1 WHAT IS A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION? THE PARIS PRINCIPLES Chris Sidoti ppt 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAPSI 2nd Public Conference New Hungarian Data Protection and Freedom of Information Authority Tamás Kovács HUNAGI.
Advertisements

Timeline – Choice of Law in International Contracts Mandate given to conduct feasibility study Working Group formed Third Working.
The Registered Human Resources Professionals Act, 2013 RHRPA, 2013.
National human rights institutions. Obligations under HR treaties respect - governments themselves and their agents must not violate human rights protect.
COMPLAINTS AGENCIES IN THE COMMONWEALTH Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative.
The Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina Skopje, October 3-4, 2012 Almedina Karić, Communication and International Relations Adviser.
Den Europæiske Ombudsmand Der Europäische Bürgerbeauftragte Ο Ευρωπαίος Διαμεσολαβητής The European Ombudsman Il Mediatore Europeo Le Médiateur Européen.
Process for Policy Development and Mechanism for Policy Concerns.
DEFINING A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION
The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Kyiv University of Law Anna Vasilchenko Department of International Law Group IL-41.
C UNHCR and Immigrant Council of Ireland National Conference on Statelessness in Ireland 21st October 2014, European Parliament Office National launch.
Implementing article 33 of the Convention: cases, positions and lessons Linnéa Arvidsson Regional Office for Europe UN Human Rights.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
1 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission Activities of the Commission Summary Legal Department Maka Salkhinashvili 26 June - 3.
FUNCTIONING AND POLICIES OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LAW REFORM COMMISSION.
Courts and Tribunals Operation and control of the Courts and Tribunals as well as the legal status of professional Judges and Magistrates, who shall form.
National Human Rights Institutions and the Paris Principles
Commission for the Prevention of Corruption Republic of Slovenia INTEGRITY I ACCOUNTABILITY I RULE OF LAW.
INTERACTION WITH THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM
Module 6 National implementation and monitoring frameworks.
Company LOGO National Human Rights Institutions – history, purpose and functioning–
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
2014 China-EU High Level Forum “China and EU Dialogue: Rule of Law” Subtopic reforming the System of law enforcement: development of administrative oversight.
XXXIX Course on International Law Current Issues in International Development: Some Perspectives from the World Bank Lecture 1 The Rule of Law in the World.
Good practices from and for the EU accountability process Irena Petruškevičienė Vilnius, 17 October 2006.
International Cooperative Banking Association ICBA Paris 21/11/2008 Cooperative Groups and European Legislation Apostolos Ioakimidis Commission of EU,
Maharashtra State Commission For Women January 25, 1993.
NHRI Models Is there a magic formula? Challenges and Practical Aspects.
Human Rights Centre Advancing Human Rights 1. National Human Rights Institutions Adopted in 1993 by the United Nations General Assembly, the Paris Principles.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package – Module 2.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO - UNDERSTANDING THE CODEX ORGANIZATION 2.2 What is Codex?
1 EU LAW WEEK 3 INSTITUTIONS OF THE EU. 2 INSTITUTIONS Institutions of the EU Principal Institutions Advisory Institutions 1.European Parliament 2.The.
Corruption, Democracy and justice Pim Albers Special advisor European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ)
Basic concepts in Human Rights
A SSOCIATION OF P UBLIC A CCOUNTS C OMMITTEES (APAC) Report on SADCOPAC Best Practices Guideline Hon Sipho Makama APAC General Secretary SADCOPAC CONFERENCE.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE National Human Rights Institutions and the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights in Macedonia and the Western Balkans What.
SEYCHELLES EXPERIENCE Hon. Nichole Barbe, PAC Member, Seychelles.
Politics and human rights  Kathalijne Buitenweg  Laurien Koster.
SAI & PAC Relationship Perspective from the Maldives “The work of an SAI, and its relations with parliament are key factors in a strong chain of accountability.
IMPLEMENTING THE GOOD PRACTICE PRINCIPLES FOR PACs: THE CASE OF ZAMBIA Presented by Hon Vincent Mwale, Chairperson of the Public Accounts Committee of.
By Dr. Otiende Amollo, EBS, Chairperson of the Commission on Administrative Justice A Presentation to the Regional Conference for East Africa NHRIs on.
1 Institutions and democratic principles in EU  The functioning of the EU is founded on representative democracy.  Member States are represented in the.
Court of Justice of the European Union, ZS , Praha.
Summary of Resolutions & Best Practice Guide By Hon. Kagiso Molatlhegi, MP. BOTSWANA PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE1.
Myanmar National Human Rights Commission Prepared by Human Rights Education Institute of Burma (HREIB) and Burma Partnership (BP)
Legacy Report of Select Committee on Finance By: Zolani Rento Date: 09 July 2014.
Dr Jarosław Sułkowski.  Constitution of the Republic of Poland  the Act of 15 July 1987 on the Commissioner for Human Rights LEGAL ACTS.
European Labour Law Institutions and their Competencies JUDr. Jana Komendová, Ph.D.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
The European Convention of Human Right Corso di inglese giuridico (M-Z) Prof.ssa C. M. Cascione Università degli Studi di Bari ‘Aldo Moro’ Lezione n. 10.
Law LA1: European Union Institutions European Union Institutions AS Level Law: Unit 1.
Unit A.2 – Strategic Programming, Reports, Consultative Commitee, External Relations P 1 21 March 2005 Istanbul – 21 March 2005 Luc Schaerlaekens Unit.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
Prof. Susanna Cafaro A.A 2014/2015 – Law Faculty. Università del Salento.
Mission, Mandate, Structure By Nils A. Butenschon, Director.
U4 – who we are Operational since 2003 as a web-based resource centre funded by:
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
OVERVIEW OF THE ASMAL REPORT
INVESTORS PROTECTION IN INDIA
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
International Criminal Court (ICC)
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
National Commission for Scheduled Castes
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli:
Movement for One Democratic State in Palestine
DEFINING A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION
International Organisations – General Issues, Part 1
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Mandate & Activities of PC: Home Affairs in Relation to Organs of State 29 July 2014.
EITI - Grievance mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

