Recent Developments and New Challenges Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act NCHER Winter Legal Meeting Mark W. Brennan January 24, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Pharmaceutical Compliance Forum Clinical Trials Case Study Stephen J. Immelt Thursday, November 8, 2007.
Advertisements

The Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act Virginia State Bar Annual Meeting Corporate Counsel Section CLE Program June 18, 2004.
19 April 2012 The Office Agents Society Changes of Use from Commercial To Residential Michael Gallimore Hogan Lovells International LLP.
Art. 6 – 8 of the draft Unitary Patent Regulation Prof. Dr. Winfried Tilmann.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: New Developments and Issues to Watch September 26, 2014 Mark W. Brennan, Partner.
February 12, 2014 Life Sciences Enforcement Year in Review: Examining Hot Button Areas for FDA & Related Government Enforcement Peter Spivack, Hogan Lovells.
NACARA Annual Conference Industry Perspectives Panel September 29,2014 Boise, Idaho Andy Madden Director State Government Affairs ACA International.
COLLECTION HOT TOPICS WV HMFA Winter Educational Conference January 15, 2015.
COMPLYING WITH HIPAA PRIVACY RULES Presented by: Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law.
Texting & HIPAA Compliance in your practice
Wireless Access Code: Download the agenda PDF at:
Silicon Valley Apps for Kids Meetup Laura D. Berger October 22, 2012 The views expressed herein are those of the speaker, and do not represent the views.
16 July 2011 The Business Case for Mediation (for “ICC Arbitration & Amicable Dispute Resolution – Focus on India”) Jonathan Leach, partner, Hogan Lovells.
April 8, 2013 NPE litigation in Japan Activities and impact of FRAND commitments Eiichiro Kubota, Hogan Lovells Tokyo.
Understanding the GRAS Process Martin J. Hahn Hogan Lovells US LLP Date: July 16, 2013 Food and Agriculture Group.
January 2012 Workshop on competition law aspects International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Jacques Derenne.
Recent developments in aviation liability & insurance: The 1973 Hague Convention on the law applicable to products liability: choice of law issues in aviation.
Responsible Person v. Safety Assessor Sylvie Gallage-Alwis Avocat à la Cour / Solicitor in England & Wales ECORE ERPA Seminar – Tel Aviv – 16 June 2014.
Proactive Changes to the TCPA – It’s All about Communication Balaji “Raj” Rajan, Ceannate Corp James Schultz, The Sessions Firm Timothy Fitzgibbon, NCHER.
January 29-30, 2013 Tokyo, Japan Exportation of Knock-Down Kits: (Direct or Indirect) Infringement? AIPLA Mid-Winter 2013 Pre-Meeting Yusuke Inui, Attorney.
Data Protection Paul Veysey & Bethan Walsh. Introduction Data Protection is about protecting people by responsibly managing their data in ways they expect.
"The Role of Arbitration in the Dispensal of Justice" Does Arbitration Maintain the Advantages it Traditionally Enjoyed? Nathan Searle, Senior Associate.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Joseph A. Levitt Hogan & Hartson April 21, 2009 FDA Regulation of Bottled Water An Overview.
Unfulfilled Promises: Affordable Housing in Metropolitan Washington Presentation to the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Mary Anne Sullivan,
Ethical Issues in Setting Litigation Reserves Clay James, Partner at Hogan Lovells Annie Kao, Senior Litigation Counsel at Vail Resorts December 8, 2010.
Nicolas Pourbaix, Senior Associate
Eric J. Pritchard One Liberty Place, 46 th Floor 1650 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (215)
January 2012 Workshop on Radio Frequencies International Legal Expert Meeting, January 2012 Leiden University, The Netherlands Gerry Oberst.
Protection of Intellectual Property in the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan By Natalia Gulyaeva.
