Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Advertisements

21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
Instructional Leadership for the 21 st Century University of South Alabama in collaboration with Baldwin and Mobile County Public Schools.
Childrens Low-cost Laptop Program Kathleen Barnhart Faith Bishop Marica Cullen.
Enhancing Education Through Technology NCLB Title II Part D Cathy HigginsOffice of Educational Technology
The Capstone Program Is It For You?. What is Capstone? Capstone is an online course offered through WHRO and PBS Teacherline to assist teachers in integrating.
Update and 2009 Grant Process. What is ITQ? Part of Federal No Child Left Behind $$ focused on increasing the number of “highly qualified” teachers in.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Bidder’s Conference March 15, 2008.
Title I Parental Involvement
Oklahoma State Department of Education Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Title II, Part B Competitive Grant Program No Child Left.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 9 Competitive.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Educational Technology Plan Del Mar Union School District.
St. Charles School District What is Title I? United States Federal Government’s largest education assistance program for schools. Title I,
Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Friday, January 10, :00-3:30 p.m.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Enhancing Education through Technology Grant: Improving Instruction Through Regional Data Initiatives.
Company LOGO Grants and Funding Helping schools pursue federal and state entitlement and competitive grants.
2008/2009 Title II D Competitive Grant Models of Demonstrated Proficiency Webinar,September 27, 2008 Barbara Fardell, Educational Technology Manager.
Company LOGO What Can the Data Tell You? Adventures in Finding Funding.
Oregon Reading First Orientation Holiday Inn Portland Airport November 12, 2002 Oregon Department of Education.
Professional Development System. Purpose Purpose of today’s discussion is to: o Provide background of State Leadership Activities o Review plan for change.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
Title II Part A of NCLB IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY GRANT PROGRAM.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Company LOGO Grants and Funding Finding federal and state entitlement and competitive grants for your school.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
TIES E2T2 Grant Project Technology Integrationist Community of Learning (TICL)
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
New York State Staff/Curriculum Development Network S/CDN September 22, 2005.
NCLB Title II-D Enhancing Education Through Technology Program Consolidated Application Information Sessions Spring 2007.
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Grant Proposal for Project Name Organization Name.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Preparation Program Partnerships: Best practices for meeting state and local personnel needs Phoebe Gillespie, Ph.D. Director, Personnel Improvement Center.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships and Troops-to-Teachers By Sander Langebeeke And Kentavius Means.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Title IIB Massachusetts Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program (MMSP) Information Session Anne DeMallie, MMSP Coordinator December 8, :30.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
North TIER Derek Kelley Technology Integration Educator Institute Chair Fairfax County Public Schools/ North TIER Partnership.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
CCRESA Rubric Presentation Jeni Corn, Malinda Faber, Friday Institute, NC State University.
Grant Proposal for [Project Name]
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Office of Title I & Section 31a Compliance Welcome! Title I, Part A (Title I) Program and Budget Planning March
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Local Station Grant Program Goals and Requirements.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Chapter 12 Technology, Teaching, and You Teaching and Learning With Technology, 3e.
Sayreville Public Schools Curriculum & Instruction Budget Presentation Dr. Marilyn Shediack Assistant Superintendent Curriculum & Instruction.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
How can ARRA Funds Be Wisely Applied? How Researchers Can Help Lou Cicchinelli, Ph.D. Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning Fourth Annual IES.
Improving Instruction through Regional Data Initiatives FY2010 ARRA Title II, Part D Competitive Grant Program Applications due September 15, 2009.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 26, 2009 Webinar.
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
NC Mathematics and Science Partnership Program
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine

Title II, Part D: Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive grant Technology Integration Technology literacy for students Only high-need LEAs are qualified to apply If you are not a high-need LEA, you must partner with a high-need LEA. 25% must be used for professional development

Title II, Part D EETT: Project Goals Encourage school districts to develop & adopt sustainable projects that:  Improve student academic achievement  Assist every student  Provide high quality professional development

Title II, Part D EETT Eligibility Projects of “significant size” and scope High-need LEAs ELA and mathematics focus Eighth-grade technology literacy Partnership

Title II, Part D EETT Benefits to Students Technology Literacy through Effective Integration  Students must achieve fluency by the eighth- grade Increase Access Raise Achievement

Title II, Part D EETT - Benefits to Teachers Provide professional development focused on effective integration of technology  25% for professional development Support innovative methods of instruction  online learning Promote communication and family involvement

Title II, Part D (State) Specific Requirements State focus areas Date of RFP release Date proposals are due

Title II, Part D Programs Funded in (State) LEA A  Focus area  Kind of professional development used LEA B  Focus area  Kind of professional development used

Meeting the Requirements of NCLB Scientifically based research High quality professional development Effective integration of technology Measurable effect on student performance

Grant Writing Timetable DescriptionStart Date to Completion Date Phase 1Grant planning Meet with teachers and administrators Select curriculum focus Conduct needs assessment January through March Phase 2Proposal writing Assign roles Assemble narrative Create budget narrative Submit proposal – June 1st April through May Phase 3Implementation of the programPlanning meeting

Funding Considerations Stipends paid to participants Stipends for face-to-face facilitators Teacher laptops Classroom application materials  software  books

Sample PD Budget ResourceBudget Stipends (3 schools, 20 teachers, 60 courses at $100 stipend/course) (PD expense) $6, Technology (20 laptops)$24, Professional Development Courses (60 courses at $180/course) (PD expense) $10, On-site support (5 days at $1500 per day) (PD expense) $7, Supplies and Materials$7, Total$55,800.00

Key Personnel District Administration: Tech Director, Director of PD, PD Providers, etc. Building Admin Professional Development Personnel Building Admin Professional Development Personnel Building Admin Professional Development Personnel Team Teams must be assembled before grant is submitted.

Evaluation How and when will the project will be evaluated?  quality assurance steps  evaluation methods  acting upon results

PBS TeacherLine  online professional development  facilitated courses  supportive learning community  exemplary resources Proven effect on student outcomes Meet NCLB requirements

PBS TeacherLine: Goals Improve student outcomes Support collaborative learning Provide rich course content  aligned with state learning outcomes and objectives  help teachers achieve highly qualified status Professional recognition  PDPs  graduate credit

PBS TeacherLine Benefits Research based content Meets NCLB requirements Flexibility Cost savings Time saving Affects change in the classroom ISTE certificate

PBS TeacherLine Technology Courses ISTE certificate In-depth study Network Earn credits Create a portfolio

PBS TeacherLine Content NCTM IRA NCTE ISTE

We can help you! Partnership Needs assessment Program design Grant narrative Project management

Questions? (Contact Information - PBS TeacherLine Station)