WG ANOVA Analysis of Variance for Within- groups or Repeated measures Between Groups and Within-Groups ANOVA WG ANOVA & WG t-tests When to use each Similarities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kxk BG Factorial Designs expanding the 2x2 design reasons for larger designs statistical analysis of kxk BG factorial designs using LSD for kxk factorial.
Advertisements

Pearson’s X 2 Correlation vs. X² (which, when & why) Qualitative/Categorical and Quantitative Variables Contingency Tables for 2 Categorical Variables.
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Thirteen Inferential Tests of Significance II: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with More than Two Groups.
Dr. Sinn, PSYC301, The joy of 1-way ANOVA1 Unit 3 Outline Day 1: Introduce F Return Tests (20) Power (20) Matching variance with data, ranking Fs (20)
Basic Data Analysis for Quantitative Research
Between Groups & Within-Groups ANOVA
Multiple Group X² Designs & Follow-up Analyses X² for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons & RH Testing Alpha inflation Effect sizes for k-group.
Design Conditions & Variables Explicating Design Variables Kinds of “IVs” Identifying potential confounds Why control “on the average” is sufficient Characteristics.
Inferences About Means of Two Independent Samples Chapter 11 Homework: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7.
Multiple Group X² Designs & Follow-up Analyses X² for multiple condition designs Pairwise comparisons & RH Testing Alpha inflation Effect sizes for k-group.
Statistical Analysis of Factorial Designs z Review of Interactions z Kinds of Factorial Designs z Causal Interpretability of Factorial Designs z The F-tests.
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
3-way Factorial Designs Expanding factorial designs Effects in a 3-way design Defining a 3-way interaction BG & WG comparisons Experimental & Non-experimental.
2x2 ANOVA BG & MG Models Kinds of Factorial Designs ANOVA for BG, MG & WG designs Causal Interpretation of Factorial Results.
Prelude to Research Designs Review of a few things Demonstrations vs. Comparisons Experimental & Non-Experimental Designs “IVs” and “DVs” Between Group.
Analyzing quantitative data – section III Week 10 Lecture 1.
Review of Factorial Designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial results for a 2x2 factorial designs Descriptive &
Design Conditions & Variables Limitations of 2-group designs “Kinds” of Treatment & Control conditions Kinds of Causal Hypotheses Explicating Design Variables.
Complex Design. Two group Designs One independent variable with 2 levels: – IV: color of walls Two levels: white walls vs. baby blue – DV: anxiety White.
Lecture 13: Factorial ANOVA 1 Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.
Pearson’s r Scatterplots for 2 Quantitative Variables Research and Null Hypotheses for r Casual Interpretation of Correlation Results (& why/why not) Computational.
Comparing Means: T-Test PSYC 301 /SPSS SPRING 2014.
Advanced Research Methods in Psychology - lecture - Matthew Rockloff
ANOVA Chapter 12.
Repeated Measures ANOVA
ANOVA Analysis of Variance.  Basics of parametric statistics  ANOVA – Analysis of Variance  T-Test and ANOVA in SPSS  Lunch  T-test in SPSS  ANOVA.
ANOVA Greg C Elvers.
ANOVA Analysis of Variance Picking the correct bivariate statistical test When, Why to Use ANOVA Summarizing/Displaying Data -- 1 qual & 1 quant var How.
1 of 46 MGMT 6970 PSYCHOMETRICS © 2014, Michael Kalsher Michael J. Kalsher Department of Cognitive Science Inferential Statistics IV: Factorial ANOVA.
Independent Samples t-Test (or 2-Sample t-Test)
Chapter 10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs.
Types of validity we will study for the Next Exam... internal validity -- causal interpretability external validity -- generalizability statistical conclusion.
1)Test the effects of IV on DV 2)Protects against threats to internal validity Internal Validity – Control through Experimental Design Chapter 10 – Lecture.
Chapter 7 Experimental Design: Independent Groups Design.
