PAY FOR PERFORMANCE: GETTING IT RIGHT. A Solution in Search of a Problem? zTeaching salaries too low overall zTeaching is a “flat” profession zSame compensation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing a System of Performance-Based Pay Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Excellence and Support System
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation, Charlotte Danielson 1 Making the Most of Teacher Evaluation Charlotte Danielson
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
KEDC Project for Special Educator Effectiveness (Project SEE) KEDC Special Education.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
General Instructions 1. Save the Power Pt template to your desktop and a flashdrive used only for your portfolio. Using SAVE AS rename the portfolio with.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
Your Name Teaching Portfolio (Begin Year-End Year)
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Challenges and Opportunities: Growing at Maret PERSONAL LIFEPLANNING/PREPARATIONCLASSROOMCOMMUNITYREFLECTION.
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Introduction to Core Professionalism
The Unannounced observation
Presentation transcript:

PAY FOR PERFORMANCE: GETTING IT RIGHT

A Solution in Search of a Problem? zTeaching salaries too low overall zTeaching is a “flat” profession zSame compensation for excellent as for mediocre teachers zLittle incentive to improve own knowledge and skill zLittle incentive to improve student performance

Typical Characteristics of Pay-for-Performance Systems zDifferentiated Career Levels, with Enhanced Compensation for Upper Levels zBonuses for Teams or Schools Demonstrating Increased Student Learning

Underlying Assumptions of Pay-for-Performance Systems zGood teaching is essential to high levels of student learning zProfessional learning should continue throughout a teacher’s career zIndividuals are motivated to perform at higher levels by the promise of greater compensation.

More Underlying Assumptions zPeople beginning their careers are attracted towards professions that offer advancement and reward for higher performance. zStudent learning is a result of both individual and team effort. z“Carrots” are better than “sticks.”

Design Challenges of Pay-for- Performance Systems zDefensible Techniques for Determining the Quality of Teaching zAdequate Measures of Student Learning

Requirements to Determine Good Teaching zClear definition of teaching - (the “what”) zInstruments and procedures that provide evidence of teaching - (the “how”) zTrained evaluators who can make consistent judgments based on evidence zTeachers who have had the “opportunity to learn” the “what” and the “how”

The Domains zPlanning and Preparation zThe Classroom Environment zInstruction zProfessional Responsibilities

A Framework for Teaching: Components of Professional Practice Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with Families Contributing to the School and District Growing and Developing Professionally Showing Professionalism Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Providing Feedback to Students Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Selecting Instruction Goals Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Designing Coherent Instruction Assessing Student Learning Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behavior Organizing Physical Space

Copyright ©1999 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. The Classroom Environment

The Instruments and Procedures zTaken together, they document all the evaluative criteria zThey represent a “natural harvest” of a teacher’s work zThe timelines and workload are reasonable, for teachers and evaluators zThey promote professional learning

Evidence, Interpretation, Judgement INTERPRETATION EVIDENCE FOR A COMPONENT JUDGEMENT

Opportunity to Learn the “what” and the “how” zOrientation to the system zFamiliarity with the evaluative criteria, and how they apply to own setting zAdequate structure and guidance for preparing artifacts of teaching

Measures of Student Learning zAligned with state and/or district content standards zApplied to teacher teams, not individuals zDemonstrate patterns over time zUse multiple measures

Pitfalls and Dangers of Pay-for-Performance zRigid and formulaic design zInadequate communication zInsufficient training zPremature and too rapid implementation (bugs still there) zFear of misuse zUnintended negative consequences

Recommendations for Design of Pay-for-Performance zLink the design to purposes zKeep it simple (only a few levels) zEngage everyone in the design process zTake PLENTY OF TIME to design zCommunicate with everyone, often

More Recommendations for Pay-for-Performance zInvest in training, and more training zPilot first with volunteers; revise zImplement slowly with no stakes zBuild in a feedback and ongoing revision process zCommunicate with everyone, often

Promises and Benefits of Pay-for-Performance zA focus on good instruction zAttention to results with students zRecognition for superior performance zEnhanced professional culture