HISTORY & HISTORIANS Contested Pasts Queen’s University of Belfast School of History and Anthropology HIS1001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing EAP courses for distance delivery in the global context David Donnarumma Helen Peters.
Advertisements

Pre-entry qualifications – staff perceptions versus reality Sarah Maguire Derry Corey.
Margaret Masson Glasgow Caledonian University BMAF Annual Conference 2009 Workplace mentoring for student support and employer engagement.
Case Studies M.Sc. in Applied Statistics Dr. Órlaith Burke Michaelmas Term 2012.
Peer assessment and group work event and practical workshop RSC WM Stimulating and supporting innovation in learning.
Contents The Role of the Personal Tutor in Supporting the Transition from FE into HE. Jacki Cartlidge & Sue Riddell Learning and Teaching Enhancement Unit.
Project Management Network for Excellence in Learning & Teaching PMnetwork for Excellence in Learning & Teaching Fifth Workshop Bournemouth University.
Research Informed Teaching – a summary Dr Susan Hill and Assoc Prof Tony Fetherston.
Peer Feedback and Assessment: Students as Partners in Designing Inclusive Assessment and Feedback Regina Pauli 1 and Marcia Worrell 2 1 Department of Psychology,
Research Skills AIH 2020 Dr Janette Martin & Dr Pat Hill 13 Feb 2012.
Paul Quick, PhD Coordinator of Faculty and TA Development Course Design 1: Planning your FYOS First-Year Odyssey Seminar Workshops.
IB THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE An Overview.
ESCalate seminar, Swansea Metropolitan University 3 June 2008 Digital tools for blended learning
D EVELOPING G RADUATE A TTRIBUTES T HROUGH T HE S USTAINABILITY A GENDA A ND P ROBLEM - BASED L EARNING Workshop Friday 30 th November 2012 Keele Hub for.
Evaluation of a Staff Development Programme for Online Teaching – A Case Study Catherine Gerrard University of Paisley.
JOANNA MacDONNELL Lecturer FdA Broadcast Media University Centre Hastings (UCH)
Innovations in biochemistry teaching – a new approach to course design and delivery Sue R Whittle Faculty of Biological Sciences On behalf of the Biochemistry.
Making Sense of Assessments in HE Modules (Demystifying Module Specification) Jan Anderson University Teaching Fellow L&T Coordinator SSSL
In ten slides or less Exemplar(y) Writing. Academic Writing Modular v. Integration Writing to Learn v. Writing in the Disciplines Wants v. Needs.
Problem-based Learning An Introduction. What is PBL? –“the most significant innovation in education for the professions in many years” –now very common.
Peer-Led Team Learning: A Model for Enhancing Student Learning Claire Berardini & Glenn Miller Third Annual Faculty Institute Pace University.
Tutorials via Social Networking. Samer El-Daher, Lucie Pollard School of Science.
Welcome to LT1H02N Studying Service Sector Management.
Assessment in Higher Education Linda Carey Centre for Educational Development Queen’s University Belfast.
1 Small Group Teaching Linda Carey Centre for Educational Development Queen’s University Belfast.
Using formative feedback, asynchronous discussion boards and recognition to develop the creative, confident and inspired learner 2. Teaching and Assessment.
BMAN Integrative Team Project Professor Linda A Macaulay.
Dafna Hardbattle, Ken Fisher & Peter Chalk London Metropolitan University International Blended Learning Conference University of Hertfordshire,
Perceptions of the Value of the Online Tools Alessandra Abbattista and Ali Messer, University of Roehampton Dr Arthur Chapman, Institute of Education.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Henry Shu-hung CHUNG Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong.
Enhancing Learners’ Lifelong Learning Through Implementing Problem-Based Learning Presenter: Dr Danh Duc Nguyen Department of Psychology and Education,
St Andrew’s Junior College
CPLA Video Case Studies Making Media Nursing. Making Media - Background First year, semester long 20 credit core module Involved 200 students with 4 staff.
Group work – why do it? Rachel Horn – Civil & Structural Engineering.
Social Spaces Identity/ Belonging Social Structures Social Capital Social Formation Relationships Groups/ Teams Key Members Basic Connections.
Contents Kay Hutchfield: Module Leader, IPL Skills for Professional Learning Journey to HE Conference: King’s Hill Facilitating student transition through.
Mathematics Development Programme for Teachers Assessments of progress.
Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J Drs Natalie Lloyd and Reva Ramiah Cementing the Discipline.
Students seizing responsibility: A revolution of collegiality Amie Speirs, Zoe Welsh, Julia Jung and Jenny Scoles Introduction: In our project Students.
Professional Practice
FYITS – Students Mktg Briefing Nov 2010 BSc (Hons) Engineering Management Nature of Course The course seeks to equip students with management knowledge.
C ENTRE FOR E XCELLENCE IN T EACHING & L EARNING A SSESSMENT FOR L EARNING Assessment for Learning in Practice: case studies from Northumbria's CETL Gill.
HISTORICAL STEPS: THE EXAMPLE OF THUCYDIDES This exercise explores what sorts of questions make up a historical explanation using the example of Thucydides'
Results of WP 4: Implementation, experimentation of teacher training actions Open University of Catalonia - From November 4th to December 19th.
Computer Education for First Year High School Student By: Bacala, Jane De Asis, Xela June L.
IB: Language and Literature
Development of a Web-Based Groupwork Assessment Tool Groupwork and Assessment Methods Demonstration of Software Discussion Hannah Whaley David Walker
HISTORICAL STEPS: THE EXAMPLE OF THUCYDIDES This exercise explores what sorts of questions make up a historical explanation using the example of Thucydides'
The Great History Conundrum Alex Moseley University of Leicester.
AS TEACHING STRATEGIES. (COOPERATION)  Small group work  Large group work  Critical outcomes (principles of OBE) Focus on the outcome.
MA Digital Documentary Portfolio Review Stage 2. Student Profile: who are our students? Standard offer: 2.1 equivalent plus applicants without this level.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
UCAS conference: Getting into Competitive Subjects Workshop: ‘Getting into History’ Dr Adrian Smith.
 Spring 2014 MCED 3430 Kelly Chaney.  Shared Group Grade o The group submits one product and all group members receive the same grade, regardless of.
BUS 660 Entire Course (2 Sets) For more course tutorials visit This Tutorial contains 2 Sets of Papers for each Assignment (Check Details.
Use of Blackboard™ Grade Centre for Immediate Feedback Helen Higson.
Graduate Attributes in Syllabus design for EAP
Research, Reasoning and Rhetoric: Thinking with History: Lecture 6 Understanding marks and feedback 7: Understanding marks and feedback Ted Vallance.
SSP4000 Introduction to the Research Process Wk1: Module Introduction
Katie Cattanach, MSc. Ambitious Futures Dr. Ruth Watkins
Class poll Go to and use the code
Creative assessment and feedback
The “Problem” is front-loaded Presentation/Product
Year 9 History: Contextual Homework
Contents Introduction/Contacts Description Of Module (& LOs)
What aspects of a team make it a Community of Practice?
Workshop Overview 1. Why assess process?
Information on Business Studies
Presentation transcript:

