Grants Factory 20131 GRANTS FACTORY WRITING GROUPS 2013 - 14 Essential Elements of a Good Grant Application Mick Tuite School of Biosciences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Useful tips for applicants when writing a grant application Arts and Humanities Research Council.
Advertisements

ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
Yiu-fai Cheung, MD Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine LKS Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China Sharing in GRF.
How to write a Research Grant? or How to get a grant rejected? Spencer Gibson Provincial Director, Research CancerCare Manitoba.
Writing a Compelling Grant Application Trish Lowney, PhD
How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
Starting Guide for Research Proposal IIC University of Technology The Kingdom of Cambodia IIC University of Technology The Kingdom of Cambodia 1IIC University.
Counting Down the Top Ten List for Proposal Writing Royal Roads University Office of Research February 26, 2010.
The Systems Analysis Toolkit
How to write a successful grant application Dr Paul Colville-Nash Programme Manager, Infections and Immunity Board Medical Research Council October 2010.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Top 10 Tips for Effective Grant Writing Karen Kidd, Canada Research Chair & Professor, Biology, University of New Brunswick, Saint John Presented at the.
Proposal writing
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
The Personal Statement: Strategies for Supporting Students
How to write successful fellowship applications Dr Liz Elvidge, Head, Postdoc Development Centre.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
RGC Grant Applications in Biology & Medicine Formulating and Writing winning proposals Kathy Cheah, 2003.
How to get that first NIH grant
What do reviewers look for in a research proposal? Research Councils’ review criteria Dimitra Koutsantoni Research & Knowledge Transfer Manager.
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
Grants Factory How the peer review panel works Mick Tuite (Biosciences) BBSRC/Leverhulme Trust Simon Kirchin (SECL) AHRC Jan 2013.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Jumping on the Funded Research Bandwagon Paul O’Reilly Dublin Institute of Technology Presentation to Faculty of Commerce and Centre for Innovation and.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
WCHRI Innovation Grants The Art & Science of Grant Writing Dr. Kathy Hegadoren Dr. Jason Dyck.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Workshop for New Zealand Health Delivery Research Investment Stream Project Applicants.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 15: Capacity development and training on Maternity.
Methods, Outcomes, Significance. The obvious.... Check aims and remit Check guidelines, submission dates, additional requirements – Signatures in advance.
Components of a successful grant application Ann Crosland
Developing IFS Research Proposals AuthorAID Proposal Writing Workshop June 2011.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
Insert your Small Grant Scheme Project Title Date: 4 th September, 2012 Exceptional healthcare, personally delivered Presented by.
Case study of a successful proposal Rob Davies. Parts of a proposal Part A - Proposal Administrative Overview - forms Part B- Description of objectives.
Rejoinders for ARC DP Assessment Reports: Your last chance for influencing the CoE members Zhihong Xu Griffith University.
COACh program  Consult the TRC website and read clearly the call for research proposals as well as the criteria against which.
GRANT WRITING Find the right grant and win the funding!!
Writing the Proposal: Scientific and technological objectives PHOENIX Training Course Laulasmaa, Estonia
Funded by the European Commission WHAT MAKES A GOOD PROPOSAL?
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
The Proposal AEE 804 Spring 2002 Revised Spring 2003 Reese & Woods.
NHMRC Development Grants Overall Objectives The aim of a Development Grant is to progress research to a stage where it can attract investment from.
Working with the NIHR Research Design Service to maximize successful grant applications Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands.
Presenting a Paper (in English) Sean Kung July
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Programme Grants for Applied Research and Programme Development Grants Programmes Supporting a successful application September 2014.
Research Fellowships. Overview Introduction Why apply for a fellowship Finding the right fellowship The application process Assessment criteria for funding.
Proposal Writing 101 Engineers Without Frontiers CEE 402.
Writing a research proposal Mamoun Ahram Office of Research Jordan University Hospital Faculty of Medicine The University of Jordan
How to Write a Project Proposal Specialization Introductory Module Thursday, May 9, 2013 Barbados.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
Research for Patient Benefit Preparing a research proposal What makes a good proposal? Professor Scott Weich, Panel Chair.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
ACF, Office of Child Care Tribal Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Visiting Program: Development and Implementation April 2016.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
Applying for funding: Tips fom the trenches
MSc in Social Research Methods
External Peer Reviewer Orientation
Insert your Springboard Project Title
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
WCHRI Innovation Grants Application information session 2018
Research Methods Technical Writing Thesis Report Writing
Tips for Writing Proposals
Coaching change through data driven team work
Presentation transcript:

Grants Factory GRANTS FACTORY WRITING GROUPS Essential Elements of a Good Grant Application Mick Tuite School of Biosciences Mick Tuite School of Biosciences

My experience Mick Tuite School of Biosciences Mick Tuite School of Biosciences 2Grants Factory 2013

3 Score Range: Definition: Good Work that has merit and meets the majority of the assessment criteria to an adequate level and is likely to advance the field Guidance to panel: Fundable in principle but unlikely to be funded Reality: Never funded

Grants Factory Score Range: Definition: Very Good Work that is internationally competitive and meets the majority of the assessment criteria to a high level and will advance the field Guidance to panel: Fundable Reality: Very unlikely to be funded

Grants Factory Score Range: Definition: Excellent Work that is of high international standard and addresses and meets the majority of the assessment criteria to a very high level and will answer important questions in the field Guidance to panel: Fundable Reality: In with a chance!!

