LDSE Consultation Session 9 March 2011 The Commonwealth Club, London Partners Institute of Education Birkbeck London Met London School of Economics Oxford.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Supporting further and higher education e-Learning and Pedagogy overview Helen Beetham Programme Consultant.
Supporting managers: assessment and the learner journey
Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Building online support for HE teachers as digital innovators Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education OER in the disciplines 26 October.
What The Research Says: Can Apps for Teachers Drive Learning Innovation? 21 March 2014 Teachers building community knowledge of learning innovation Diana.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
Digital technology for enhanced and efficient learning and teaching
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Click to edit Master title style HELP ME! Higher Education Launch Pad Mobile Enhanced Julie Murphy and Adele Cushing.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
PeeQuality Assurance for dyslexia specialist 1:1 tutors Janet Skinner, Chair of ADSHE QA working party Devon and Cornwall ADSHE regional group 22 nd November.
Consistency of Assessment
Performance management guidance
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
Phoebe A wiki-based pedagogic planner to promote innovative practice in Design for Learning Liz Masterman Oxford University Computing Services with Marion.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
The Learning Designer: Building Community Knowledge Linking with MirandaNet and Handson ICT.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Supporting the teacher as learner Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education May 2011, Manchester.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
TEACHING EVALUATION CAN BE A ONE DISH MEAL Heather Campbell Brescia University College London, Ontario, Canada
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Jan 2013 cc: by-nc-sa Learning design for online courses The Pedagogical Patterns Collector, the Learning Designer, and MOOCs Diana Laurillard.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
1 Pedagogical implications of mobile technologies Diana Laurillard WLE Symposium on M-Learning 9 February 2007.
The New Scottish Teacher Education Professional Standards and the Development of the Professional Update System Tom Hamilton Director of Education and.
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning Diana Laurillard 2007 European LAMS Conference University of Greenwich 5 July 2007.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Microsoft Corporation Teaching with Technology. Ice Breaker.
Hertfordshire in Action Working in Partnership to secure effective Transition and Progression.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Professor Richard Noss (Director) London Knowledge Lab, IOE Professor Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab, IOE Professor Mike Sharples LSRI, Nottingham.
Mentor Training University of East London Cass School of Education and Training Post-Compulsory Education and Training.
Enquiring into Entrepreneurial School Leadership Sue Robson.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
ACCURACY IN ASSESSMENT; EVIDENCING AND TRACKING PROGRESS IN TEACHER EDUCATION BEA NOBLE-ROGERS.
EToolbox: Mapping Technology to Learning Getting Started.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Personalised Learning NOCN Level 2. Induction Welcome and introductions Completion of enrolment forms Qualification Initial assessment Personalised learning.
LORO: fostering professional development through OER Anna Comas-Quinn and Tita Beaven Department of Languages, Faculty of Education and Language Studies,
The most important outcome of education is to help students become independent of formal education.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
Final Project Presentation & Design Guidelines Education 92A: The Evolution of Education.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Enriching and enhancing teaching and learning.
Educators as the drivers of innovation in digital pedagogy Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education.
1. 2 Learning Environments and Working Walls 3 Objectives of this powerpoint presentation To provide a resource for schools to gain a clear understanding.
Addressing quality assurance and professional development for online teachers Kirsteen Donaghy.
Applying Laurillard’s Conversational Framework to Blended Learning Blogging and Collaborative Activity Design R Papworth, R Walker & W Britcliffe E-Learning.
The Exeter Model of ITE Induction for Initial Teacher Education Coordinators, Mentors, Principal School Tutors, University Visiting Tutors and External.
M253 Students Study Guide Mrs. Fatheya Al Mubarak – AOU Dammam.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Tips for Academic Quality Assurance Hugh Starkey Tempus DO IT 2 nd Consortium Meeting Landau 13 March 2013.
Supporting the teacher as innovative learning designer March 2012 Diana Laurillard London Knowledge Lab Institute of Education.
School of Teaching & Learning Development Advanced Lecturer in Education: Julie-Ann Stobo BA (Hons)
Designs and testing for a ‘pedagogic planning tool’ A User-oriented Planner for Learning Analysis and Design - Overview Review meeting 23 January 2007.
Planning (primary version)
SCEL Framework for Educational Leadership
CEA Case Study Marianne Farrugia.
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Developing the Guided Learner Journey
Blended learning By: Hayati Wasistya Astri Ulvi
Laura Hollinshead University of Derby
Learning design tools for institutional change
Presentation transcript:

LDSE Consultation Session 9 March 2011 The Commonwealth Club, London Partners Institute of Education Birkbeck London Met London School of Economics Oxford Royal Veterinary College Association for Learning Technology This file is on the ALT Open Access Repository at Link

The givens Reducing the per capita cost of wider participation Need for flexible supported open learning  TEL Large scale requires institutional collaboration OERs are needed, but under-used Acknowledge teacher workload, teacher resistance Reducing the per capita cost of wider participation Need for flexible supported open learning  TEL Large scale requires institutional collaboration OERs are needed, but under-used Acknowledge teacher workload, teacher resistance

The givens Innovation Including use of TEL, needs teachers able to collaborate to develop the new knowledge of how to do this – so they must be able to build on the work of others, not just at the level of private local groups; – we need a form of ‘open source’ teaching. Especially in use of TEL, requires analytical tools to help teachers work out how to make the transition to technology worthwhile – we need to work out how to use TEL to achieve larger student numbers and high quality learning experiences and lower unit costs of teaching Innovation Productivity

Supporting teacher collaboration A Learning Design Support Environment (LDSE) for teachers Build on the work of others: Importing existing ‘pedagogical patterns’ of good teaching Searching for OER ‘content resources’ to populate the patterns Adapting to own context – Test – Redesign – Re-test - Publish Extend their knowledge of using TEL: Testing out TEL versions of conventional learning designs Modelling pedagogical and logistical benefits/disadvantages Aiming for teachers to A microworld for teachers to adopt, adapt, test in practice, redesign, and share designs To do this we are developing

Adaptive professional development Teachers are best placed to design good pedagogy  Provide tools for design, development and sharing  Give them time to invest in learning about technology  Promote teacher collaboration  Make teaching innovation like science “scientific criticism is the engine of science … the criticism of teaching practices is the engine of progress in teaching” (Benedet, 2010)

The key features  A formal structure for pedagogical patterns  Forms of representation of learning designs  An ontology for learning design  Designing at Module and Session levels  Importing and adapting an existing design  Selecting from existing teaching-learning activities  Editing the properties of TLAs  Analysis of teaching costs and learning benefits  Sharing specific and generic patterns  Incorporating Open Education Resources  Exporting a design to an institutional format  Integrating with Blackboard  A formal structure for pedagogical patterns  Forms of representation of learning designs  An ontology for learning design  Designing at Module and Session levels  Importing and adapting an existing design  Selecting from existing teaching-learning activities  Editing the properties of TLAs  Analysis of teaching costs and learning benefits  Sharing specific and generic patterns  Incorporating Open Education Resources  Exporting a design to an institutional format  Integrating with Blackboard

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa Tutorial: The water cycle Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own animation of the water cycle, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using their lecture notes; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: Using a search engine Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of using a search engine, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the Library guidelines; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: The water cycle Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own animation of the water cycle, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using their lecture notes and book; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: Using a search engine Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of using a search engine, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the Library guidelines; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Pedagogical patterns: Form and Content Content Tutorial: Using a search engine Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of using a search engine, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the Library guidelines; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion ‘capturing pedagogy’ (Laurillard, 2008) Black text is pedagogy Coloured text is content-specific Black text is pedagogy Coloured text is content-specific

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa OE Patterns library Tutorial: Using a search engine Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of using a search engine, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the Library guidelines; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Sharing pedagogical patterns Tutorial: On a system or process Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of the system/process, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the resources provided; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: The water cycle Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own animation of the water cycle, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the OER cycle; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: The water cycle Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own animation of the water cycle, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the OER cycle; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: Using a search engine Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of using a search engine, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the Library guidelines; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: On a system or process Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of the system/process, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the resources provided; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa Sharing pedagogical patterns Tutorial: On a system or process Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of the system/process, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the resources provided; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and collaborating to produce a better animation to post on their website Tutorial: On a system or process Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of the system/process, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the resources provided; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: The water cycle Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own animation of the water cycle, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the OER cycle; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and revising their account in the light of the tutor’s summary of the discussion Tutorial: The water cycle Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own animation of the water cycle, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the OER cycle; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and collaborating to produce a better animation to post on their website Tutorial: The water cycle Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own animation of the water cycle, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the OER cycle; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and collaborating to produce a better animation to post on their website and collaborating to produce a better animation to post on their website Tutorial: Using a search engine Learning Outcome: A clear understanding of the role of the critical factors in the system Summary: through preparing their own account of using a search engine, to demonstrate the role of the critical factors, using the Library guidelines; presenting it to their group; defending it against questions and comments; and collaborating to produce a better account to post on their website

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa A Learning Design Support Environment A prototype for LDSE – a TLRP-TEL project Build on the work of others – import relevant designs and patterns

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa A Learning Design Support Environment A prototype for LDSE – a TLRP-TEL project Edit properties of the learning design Drag and drop sample learning outcomes

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa Types of ‘Session’ Choice of Session Types Carrying out a learning design Supervised individual work Unsupervised group work Summative assessment Supervised class Supervised group work Unsupervised individual work Dragged onto a timeline Edited, linked to files, etc.

