SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marion Wichmann-Fiebig II 5 Abteilungsleiterin „Luft“ 1 Review of the Gothenburg Protocol Link to potential PM control under CLRTAP: – Specifies control.
Advertisements

CLRTP PMEG Third meeting, 13 & 14 March 2006, Dessau.
Summary of relevant information in the CAFE Position paper on PM Martin Meadows UNECE PMEG Berlin, 23 & 24 May 2005.
CO 2 monitoring and modelling across Greater London Lester Kwiatkowski.
S Larssen: PM-PP-Stockholm-Oct-2003.ppt slide 1 PM in Europe - State and past trends Emissions and concentration levels Steinar Larssen Norwegian Institute.
Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Transport with Behavioural Change- a London Perspective Helen ApSimon & Tim Oxley With help from members of APRIL.
IAM activities in the UK comparisons with GAINS & work on emission projections and the road transport sector Helen ApSimon, T Oxley, N Hasnain, A Elshkaki.
MODELLING FUTURE TRENDS IN URBAN NO2 TO 2020: and some questions arising Tim Oxley Helen ApSimon Ayman Elshkaki Tessa Lennartz -Walker UK National Focal.
Development of the co-operation within the convention on long-range transboundary air pollution– St Petersburg April 2012 CITEPA – 7, Cité Paradis.
Model used in « Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter in the UK » [Stedman et al., Receptor modelling of PM 10 concentrations at a UK national.
Preparation of the guidelines for vehicle non-exhaust emission modelling of PM10 and PM2.5 in Latvia Aiga Kāla, Valts Vilnītis SIA Estonian, Latvian &
Source apportionment of PM in the ADMS model David Carruthers Workshop on Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter Imperial College London Friday, 23.
London’s approach to preventing air pollution episodes Ben Barratt, King’s College London Expert Meeting on Improving Air Quality in the Beijing- Tianjin-Hebei.
PM in Sweden HC Hansson and Christer Johansson ITM, Stockholm University.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
PM mapping in Scotland, 2007 Andrew Kent. What are we presenting today? 1) Context to the work 2) Modelling process 3) Model results 4) Future work possibilities.
Modelling urban pollution within the UK scale integrated assessment model, UKIAM Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated.
RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: Health impacts of PM.
The use of the BelEUROS model for policy support at LNE TEMIS-workshop 8/9 October 2007 on behalf of: Mirka Van der Elst Flemish Ministry of the Environment,
LINKING EUROPEAN, NATIONAL & CITY SCALES UK National Focal Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling Helen ApSimon and Tim Oxley, Imperial College in.
National Integrated Assessment Modelling Report on meeting at IIASA 21 March 2011 (Tim Oxley, Imperial College)
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
1 Source apportionment of PM in the PCM model John Stedman 23 April 2010.
Some thoughts on addressing uncertainties in integrated assessment models Helen ApSimon and Tim Oxley Imperial College London.
1 Road Transport Projections: April 2009 Base Tim Murrells & Yvonne Li Air Pollution Research in London – Transport & Noise Group Meeting Imperial College.
The robustness of the source receptor relationships used in GAINS Hilde Fagerli, EMEP/MSC-W EMEP/MSC-W.
Application of air quality strategies of Western Europe for modeling of the transboundary air pollution impact on the Russian Federation with the GAINS.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Modelling the spatial distribution.
10th EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Management and Assessment, Vilnius, October 2005 Air pollution at street level in European cities Nicolas Moussiopoulos,
Scottish Pollution Mapping Nicola Brophy
Air Quality Management in Mumbai V.K.Phatak MMRDA.
Simulation of European emissions impacts on particulate matter concentrations in 2010 using Models-3 Rob Lennard, Steve Griffiths and Paul Sutton (RWE.
Air quality and health impact assessment AQ information at the regional scale, urban background scale and street scale past, present and future air quality.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
IIASA International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) An Integrated Assessment Model for Fine Particulate Matter in Europe Markus Amann, M.
1 EEA Activities Collect, process and disseminate air emission and air quality data Report on trends in air emissions and in air quality Support the development,
National Integrated Assessment Modelling Report to TFEIP on NIAM meeting at IIASA 22 March 2010 and work related to emission projections.
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no Contribution from MSC-W to the review of the Gothenburg protocol – Reports 2006 TFIAM, Rome, 16-18th May, 2006.
1 Prediction of Air Quality over Tokyo Metropolitan Area by Using the JCAP II Air Quality Simulation System Presented at the 6th Annual CMAS Conference,
Attaining urban air quality objectives- links to transboundary air pollution Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated Assessment.
11 September 2015 On the role of measurements and modelling in Dutch air quality policies Guus Velders The Netherlands (RIVM)
Standard images are available on the intranet For more specific images please contact Matthew Hart For PowerPoint help please contact Elizabeth Leishman.
Senate department for urban development Unit IX D: air pollution and noise control, M. Lutz Integrating particulate matter Integrating particulate matter:
Uniform limit value for air quality: Bring down PM2.5 everywhere below a AQ limit value Gap closure concept: Reduce PM2.5 levels everywhere by same.
SOURCES emissions Atmospheric dispersion RECEPTORS exposure Abatement options & costs Exceedance of criteria for protection Integrated Assessment of effective.
SPATIAL CONSIDERATIONS Tim Oxley & Helen ApSimon UK National Focal Centre for Integrated Assessment Imperial College London.
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Particulates: Where is the current policy emphasis in the EU CAFE Programme? A contribution to the panel discussion “Nanoparticles from road vehicle exhaust:
Joint thematic session on B(a)P pollution: main activities and results
Task c Using, inter alia, the results of the EMEP model, prepare supporting information for the third meeting of Expert Group for reviewing the characteristics.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
SHERPA for e-reporting
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
Assessment of Atmospheric PM in the Slovak Republic
Traffic related air pollution : total mass PM10 or Black Carbon (BC) as indicator ? Frans Fierens Scientific staff member of the Flemish Environment.
Thematic Assessment Report on Ammonia
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Z.Klimont, J.Cofala EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) Variability in emission parameters of ozone precursors’ emissions in the GAINS.
19th TFMM Meeting, Geneva May 3rd 2018
Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012
RECEPTOR MODELLING OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
An Overview of Europe’s Air Quality and Air Pollutant Emissions
WORK OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AIR QUALITY EXPERT GROUP (AQEG)
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Assessment of LRT contribution to cities in Europe using uEMEP?
Air Quality In Cambridge
Presentation transcript:

SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PARTICULATE MATTER Imperial College 23 rd April 2010 APRIL:Air Pollution Research in London

Which Sources? Emissions? What chemical composition? SO4,NO3,NH4, C, Fe etc Concentration Exposure Where from? nearest road other UK sources outside UK?

SOURCE APPORTIONMENT of PM in INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELLING at IMPERIAL COLLEGE Tim Oxley, Helen ApSimon, Ayman Elshkaki Imperial College London

1.PM modelling in UK IAM: uses data and work from several other modellers: aimed at predicting future concentrations and exposure 2.Emissions 3.Primary PM concentrations 4.Secondary SIA (SO4, NO3 and NH4) concentrations 5.Other contributions to PM 10 & PM Trends 2010 to 2020

UK integrated assessment model, UKIAM Aim: Assess future scenarios and abatement measures in relation to setting of national emissions ceilings for 2020-> UK air quality, ecosystem protection and GHG emissions Pollutants: SO2, NOx, NH3, PM10, PM2.5, CO2, N2O, CH4 Detailed sub-model BRUTAL for road transport -> roadside concentrations + 1x1 km background concentrations Emissions UK sources based on NAEI (point or 1x1 km) Contributions imported from other countries and shipping

shallow canyons suburbs deep street canyons dense pop. city centre Open roads rural Road-side increment NOx, primary PM Emissions each UK road link NOx,PM,CO2,N2O (iMOVE) Traffic flow, ave speed, vehicle mix+ data base emission factors Superimpose on background concentration NOx, primary PM from UK sources Grid 1x1 km emissions road transport Other UK emissions PPM model Add long-range secondary PM: & primary NOx and PM contributions imported (including shipping) and from other sources Calculate NO2 concentrations from total NOx allowing for  frac. BRUTAL (UKIAM)-> modelling of urban air quality

EMISSIONS PRIMARY PM (UEP32 scenario) (ktonnes) PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 Power Dom Industry Road Trans Off-road Agric/Nat ______________________________________________________________ Total UK EU 27 (inc UK) NB IIASA total PM2.5 agrees very well but sources covered differ ? Are there missing sources of PM e.g. from cooking

PRIMARY PM CONCENTRATIONS (PPM model) Small contributions imported and from shipping PM 2.5 in 2010 Sources (kt) UEP32 scenario Power 3.0 Domestic 9.9 Industry 24.6 Roads 20.1 Off-road 7.4 Agri/nat. 6.7 Total UK 71.7

PRECURSOR EMISSIONS Secondary Inorganic Aerosol kt UEP32 scenario SO2 NOx SO2 NOx Power Domestic Industry Roads Off-road ___________________________________________________ Total UK EU UK NH3 307kt in both 2010 and 2020 (IPPC not included) EU27 NH kt in 2010 and 4124 in 2020

UKIAM : use of pre-calculated source-receptor footprints each source->rapid scenario assessment Take reference case and estimate effect of reducing emissions from a source by specified amount on concentrations/deposition-> multiply effect for bigger/smaller changes in emission More complicated for secondary PM with interacting pollutants- e.g. need to allow for effect of NH3 on NO3 concentrations. CONCENTRATIONS OF SIA= SO4+NO3+NH4 FRAME and EMEP models-

SIA components in 2020; based on FRAME/EMEP models Frame NH4 SO4 NO3 total PWM 0.74  g/m fine (PM2.5) all (PM 10) EMEP implies larger proportion imported than FRAME-> total SIA 4.5  g/m3

OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS PWC PM10 PM2.5 Ca dust * Fe (inc re-* Suspension) Sea salt * SOA (HARM Model) Water _____________________________ Total * based on maps from AEA (JS)

Total PM 10 in 2010Total PM 2.5 in 2010

Source Apportionment PM 10 in 2010 (UEP32 scenario) NB popn. weighted 1x1 km background concentrations

Source Apportionment Scenario UEP32 PM 10 (2010) PM 10 (2020) NO 2 (2020)

Local road 0ther roads Non-road primary Euro SIA UK SIA Ship PM Import PM Other 30.1  g/m  g/m  g/m  g/m3 M. Road Southampton 2010 ROADSIDE SITES 2020

Roads “at risk” of exceeding AQ limit value (ann. ave. PM 10 > 31.5  g/m3) km UK London NB background higher over east UK (high Ca dust) -> exceedance outside London

Some comments Modelled primary PM reduces with exhaust fraction becoming negligible, and road transport small (tyres and brakes) but are there sources missing from inventory? SIA- also reduces with up to half imported from Europe and dependent on other countries reductions but uncertainties Other components SOA, dust etc add up to as much or more than primary and SIA for PM10, and are also a significant addition to PM2.5-> more work needed on these. In future: Move towards a speciated PM inventory re toxic components, black C etc