HISTORY & HISTORIANS Contested Pasts Queen’s University of Belfast School of History and Anthropology HIS1001

Aims of Module To introduce first-year students to history and its study at university: –To reflect upon the nature of the historical discipline –To understand the contested and limited nature of historical knowledge –To explore the dangers of simplistic explanations –To provide an awareness of differing viewpoints –To motivate students and highlight the importance of history All part of the QAA (2007) subject benchmarks

Module Design Quandries Motivation - engaging students with historiography and difficult conceptual questions Sources - encouraging students to approach both primary sources and historical writing in a more critical manner Skills - developing disciplinary and learning skills Logistics - additional teaching resources for c students

Approach of Module 1) ‘Contested Pasts’ Provide a discursive framework via three case studies: Crusades, Slavery, Rwandan Genocide

2) ‘Public History’ = The Legacy of the Past

3) ‘Public History’= how history is communicated to the public

Structure & Assessment Part One (weeks 1-7) Weekly lectures (two) – two weeks for each case study Two-hour tutorials each week Weekly Online Discussion Forum/Journal Guest speakers Individual Essay Part Two (weeks 8-12) Group Project (‘Public History’) Group Presentation (week 12)

Workshop Tasks Online Discussion Forums –What are the advantages and disadvantages of this teaching approach? –Potential difficulties in implementation and how could these be tackled? Group Projects and Presentations –What are the advantages and disadvantages of this teaching approach? –Potential difficulties in implementation and how could these be tackled?

Online Discussion Forum Weekly tutorial journal entries –Students submit six weekly assignments ( words each) on different sources and ‘public history’ –Journals available for all tutorial students to read Discussion –Entries and sources discussed in tutorial –General feedback given online by tutor –Individual marks and feedback after three and six entries –Follow-up online discussion (outside tutorial time) on related historiographical or historical questions Projects –Discussion Forum used by groups to organise and discuss project work

Structured Feedback

Online Debate

Group Project & Proposal Aims –To design a ‘public history’ project (eg. documentary, exhibition, website, etc) based on one case study –To explore the difficulties in communicating contested and sensitive history to the public –To examine the relationship between academic and public history –To understand the limitations of ‘historical truth’ –To work in a team and develop communication skills

Group Work Approach Structure –Assigned groups of 3-4 students –Scheduled group work for last four tutorials –Tutor provides weekly, progressive tasks for groups –Group Project Proposal of 3,500 words + appendices –Group presentation (15 min) at final tutorial

Main Problems –Non-attendance by individuals –Lack of individual contributions Assessment Approach –A single mark for all students for project proposal; another for presentation –Students lose 10 marks from project proposal mark for each of group-work tutorials missed. –Students who miss all four group-work tutorials are marked absent for both the project and presentation. Motivation –Four weekly tutorials specifically for group work – task-led by tutor – weekly discussion/feedback from all students. –Using existing skills and imaginative ideas of group members –Engaging with sensitive and ‘charged’ historical debates –Prize for best project