Grants Factory Score Range: Definition: Exceptional Work that is at the leading edge internationally, addresses all of the assessment criteria, and meets the majority of them to an exceptional level. Likely to have a significant impact on the field Guidance to panel: Fundable Reality: Almost a dead cert!

The Research Funding Toolkit Jacqueline Aldridge Andrew Derrington 7Grants Factory 2013

What makes a project ‘fundable’?.....asks an important question that will be answered in a cost effective manner by someone who knows what they are doing that will have ‘impact’.... 8Grants Factory 2013

......asks an important question that will be answered in a cost effective manner by someone who knows what they are doing IMPORTANCE SUCCESS VALUE COMPETENCE IMPACT What makes a project ‘fundable’? 9Grants Factory 2013

The ‘Case for Support’  Excite  Need  Solvable 10Grants Factory 2013

Constructing the Case for Support OPENING LINES PROJECT MANAGEMENT, DISSEMINATON, KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER, ETHICS etc BACKGROUND AIMS & OBJECTIVES WORK PLAN Preview 11Grants Factory 2013

Aim(s): what your project should achieve overall. e.g. cure Alzheimer’s Objectives: what you will do to achieve your aim e.g. identify the ‘rogue’ protein Outputs: the objectives or activities that you will have delivered by the end of your project e.g. identified the ‘rogue’ Alzheimer’s protein Outcomes: the differences that will have been made by delivering your objectives and achieving your output e.g. a new drug target for Alzheimer’s Aims, Objectives, Outputs and Outcomes 12Grants Factory 2013

Constructing the Case for Support: Opening Lines  What is the question you are asking?  Why is it an important question?  Why it will bring a step change in the field! 2-3 sentences Accessible language Simple message(s) Excitement Timeliness “...a foot in the door......” 13Grants Factory 2013

Lay/Technical Summary Lay Summary: Describes the proposed research in simple terms in a way that could be publicised to a ‘general audience’ Technical Summary: Describes the proposed research in a manner suitable for a ‘specialist reader’ Why are the summaries important? First thing read by the introducing panel member...who might not be a specialist in the topic......and likely to be read by other members of the panel What should they do? Make it abundantly clear why this project is interesting, exciting - why the project must be funded now - what the wider ‘impact’ of the project will be 14Grants Factory 2013

Constructing the Case for Support: Background  What is known...?  What is not known...?  What must we know....?  Why now...?  Why am I the right person...? Familiarity with the literature Avoid too much self-citation Use simple diagrams Reiterate importance of project Include preliminary data 15Grants Factory 2013

Constructing the Case for Support: Aims & Objectives  Specific research questions....  No more than Logical flow Avoid interdependency Idea of timelines (6 month resolution) 16Grants Factory OUTCOME OUTCOME

Constructing the Case for Support: Work plan  Defined work packages  Start with the objective  End with the expected outcome  Sufficient technical detail  Appropriate methodology  Highlight innovative approaches Be ambitious yet realistic Avoid jargon/lab slang Include alternative approaches Be alert to health & safety and ethical issues 17Grants Factory 2013 GANTT Chart

Constructing the Case for Support: Overview OPENING LINES/PREVIEW BACKGROUND AIMS & OBJECTIVES WORK PLAN PROJECT MANAGEMENT, DISSEMINATON, REFERENCES, ETHICS etc ~ 5% ~ 30%~ 50%~ 10% 18Grants Factory 2013

Less strategic importance compared to other proposals Proposal poorly written Insufficient preliminary dataProposal lacked focus Proposal overambitious and unlikely to achieve all of its objectives Proposal lacked detail Work programmes poorly integrated Lack of relevant expertise Under resourcedPoor track record Will not significantly advance the field Poor value for money Will not significantly increase knowledge in the field Costs not adequately justified Is this project of international quality and therefore worthy of funding? Yes / No Please X any of the following standardised comments that apply to this proposal : Why Do Committees Say NO!! In order of priority, please specify the STRENGTHS of the proposal: In order of priority, please specify the WEAKNESSES of the proposal: 19Grants Factory 2013

What Other Steps Can I Take.....? Profile/standing in your field  Research/conference papers  Seminars/conference talks Presentation of grant  12pt Arial, layout  Use of images (unpublished data)  Proofread!  Avoid extensive self-citation Achievable ‘pathway to impact’ Realistic costings 20Grants Factory 2013

10 Tips For Writing a Successful Application 1.Read the eligibility rules 2.Leave plenty of time to prepare 3.No unexplained jargon 4.Get other people to read it 5.Explain why the research is needed 6.Network effectively 7.Justify extra time or resources 8.Participate in funding panels 9.Interpret referees feedback carefully 10.Plan applications in batches Blog: The Guardian ‘Learning & Teaching Hub’ April