27 October 2011 Competitive dialogue in UK PFI PPP Forum Perspective Andrew Briggs, Partner.
December 8, 2014 Healthcare/Privacy Current Law Affecting Uses of Health Data Melissa Bianchi Partner.
Hogan Lovells The solicitor's role Gathering the evidence –Disclosure in most cases: –Disclosure in most fraud cases: 1.
27 September 2013 Promoting Russia as a Seat of Arbitration: What Are the Best Ways Forward? Peter Pettibone.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Transatlantic merger enforcement Catriona Hatton November 28, 2007 Brussels.
Part 6 – Special Legal Rights and Relationships Chapter 35 – Privacy Law Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 34-1.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Clinical Trials Track: Key Compliance Risks FDA Overview Meredith Manning November 8, 2007.
2006 SISO Executive Conference Legal Issues in Using Mailing Lists: The CAN-SPAM ACT The Junk Fax Prevention Act The National Do Not Call Registry.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Alice Valder Curran, Partner Tuesday, October 17, 2006 Private Prices, Public Markets: The Evolution of Price.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
Mutuals' Forum 2010 Regulators & Legislators: Appreciating the Mutual Difference John Gilbert, Consultant 4 November 2010.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. National Pharma Audioconference Bristol-Myers Squibb 2007 Settlement Stephen J. Immelt, Esq. November 26, 2007.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Dawn raids.
Russian response to US sanctions: what has been done and what to expect? 14 August 2014.
November 2015 Presentation to South African Diamond Producers Organisation on Legal Liability Awareness – Introduction to the Mine Health & Safety Act.
Us Legislative Day 2014 IRS Regulations on Charitable Care.
Serving the Public. Regulating the Profession. CANADA’S ANTI-SPAM LEGISLATION (CASL) Training for Chapters Based on Guidelines for Chapters First published.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
AND CE-Prof, Inc. January 28, 2011 The Greater Chicago Dental Academy 1 Copyright CE-Prof, Inc
The Current Telephone Consumer Protection Act Landscape & What You Need to Know to Avoid Liability National Bar Association Commercial Law Section Corporate.
Mark W. Brennan, Partner, Hogan Lovells US LLP Update on The Telephone Consumer Protection Act and the FCC’s Rulemaking.
Turnaround Management Association of Southern Africa - presentation Panamo Properties (Pty) Ltd v Nel and Another NNO NUMSA v Wilro Supplies CC & Companies.
The Latest From the TCPA Legal Landscape Edward J. Mullins III Senior Associate Jeffrey A. Backman Shareholder.
Disclaimer This presentation is intended only for use by Tulane University faculty, staff, and students. No copy or use of this presentation should occur.
Mark W. Brennan, Partner, Hogan Lovells US LLP The Telephone Consumer Protection Act: Recent Developments and Key Compliance Challenges for Utilities.
Top Five Compliance “Must Dos” When You Get Home Tomorrow
6 October 2016 Social media: do you have the right social media strategy that will impact your business’ growth? - Legal and Regulatory Issues William.
The E-Rate Program CIPA Update Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT: 2015 UPDATES TO FCC REGULATIONS
AFTER 20 YEARS, IT’S TIME TO UPDATE THE TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (TCPA). Howard Waltzman Partner
SLSA Private Loan Committee Meeting: TCPA Developments
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act
FSMA Enforcement: Focus on Inspections
The Future of the TCPA After ACA International v
Current Privacy Issues That May Affect Your Credit Union
Single Firm Conduct: EU / US convergences and divergences
What Every Business Needs To Know about the TCPA
SLSA Private Loan Committee Meeting: TCPA Update
Presentation transcript:

