HL7 Clinical Genomics – Implementation Roadmap The HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Helmut König, Siemens Medical Solutions
Advertisements

Archetypes in HL7 v2 Andrew McIntyre Medical-Objects HL7 International May 2009.
Message Simplification Making Version 3 as easy to implement as Version 2 – but with sound semantics
1 HL7 Jan 2007 Working Group MeetingsPharmacogenomics Update RCRIM TC Philip M. Pochon Covance Enterprise Architecture.
1 Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Genetics Institute Marc S. Williams, M.D. Director Grant M. Wood Senior IT Strategist Introduction to HL7 Clinical.
1 HL7 Jan 2010 Working Group MeetingsCTLAB Pharmacogenomics Update JOINT RCRIM and CG Session CTLAB Message Pharmacogenomics Results Overview.
HL7 Clinical Genomics and Structured Documents Work Groups CDA Implementation Guide: Genetic Testing Report DRAFT PROPOSAL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD
HL7 Clinical Genomics – RIM Constraining Issues May 2008 The HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Co-chair and Modeling.
HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG: Tissue-Typing Models and a Reusable Genotype Module HL7 V3 Compliant HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG Facilitator Amnon Shabo (Shvo)
HL7 v3 Clinical Genomics – Overview
BRIDG Overview Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008.
IHIC 2011 – Orlando, FL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator HL7 Structured Documents WG.
HL7 Now and After PlugIT HL7 Finland , PlugIT, Kuopio, MicroTower Timo Tarhonen, Tietotarha ( Co-chair.
S&I Framework Testing HL7 V2 Lab Results Interface and RI Pilot Robert Snelick National Institute of Standards and Technology June 23 rd, 2011 Contact:
FHIR Without the smoke. FHIR Experience In the last 4 weeks, we have been busy. We … Prototyped a Device Data Aggregator/Reporter using FHIR resources.
C-CDA Constraints FACA - Strategy Discussion June 23, 2014 Mark Roche, MD.
Clinical Genomics Work Group (HL7) Mukesh Sharma Washington University in St. Louis.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Creating Architectural Descriptions. Outline Standardizing architectural descriptions: The IEEE has published, “Recommended Practice for Architectural.
© CDISC SHARE TA Research Concepts Pilot. © CDISC 2014 SHARE TA RC Pilot SHARE TA RC Pilot: Bringing together the TA Project RC experience with.
LRI Validation Suite Meeting November 1st, Agenda Review of LIS Test Plan Template CLIA Testing EHR testing (Juror Document)—Inspection Testing.
EsMD Harmonization WG Meeting Wednesday, June 13 th, 2012.
A Model Driven Approach for Cross Paradigm Interoperability using OMG’s MDMI Standard Cross Paradigm Working Group.
3/18/19990© 1999, Health Level Seven, Inc. Introduction: Vocabulary domains Marital Status –single (never married) –married –divorced –separated “Vocabulary”
Harmonization of SHARPn Clinical Element Models with CDISC SHARE Clinical Study Data Standards Guoqian Jiang, MD, PhD Mayo Clinic On behalf of CDISC CEMs.
FHIM Overview How the FHIM can organize other information modeling efforts.
HL7 Version 3 – A new implementation direction Grahame Grieve CfH / Jiva / HL7 Australia co-chair Infrastructure & Messaging TS Project Lead, Eclipse OHF.
Model-Driven Health Tools (MDHT) CDA Tools Overview
HL7 Study Data Standards Project Crystal Allard CDER Office of Computational Science Food and Drug Administration February 13,
NHS CFH Approach to HL7 CDA Rik Smithies Chair HL7 UK NProgram Ltd.
HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG: A Shared Genotype Model HL7 V3 Compliant HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG Facilitator Amnon Shabo (Shvo) IBM Research Lab in Haifa.
Agenda Introduction to MDHT MDHT Capabilities MDHT support using Consolidated CDA 1.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1 Patient Care Devices Domain Test Effort Integrating.
Automating the production of CDA R2 artefacts using openEHR Archetypes and Templates. Making Health Compute December 5 th, 2007.
Clinical Genomics Work Group (HL7) Mukesh Sharma Washington University in St. Louis June 16, 2011.
SMART/FHIR Genomic Resources
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
10/27/111 Longitudinal Care Work Group (LCWG) Proposal to Re-Scope and Re-Name the LTPAC WG.
New ITS Investigation NHS CfH Research Report Grahame Grieve, Laura Sato, Charlie McCay.
HL7 v3 Clinical Genomics – Overview The HL7 Clinical Genomics Work Group Prepared by Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling.
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 3b National and International Standards Developing.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1.
This material was developed by Duke University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.
Building WormBase database(s). SAB 2008 Wellcome Trust Sanger Insitute Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory California Institute of Technology ● RNAi ● Microarray.
DICOM SR / CDA Rel.2 Mapping San Antonio WGM, May 2006 Helmut König Co-Chair II SIG / DICOM WG20 Siemens Medical Solutions.
S&I PAS SWG March 20, 2012 Consolidated CDA (C-CDA) Presentation 1.
HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG: Tissue-Typing Models and a Reusable Genotype Module HL7 V3 Compliant IBM Research Lab in Haifa together with Hadassah University.
Query Health Technical WG 6/14/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Announcements2:05 – 2:10 pm RI and Spec Updates2:05 – 2:10 pm QRDA Discussion2:10 – 3:00 pm.
Part I: Introduction to SHARPn Normalization Hongfang Liu, PhD, Mayo Clinic Tom Oniki, PhD, Intermountain Healthcare.
Should We Standardize the text/xml Form of DICOM Objects Returned by WADO? DICOM Working Group 10 Munich, Germany, 2 September 2004 Should We Standardize.
DICOM Security Andrei Leontiev, Dynamic Imaging Presentation prepared by: Lawrence Tarbox, Ph.D. Chair, WG 14 Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Washington.
Collaborating With Your Health Plan 03/07/05 To paraphrase A. Einstein: We cannot solve today’s problems with the same level of thinking that created them.
CIMA and Semantic Interoperability for Networked Instruments and Sensors Donald F. (Rick) McMullen Pervasive Technology Labs at Indiana University
New ITS and Wrappers R2 Charlie McCay
THE DICOM 2014 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR August 26Chengdu, China HL7 and DICOM: Complementary Standards, Collaborating Organizations Bao Yongjian Principal.
CDA Overview HL7 CDA IHE Meeting, February 5, 2002 Slides from Liora Alschuler, alschuler.spinosa Co-chair HL7.
HL7 V2 and V3 – where next? Charlie McCay HL7UK Chair-elect
1 Model Driven Health Tools Design and Implementation of CDA Templates Dave Carlson Contractor to CHIO
NAACCR Data Standards Activities to Achieve Interoperability Ken Gerlach, Chair NAACCR Interoperability Ad Hoc Committee June 12, NAACCR Annual.
HL7 Clinical Genomics – Domain Information Model The HL7 Clinical Genomics Work Group Prepared by Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair.
NAACCR CDA Pilot Project - Overview, Status, and Findings 2009 NAACCR Conference Ken Gerlach, Co-Chair, NAACCR Clinical Data Work Group; Health Scientist,
Model-Driven Health Tools (MDHT) CDA Tools Overview John T.E. Timm (IBM Research) and David A. Carlson (Veterans.
The use of LOINC in CDISC Standards German CDISC Users Meeting Stuttgart Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma.
Object Hierarchy Containment Tree
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Networking and Health Information Exchange
Nutrition in HL7 Standards
Nutrition in HL7 Standards
The use of LOINC in CDISC Standards
Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008
Presentation transcript:

