Components & Subsystems New generations of RF Amplifiers : from system requirements to technologies Michel Caplot, Christian Robert, Michel Grezaud, Bernard.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RF Specification discussion MICE RF workshop 16 th April 2012.
Advertisements

X Band Vacuum Devices Presented by: Tony Johns,
CHAPTER 3 MICROWAVE ‘O’ TYPE TUBES
HIGH POWER SYSTEMS FOR WIND PROFILER K. P. Ray K. P. Ray Society for Applied Microwave Electronics Engineering & Research IIT campus, Powai, Mumbai-400.
MICE Refurbishment of CERN RF equipment for MICE M. Vretenar, CERN AB/RF.
RF systems for MICE Andrew Moss The MICE RF Group and the TIARA WP7 Team Contributions include Daresbury, RAL, CERN, LBNL, LANL, FNAL, Strathclyde & Sheffield.
THE MICE RF SYSTEM J.F.Orrett* A.J.Moss, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory, WA4 4AD, UK Accelerator Science and Technology Centre
THALES ELECTRON DEVICES
1.0 MW / 175 MHz Source for IFMIF: a study of alternatives
Proton Source Workshop December 7 & 8, 2010 John Reid December 8, 2010.
DESIGN OF A HIGH POWER TEST STAND FOR ESS SPOKE CAVITIES
Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology
Microwave semiconductor devices
1 MICE RF Daresbury Laboratory Support Joe Orrett - ASTeC.
Conventional Tubes Conventional Device tubes cannot be used for frequencies above 100MHz 1. Interelectrode capacitance 2. Lead Inductance effect 3. Transit.
Carlos A. Martins ESS – Accelerator Division - RF Electrical Power Systems August 19 th, 2015 C4 – RF sources and related.
Thales Components & Subsystems
Klystron Modulator for Proton Driver
Design Status of IOT for ILC
David Regidor, Moisés Weber (CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain) The IFMIF-EVEDA Accelerator Prototype will be a 9MeV, 125mA CW deuteron accelerator to validate the.
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Alex Zaltsman R&D ERL High Power RF Systems Alex Zaltsman February 17-18, 2010 High Power RF Systems.
RF Sources and Combiners Emma Wooldridge. 28th-29th April 2004Joint Accelerator Workshop Outline Very quick RF power overview RF power sources –Triodes.
Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources Heinz Bohlen, Thomas Grant Microwave Power Products Division CPI, Palo Alto 1.
I. Syratchev, April 2015, EuCARD2, Barcelona. Review of Efficient RF Sources I. Syratchev, CERN.
IOTs for ESS Morten Jensen November 12, 2013 EnEfficient RF Sources Workshop Cockcroft Institute 3-4 June 2014.
WORKSHOP SUMMARY. 2 Workshop summary CWRF08: finally we have: 54 ~10 33 talks Number of participants rose by almost 6dB.
ECE 662 – Microwave Electronics
The selection of operating mode for 10MW L-band MBK with high efficiency Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China November.
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
Solid State RF High Power Amplifier Developments at SOLEIL Ti RUAN, on behalf of SOLEIL RF Group CWRF10 CELLS-ALBA Barcelona Spain May
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Renovation of the 200 MHz RF system LLRF issues. Cavities redistribution 26 October th LIU-SPS Coordination Meeting 2  2011 : 4 cavities 2 x 4.
ALBA RF Amplifiers based on IOTs CWRF08 - CERN, March 2008 Michel Langlois & Paco Sanchez 1 Michel Langlois & Paco Sanchez.
Andrew Moss ASTeC TIARA Mid term meeting 12 th 14 th June 2012 CIEMAT ICTF Progress on the MICE RF System.
RF Sources – Klystrons I. Syratchev on behalf of
Operational experience of high-power RF at Diamond Light Source
Ingot Niobium Workshop RF Sources Andrew Kimber 4 th December 2015 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is managed by Jefferson Science Associates,
ATC / ABOC 23 January 2008SESSION 6 / MTTR and Spare Parts AB / RF GROUP MTTR, SPARE PARTS AND STAND-BY POLICY FOR RF EQUIPMENTS C. Rossi on behalf of.
CW and High Average Power Workshop BNL The Diamond Storage Ring IOT based High Power Amplifier Morten Jensen on behalf of the SR RF Group.
Slide: Sixth CW and High Average Power RF Workshop Cavity combiners for transistor amplifiers M.Langlois, J.Jacob, J.M. Mercier.
Status of the 1.2 MW MB-IOT for ESS Morten Jensen CLIC Workshop 2016, January, CERN.
Solid State Amplifier Circuit Design Student: Branko Popovic Advisor: Geoff Waldschmidt.
FREIA: HIGH POWER TEST STAND Rutambhara Yogi & FREIA Group ESS RF Group Unit Leader for Spoke Power and RF Distribution FREIA Group Unit Leader, Uppsala.
650 MHz Solid State RF Power development at RRCAT
IIFC Meeting February 24-25, 2015, RRCAT P. R. Hannurkar, Akhilesh Jain, M. R. Lad RF Systems Division 650 MHz RF Power 1.
Presented in IIFC meeting on 27-Oct-2010 at RRCAT, Indore.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Linac RF System Design Options Y. Kang RAD/SNS/NScD/ORNL Project – X Collaboration Meeting April , 2011.
Gridded Tubes Proton Driver Efficiency Workshop 29 February 2016 – 2 March 2016 Paul Scherrer Institute
CERN LHC RF Power Systems
DESIGN STUDY November 28 th - 30 th 2005First EURISOL Design Study TOWN MEETING High Power RF Amplifiers Development at LNL Fabio Scarpa - INFN LNL.
In House RF Power Option John Reid December 14, 2011.
ISIS OPTIMVS NEVTRONVM SPALLATIONENSIVM FONS MVNDI
Results of on-site performance tests on 20kW Solid State Wide Band Amplifier for the CLIC DB Front End at CERN* Purushottam Shrivastava, P. Mohania,
Prospects for developing new tubes
How does a klystron work? TE-MPE Section Meeting Karolina Kulesz
Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology
Syratchev(CERN) on behalf of
Development of high-power IOTs as an efficient alternative to klystrons Morten Jensen Energy for Sustainable Science 24 October 2013, CERN.
RF Sources and Combiners
Visit for more Learning Resources
Thales Klystrons for Linacs
Status of the ALS and APEX RF Systems at LBNL
Construction and Commissioning of Electronic Test Benches
Construction and Commissioning of Electronic Test Benches
Application of the moderate peak power (6 MW) X-band klystron’s cluster for the CLIC accelerating structures testing program. I. Syratchev.
X-band Facilities and High Gradient Tests Stands Around the World
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Saclay Test Facilities
Summary INDA to supply 9 (1 proto + 8 series) ICRF Sources to IO, each capable to deliver 2.5 MW/CW RF power at VSWR 2:1 in the frequency band 35 – 65.
Presentation transcript:

Components & Subsystems New generations of RF Amplifiers : from system requirements to technologies Michel Caplot, Christian Robert, Michel Grezaud, Bernard Darges and Pascal Ponard cw RF Workshop – CERN – March 2008

1 Components & Subsystems System requirements (1) From System requirements to Technologies….and not the opposite way System requirements do include technical performance but are not limited to these performance Systems requirements should cover system life time Cost of a system is not limited to purchasing cost: it clearly include Life Cycle Costs (LCC) Purchasing cost Maintenance cost System evolution cost Supplier support cost Spare part cost ……

2 Components & Subsystems System requirements (2) Systems Requirements  Technical performance  LCC including availability of spare parts over 2 or 3 decades  System architecture  System reliability  System availability (fault tolerance, graceful degradation, maintainability, testability, …)

3 Components & Subsystems Architectures (1) Large klystron based RF amplifiers Multi-IOT based RF amplifiers High power Few items to maintain Centralized architecture Lower power at each stage Easy replacement Decentralized architecture with local control

4 Components & Subsystems Multi-coupled IOT based RF amplifiers Architectures (2) Multi-coupled Solid State based RF amplifiers Coupling losses Graceful degradation Easy replacement Coupling losses Low voltage Obsolescence management

5 Components & Subsystems Architectures (3) Architecture should not take into account technologies Architecture is strongly dependent on requirements Solid State vs. Electron Device architectures : really a debate ? Solid StateElectron Devices Low voltageHigh voltage Graceful degradation but coupling lossesSome possible graceful degradation Obsolescence managementFew suppliers but existing (!!!) Components not driven by science market Ability to produce components some decades after system start LCC (design evolution due to new components)LCC In both cases, experienced high power RF designers are mandatory !!!