Recent Developments and New Challenges Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act NCHER Winter Legal Meeting Mark W. Brennan January 24, 2014

Summary In an ever-changing technological landscape, organizations are increasingly at risk under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Regulators and plaintiffs’ class-action attorneys are targeting alleged TCPA violations With so much at stake, organizations need to know about the latest developments and prepare appropriate compliance strategies to minimize the risk of a TCPA claim or enforcement action 2

3 Overview Background on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”) Current TCPA Trends The Communication Innovators (“CI”) Petition and NCHER’s Efforts New TCPA Requirements Other Pending TCPA Petitions FTC Activity State Activity Issues to Watch in 2014 What You Can Do

4 Background on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”) Congress enacted the TCPA specifically to curb aggressive telemarketing practices. –Using automatic dialing equipment to make unsolicited calls to random or sequential telephone numbers. –Calling sequential telephone numbers in a way that ties up a block of telephone numbers and creates public safety risks. –Concerns about telemarketers shifting calling costs to wireless consumers. Codified at 47 U.S.C. § 227.

5 Background on the TCPA (cont’d) Imposes a number of restrictions on telemarketing calls, faxes, and other outbound communications. Some restrictions apply to non-telemarketing calls, including communications related to debt collection. Implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). FCC rules available at 47 C.F.R. § et seq.

6 Background on the TCPA (cont’d) Two TCPA provisions have become increasingly problematic for organizations as more and more consumers rely exclusively or primarily on wireless telephones. First, the TCPA prohibits callers from using an “automatic telephone dialing system” (“autodialer”) or a prerecorded or artificial voice message to call, inter alia, wireless telephone numbers, absent an emergency or the “prior express consent” of the called party. –Applies regardless of the content of the call. –The FCC and some courts have determined that this restriction applies to both voice calls and text or short message service (“SMS”) messages.

7 Background on the TCPA (cont’d) Second, the TCPA separately prohibits callers from using a prerecorded or artificial voice message to call residential telephone numbers without prior express consent. Several exceptions to this restriction: –Calls that do not include a solicitation or constitute telemarketing (e.g., pure debt collection calls) –Calls not made for a commercial purpose –Emergency calls –Calls made by or on behalf of a tax-exempt nonprofit organization –Certain healthcare calls subject to HIPAA

8 Background on the TCPA (cont’d) The TCPA defines an autodialer as “equipment which has the capacity –(A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and –(B) to dial such numbers.” The FCC has taken the position that (at least some) predictive dialers are “autodialers,” which has created significant confusion over the application of the TCPA to new technologies (more on this later).

Background on the TCPA (cont’d) TCPA Violations Can Be Costly Statutory damages of $500 per call, potentially up to $1,500 per call for knowing or willful violations. Injunctive relief also available. Class actions allowed, no cap on damages, no de minimis exception: –1,000 calls = at least $500,000, potentially $1.5 million Even if the call is not answered and no message is left, plaintiffs can still seek damages. 9

Background on the TCPA (cont’d) Organizations may be vicariously liable for a vendor’s actions Federal common law principles on vicarious liability apply... –Can be liable for the actions of an agent who is acting on the principal’s behalf and subject to the principal’s control.... including principles of apparent authority and ratification –Can be liable if third-party beliefs about an actor’s authority to act as an agent are reasonable and traceable to the principal. –Can be liable if one knowingly accepts the benefits of the acts, e.g. accepting payment. 10

11 Current TCPA Trends There has been a dramatic shift in the use of wireless telephones over the last decade. Approximately two out of five ( 39.4% ) American homes are wireless-only households. Another 15.7% of households receive all or almost all calls on wireless telephones despite also having a landline telephone (“wireless-mostly”). Approximately 65.6% of year-olds and 59.9% of year- olds live in wireless-only households (many never had a landline). More than half of Americans whose incomes are below the poverty line rely only on wireless services. Consumers can easily “port” their landline number to their wireless device.

Current TCPA Trends (cont’d) 12 NOTE: Adults are aged 18 and over; children are under age 18. SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Health Interview Survey. Percent Wireless rules increasingly important, particularly when serving younger Americans.

Current TCPA Trends (cont’d) Extensive litigation (especially in the debt collection context) over the meaning of “prior express consent” –Do they have to give you the specific telephone number? –What happens if they change telephone numbers? –Do you have to disclose specifically that you may use autodialers and prerecorded messages? –Do you have to disclose specifically that you may send text messages (not just voice calls)? –Skip-tracing? –Do you have to disclose specifically that you may engage in telemarketing? 13

Current TCPA Trends (cont’d) Extensive litigation over the meaning of “autodialer” –Predictive dialers? –Preview dialers? –Multiple-mode dialers? –Auto-generated text message replies? –Representative-assisted IVR systems? 14

The Communication Innovators (“CI”) Petition and NCHER’s Efforts CI filed a Petition for Declaratory Ruling with the FCC in June 2012 regarding the applicability of the TCPA to predictive dialers. CI requested confirmation that predictive dialers that are not used for telemarketing and do not have the current ability to general and dial random or sequential numbers are not “autodialers.” –If the equipment must be modified to be able to dial random or sequential numbers, it should not be considered an autodialer unless modified. FCC sought comment on the petition, and the petition remains pending. 15