HL7 Clinical Genomics – Implementation Roadmap The HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator HL7 Structured Documents TC CDA R2 Co-editor CCD Implementation Guide Co-editor

Haifa Research Lab 2 V2 :||: V3 Challenges  What should be the position of the HL7 community towards independent modeling attempts of v2 messages applied to new domains that have been solely modeled in v3?  What’s the long term vision?  Gradual conversion to v3 until v2 is deprecated? Or -  V2/V3 Co-existent? If so - how?  Divergence is the current situation:  V3 and V2 ‘languages’ have different semantics  V2 - V3 ‘attribute mapping’ does NOT help when semantics at the source level is different, e.g., different structures, dynamics, etc.

Haifa Research Lab 3 Proposed Approach  Recognize V3 models as a single source of semantics  Refer to V2 messages is a partial v3 implementation  Automatically generate v2 messages from v3 models, much like the V3 XML ITS  Acknowledge the incompleteness of the v2 implementation, but  Address specific requirements of use cases  Let the operator of the v3  v2 generator make domain choices  Document the gaps  Imply missing semantics from the v3 models

Haifa Research Lab 4 A Proposed Roadmap for CG Implementations V3 XML ITS Family History Implementation V2 message generation Genetic testing Implementation Balloted informative implementation specifications CDISC SDTM Pharmacogemomics Implementation Technologies: The Clinical Genomics semantics: represented by normative HL7 V3 Models

Haifa Research Lab 5 Example: The GeneticVariation Model Geneti c Loci Geneti c Locus Individual Allele Sequenc e Variation Sequence (observed or reference) Genetic Document participants Associated data (vocab. Controlled)

Haifa Research Lab 6 New ITS Tool: Domain-Specific V3  V2 Generator OBR OBX OBR OBX OBR OBX OBR OBX Genetic LociGenetic LocusIndividual AlleleSequence Variation PID Subject OBR OBX Associated data User-defined preferences

Haifa Research Lab 7 GeneticVariation in V2 (with V3 similarities) e.g., GeneticLoci.interpretationCode V3 GeneticLoci overall ‘summary’ V3 GeneticLocus & SequenceVariation e.g., GeneticLocus.value

Haifa Research Lab 8 What Should the V3  V2 ITS Tool Facilitate?  Consistently capture v3 structural codes & clone names in v2 fields (is it doable?)  The choice of v2 ‘common patterns’, e.g.:  Patterns of implementing v3 nesting clones (Sub-ID? Parent id?)  Document common gaps like v3 associations  Transform v3 XML schemas to v2 XML-encoded and on to v2 ASCII