6 Components & Subsystems Electron device evolution - Klystrons & IOTs (1) Klystrons 1 GHz10 GHz 100 GHz 10 MW 1 MW 100 kW 10 kW IOT CW Klystrons Pulsed Klystrons MBK EIK µs Klystrons 1 kW Radiotherapy Security Industry Radiotherapy Security Industry Scientific Accelerators & Fusion Scientific Accelerators & Fusion Broadcast Defense f P peak IOTs

7 Components & Subsystems Electron device evolution – Triodes & Tetrodes (2) Diacrodes 1 MW 100 kW 10 kW 10 MHz100 MHz 1 GHz 1 MHz TV Diacrodes Induction Laser Radio Triodes & tetrodes Scientific Accelerators & Fusion Scientific Accelerators & Fusion Scientific Accelerators Scientific Accelerators Triodes & Tetrodes

8 Components & Subsystems Electron device evolution – Solid State Device (3) Solid State amplifiers Solid State amplifiers 1 W 1 kW 1 MW Si/GaAs PWM (S-class) E class AB class F class PWM (S class) C (D) class AB class C class A class Si/SiC/GaN 1 MHz 1 GHz

9 Components & Subsystems Diacrode - A major evolution for tetrode technology (1) Cathode Control Grid Screen Grid Anode The end capacitance is mainly done in this area Fig 18 TH 628 Diacrode K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A Two tetrodes K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A K G 1 G 2 A One Diacrode

10 Components & Subsystems Diacrode - A major evolution for tetrode technology (2) Frequency - MHz cw Power - MW VSWR = 2.0:1 Both tubes with the same cathode

11 Components & Subsystems Solid State – Amplifier Class of Operation Impact (1) 100% A AB B C D 98% 0.1 Frequency, MHz 75% 65% 55% 25% % Thales new design Si MOSFET Technology Amplifier Class of operation Efficiency, %

12 Components & Subsystems Solid State – Amplifier structure Impact (2) Si LDMOS Technology (low frequency) No required tuning or adjustment 90 % SMT technology Last MOSFET technology RoHS compliance In case of component technology evolution, Pallets are changing but not Case Interface and not Racks Pallet Case Racks 10 kW Complete rack 600 W Complete rack

13 Components & Subsystems Solid State – GaN device for high frequency (3) KORRIGAN : a GaN foundry for Europe GaN TECHNOLOGY RF power densityx 10 Output powerx 10 Power added efficiencyx 2 Junction temperature> 250°C Voltage supply > 28V

14 Components & Subsystems Solid State – GaN device for high frequency (4) Substrates Epitaxy Process Die Bank Assembly Test Final Product Delivery CTH, ISOM, CIDA, PTO U.Roma TV, CNR IFN GaN HEMT Foundries SELEX, UMS (<-Tiger), QinetiQ TNO, IRCOM, CTH System Houses ELT, SELEX, Thales, Indra, EMW, SAAB, BAE ISOM TNO GaN epi-wafers Picogiga, QinetiQ LiU, Tiger, ULE U.Padova, ISOM, CIDA NORSTEL KORRIGAN : a GaN foundry for Europe

15 Components & Subsystems IOTs – Modularity based design (1) Diamond TH793 IOTs MHz 80 kW cw TH713 IOTs L band 16 kW cw

16 Components & Subsystems IOTs – Modularity based design (2) Combined RF Output Coupling cavity Modularity allows for Fault tolerance through graceful degradation, due to the operation of each RF source at a lower power: in case of one source failure, two remaining can supply full power

17 Components & Subsystems Conclusion New generations of RF amplifiers should be defined by System Requirements that include technical performance but also system operation requirements and Life Cycle Costs (and not only Purchasing Cost) There is not a debate between Solid State and Electron devices: based on system requirements, technological answers may be based on a unique type or on a combination of technologies Both Solid State and Electron devices have evolutions. SSD design based amplifier must incorporate an architecture that allows to mix different solid state technologies in order to take into account that science is not the market driver