The CI Petition and NCHER’s Efforts NCHER and other leading associations have been engaging with FCC staff to support the CI petition. –Several meetings and telephone calls with high-level FCC staff –Numerous written advocacy filings NCHER has been highlighting the substantial benefits from using predictive dialers and other new technologies to reach students on their wireless telephone numbers. The advocacy is making a difference. 16

New TCPA Requirements New FCC TCPA rules went into effect in October 2013 requiring prior express written consent for: –All autodialed or artificial or prerecorded telemarketing calls to wireless telephone numbers Includes text/SMS messages –All artificial or prerecorded telemarketing calls to residential telephone numbers 17

New TCPA Requirements (cont’d) Written consent must be signed (can be electronic with E- SIGN Act) and be sufficient to show that the consumer: 1.Received “clear and conspicuous disclosure” that the consumer will receive prerecorded and autodialed telemarketing calls from a specific seller; and 2.Agrees unambiguously to receive such calls at a telephone number that the consumer designates Consent can given by , verbally, through a website, or in a paper document Cannot require consent as a condition of providing any goods or services 18

New TCPA Requirements (cont’d) Must implement an automated, interactive opt-out mechanism that allows a consumer to opt out of receiving additional calls immediately during a call Must automatically process revoked consent – a single call after withdrawal is a violation Other changes to the law include: how parties calculate the call “abandonment” rate; an exemption for certain HIPAA-regulated calls Three parties filed petitions for reconsideration of the FCC decision adopting the new written consent rules; the FCC has not yet acted on the petitions 19

20 Other Pending TCPA Petitions Several parties have also filed petitions for declaratory rulings or clarifications of the FCC’s TCPA rules, including: GroupMe (group text messaging and third-party consent) Cargo Airline Association (exemption for package delivery notifications) YouMail (mobile app “virtual receptionist”) GlideTalk (text invitations to video message service)

Other Pending TCPA Petitions (cont’d) A Coalition of Mobile Engagement Providers (effect of new TCPA rules on past consents) Direct Marketing Association (disclosure rules) PACE (one-click dialing) United Healthcare (reassigned wireless numbers) 21

22 FTC Activity The Federal Trade Commission also regulates telemarketing through its Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”). –Aggressive enforcement –Pursuing technological solutions FTC does not have general jurisdiction over non- telemarketing calls. No private right of action under the TSR

23 State Activity States also regulate telemarketing and automated calling activities. 2012: NY law imposing new restrictions similar to the FCC’s Robocall Report and Order. –Focused on prerecorded voice telemarketing calls. –Extends additional telemarketing laws to out-of- state callers, including registration requirements. 2013: Illinois law imposing statutory damages and recordkeeping requirements on autodialed calls.

24 Issues to Watch in 2014 How will the FCC apply its new “prior express written consent’ requirements? What does “autodialer” mean? To what extent does the TCPA apply to mobile device applications, mobile financial services, and other new technologies and services? What happens if someone changes his or her telephone number? Will the number of TCPA claims continue to skyrocket?

25 What You Can Do Assessing your existing data –What level of consent can you demonstrate? –Have you obtained any additional consents under the new rules? Reviewing intake and account forms, calling scripts, and other consent channels –Are the disclosures adequate? –Are the telephone number types specified? –Is your privacy policy sufficient? Analyzing the available opt-out mechanisms

26 What You Can Do (cont’d) Reviewing calling policies and manuals Preparing training modules for employees Analyzing vendor agreements for TCPA compliance and adequate protection (including vicarious liability issues) Assessing call monitoring and recording compliance issues Evaluating management of customer number changes Ensuring adequate record retention Obtaining insurance Monitoring TCPA litigation developments and pending FCC proceedings for filings and decisions of interest

Hogan Lovells Hogan Lovells has offices in: Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Budapest* Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Jakarta* Jeddah* Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rio de Janeiro Riyadh* Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Zagreb* "Hogan Lovells" or the "firm" is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses. The word "partner" is used to describe a partner or member of Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP or any of their affiliated entities or any employee or consultant with equivalent standing. Certain individuals, who are designated as partners, but who are not members of Hogan Lovells International LLP, do not hold qualifications equivalent to members. For more information about Hogan Lovells, the partners and their qualifications, see Where case studies are included, results achieved do not guarantee similar outcomes for other clients. Attorney Advertising. © Hogan Lovells All rights reserved. *Associated offices 27 Questions?