1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Challenges in Finding and Connecting New Water Sources J. Tupling, P.Eng. June 22, 2009.
Advertisements

Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 Presentation To Geology Matters, November 2012.
Environmental Assessment in Nova Scotia
Federal EA and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 Presentation to the Bras d’Or Lakes Collaborative Environmental Planning Initiative (CEPI)
Responsible Resource Development April 17, Context Government focussed on responsible development of Canada’s natural resources to create jobs and.
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 and Aboriginal Consultation November 2012.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
THE DIVERSITY OF INTERESTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE A CHALLENGE FOR THE RULE OF LAW By Professor D E Fisher.
Presentation by Cambodian Participants Phuket, Thailand February 2012 Health Impact Assessment Royal Government of Cambodia.
29e CONFÉRENCE INTERNATIONALE DES COMMISSAIRES À LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES ET DE LA VIE PRIVÉE 29 th INTERNATIONAL DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONERS.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
Environmental Impact Assessment Myriam Raiche November 8, 2007.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Purpose of the Standards
Risk and Resilience: A Canadian Perspective on Climate Change Adaptation Donald S. Lemmen, PhD Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural.
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
REFORMING FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAW MARCH 19, 2012.
1. 2  Strategic – BC Hydro Long Term Planning  Project level  Environmental Assessment ▪ Federal - Canadian  Integration 3.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Environmental Assessment in Newfoundland & Labrador Environmental Assessment in Federations: Current Dynamics and Emerging Issues Conference Current Dynamics.
Overview of Land and Resource Management in the NWT.
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Overview of Environmental Assessment in BC Presentation to the Professional Economists Association of BC November 28,
CEAA REGULATIONS AND PROCESS OPTIONS SEPTEMBER 24, 2012.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
1 Human Pathogens and Toxins Act: Bill C Gaps of the Current Regulatory Regime The Human Pathogens Importation Regulations (HPIR) were established.
1 Small Community Environmental Compliance Assistance Project May 8, 2007 Arizona’s.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
LEGISLATING CEAA 2012 OCTOBER 1, Overview CEAA Seven-year Review ENGO Engagement in Seven-year Review Industry Engagement in Seven-year Review Environment.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDER ABORIGINAL LAND CLAIM AGREEMENTS FEBRUARY 23, 2012.
DECISION-MAKING, FOLLOW-UP AND ENFORCEMENT OCTOBER 15, 2012.
Bill C-45 Deficiencies Concerns from Canadian Environmental Organizations Susanna D. Fuller, Marine Coordinator, Ecology Action Centre February 26 th,
Environmental Assessment at a Crossroads Stephen Hazell December 5, 2012.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT - LEGAL FRAMEWORK APRIL 2, 2013.
Agency Coordination: Fraser River Estuary Management Program [FREMP] Georgia Basin/Puget Sound Research Conference 3 April 2003 Vancouver,
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MARCH 15, 2012.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NOVEMBER 12, 2012.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ABORIGINAL LANDS AND PEOPLES NOVEMBER 5, 2012.
1 Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Update on Preparations for the CEPA 1999 Parliamentary Review September, 2005 Presentation to the Canadian.
Canada’s Federal Environmental Assessment Regime Presentation to the Forum of Federations Environmental Assessment Conference Ottawa, Canada September.
INTRODUCTION CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT (CEAA) SEPTEMBER 24, 2012.
Special Railways Phase III Proposed approach to regulatory changes Jakarta 16 May 2011.
Fisheries Protection Program: An overview November
Infrastructure Development Bill [B ] Submission by the Centre for Environmental Rights to Portfolio Committee on Economic Development 14 January.
The Role of Peer Review in a Multilateral Framework on Competition Policy Andrea Bruce Investment Trade Policy UNCTAD Regional Seminar for Latin America.
CITIZENS’ ALLIANCE OF PEI JUNE 25, 2014 Submission to the Standing Committee on Agriculture, Environment, Energy and Forestry of the Prince Edward Island.
IPASA presentation to Portfolio Committee on Health 31 October 2014 Abeda Williams.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
INTRODUCTION CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT (CEAA) FEBRUARY 16, 2012.
INTRODUCTION TO CANADIAN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT (2012) MARCH 19, 2013.
Environmental Assessment Act – Overview Environmental Media Group.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
PDP SUBMISSION Purpose (1) The purpose of this Act is to promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources. (2) In this Act, sustainable.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
CEAA 2012 EA PROCESS OPTIONS OCTOBER 15, 2012
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Canadian Navigable Waters Act
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
Environmental Assessment and Licensing (EAL) in Manitoba
Presentation transcript:

1 Brace Centre for Water Resources Management McGill University, Sept. 25 François Boulanger, Regional Director The New Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA)

2 Presentation Outline  Review of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act  Highlights of Bill C-9 (Amendments to the Act) Act) Overview (Background/Purposes) Most significant changes Next steps…

Module #13 Purposes of the Act Consider environmental effects Promote sustainable development Ensure cooperation, coordination & efficiency Avoid significant adverse effects Ensure public participation

4 4 Application of the CEAA The CEAA sets out the responsibilities and procedures for environmental assessments of projects involving the federal government. Proclaimed January 1995 – Reviewed in 2000 Assess projects requiring a federal decision assessments annually

5 ________________________________________ For CEAA to apply, there must be:  A “CEAA project”  A federal “decision” to make about the project __________________________________________ Does the federal Environment Assessment Process apply?

6 CEAA Project CEAA Project Undertaking related to a physical work Some activities not linked to a physical work OR Construction Operation DecommissioningModification

7 EA Decision Triggers EA Decision Triggers ____________________________________________ EAEA Funding Regulatory Decision Property Transfer Project Proponent

8 Type of Assessment ScreeningComprehensive StudyReview Panel 6,000-7,000/yr 42 completed 9 panels completed 14 ongoing 7 ongoing

What federal EA should include? Screenings: Environmental effects Cumulative effects Significance of effects Mitigation Public comments where appropriate Other matters optional, e.g. need for project Comp. Studies, Review Panels: Screening items Purpose of project Alternative means Need for follow-up program Capacity for renewable resources Public consultation

Module #310 Possible Screening Decisions Not Likely Significant Not Likely Significant Proceed with project project Proceed with project project Uncertainty/ Significant adverse effects justifiable/ Public Concern Warranted Uncertainty/ Significant adverse effects justifiable/ Public Concern Warranted Panel or Mediation Mediation Likely significant (Not justifiable) Likely significant (Not justifiable) Do not proceed with project Do not proceed with project

CEAA Project Example Dredging in the Saint-Lawrence Activity is a project under CEAA (Inclusion List)Activity is a project under CEAA (Inclusion List) Potential trigger : proponent, funding and regulatory decisionPotential trigger : proponent, funding and regulatory decision Type of EA : ScreeningType of EA : Screening Potential Federal Authorities involved in the EA : Public Work, Fisheries and Oceans, Environment CanadaPotential Federal Authorities involved in the EA : Public Work, Fisheries and Oceans, Environment Canada

Highlights of Bill C-9 Amendments to the Act

Overview of Bill C-9  Minister of the Environment’s 5 yr. Review - (1200 Canadians consulted)  Builds on existing fundamentals & core principles - Self-assessment  Royal Assent - June 2003  Goals targeted: - More certain, predictable and timely process - Improved quality of assessments - More meaningful public participation

Increase Cooperation Increase Cooperation 1) Promote cooperation & coordinated action between federal & provincial governments with respect to EA processes for projects - s.4(1)(b.2) 2) Promote communication & cooperation between RAs and Aboriginal peoples - s.4(1)(b.3)

Support Precautionary Principle Support Precautionary Principle 4(1)(a) … in a precautionary manner …to ensure that such projects do not cause significant adverse environmental effects. New s.4(2) New s.4(2) Duties of the Government of Canada … in a manner that protects the environment & human health & applies the precautionary principle New s.4(2) New s.4(2) Duties of the Government of Canada … in a manner that protects the environment & human health & applies the precautionary principle

Improved Federal Coordination ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ New: Federal Environmental Assessment Coordinator for screenings & comprehensive studies - s Federal Environmental Assessment Coordinator for screenings & comprehensive studies - s _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Role: - Coordinate participation of federal authorities - Facilitate communication & cooperation with other jurisdictions other jurisdictions _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Focus on Appropriate Projects 3Simplify class screening process 3Expand Exclusion List Regulations 3Expand coverage of the Act (Crown Corps, $ reserve land, federal land)

