March 2009 Current Status of Biotech Patenting In India Kausalya Santhanam Ph.D Patent Agent USPTO, IPO Confidential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Keys to Successful Commercialization Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. Tucson, Arizona October 18, 2001.
Advertisements

The Intellectual Property Rights Regime in India & US: The Evolving Landscape February 15, 2014, The Hyatt Regency Hotel, New Delhi D. CALAB GABRIEL.
Patenting Antisense Oligonucleotides and Methods
Proteomics Examination Yvonne (Bonnie) Eyler Technology Center 1600 Art Unit 1646 (703)
Utility and Written Description Steve Kunin Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy Esther Kepplinger Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations.
1 Homology Language Brian R. Stanton Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (703)
April 19,2007Markpatent.Org1 DRAFTING & PROCECUTING PHARMA AND BIOTECH PATENTS IN INDIA BY Dr. Rajeshkumar H. Acharya.
Diagnostics: Patent Eligibility and the Industry Perspective
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
1 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph and the Wands Analysis Remy Yucel, SPE 1636 (571)
Antibody Patents in India Pravin Anand 14 th October 2011 Anand and Anand.
1 35 USC 112, 1 st paragraph enablement Enablement Practice in TC 1600 Deborah Reynolds, SPE
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
Gene Therapy: Overcoming Enablement Rejections Karen M. Hauda Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 1632 (703)
Proteomics and “Orphan” Receptors Yvonne (Bonnie) Eyler Technology Center 1600 Art Unit 1646 (703)
“REACH-THROUGH CLAIMS”
1 Biotechnology Partnership Meeting April 17, 2001 James Martinell Senior Level Examiner Technology Center 1600.
Intellectual Property March 4, 2015 Don Keach Director, Intellectual Property Development and Technology Transfer Office Copyright University of Kentucky.
P A T E N T A T T O R N E Y S The EPO‘s approach in assessing inventive step for antibody claims Dr. Andreas Hübel M I C H A L S K I H Ü T T E R M A N.
Antibody Patents in the United States Dan Altman Knobbe Martens Olsen & Bear, LLP Dan Altman Knobbe Martens Olsen & Bear, LLP.
1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) Gary Jones SPE, Technology Center 1600 (703)
Animals and Transgenesis Peter Paras, Jr.. 2 Overview Introduction — Definitions Types of Transgenic Animals — How they are made Examination of Transgenic.
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Topic: Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Topic: Examining Issues When.
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
Issues in Patenting Proteins Jon P Weber, SPE 1657.
Intellectual Property Overview for the Academic Researcher AMSTER ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP December 9, 2008 Kenneth George.
Examination Issues: Immunology Yvonne (Bonnie) Eyler Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 USPTO (571)
1 Unity of Invention: Biotech Examples TC1600 Special Program Examiner Julie Burke (571)
1 Intellectual Property Protection for Plants in the United States Anne Marie Grünberg Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Units 1661 and 1638.
Stem Cells Peter Paras, Jr.. 2 Overview Introduction — Definitions Types of Stem Cells — Origin Examination of Stem Cell Claims — Statutes — Sample Claims.
Meanwhile in Europe: HGS Inc v Eli Lilly & co The industrial application test for novel proteins: All in the family? AIPLA Biotech committee meeting 25.
Patenting Antibodies in Europe
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
Korean Patent System and Recent Changes. Practices in Chemistry. Bong Sig SONG Korean Patent Attorney Y. S. CHANG & ASSOCIATES February 9 th 2008.
