An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Becoming a World Class Leader: Leading Through Transition June 2012.
Model Curriculum Maps 2012 Curriculum Summit November 13 – 14, 2012 Julia Phelps and Karen White Raising the Rigor of Teaching and Learning.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
 Student Learning Objectives February 26, 2015 Work and Creation Session.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS Literacy Design Collaborative & the Common Core State Standards Implementation Plan 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Becoming a World Class Leader: Fostering Effective Teaching and Learning for Each and Every Child Leadership I and II April 2012.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
COLLABORATIONS TeachersPrincipals Central Office Staff UnionsCommunity.
SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Fulfilling the Promise of Preparation: Translating Vision Into Reality.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Recognize how SLOs align the teacher and principal evaluation Develop a shared understanding of the purpose for using SLOs Become familiar with the SLO.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
One Team. One Vision. Unlimited Success Gerald Oehler Old Court Middle School
Becoming a World Class Leader: A Focus on Teacher Evaluation and EEA June Leadership.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational fair use exemption to U.S. Copyright law.

Today’s Session Outcomes Participants will: gain knowledge about the new HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process prepare to participate in the Countywide Professional Development Day on April 25, 2013.

Question Parking Lot Using the sticky notes provided, capture any questions you have. Place them on the Question Parking Lot. Your questions will contribute to a FAQ list.

V V V V V V Vision of Exemplary Teaching for Student Learning “All Students Learn” Knowing The Learner WHO? Knowing the Curriculum & Content WHAT? Knowing the Curriculum & Content WHAT? Knowing the Pedagogy HOW? Knowing the Pedagogy HOW? Personal Development Cognitive Development Social Development Knowing Myself and My Influence on Learners Knowing Myself and My Influence on Learners

What’s New? Starting in the school year, HCPSS will be implementing a new teacher evaluation process for all teachers.

We Learn So Our Students Learn Site-based Professional Learning Modules Self-directed Resources: Professional Learning Bundles Framework Domain Courses Ongoing, Customized Supports

How did we arrive at this new Teacher Evaluation Process? Beginning in 2009, due to new Federal and State mandates, HCPSS revised the teacher evaluation process. A new evaluation process was developed in collaboration with school-based leaders, central office leaders, HCEA and HCAA.

How did we arrive at this new Teacher Evaluation Process? The new HCPSS evaluation was designed to support teachers in implementing the Common Core curriculum ensuring the use of multiple measures. A pilot consisting of 10 schools is taking place this school year. (4-Elementary, 3-Middle, 3-High School) The new evaluation process goes into effect for all teachers during the school year.

What’s Changing? Replacement of Appendix D with a Goal Setting Form Inclusion of a new Domain for Student Growth Use of the 2013 Charlotte Danielson Framework for Teaching

How will it affect teachers? The new evaluation is designed to support the professional growth of teachers and the academic achievement of our students. Teachers will focus on all four Danielson domains. Teachers will select areas of focus for the student growth component. Teachers will now be rated as ineffective, effective, or highly effective.

HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Model Charlotte Danielson’s Framework For Teaching Professional Practice (50%) Domain 1 Planning and Preparation 12.5% Domain 3 Instruction 12.5% Domain 2 Classroom Environment 12.5% Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities 12.5% Literacy Reading Writing Speaking and Listening Differentiation 25%/30% Mathematical Practices Overarching Habits Reasoning and Explaining Modeling and Using Tools Seeing Structure and Generalizing Differentiation 25%/30% Creative Problem Solving in Support of MD STEM Standards of Practice Understanding Challenges Generation of Ideas Preparation for Action Application of Technology Differentiation 25%/30% Content Assessments Performance-Based Tasks Differentiation 25%/30% Qualitative Measures Quantitative Measures Growth on State Assessments (As Mandated by MSDE) 20% Domain 5 Student Growth (50%)

Literacy 25%/30% Mathematical Practices 25%/30% Creative Problem Solving in Support of MD STEM Standards of Practice 25%/30% Content 25%/30% Growth on State Assessments ( Mandated by MSDE) 20% Student Growth (50%) SLOs

Past, Present, and Future With a partner, discuss the following questions comparing the new model with the one we have used in the past: What’s different? What’s similar?

What are Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)? Student Growth

Student Learning Objective. A specific, rigorous, long-term goal for groups of students that represents the most important learning during an interval of instruction. Determined in consultation with evaluator Flexible and job-specific Data-rich process A definition…

SLOs and You Most teachers will write two SLOs. Teachers of grades who are teachers of record for mathematics and/or English Language Arts whose students take the MSA will write one SLO.

SLOs and You Non-tenured teachers will be evaluated on Domains 1- 4 (Professional Practice) and Domain 5 (Student Growth) on a yearly basis until tenured.

SLOs and You Tenured teachers will be evaluated on Domains 1-4 (Professional Practice) every three years. All teachers will be evaluated on Domain 5: Student Growth (SLOs) every year.

SLOs and You Teachers of HSA assessed areas must align one of their SLOs to the HSA.

Timeline By September 30, 2013Set goals in collaboration with evaluator. Write SLOs. May be individual or team goals. Fall Semester 2013Demonstrate critical attributes through observation. Collect artifacts and evidence. Follow a continuous improvement process. By January 31, 2014Mid-Year Progress Review: Confirm and revise goals, processes, document progress. Spring Semester 2014End of Year Conference and Evaluation: Present documentation and reflection to evaluator. Evaluator completes evaluation and provides copy to teacher.

Reflection/Exit Ticket a question I still have? some supports I need? one connection I made today? Based on today’s overview of the new Teacher Evaluation Process, What is/are…

The April 25 th Professional Development Day will be YOUR opportunity to: deepen understanding of what SLOs are; analyze and evaluate an example of an SLO; brainstorm artifacts and evidence to support SLOs; become aware of resources available to support the writing, implementation, and evaluation of SLOs.

Support for writing SLOs April 25 PD session SLO template, guiding questions, and samples pss.org/Elementary+SLOs pss.org/Secondary+SLOs

Between now and April 25 Check out draft SLOs on the Transition to Common Core wiki: transitiontocommoncore.wikispaces.hcpss.org/home

An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 All images unless otherwise indicated are property of HCPSS or taken from Microsoft Clipart Gallery