Comprehensive Study s.21-s.23 New:  Assessment track established by Minister of the Environment during scoping phase (s.21) a) Continue with CS OR b) Conduct review panel or mediation  Opportunity for public consultation before making recommendation

Comprehensive Study (cont.) New  Opportunity for public consultation during conduct of study (s. 21.2)  Participant funding (s. 58) - (Agency)  At the end of the CS, the Minister issues an EA decision  Maintained: Opportunity for public comments on CS report

Prohibition Orders Prohibition Orders New:  Power for Minister of the Environment or an Responsible Authority to prohibit work on a project until EA decision taken  Power for Minister of the Environment or an Responsible Authority to prohibit work on a project until EA decision taken- s.20 or s.37 Enforceable by court injunction sought by the NOTE: Enforceable by court injunction sought by the Attorney General or any person Attorney General or any person - s.11.2 New:  Power for Minister of the Environment or an Responsible Authority to prohibit work on a project until EA decision taken  Power for Minister of the Environment or an Responsible Authority to prohibit work on a project until EA decision taken- s.20 or s.37 Enforceable by court injunction sought by the NOTE: Enforceable by court injunction sought by the Attorney General or any person Attorney General or any person - s.11.2

New Considerations Recognition that community knowledge &  Recognition that community knowledge & Aboriginal traditional knowledge may Aboriginal traditional knowledge may be considered in EA - s.16.1 be considered in EA - s.16.1 Recognition that community knowledge &  Recognition that community knowledge & Aboriginal traditional knowledge may Aboriginal traditional knowledge may be considered in EA - s.16.1 be considered in EA - s.16.1  Recognition that results of regional studies may be used where federal authorities may be used where federal authorities have participated - s have participated - s  Recognition that results of regional studies may be used where federal authorities may be used where federal authorities have participated - s have participated - s. 16.2

Follow-up - s.38 New: Mandatory follow-up after comprehensive study, review panel & mediation s. 38(2) Mandatory follow-up after comprehensive study, review panel & mediation s. 38(2) Scope of follow-up less restrictive s. 38(3) Scope of follow-up less restrictive s. 38(3) Federal Authorities that request particular follow-up measures must assist in implementation if requested by RA s. 38(4) Federal Authorities that request particular follow-up measures must assist in implementation if requested by RA s. 38(4) Clarified: Responsible Authority must consider if follow-up appropriate for a screening s. 38(1) Responsible Authority must consider if follow-up appropriate for a screening s. 38(1) Results of a follow-up program may be used for implementing Results of a follow-up program may be used for implementing adaptive management & to improve quality of future EAs s. 38(5) adaptive management & to improve quality of future EAs s. 38(5)

Meaningful public participation Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (CEAR) (Internet site & project files)  Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry (CEAR) (Internet site & project files) Notice of commencement of EA Provide scope of project  Expand opportunities for participation Ministerial Guideline criteria  Expand role of public in comprehensive studies Consult on scoping & EA track, during study Participant funding program extended

Enhanced Agency role - s.62 & s.63 New Objects: Promote & monitor & facilitate  Promote & monitor & facilitate – Compliance with the Act – Quality of assessments Consult Aboriginal peoples on policy issues related to the Act  Consult Aboriginal peoples on policy issues related to the Act Power to: Establish & lead quality assurance program Assist parties in building consensus & resolving disputes Obtain information from Responsible Authorities/bodies subject to Act & Regs. Power to: Establish & lead quality assurance program Assist parties in building consensus & resolving disputes Obtain information from Responsible Authorities/bodies subject to Act & Regs.

Next Steps...  Coming into force - Fall 2003  Transitional provision EAs started before proclamation EAs started before proclamation can continue under the old process can continue under the old process  Requirement for Parliament to review the Act, 7 years after Royal Assent the Act, 7 years after Royal Assent  Coming into force - Fall 2003  Transitional provision EAs started before proclamation EAs started before proclamation can continue under the old process can continue under the old process  Requirement for Parliament to review the Act, 7 years after Royal Assent the Act, 7 years after Royal Assent