FSUTMS Air Quality Postprocessor presented to Full MTF presented by Diana Fields, FDOT Systems Planning Keli Paul, AICP, Cambridge Systematics November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Centralina Nonattainment Area Elected Officials and City and County Managers and Planners.
Advertisements

Overview of the Mountain Area Transportation Conformity Process.
Overview of the Transportation Conformity Process.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Granville County Board of Commissioners Donnie Redmond July 5, 2005.
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Welcome to Arizona WESTAR Fall Business Meeting October 31 - November 1, 2011 Tempe, Arizona Eric C. Massey, Director Air Quality Division.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
“Cleaner Air Sooner” South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Bureau of Air Quality.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
How Do Traffic Control Measures Affect Vehicle Gas Emissions Presented by: Ryan O’Connell Co-Authors: Kevin Lu Dr. Wen Cheng Dr. Xudong Jia.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
Evaluation Tools to Support ITS Planning Process FDOT Research #BD presented to Model Advancement Committee presented by Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., PE.
DEP’s Air Regulatory Update
SUMMARY OF BENEFITS AND RETURN ON INVESTMENT GPS FLEET TRACKING.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
Texas Rural Air Monitoring Sites Sonia Uribe November 16, 2004.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
David A. Ramirez Area Director for Border and Permian Basin Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Border to Border Transportation Conference November.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Calculating Emissions Within a Travel Demand Model Using.
Maryland’s Innovative Measures State Implementation Plan 2004 EPA Air Innovations Conference Brian J. Hug – Chief, Air Quality Policy and Planning Division.
Smart Growth Implementation Assistance Montgomery County, MD Fact Sheet More about Smart Growth at Preliminary Project.
4-1 Model Input Dollar Value  Dollar value of time  Accident costs  Fuel costs  Emission costs.
Truck Idle Reduction and CMAQ Shawn Seals Office of Air Quality Air Innovations Conference Chicago, Illinois August 12, 2004.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Permit Training Region 4 – Atlanta, GA Dec , 2010.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Current State of FSUTMS Practice Presented to Model Task Force November 9, 2009 Terry Corkery FDOT Systems Planning Office.
STATEWIDE WORKSHOP ON THE CALIFORNIA MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS INCLUDING GREENHOUSE GASES August 23, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection.
CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
EPA’s New Air Quality Standards. Topics The Revised Standards Our Current Readings Benefits Versus Costs Conformity – What Is It? Sources of Our Air Pollution.
Transportation leadership you can trust. TRB Planning Applications Conference May 18, 2009 Houston, TX A Recommended Approach to Delineating Traffic Analysis.
Transit Connections 2013 The Value of Transit Transit: It’s Personal Amy Fitch University of Nevada, Reno Julie D. Hunter Washoe County Health District.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Commuter Connections FY 2009 Work Program National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 20, 2008.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Conformity Determination Graciela Lubertino, PhD November 7, 2012.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Travel Time Value Calculator: The Development of an Analysis Utility in Cube/Voyager.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
COG/DTP Staff Eulalie Lucas and Erin Morrow Comments on Draft MOVES 2009 International Emission Inventory Conference April 16-17, 2009 Baltimore,Maryland.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
Permitting and National Ambient Air Quality Standards Changes Rick Goertz, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Truck Stop Electrification And Air Quality Conformity Presented by Bob Dickinson South East Texas Regional Planning Commission Air Innovation Conference.
1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.
Take a deep breath! Please read the board. Please find your notes from yesterday.
Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
An Overview of the Energy Reduction Calculator.  Calculates reduction in emissions for a facility Emissions computed are Carbon Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide,
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Pesticides March 2005 Randy Segawa.
1 Air Pollution Automobile Emissions: An Overview Emissions from an individual car
Station Name CY 2014 AQS Data Certified CY 2015 AQS Data Certified Ute 167Y68Y Ute 367Y66Y Mesa Verde National Park65Y66 Bloomfield62Y61 Navajo Dam63Y68.
EPA Methane Regulations Details on the Final Rules and Summary of Impacts May 16, 2016 Producer: Claire Carter Edited by: Afzal Bari Director: Afzal Bari.
Department of Air Quality Exceptional Event Streamlining, Standardization & Coordination CDAWG November, 2015 Clark County.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
Emission Inventories and Climate Leadership in National Parks Shawn Norton, US National Park Service Karen Scott, Environmental Protection Agency.
Presented to Model Task Force Meeting presented by Danny Lamb, Florida DOT District 7 November 9, 2009 Model Task Force Priorities Survey.
Alternative Alignments Public Meeting
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Planning to Achieve the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
Presentation transcript:

FSUTMS Air Quality Postprocessor presented to Full MTF presented by Diana Fields, FDOT Systems Planning Keli Paul, AICP, Cambridge Systematics November 10, 2009

1 Overview What is the FSUTMS Air Quality Postprocessor (AQPP)? Benefits of the FSUTMS AQPP Emissions Calculation Process Impacted FSUTMS Models Schedule FSUTMS AQPP Training Opportunities Next Steps Demonstration

2 What is the FSUTMS AQPP? A module within FSUTMS/Cube Voyager that calculates emissions for portions of the nonattainment area (NAA) inside the FSUTMS travel demand model Calculates: Emissions related to Ozone formation −Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) −Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Emissions related to Greenhouse Gas (GHG) formation −Carbon Dioxide Equivalents (CO2eq) −Methane (CH4) −Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Users: Ozone NAAs for conformity Areas interested in measuring GHG emissions

3 Benefits of the FSUTMS AQPP Streamlines Calculation of Emissions Minimizes number of times needed to run MOVES Shorter run times Outputs summary tables in.csv and.dbf format Standardized approach Reduces human error Facilitates transferability Streamlines interagency consultation process Outputs loaded network with emissions by pollutant on each link (total and per mile) to visualize emissions geographically

4 Benefits of the FSUTMS AQPP (Cont’d) Output Summary Table

5 Benefits of the FSUTMS AQPP (Cont’d) Output Loaded Network

6 Emissions Calculation Process

7 Impacted FSUTMS Models Currently exceeds ppm standard based on ozone monitoring data Northwest Florida Regional Planning Model Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model What happens if a potentially stricter standard is implemented?

8 Schedule December 2009 – MOVES2009 Final Release Early 2010 – NAAs run MOVES emissions factors using final release and localized paremeters & FDOT finalize AQPP process Spring/Summer 2010 – AQPPs complete for currently anticipated NAAs based on ppm standard (base year) Fall 2010 – AQPPs complete for anticipated NAAs based on a potentially stricter standard (base year) August 2011 – EPA designates Ozone NAAs August 2012 – Ozone NAA Conformity Determination Reports (CDRs) Must be Approved by U.S. DOT

9 FSUTMS AQPP Training Opportunities

10 Next Steps Coordinate FSUTMS AQPP process with: EPA Region 4 FHWA FL Division and Resource Center DEP SIP emissions budget calculation process FDOT Districts Potential ozone nonattainment areas (MPOs/Counties) Formalize interagency consultation process Ozone baseline year (2007?) MOVES input parameters by County Use of HPMS adjustment factors Upon final MOVES2009 release: Localize MOVES input parameters in coordination with DEP Run MOVES emissions factors for base year

11 Demonstration of the FSUTMS AQPP

12 Contact Information Diana Fields FDOT Systems Planning 605 Suwannee Street, MS 19 Tallahassee, FL Phone (850) Fax (850)