Broadening the Scope of the Claims in Gene Therapy Applications Deborah Reynolds Detailee, TCPS
1 Kathleen Kerr Bragdon Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 Kathleen Kerr Bragdon Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600 Patents.
Biotech Inventions in Latin America Argentina Ignacio Sánchez Echagüe Marval, O’Farrell & Mairal.
The Patent Document II Class Notes: January 23, 2003 Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003 Professor Wagner.
Impact of Myriad Decisions on Patent Eligibility of Biotechnology Inventions in Australia and the US.
© 2011 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is the property of Barnes & Thornburg LLP which may not be reproduced,
Biotechnology in Medicine Chapter 12.
Patenting Biotechnology in Japan and recent hot issues AIPLA Mid-Winter Meeting January 25, 2012 Ayako Kobayashi TMI Associates.
Intellectual Property, Patents & Technology Transfer Sagar Manoli Shashidhar, Philippe Abdel-Sayed Responsible Conduct in Biomedical Research EPFL,
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Technology Center 1600 Michael P. Woodward Unity of Invention: Biotech Examples.
Josiah Hernandez Patentability Requirements. Useful Having utilitarian or commercial value Novel No one else has done it before If someone has done it.
1 Written Description Analysis and Capon v. Eshhar Jeffrey Siew Supervisory Patent Examiner AU 1645 USPTO (571)
© 2011 Dannemann Siemsen. Todos os direitos reservados. Biotech IP issues in Brazil Gustavo Morais May 2011 Gustavo Morais May 2011.
Patentability of Reach-Through Claims Brian R. Stanton Practice Specialist Technology Center 1600 (703)
© J. Straus Patenting of Genes and Life Forms, and the impact of Patenting on Upstream Science Joseph Straus, Munich WIPO Open Forum on the Draft.
Patentability Considerations in the 3-D Structure Arts Patentability Considerations in the 3-D Structure Arts Michael P. Woodward Supervisory Patent Examiner.
Trilateral Project WM4 Report on comparative study on Examination Practice Relating to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and Haplotypes. Linda S.
1 Demystifying the Examination of Stem Cell-Related Inventions Remy Yucel, Ph.D. Supervisory Patent Examiner Technology Center 1600 United States Patent.
Intellectual Property Rights and Pharmaceutical Industry
Examining Claims for Compliance with 35 U.S.C. 112(a): Part II – Enablement Focus on Electrical/Mechanical and Computer/Software-related Claims August.
Patent Protection of Biotechnological Inventions in China Gesheng Huang Partner Zhongzi Law Office AIPLA Spring Meeting, May 12-14, 2011, San Francisco,
Vector Claims in Gene Therapy Applications: In vivo vs. In vitro Utilities Deborah Reynolds SPE GAU
Patenting Interfering RNA John LeGuyader – SPE Art Unit 1635 (571)
How to Claim your Biotech- Based Invention Deborah Reynolds Detailee, TCPS
1 Enablement Issues in Pharmaceutical Claims Joseph K. M c Kane Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit Ardin Marschel Supervisory Patent.
Examination Practice in Applications Presenting “Reach-Through Claims” George Elliott Practice Specialist Technology Center 1600
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 16, 2009 Class 2 Introduction to Patents.
Patents II Disclosure Requirements Class 12 Notes Law 507 | Intellectual Property | Spring 2004 Professor Wagner.
1 Utility Guidelines, Homology Claims and Anti-Sense Molecule Claims Drew Hissong, Ph.D. dhissong*sughrue.com Sughrue Mion, PLLC
Patenting Biotechnology in Japan and recent hot issues
Law 677 | Patent Law | Spring 2003
Patents II Disclosure Requirements
Stem Cells Peter Paras, Jr.
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
Examination Practice in Applications Presenting “Reach-Through Claims”
Examination Issues: Immunology
Presentation transcript:

