LibQual Analysis at a Liberal Arts College: a Journey Sara Penhale Tom Kirk, Christine Larson, Shirley Smith, Janet Wagner, and Jeannette Wilson Earlham College
Liberal arts college with approximately 1200 students and 130 teaching faculty Library focuses on the teaching & learning process Long-standing program of teaching information literacy skills Librarians well-integrated into the life of the college
Assessment in the Library Experience in assessment Limited expertise in large scale surveys and data sets Analyzing LibQual data becomes a new journey
Radar Chart
Image from NASA Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer
A journey begun on familiar territory, continued over thin ice on an unclear path, but heading toward a known destination IMPROVED LIBRARY SERVICE
Our path thus far… 1.Considered survey comments 2.Examined data analysis provided by LibQual 3.Began our own data analysis, relevant to our own institution
Step 1. Considered survey comments
Dissatisfaction with handling of fines at the circulation desk Student workers contribute to the problem
Arriving at improved library service Improved training program for students workers Emphasis on checking in books properly, customer service attitude, etc.
Guideposts for survey comments Expect to receive opposing comments Look for corroboration of what you suspect Look for new insights and what’s missing Recognize the need to look further for conclusions
Our journey continues… Step 1. Considered survey comments Step 2. Examined data analysis provided by LibQual
Step 2. Analysis provided by LibQual Entire survey population Sub-groups, such as faculty or undergraduates Radar charts for core questions Data summaries, descriptive statistics Comparative norms
Earlham College Aggregate Results
Results for Core Survey Questions Separate Survey Sub-Groups Undergraduates Faculty
Results for Core Survey Questions Faculty
Significant differences between undergraduates and faculty on questions related to satisfaction “How would you rate the overall quality of service provided by the library?”
Undergraduates 7.41 Faculty 8.12 (on a scale of 1-9)
Arriving at improved library service Maintain good relationships with faculty Make effort to integrate new faculty Look to improve undergraduate experience
Guideposts for data analysis provided by LibQual Consider comments and data together Be aware of the limitations of the survey questions and the demographic categories
Our journey… Step 1. Considered survey comments Step 2. Examined data analysis provided by LibQual Step 3. Began our own data analysis
Step 3. Our own data analysis Noted factors relevant to our own institution Considered what additional analyses would be of interest Found help and plunged in!
Factors relevant to our institution Course-integrated program of instruction in information literacy skills Our interest in the progress of undergraduates throughout their four years
Additional Analysis Assistance from Dr. Katherine Milar, Psychology Department Compared students from different years ANOVA – Analysis of Variance – on a variety of variables
Using this information to arrive at improved library service Note large change between end of first year and end of second year Lesser changes in later years Consider meaning in context of both library program and student development Work with faculty to plan and implement changes
Guideposts for doing your own LibQual analyses Add comparisons with other institutions Be selective in what you analyze Continue to focus on the destination
Begin your own journey to improved library service 1.Start on familiar territory 2.Follow the map provided by LibQual 3.Chart new territory with your own analysis
EARLHAM COLLEGE -- URL for Presentation publications.htm Sara Penhale Science Librarian Tom Kirk College Librarian