 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Extension Specialist University of Delaware Cooperative Extension.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.
Planning for Our Future:
Christopher Brosch University of Maryland Modeling Subcommittee Meeting January 11, 2012.
Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Partnering, Leadership & Management Partnering, Leadership.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
1 The Chesapeake Bay Program James Edward, Deputy Director EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office CAC meeting, June 1, 2012 EO Action Plan, Progress Report.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Specialist; UD Cooperative Extension Chair, Chesapeake Bay Program Water Quality Goal Implementation Team.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Update Chesapeake Action Plan – Report to Congress Strengthening the Management, Coordination, and Accountability of the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership.
Chesapeake Bay Program Presented by: Elizabeth Mills, Heather Plumridge, Elizabeth Repko Possibilities, Problems, and Promise.
Maintaining healthy watersheds in the Chesapeake LGAC meeting December 4, 2014 Mark Bryer The Nature Conservancy Chair, Healthy Watershed Goal Team.
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Local Government Advisory Committee March 14, 2014.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
GIT 6 Role in Advising Management Board on Alignment Issues Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice-chair.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee December 3, 2013.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure (and millions of dollars in savings): Balancing our investment in the Chesapeake by maintaining healthy.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.
Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office
James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
CBP Agreement and EC Membership Options for Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration April 17,
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,
Indicator Status Updates Overview Nita Sylvester, EPA CBPO Chair of STAR’s Indicator Workgroup.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
State of the Chesapeake Bay Program Nick DiPasquale, CBP Director, EPA Executive Council Annual Meeting June 16,
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Nick DiPasquale, Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency December 4, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing and.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
CBP GIT Implementation Workgroup Structure Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Goal Implementation.
Chesapeake Bay Program
CRC Staffer Update Megan Hession Habitat Goal Implementation Team.
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Local Planning Process…
Concepts and Timeline for Developing a CBP Biennial Strategy Review System (DRAFT) October 31, 2016 (DRAFT)
Current VA Ag Initiatives
The Watershed Agreement and the Phase 3 WIPs
Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
CBP Organizational Structure
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Presentation transcript:

 Jennifer Volk Environmental Quality Extension Specialist University of Delaware Cooperative Extension

 The CBP is a partnership o Federal agencies o State agencies o Local governments o Non-profit organizations o Academic institutions

 Federal agencies o Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) o US Department of Agriculture (USDA) o US Forest Service (USFS) o US Geological Survey (USGS) o US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) o And more  State agencies o Natural Resources/Environmental departments o Agricultural departments o Parks and Recreation groups o Fish and Wildlife agencies  Local Governments DNREC MDA DDA DCR DNR MDE DEQ DEP DCNR PDA DEC DAF Alphabet soup!

 Non-profit organizations o Chesapeake Bay Foundation o Center for Watershed Protection o Ducks Unlimited o National Fish and Wildlife Foundation o And more  Academic institutions o Land grant universities o Cooperative Extension programs o Sea Grant programs o Research centers and consortiums o And more

 Brings together diverse leaders and experts across numerous political boundaries to collaborate on achieving a common goal –a healthy bay o Consolidate and coordinate efforts o Share resources o Compliment efforts and avoid duplication  Partners come together to evaluate data, share best practices, report on progress toward goals, and make policy and management decision

 1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement o Signed by governors of Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia; mayor of District of Columbia; administrator of EPA; chair of Chesapeake Bay Commission o Signatories became the Executive Council  1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement o 40% nitrogen reduction by 2000  Chesapeake 2000 o Goals to reduce pollution, restore habitat, protect living resources, promote sound land use practices, and engage the public o Headwater states (Delaware, New York, West Virginia) joined the water quality restoration efforts

 Executive Order (May 2009) o Increased focus and emphasis on Bay restoration  Total Maximum Daily Load (December 2010) o Set limits on nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment o 100% of the actions to achieve the TMDL must be in place by 2025 o 60% of the actions to be in place by 2017  Watershed Implementation Plans (2010, 2012, 2017) o Outlines how jurisdictions will achieve load reduction goals o Spatial and temporal goals for implementing best management practices (BMPs)  2-Year Milestone Goals o Interim goals that ensure accountability and progress toward 2017 and 2025 targets

Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Partnering, Leadership & Management Partnering, Leadership & Management Maintain Healthy Watersheds Maintain Healthy Watersheds Protect & Restore Water Quality Protect & Restore Water Quality Sustainable Fisheries Sustainable Fisheries Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Goal Implementation Teams Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Implementation Workgroups Management Board Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee Local Government Advisory Committee Local Government Advisory Committee Citizens’ Advisory Committee Citizens’ Advisory Committee Action Teams Social Sciences Laboratory Recommendation Action Team Action Teams Social Sciences Laboratory Recommendation Action Team Chesapeake Executive Council Principals’ Staff Committee Chesapeake Executive Council Principals’ Staff Committee Independent Evaluator Independent Evaluator Communications Workgroup Communications Workgroup Workgroups