March 2009 Current Status of Biotech Patenting In India Kausalya Santhanam Ph.D Patent Agent USPTO, IPO Confidential

Patents  Legal monopoly limited in scope and duration (20 years)  National in scope  Exclusionary in nature Commercial Attributes  Novelty  Inventive Step (Non-obviousness)  Industrial Application (utility) Patentability Confidential

Composition  Nucleic acid sequence  Protein sequences  Antibodies  Small Molecules Protectable Inventions in Biotech Method of Use  Treatment  Diagnosis  Screening Tools  Machines  Devices Process  Method of Making  Synthesis Confidential 3(d) Mere discovery of - a new form - a new property - a new use of a known compound not patentable unless differ significantly with regard to efficacy

 Article 27 of TRIPS provides the basis for patentability  US patent law grants patent to microorganisms when modified by human intervention (Diamond v Chakraborty, US Supr. Court, 1980)  EPO has similar law with regard to patenting microorganisms  Patentability Criteria – Novelty, Inventive step (Non-Obvious in US), Industrial applicability (Utility in US)  Patenting of transgenic animals – Allowed in the US (ex: oncomouse); treated on a case by case basis elsewhere  Dimminaco A.G. v Controller of Patents & Designs (Calcutta High Court, 2002) History and Facts Biotech Inventions Confidential

 Section 3 (Patent Amendment 2003) establishes Patentability Criteria for microbiological processes  Microbiological process that can be established as ‘inventions’ are patentable  Patentability Criteria – Novelty, Inventive step, Industrial applicability  Biological material deposited at MTCC and Gene Bank, IMTech, Chandigarh - all characteristics for identification of the microbial sample - access to material allowed after publication of the application - disclose the geographical source of the biological material  Indian law does not allow patenting of animal, whole or part Indian Patent Act Biotech Inventions Confidential

Biotech Inventions What is patentable? Taq polymerase naturally-occurring Purification from T. aquaticus PCR Recombinant form of Taq polymerase Novel? Obvious? Useful? Confidential

Biotech Inventions The catch…  Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs)  Gene Fragments  SNPs  Genetic Tests (screening, diagnostic)  Proteins  Stem Cells Novel? Obvious? Enablement? Written Description? Useful? Confidential

SpecificSubstantial Credible Utility - US Industrial Applicability – EP and others Real WorldWell established OR Biotech Inventions Patentability Confidential

35 USC § 112, 1 st paragraph The specification shall contain a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains…to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention Three Prong requirement in the specification  Written Description  Enablement  Best Mode Patentability - US Confidential

Written Description Requirement  A patent specification must describe an invention in sufficient detail that one skilled in the art can conclude that the inventor had possession of the claimed invention  Possession can be shown by i. Actual reduction to practice ii. Reduction to drawings iii. Describe relevant identifying characteristics - structure - functional characteristics (with a correlation between structure and function) - physical characteristics - chemical characteristics - combination of the above Patentability - US Confidential

Enablement Requirement  Disclosure of information sufficient for the ordinary skilled person to make and use the full scope of the claimed invention  Disclosure should facilitate the making and using [of the invention] without undue experimentation Due to unpredictable nature of biotech, enablement requirement is high Patentability - US Confidential

Written Description and Enablement (35 USC § 112) Ex: The composition of claim 1 wherein said nucleotide sequences are selected from the group consisting of: - the N. gonorroheae DNA insert of ATCC 53409, ATCC and ATCC and discrete nucleotide subsequences thereof… Ex: An isolated polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: XX selected from the group consisting of: - a mature form of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: XX - a variant of the mature form of an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: XX - a fragment of the mature form of the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: XX Written Description can be satisfied by depositing the biological material (Enzo Biochem. Inc. v Gen-Probe Inc., Fed. Cir. 2002) Biotech Inventions Patentability Requirements Yes x No Confidential

Biotech Inventions Patentability Requirements Enablement (35 USC § 112) Ex: US5,756,349 Vertebrate cells which can be propagated in vitro and which are capable upon growth in culture of producing erythropoietin in the medium of their growth in excess of 100 U of erythropoietin per 10.sup.6 cells in 48 hours as determined by radioimmunoassay, said cells comprising non-human DNA sequences which control transcription of DNA encoding human erythropoietin Enabled? By Describing ‘a way’ to make EPO… Can Amgen claim all cells that propagate in vitro comprising non-human DNA sequence that control transcription of DNA encoding human erythropoietin? Amgen v Hoechst (Fed. Cir. 2003) Confidential

