Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction: Definition of food safety. Food safety (International Life Sciences Institute- ILSI): “Assurance that food will not cause harm to the consumer.
Advertisements

United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS NOTICE CLARIFYING AND EXPANSION OF SAMPLING ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03G Fully Cooked Not Shelf Stable Tool Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through.
Validation of Microbiological Methods for Use in the Food Industry Brazilian Association for Food Protection 6 th International Symposium Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Microbiological Criterion to Assess the Acceptability of a Food Lot Jenny Scott FDA/CFSAN U.S. Delegate – Codex Committee on Food Hygiene.
World Health Organization
1 MANUFACTURING AND PRODUCTION OF BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS (ERT 455) HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) SYSTEM Munira Mohamed Nazari School.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 E. coli O157:H7 and Certain Beef Exporting Countries Sally White, Director,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service 10/31/07OPPD; Policy Development Division1 FSIS Notice ROUTINE SAMPLING AND.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service August 27, 2008 Carol Maczka, PhD Assistant Administrator Office of Food Defense.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety Inspection Service SALMONELLA SUBTYPING RESULTS IN RAW PRODUCTS FSIS Notice /3/2010 Policy Development.
Public Health Information System: Headquarters Session HACCP Verification.
WHO FOOD COURSE SAFE FOOD PRODUCTION: HACCP HACCP and food regulators.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 E. Coli Checklist for Beef Operations E. coli O157:H7 - Addressing the Challenges,
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
DENNIS CRYER Veterinary Meat Hygiene Adviser Food Standards Agency
Food Industry Perspective on Non-O157 STEC Jenny Scott Vice President, Food Safety Programs Grocery Manufacturers/Food Products Association.
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Example 5b: Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach Kerry L. Dearfield, Ph.D. Scientific Advisor.
Method Validation and Verification: An Overview Patricia Hanson, Biological Administrator I Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Food.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS Foodborne Illness Investigations: Current Thinking Scott A. Seys, MPH Chief,
E. coli O157:H7 FSIS Actions Directive 10,010.1 Rev. 1 In-Plant Control Transit.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Example (5A) Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach.
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
Important informations
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 New FSA Tools EIAO Methodology Industry Walkthrough December 18, 2008 Washington,
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Loren Lange Deputy Assistant Administrator Office of Public Health Science April.
Lessons Learned from the Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein Incident Jenny Scott FDA CFSAN Office of Food Safety.
Jenny Scott FDA/CFSAN U.S. Delegate – Codex Committee on Food Hygiene
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
STRATEGIES FOR THE DETECTION OF UNKNOWN BIOLOGICAL AGENTS Dr. Peter J. Stopa US Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 3 Microbial Testing for Control Verification Robert L. Buchanan U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety.
Why do we need to do it? What are the basic tools?
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Treatment of Primal Cuts STEC - Addressing the Challenges, Moving Forward.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA HACCP Principle.
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 2 HACCP Impacts on Contamination Levels in Meat and Poultry Products: FSIS Perspective Delila R. Parham, DVM Office of.
Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001
Food Monitoring Lab Requirements & System Implications Shaun Kennedy Associate Director National Center for Food Protection & Defense Center for Animal.
Example (5A) Operationalising a Performance Objective with a Microbiological Criterion for a Risk-Based Approach.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator Office of Field Operations.
Quality control & Statistics. Definition: it is the science of gathering, analyzing, interpreting and representing data. Example: introduction a new test.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
Compliance and Investigations Division (CID). Proposed Rules  Official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products, will keep records.
FSIS Employee Training & Outreach to Small & Very Small Plants FSIS Public Meeting Control of E. coli O157:H7 FSIS Employee Training & Outreach to Small.
Laboratory Perspective on Testing Methodologies Wendy Warren-Serna, Ph.D. USDA-FSIS Public Meeting Control of E. coli O157:H7.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service FSIS Risk Assessments for E. coli O157:H7 Dr. Carl Schroeder Office of Public.
 This notice provides new instructions to Enforcement Investigations and Analysis Officers (EIAOs) and Public Health Veterinarians who were trained in.
Explaining the FSIS Sampling Program for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Raw Ground Beef Kristina Barlow, Priya Kadam, Stephanie Buchanan, Priscilla Levine.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 Across Establishment Ranking Concept For Processing and Slaughter February.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Overview of Trim Sampling Compliance Guidelines and Discussion Daniel Engeljohn,
USDA Public Meeting; Control of E. coli O157:H7
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Background and Overview of the FSIS Plan to Address Today’s Issues Daniel Engeljohn,
Experiences with Controlling Listeria monocytogenes in Ready- to-Eat Food Processes W. Payton Pruett, Jr., Ph.D. ConAgra Refrigerated Foods USDA Listeria.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 03B Raw Ground Meat Industry FSA Methodology Walk-through December 18, 2008.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods Subcommittee.
The Role of Microbiological Testing in Ensuring Meat Safety American Meat Institute Washington, DC November 2009.
Wyeth-Ayerst Pharmaceuticals1 CLEANING VALIDATION Microbial Monitoring Anthony M. Cundell Ph. D. Associate Director, QA Microbiological Development & Statistics.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 11 ISSUES FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION: E. coli O157:H7 DANIEL ENGELJOHN, Ph.D. Deputy.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
HACCP Principle 3 – Establish Critical Limits
Establish Critical Limits
Introduction: Definition of food safety
Food Production Systems
Microbiological Sampling of Dairy Products
H A C C P HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS 1 December 2018
Introduction: Definition of food safety
Presentation transcript:

Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry FSIS EIAO Correlation March 3, 2011 Peter Evans, Ph. D, M.P.H Senior Microbiologist FSIS Office of Public Health Science peter.evans@fsis.usda.gov

Background Establishments sample and test components and raw ground beef (RGB) products for E. coli O157:H7 Mitigate the probability of releasing adulterated product assess the adequacy of process controls for E. coli O157:H7 Reduce amount of product subject to recall or diverted to cooking when a positive test result is obtained. Required by customer

Background: Sample Definitions Lot: total material to be defined by establishment. Should be produced under uniform conditions Sample: material selected from a lot to be tested for the presence of E. coli O157:H7 cells Sampling plan: procedure for sampling a production lot or environment Lot prevalence: proportion of positive to total pieces Statistical sampling: Provides X level of confidence for detecting (rejecting) lots contaminated at Y lot prevalence (% pieces testing positive)

Background: Sampling Plan Define product to be tested Define product (i.e, the lot) represented by the sample Define target microorganism Describe how to sample the product How many independent pieces (N) Describe how the sample is analyzed in the laboratory How much of the sample is used What analytical method(s) is used Describe how to evaluate the data What is the acceptable level in each piece (m) How many unacceptable pieces to reject the lot (c)

Background: ICMSF Sampling Plans International Commission for Microbiological Specification of Foods Microorganisms in Foods 7 (2002) Recommended statistical sampling procedures chosen on basis of hazard and degree of health concern after sampling Case 15 (severe hazard, increasing health concern) N=60 pieces m = 0 per 25 grams c = 0 If assumptions met, case 15 provides high confidence of rejecting lots contaminated at 5% (i.e., 3 of 60 pieces contain detectable E. coli O157:H7)

Probability of accepting lot with 5% contamination Background: ICMSF Sampling Plans 2 Higher N detects lower lot prevalence N Probability of accepting lot with 5% contamination 5 77 15 46 30 21 60 100 1

Background: ICMSF Sampling Plans 3 Statistical sampling plans assume Uniform manufacturing conditions Equal probability of contamination throughout lot (“homogeneous distribution”) Independent and random sampling (equal probability of sampling throughout lot)

Background: Testing Definitions Analytical Test: Procedure for detecting organism of interest (E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella) in sample (Selective) Enrichment: Procedure for increasing the (relative) number of organisms of interest in the sample by allowing it to grow in the laboratory; resuscitate injured organisms Portion: The amount of sample tested by the laboratory Composite: combining pieces of sample together for purposes of testing. Dry composite: combine sample Wet composite: combine enrichment cultures Sub: the total portion is divided into smaller portions (subs) to accommodate the needs of the analytical test