1 WHAT IS A NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTION? THE PARIS PRINCIPLES Chris Sidoti ppt 1

UN Economic and Social Council – 1946 Member States were invited to consider the desirability of establishing local bodies in the form of information groups or local human rights committees.

NHRIs were being discussed often in the international arena Yet, there were very few NHRIs by 1990 First UN international conference in late 1970s – but conference of States First institutions established in late 1970s and early 1980s

International standards 1991 First International Workshop on National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Paris – workshop of then functioning NHRIs: produced the PARIS PRINCIPLES - drafted by NHRIs themselves, not by States 1992 Endorsed by UN Commission on Human Rights 1993 Adopted by the UN General Assembly

The Paris Principles National human rights institutions are official, independent institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights They should be established and function in accordance with the Paris Principles, international standards for NHRIs

They are required to be established by law (constitution or statute) They are required to have independent members with guarantees of tenure

Independence Legal Operational Policy Financial Membership

Legal independence Separate and independent legal status, either under Constitution or Act of Parliament Allows for independent decision making Able to perform its functions without interference from other government bodies

Operational independence Work without interference Determine their own priorities, programs and activities Draft own rules of procedures

Policy independence Reports, recommendations, decisions are not subject to direction of or review by others Determine their own views, findings and recommendations

Financial independence “The national institution shall have an infrastructure which is suited to the smooth conduct of its activities, in particular adequate funding. The purpose of this funding should be to enable it to have its own staff and premises in order to be independent of the government and not be subject to financial control which might affect its independence.”

Membership Appointed for fixed terms of sufficient length Subject to dismissal only for serious misconduct No government officials in voting positions

Is your NHRI independent? Consider these areas of independence:  Legal  Operational  Policy  Financial  Membership

NHRIs should also have broad mandate jurisdiction relating to universal human rights standards broad functions of research, education and investigation adequate powers adequate resources

Broad functions deal with individual complaints initiate their own investigations address systemic problems make recommendations to government refer investigations to independent prosecutors intervene in court proceedings undertake community education

Adequate powers to compel production of documents to enter and inspect premises to examine witnesses on oath to compel the attendance of a witness, even if in custody prosecutorial powers? determinative powers?