 For those skilled in the art it is relatively simple to determine - whether a certain promoter will work within a specific vertebrate cell - whether a particular vertebrate cell will produce human EPO in culture - whether a particular promoter could be operatively linked to control the transcription Outcome…  Those skilled in the art can readily use various cell cultures (vertebrate) to produce human EPO  Publications (in the given area) that demonstrate the extent of the enabling disclosure Biotech Inventions Patentability Requirements Confidential

Enablement Wands Factors (In re Wands, Fed. Cir. 1988) - Nature of the invention - State of the Prior Art - Level of ordinary skill in the art - Level of predictability - Amount of Direction - Presence of working examples - Breadth of claims - Quantity of experimentation Biotech Inventions Patentability Requirements Confidential

 Nucleotide, Protein sequences  Promoters  Vectors  Epitope sequences and Antibodies  Processes used for making the protein  Method of Use(s): diagnostic, treatment, screening  Pharmaceutical Product Gene Inventions and exemplary claims Biotech Inventions Confidential

 Improvement Strategies (ex: transgenics, knock-outs)  Gene expression methodology (ex: antisense, target specific expression)  Gene expression materials (ex: specific promoters)  Gene Constructs Biotech Inventions Enabling Technologies Confidential

Bioinformatics GenomicsProteomicsClinical/Regulatory Highthroughput Tools Data Mining Data Storage Data AnalysisPattern Recognition Molecular Modeling Predictive Tools Biotech Inventions Confidential

Biotech Inventions  Client oriented – Diverse needs: breadth of claims?  Anticipate and prevent competition is difficult  Scarce judicial precedent  Invention obsolete? Bioinformatics – Challenges in Patenting Confidential

Other Issues…  Bits and pieces: Allowing a single genomic gene to be patented in several ways (ex: fragments, SNPs, peptides)  Preventing knowledge sharing (decrease in publications) and impeding research activities  Social, ethical and religious issues (ex: stem cell research) Biotech Patenting Confidential

Source: Indian Patent Office, Annual Report Biotech Patents - India Indian Patent Applications Filed/Granted between 2000 to 2005 in allied areas YearBiotechChemicalDrug /0787/353883/ /0778/483879/ /0776/399966/ /02952/ / /713916/

Biotech Patents - India  First Product Patent Granted (post 2005 era) Pegasys (Roche) – Pegylated IFNα 2a  Increase in no. of Biotech Application Filings Homegrown company filings less in no.? Homegrown companies filed outside India pre-2005?  Product vs Process Applications Process Product  Patent Examiners About Dwindling  Patent Examining Process Training in specific fields/art  Oppositions

Goal: Tie Applications to Appropriate Process Points Identification Cell ValidationAnimal Validation/ Preclinical Clinical Drug Discovery ProvisionalUpdated Provisional/UtilityUtility/CIPUtility Composition and MOU Formulation and Dose 12 months Integration of IP and Research Product Confidential

Portfolio Management Identification of >25 Compounds Biology Validation In vitro Studies Chemistry IP Preclinical Animal Studies, Pk, Tox Clinical Phase I, II <2 Products Licensing or Partnering deals IP Audits Project Management Disease GroupsIP Regulatory Affairs Formulation/ Manufacturing Marketing - Patent Application Confidential

IP Strategies – Related Applications Building a fortress around the basic Invention/ technology Confidential Gillette Mach 3 Core Technology (Diamond like Coating) Use of 3 staggered Blade getting progressively closer to skin Rubberized contour grip for better handling Vacuum chamber in which the DLC blade coating was applied Indicator strip signaling when the shaver is no longer experiencing ‘the optimal shave’ Single point cartridge loading system - Avoiding upside down attachment New forward pivot design positioning the blades in an optimal shaving position

Thank You! March, 2009