quiet and solitude A meditative place A contemplative environment Space that facilitates quiet study A place for reflection and creativity * website enabling me locate info on my own * elec resources accessible home or office * access tools allow me find on my own Modern equip me easily access info I need * info easily accessible for independent use Convenient access to library collections Comprehensive print collections Complete runs of journal titles Interdisciplinary library needs addressed Timely document delivery/interlibrary loan Convenient business hours ________________________________________________________________

Affect of Service uAbsorbed several of the original SERVQUAL questions measuring Responsiveness, Assurance and Empathy uIn the current analysis also includes Reliability uAll in all: the Human Dimension of Service Quality

Access to Information uCovers scope, timeliness, and convenience of access uAdequacy of collections uComprehensiveness, quality, and depth of information resources uAll in all: required information delivered in the format, location, and time of choice

Personal Control uCovers ease of navigation, convenience, and support services uPersonal control of the information universe in general and web navigation in particular uAll in all: How users want to interact with the modern library

Library as Place uCovers usefulness of space, symbolic value, and refuge for work and study uTranscends the SERVQUAL dimension of Tangibles to include the idea of the library as the campus center of intellectual activity uAll in all: As long as physical facilities are adequate, library as place may not be an issue

Survey Design Considerations uThree scales exploring optimal, minimal, and actual service levels uTwenty-five questions clustered around four dimensions uSurvey covers a sample of targeted user population uData illuminates gap between desired level of service and perception of experience

Respondents by Age (Excludes NYPL) Note: LibQUAL+  Spring 2002 Aggregate Survey Results. (2002). vol. 1, p. 19

Respondents by Sex Note: LibQUAL+  Spring 2002 Aggregate Survey Results. (2002). vol. 1, p. 20

4-Year Institution Respondent by Discipline (n=54,073) Note: LibQUAL+  Spring 2002 Aggregate Survey Results. (2002). Vol. 1, p. 38

DimensionMinimumDesiredPerceivedSA Gap Access to Information Affect of Service Library as Place Personal Control Aggregate Dimension Means (n=70,445) Note: LibQUAL+  Spring 2002 Aggregate Survey Results. (2002). vol. 1, p. 24

Mean Perceived Scores 2001/2002 Trend (n=34)

ARL Top (.46) ARL Other 6.74 (.27) Private Colleges 6.90 (.49) State Colleges & Universities 6.38 (.30) Community Colleges 7.26 (.55) Overall Mean Scores and Service Adequacy Gap Scores By Cohort Group 2002 LibQUAL+  Iteration (n=162) AAHSL 7.07 (.56)

u159 participants from 144 institutions + uLibQUAL+  met respondents minimum expectations on all the items in the evaluation survey, and slightly exceeded expectations in the provision of online tools for managing and monitoring the process uProject strengths also include the timely availability of the results, communication from research team members, and the availability of national norms. LibQUAL+  2002 Liaison Evaluation Survey Highlights

LibQUAL+  Related Documents LibQUAL+  LibQUAL+  Web Site LibQUAL+  LibQUAL+  Bibliography Survey Participants Procedures Manual