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa Planning a Session Choice of Teaching- Learning Activities Dragged onto a timeline Edited, linked to files, etc. Represents the types of learning afforded

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa Teacher time = 125 hours Learner time in class = 50 hours Other contact = 5 hours Teacher time = 125 hours Learner time in class = 50 hours Other contact = 5 hours The designed learning experience Effect of design on the learning experience, and the cost of teaching and learning support Analysing costs and learning benefits

Modelling costs and benefits of teaching Define TLAsSet group sizesSet teacher times Plan learner hours for each teaching-learning activity

Comparing costs and learning benefits - a microworld where teachers can learn, design, test and share ideas Teacher time = 125 hours Learner time in class = 50 hours Other contact = 5 hours Teacher time = 125 hours Learner time in class = 50 hours Other contact = 5 hours The designed learning experience Teacher time = 80 hours Learner time in class = 30 hours Other contact = 5 hours Teacher time = 80 hours Learner time in class = 30 hours Other contact = 5 hours

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa Structure of a pedagogical pattern Timings Teaching- learning activities Short description Learning outcome Colour- coded content

February 2011 cc: by-nc-sa From Conventional lab to Virtual lab Evolution of a pedagogical pattern topic outcome resource

Specific – generic – specific pattern designs Link

Capturing pedagogy To compare the effects of group size alternative teaching methods use of TEL on the learning experience types of learning, teacher time, learner time in class, independent learning… to focus attention on the quality of learning design and the appropriate use of TEL to model the benefits and costs of face-to- face/blended/open learning

User Responses All IPs felt that LDSE matches with their overall design practice I was looking for my practice in your [teaching & learning activities] palette and it was nice to see it represented on the [pie] chart...it is rather a haphazard approach I have at the moment … this will certainly help to structure it and record my design I like the fact that it's quantified in such a way that you can see the distribution in the pie chart for those different types of learning and if you don’t agree with quantities you can change them … it could support module or programme teams … to look across programme or my own module(s). To see that I have a mix. It could certainly engage colleagues in discussion.

 Some weren’t sure about some aspects But why I am doing this? So that the metrics work or so that I can teach this session …I do worry a little bit that it can be too prescriptive even with your improved ontology, there might be something that I might want to do and it wouldn't be there A machine is not really responsive in the same way that humans [teaching colleagues] are to each other…. I'm a little nervous about the relation between the content, what goes into the teaching and the evaluation. I don't quite trust it User Responses

 All felt that transparency was important e.g. reverse-engineering of pie charts, colour-coding of TLAs, access to properties  All felt that the possibility to change default proportions of forms of learning assigned to specific TLAs was important - properties inspector and editor

Most would use it both to support their own practice and for staff training I really like it, the LDSE now, I know it’s not there yet… It’s getting closer for me to use it (…) I’m excited by this tool! Others would use it only for teacher training purposes  One would like to see how others make use of it first  Another one felt that teaching community is not quite there yet: it would require ”another change in culture" for people to use it regularly User Responses

The givens – does LDSE address them? Reducing the per capita cost of wider participation Need for flexible supported open learning Large scale requires institutional collaboration OERs are needed, but under-used Acknowledge teacher workload, teacher resistance - Analysis of learning benefits and teaching costs - Scaffolds use of TEL - Supports an ‘open, holistic system of innovation’ - Makes OERs customisable and adaptable - Clarifies teacher workload and productivity

Questions for discussion? Does it have face validity? Is it targeted on the right challenges? Does it excite you? What concerns you? What ought we do?

Slides not used

A microworld for teachers to adopt, adapt, test in theory, experiment, test in practice, redesign, and share designs Supported by a learning design ontology, a set of structured pedagogical patterns, and a self-configuring system to represent the developing community knowledge base Supporting teacher collaboration A Learning Design Support Environment (LDSE) for teachers A microworld for teachers to adopt, adapt, test in theory, experiment, test in practice, redesign, and share designs Supported by a learning design ontology, a set of structured pedagogical patterns, and a self-configuring system to represent the developing community knowledge base To do this we are developing