GITChairsVice-ChairsCoordinatorsStaffers 1- Sustainable Fisheries NOAAMD (DNR)NOAACRC 2- Protect and Restore Vital Habitats USFWSNGO (Bay Trust)USFWSCRC 3- Protect and Restore Water Quality VA (DEQ)Academic (UDel)EPACRC 4- Maintain Healthy Watersheds NGO (Nature Con.)MD (MdDP)EPACRC 5- Foster Stewardship NPSMD (DNR)NPSCRC 6- Enhance Partg, Leadership, & Mgmt VA (DCNR)EPA CRC STARAcademic (UMd)USGS CRC CommunicationsNPSMD (MDE)NGO (ACB)CRC Summary Total: 4 Fed2 Fed7 Fed0 Fed 2 State4 State0 State 1 NGO 8 NGO-Grantee 1 Academic 0 Academic

Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Enhance Partnering, Leadership & Management Goal Implementation Teams Maintain Healthy Watersheds Maintain Healthy Watersheds Protect & Restore Water Quality Protect & Restore Water Quality Sustainable Fisheries Sustainable Fisheries Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Protect & Restore Vital Habitats Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Foster Chesapeake Stewardship Ches. Bay Stock Assessment Committee Ches. Bay Stock Assessment Committee Stream Health Workgroup Fish Passage Workgroup Agriculture Workgroup Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Workgroup Wetland Workgroup Forestry Workgroup Land Use Workgroup Urban Stormwater Workgroup Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Watershed Technical Workgroup Chesapeake Conservation Corps Action Team Decision Framework Implementation Workgroup Watershed Health Workgroup Education Workgroup Public Access Planning Action Team Land Conservation Priorities Action Team Milestone Workgroup Trading and Offsets Workgroup Maryland and Virginia Interagency Oyster Teams Invasive Catfish Workgroup Communications Workgroup Budget and Assistance Agreement Workgroup BMP Verification Committee

Science Technical Analysis and Reporting Science Technical Analysis and Reporting Modeling Workgroup Indicators Workgroup Analytical Methods & Quality Assurance Workgroup Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup Nontidal Water Quality Workgroup Criteria Assessment Protocol Workgroup Modeling Lab Action Team American Shad Indicator Action Team Brook Trout Action Team

 Mathematical representations of complex systems o Models synthesize large amounts of data The Chesapeake Bay our nations largest estuary! Large watershed with diverse topography and land use Critical habitat for many plants and animals  Model scenarios predict responses to changes in inputs and processes

 Models are part of a toolkit for decision making ResearchMonitoring Modeling Management  Establish Total Maximum Daily Load reductions  Track load changes over time

A series of models!

 Completed in 1982  63 model segments  5 land uses  2 year calibration period  No BMPs simulated Phase 1 Phase 5  Completed in 2010  1,000+ model segments  30 land uses  21 year calibration period  1400 BMP designations Phase 4  Completed in 1998  94 model segments  9 land uses  14 year calibration period  20 BMP designations

 Steady State  Advanced Bay Science  Contributed to initial “40%” goal  10,000 cells  Hydrodynamics resolved tides  Sediment/water interaction  Included living resources  Used for tributary strategies 2008  57,000 cells  Sub-hour hydrodynamics  Oysters  Menhaden

 Improvements in precision, scope, complexity, and accuracy have occurred over time  The Partnership is committed to continuously improving the models  Revisions regularly shared for review, testing, and recommendations by Partnership  New creditable data and restoration practices can be incorporated  Extensive independent scientific peer review

Water Quality GIT Source Workgroup Expert Panel Review by: Source Workgroups Watershed Technical Workgroup Water Quality GIT Watershed Model “Approved BMP list” New/Revised BMP

Agriculture  Nutrient Management  Poultry Litter  Conservation Tillage  Cover Crop Panel  Manure Treatment Technologies  Animal Waste Storage Systems  Manure Injection/Incorporation  Cropland Irrigation Management Urban  Urban Retrofits  Performance Based Management  Stream Restoration  LID and Runoff Reduction  Urban Fertilizer Management  Erosion and Sediment Control  Illicit Discharge Elimination  Impervious Disconnect  Floating Wetlands  MS4 Minimum Management Measures Forestry  Riparian Buffers  Urban Tree Planting  Forest Management  Urban Filter Strips and Upgraded Stream Buffers

 is a partnership between federal, state, and local government agencies, non-profit groups, and academic institutions with a common goal of restoring the health of the Bay.  is organized to allow thorough participation, review, and feedback on a variety of issues to help make management decisions and achieve restoration goals.

 are linked to project loads of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment and simulate how management decisions regarding pollution controls, land use, and atmospheric deposition could impact the ecosystem, specifically focusing on water quality and living resources.  have been and will continue to be modified over time as new and better sources of data become available and as new technologies to reduce pollutant losses are developed and adopted.