Background: Testing Definitions 2 Sensitivity: probability that truly positive samples are detected as positive by analytical test 1-false negative rate Specificity: probability that truly negative samples detected as negative by analytical test 1 – false positive rate Level of detection (LOD): lowest level of contamination reliably detected by analytical test LOD expressed as ratio of organisms to quantity tested material e.g., CFU per gram, MPN per mL, CFU per square-ft

Pathogen Growth During Enrichment death stationary 10 logarithmic lag immunoassay 6 Sensitivity affected by Pathogen number Background flora fat content Log pathogen level (e.g., cfu, MPN/gram PCR 4 2 24 Incubation time, hrs

Role of Enrichment ? ?

E. coli O157:H7 Test Kits EIA (Enzyme Immunoassay) Biomerieux VIDAS® UP E.coli O157 including H7 (VIDAS ECPT) Biomerieux VIDAS® E.coli O157 (ECO) 3M TECRA E. coli O157 Visual Immunoassay LFI (Lateral flow immunoassay) Neogen Reveal for E. coli O157:H7 Test Merck Singlepath® E. coli O157 Lateral Flow Assay DuPont Lateral Flow System E. coli O157 Test Kit FoodChek Systems FoodChek™ E. coli O157 SDI RapidChek® SELECT™ E. coli O157 EMD Chemicals Duopath® Verotoxin Lateral Flow Assay (Shiga toxin identification)

E. coli O157:H7 Test Kits PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Dupont Qualicon BAX® E. coli O157:H7 MP Dupont Qualicon BAX® Real-Time PCR Assay E. coli O157:H7 Dupont Qualicon BAX® System Real-Time PCR Assay for E. coli O157:H7 Bio-Rad Laboratories iQ-Check E. coli O157:H7 Real-Time PCR Test Kit Biocontrol Assurance GDS for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Selected Foods Biocontrol Assurance GDS for Shigatoxin Genes Idaho Technology, Inc. E. coli O157:H7 R.A.P.I.D.® LT Test Kit

E. coli O157:H7 Test Kits PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) BIOTECON Diagnostics foodproof® E. coli O157 Detection Kit Pall Genesystems GeneDisc E.coli O157:H7 ADNucleis HQS E.coli O157:H7 Applied Biosystems MicroSEQ® E. coli O157:H7 Detection Kit AES Chemunex ADIAFOOD Rapid Pathogen Detection System for Escherichia coli O157 and Escherichia coli O157:H7 IEH E. coli O157, Stx-producing E. coli (STEC) with Intimin

E. coli O157:H7 Test Kits Plating media RAPID'E.coli O157:H7 BBL™ CHROMagar™ O157 Immunoconcentration Pathatrix ULTRA/Auto E. coli O157 Test System

E. coli O157:H7 Tests should be fit for intended purpose For E. coli O157:H7 detection methods, this means able to detect low levels of potentially injured cells used by a regulatory body or validated by a recognized independent body (e.g., AOAC, AFNOR, ISO, Microval, Nordval) or validated using a robust experimental design with results subject to FSIS review used under the validated conditions used in a laboratory that ensures the quality of the results

Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry FSIS Issuances Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry Directive 10,010.1 section IV.B “How IPP Verify Establishment Testing for E. coli O157:H7” Compliance Guideline for Sampling Beef Trimmings for Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Draft for Stakeholder Comment, August 12, 2008) Guidance for Small and Very Small Establishments on Sampling Beef Products for Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Draft for Stakeholder Comment, August 12, 2008) Sampling and Testing Procedures for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Beef Manufacturing Trimmings, Federal Register Vol. 73 No 198 (October 10, 2008) Compliance Guidelines For Establishments On The FSIS Microbiological Testing Program And Other Verification Activities For Escherichia coli O157:H7 (April 14, 2004)

Other References FSIS Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) chapter 5.05 BIFSCo Best Practices for Using Microbiological Sampling (March 2008) ICMSF, E. coli O157:H7 in Frozen Ground Beef Patties in Microorganisms in Foods 7 (2002)

Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry AskFSIS Q&As Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry Title Last updated AOAC approval and FSIS acceptability of micro methods 05/19/2009 10:14 AM Specificity and Sensitivity Criterion for testing methods 05/19/2009 10:08 AM micro method "fit for use" determination 05/19/2009 10:22 AM Evaluation criteria for E. coli O157:H7 testing methods 05/21/2009 04:52 PM Using different sample sizes than original AOAC validation for micro methods 05/19/2009 10:18 AM

Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry AskFSIS Q&As Design of E. coli O157:H7 sampling and testing programs by Industry Title Last updated E. coli O157:H7 Test Portion Size 08/09/2010 08:46 AM E. coli O157:H7 Test Portions Smaller than 325 grams 08/03/2010 01:09 AM Confirming E. coli O157:H7 Screen Positive Test Results 04/26/2010 12:22 PM

RGB components and products FSIS Sample Size: RGB components and products Manufactured and bench trimmings (large pieces) Projects MT 50, 51, 52, 53, 55 Each piece is 1x3 in-squared (1/8 th inch deep) excised from original external surface Sampled equally from combo bins composing lot Combined sample weight (goal): ~¾ lb (~340 grams) Companion sample (1 ¼ lb) collected

RGB components and products FSIS Sample Size: RGB components and products Other RGB components and bench trimmings (small pieces) Projects MT 54 and 55 Collect 1 – 2 lbs (LTRB, AMR, head, heart, cheek weasand meat) or 2 lbs (small pieces of bench trimmings) RGB products Projects MT 5, 6, 8, 43, 44, 44T Collect 1 lb sample

RGB components and products FSIS Testing: RGB components and products Test portion is 325 gram ± 10% product Test portion range: 292.5 – 357.5 grams FSIS labs will test as 5 individual subs (65 grams per sub) FSIS labs will move to new procedure—single composite

FSIS Evaluation of Industry Testing OFO compares industry sampling and testing programs to FSIS programs Some industry programs may sample and test more frequently

E. coli O157:H7 Test Portions Smaller than 325 grams AskFSIS Q&A (last updated 08/03/2010 01:09 AM) There are circumstances where test portions smaller than 325 grams of RGB products would be acceptable: all source materials are tested at N=60 multiple samples taken on a single production line in one day or half shift that add up to over 325 grams each smaller test portion represents sampling at multiple points within the defined ground beef lot (e.g., small pieces collected at 15 min intervals combined to 65 gram composite)

E. coli O157:H7 Test Portions Smaller than 325 grams NOT appropriate AskFSIS Q&A (last updated 08/09/2010 08:46 AM) Circumstances where test portions of 325 – 375 grams of RGB products would be a more appropriate choice: large N pieces in sampling plan If 65 grams of an typical N60 sample is tested, only ~17% of sample is represented Violation of the assumptions of the statistical sampling plan investigative or follow-up testing to determine the extent of contamination and to prevent release of adulterated product following a contamination event

Advantages of larger test portions Accommodate all material represented by sample Discussed in AskFSIS Q&A and Draft Guidelines Avoid violating assumptions of statistical sampling plan Greater quantity of material per “N” N represented by 0.42 grams for 25 gram test portion, or 6.25 grams for 375 gram test portion. Lower theoretical LOD: Test with LOD 1 per 25 grams (0.04 CFU/g) could be capable of detecting 1 CFU in 325 grams (0.003 CFU/g)

Disadvantages of larger test portions More work for labs Need to have equipment to deal with larger mass and volumes Most methods validated for 25 gram test portions E. coli O157:H7 enrichment from larger test portions may be slowed (compared to 25 grams) Expectation that methods can detect low levels of potentially injured organisms (not proportional to test portion) Need to re-validate for larger test portions (65, 75, 325, 375 grams)

Take-homes Industry samples and tests RGB components or product for E. coli O157:H7 for several reasons Sampling and testing are different activities Assumptions of statistical sampling plans may be violated if the entire sample is not tested by the lab OFO uses FSIS sampling and testing procedures as a benchmark to evaluate industry procedures Some establishments sample more frequently than FSIS In some circumstances, samples less than 325 grams may be an appropriate choice by an establishment (see Ask FSIS Q&A) Analytical methods for larger test portions should be validated by the lab, or the test kit manufacturer