Intro to Factorial Designs The importance of “conditional” & non-additive effects The structure, variables and effects of a factorial design 5 terms necessary.
Chapter 10: Analyzing Experimental Data Inferential statistics are used to determine whether the independent variable had an effect on the dependent variance.
PSY2004 Research Methods PSY2005 Applied Research Methods Week Five.
Intermediate Applied Statistics STAT 460 Lecture 17, 11/10/2004 Instructor: Aleksandra (Seša) Slavković TA: Wang Yu
Advanced Meta-Analyses Heterogeneity Analyses Fixed & Random Efffects models Single-variable Fixed Effects Model – “Q” Wilson Macro for Fixed Efffects.
Basic Analysis of Factorial Designs The F-tests of a Factorial ANOVA Using LSD to describe the pattern of an interaction.
Chapter 17 Comparing Multiple Population Means: One-factor ANOVA.
Regression Models w/ 2-group & Quant Variables Sources of data for this model Variations of this model Main effects version of the model –Interpreting.
10 Experimental Research: One-Way Designs What types of evidence allow us to conclude that one variable causes another variable? How do experimental research.
Sources of Variance & ANOVA BG ANOVA –Partitioning Variation –“making” F –“making” effect sizes Things that “influence” F –Confounding –Inflated within-condition.
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200, COMM200, GEOG200, PA200, POL200, or SOC200 Lecture Section 001, Spring 2015 Room 150 Harvill.
ONE-WAY BETWEEN-GROUPS ANOVA Psyc 301-SPSS Spring 2014.
EXPERIMENTS: PART 3. Overview  Goodwin7 and these lecture notes mainly provide a review of key concepts and additional practice  Mastery needed for.
Smith/Davis (c) 2005 Prentice Hall Chapter Fifteen Inferential Tests of Significance III: Analyzing and Interpreting Experiments with Multiple Independent.
Introduction to “Kinds” of 2-way Factorial Designs Incorporating within-groups comparisons ANOVA for BG, MG & WG designs Applying LSD mmd to kxk designs.
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200, COMM200, GEOG200, PA200, POL200, or SOC200 Lecture Section 001, Fall 2015 Room 150 Harvill.
Varieties of Research Designs 3x3 Structure for single-IV designs –(3) Design differences & causal interpretability –(3) Design differences & statistical.
Handout Ten: Mixed Design Analysis of Variance EPSE 592 Experimental Designs and Analysis in Educational Research Instructor: Dr. Amery Wu Handout Ten:
Bullied as a child? Are you tall or short? 6’ 4” 5’ 10” 4’ 2’ 4”
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200, COMM200, GEOG200, PA200, POL200, or SOC200 Lecture Section 001, Fall 2015 Room 150 Harvill.
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 12: Single Variable Between- Subjects Research 1.
Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Independent Samples ANOVA: A Conceptual Introduction 2.Introduction To Basic Ratios 3.Basic Ratios In Excel 4.Cumulative.
T-tests Chi-square Seminar 7. The previous week… We examined the z-test and one-sample t-test. Psychologists seldom use them, but they are useful to understand.
F-Tables & Basic Ratios. Outline of Today’s Discussion 1.Some F-Table Exercises 2.Introduction to Basic Ratios [Between-Subject ANOVA] 3.Independent Samples.
Analyzing Data. Learning Objectives You will learn to: – Import from excel – Add, move, recode, label, and compute variables – Perform descriptive analyses.
Test the Main effect of A Not sign Sign. Conduct Planned comparisons One-way between-subjects designs Report that the main effect of A was not significant.
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). t test --Uses the t statistic to compare 2 means One-Way ANOVA --Also know as the F test --Uses the F statistic.
Six Easy Steps for an ANOVA 1) State the hypothesis 2) Find the F-critical value 3) Calculate the F-value 4) Decision 5) Create the summary table 6) Put.
More statistics questions answered: "The brain? I think it's in here"
Psych 200 Methods & Analysis
Dependent-Samples t-Test
Main Effects and Interaction Effects
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics
Analysis of Variance: repeated measures
Presentation transcript:

WG ANOVA Analysis of Variance for Within- groups or Repeated measures Between Groups and Within-Groups ANOVA WG ANOVA & WG t-tests When to use each Similarities & Differences Selecting ANOVA variables for SPSS Computation & notation stuff

ANOVA (F) Types Between Groups ANOVA –we collect the quantitative variable from each participant, who is only ever in one condition of the qualitative variable –also called “between subjects”, “independent groups”, “independent subjects”, and “cross sectional” Within-Groups ANOVA –we collect the quantitative variable from each participant, who is in all conditions of the qualitative variable (one at a time, of course) –also called “within-subjects”, “dependent groups”, “dependent subjects”, “repeated measures” designs, and “longitudinal” designs

Between Subjects (Between Groups) Control Experimental Kim Kate Will Sue John Sam Dani Dom Within-subjects (Within-groups, Repeated Measures) Control Experimental Kim Kate Kim Kate John Sam John Sam

Comparison of BG & WG ANOVA Data collection is different for the two –BG - each participant is only in one condition –WG - each participant will be in all conditions Same H0: (No mean difference) Same kind of RH (expected mean difference) Computation is slightly different for BG & WG H0: testing is the same p <.05 or F-crit < F-obt Determining Causality is the Same –random assignment (initial equivalence) –manipulation of IV (temporal precedence and ongoing eq –control of procedural variables (ongoing equivalence)

What about within-groups t-tests? –Whenever you want to compare the means on a quantitative variable for a group of participants who provide data in two conditions, you can use either a WG ANOVA or a WG t-test –The two procedures will produce exactly the same group means p-value & NHST results t 2 = F ANOVA dferror = t-test df –We will emphasize ANOVA in this class, because it is used somewhat more often, and because, unlike t-tests, can be used for larger designs (with more IV conditions – later!)

Practice With Determining Whether Design is BG or WG Here’s two different versions of a study to test that “more practice leads to better performance”-- which is BG and which WG Each person is introduced to the task and either performs immediately (score is # correct of 10), or is given 30 practices first and then performs (and is scored the same way). Each person is introduced to the task and immediately performs (score is # correct out of 10) and is then given 30 practices and performs again (getting another scores of #correct out of 10). WG BG

Some more practice... WG BG WGWG A researcher wants to know whether eating chocolate will make you more relaxed. 50 people eat ch ocolate 3 times a day for 2 months, and another 50 people are forced to eat only bread & water for 3 times a day for 2 months. Anxiety was assessed at the end of the 2 months, using a standardized interview. A researcher wants to know whether people 70+ years old experience more difficulty driving at night or during daylight hours. 20 participants first drive during the day and then during the night, receiving ratings of driving accuracy (using a 20-point scale) during each drive. A researcher has decided that watching the Simpsons will make you demented. 10 people were in the ‘No Simpson’ condition & another 10 people watched the Simpsons for 2 hours per day. At the end of the week, the participants filled out a dementia scale. To test the notion that Tokay Geckos are more active feeders at night than during the day, the researcher followed each of 12 geckos around for 24 hours and recorded the number of bugs (pets, small children, whatever) they ate during lighted and dark hours.

A bit about BG & WG ANOVA on SPSS … For BG designs: we describe the design using the IV & the DV the SPSS data set includes the IV condition value & the DV score for each participant when requesting a BG ANOVA – we specify the IV & the DV For WG designs: we describe the design using the IV & the DV the SPSS data set includes the DV score for each IV condition for each participant when requesting a WG ANOVA – we specify the DV score for each IV condition Example: IV = #Practices  10 vs. 20 DV = % correct BG – RA each participant to 10 or 20 practices record % on last practice put into SPSS  #Practices (10, coded as 1 or 20, coded as 2) & % correct WG – Each participant practices 20 times; measure DV from 10 th and 20 th practice put into SPSS  % correct on 10 th practice & % correct on 20 th practice

Your turn – tell type of design & pick which 2 variables to specify in SPSS … We wanted to know whether females or males studied more hours per week for this class. Design ? What’s the IV? What’s the DV? Which two variables would go into SPSS (yes, pick 2 – only 2) gender Draw the boxes! # hours study BG gender # hours # hours males study # hours females study We wanted to know whether students studied more hours per week for the lecture or the laboratory of this class. Design ? What’s the IV? What’s the DV? Which two variables would go into SPSS (yes, pick 2 – only 2) lecture vs. lab # hours study # hours study for lecture # hours study for lab WG # hours Lecture vs. Lab Male Female Lab Lecture

A bit about computational notation for WG ANOVA… As before, sort the DV data (X) from the study into two columns – one for each condition. Then make a column of squared values (X 2 ) for each condition sum each column -- making a ∑ X & ∑ X 2 for each group Make a new column that is the sum of each participants scores Make another column that is the square of each participants sum sum the squared values Before Therapy (k1) After Therapy (k2) X X X ∑ X k1 ∑ X k ∑ X k2 ∑ X k2 2 S S ∑ S 2

A bit about computational notation for WG ANOVA, continued … Other symbols you’ll need to know are… N = total number of data pairs (i.e, # of participants) n = number of participants in each condition of the study Yep … N = n k = number of conditions in the study ∑ X k1 ∑ X k1 2 ∑ X k2 ∑ X k2 2 The computations for WG ANOVA are slightly different – there are more kinds and some of the formulas are different – but all the various calculations will use combinations of these five terms – be sure you are using the correct one ! ∑S2∑S2