Page 0 2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures OCC – Chapter 6.
Advertisements

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs HOME Program Environmental Review Procedures HBA – Chapter 6.
The Lifecycle of Grants: Environmental Review November 7, 2012.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Grant Administrators.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITION Michael Casper, Compliance Manager  September 4, 2014.
 WELCOME  Welcome to the home page for the Louisiana Mapping Project (LaMP). The LaMP effort is being undertaken by Department of Homeland Security’s.
HUD Environmental Review Requirements November 30,2010.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 3, 2014.
2013 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop 2013 Applicants’ Workshop CDBG COMPLIANCE LITE.
1 WELCOME MAP “TUNE-UP” WORKSHOP September 19-20, 2007.
USAID Africa Bureau EIA Procedures for Sub-Projects
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop COMPLIANCE 9:30EnvironmentalRick 10:30BREAK 10:45Wage Rate ProvisionsMary Alice 11:00Uniform Acquisition Robert 11:15Conflict.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Section 3 Overview (see also DCA Policy– Appendix R)
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Program Information Workshop Monday, February 1, 2010.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Environmental Troubleshooting State Community Development Block Grant Rhode Island December 2012.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop Fair Housing/Equal Opportunity.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
2012 DCA CHIP Applicants’ Workshop Community HOME Investment Program (CHIP) HOMEOWNER REHABILITATION FEDERAL COMPLIANCE.
2013 CDBG Recipients' Workshop CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROHIBITION.
Gaining a Competitive Advantage Cindy Alligood, Pam Truitt, Mary Alice Applegate  December 3, 2014.
Office of Affordable Housing ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR THE HOME PROGRAM BY: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OFFICE OF AFFORDABLE.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
CDBG Compliance Lite Michael Casper and Pam Truitt December 2, 2015.
Program Overview/Changes & Environmental Review January 28, 2016 Small Cities CDBG Workshop - January 28, Hartford.
Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
3 CDBG Disaster Recovery Waterway Debris Program Wednesday, January 13, 2010.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
ACA Conference - September 2017
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
HUD SMAC Conference November 7, 2017
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
Presentation transcript:

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Why Environmental Review? Avoid or mitigate impacts that may harm our clients, Avoid litigation that could stop project on environmental grounds Avoid monitoring findings and/or loss of CDBG financial assistance to your project REQUIRED – by Federal Law & Regulation under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and NEPA related laws

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Statutory & Regulatory Structure National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and implementing regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 CFR Parts ). HUD Regulations (24 CFR Part 58). NEPA-Related Laws and Authorities (List at 24 CFR 58.5).

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division What is NEPA? A Decision Making Tool Ensures that environmental information is available to public BEFORE decisions are made and BEFORE actions are taken Helps public officials make decisions with an understanding of environmental consequences

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA-Related Laws/Authorities (10) National Historic Preservation Act (1966) Floodplain Management & Wetlands Protection: Executive Orders (1977) Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 Safe Drinking Water Act (1974) Endangered Species Act (1973) Wild & Scenic Rivers Act (1968)

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA-Related Laws/Authorities Clean Air Act (1970) Farmland Protection Policy Act (1981) HUD Environmental Criteria & Standards ▪ Noise Abatement and Control ▪ Near Explosives or Flammable Sites ▪ Near Airport Runway Protection Zones ▪ Near Toxic Hazards Environmental Justice E.O. (1994) Noise Control Act (1972)

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Environmental Review Regulations 24 CFR Part 58 HUD’s regulation allows local units of government to perform NEPA responsibilities and assume the responsibilities of HUD. Regulation titled “Environmental Review Procedures for Entities Assuming HUD Environmental Responsibilities” Covered in Chapter 2 of 2012 Recipients’ Manual Compliance is a General condition of all CDBG Awards.

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Certifying Officer As part of CDBG grant agreement, the Chief Elected Official of the jurisdiction assumes responsibility for environmental review and must sign the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and the Request for Release of Funds /Certification. CEO accepts the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts for the responsible entity in environmental matters for this certification.

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Do Not Take Choice Limiting Actions! Do not take ANY action until the environmental review compliance is achieved. ▪Including property acquisition Option agreements are allowable.

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Importance of Early Start Begin environmental review process as soon as possible. Typical times required to complete review range from 1 to 120 days. Must be completed by someone competent to do review

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Steps in the Environmental Review Process Create the Environmental Review Record. ▪Must be Available to Public Determine the Level of Environmental Review Required. Complete Environmental Assessment and Compliance with related Laws. Publish Required Notices According to Level of Review.

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Submit RROF and Certification to DCA. Obtain Letter “Removing Environmental Conditions” from DCA. Maintain Documentation of Compliance (Including Mitigation) in the Environmental Review Record (ERR). Steps in the Environmental Review Process, cont.

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Levels of Environmental Review Four levels of review: ▪24 CFR Part 58.34(a) Exempt ▪24 CFR Part Categorically Excluded Categorical exclusions SUBJECT to laws and authorities at 24 CFR Part 58.5 Categorical exclusions NOT subject to laws and authorities at 24 CFR Part 58.5 ▪24 CFR Part Environmental Assessment ▪24 CFR Part Environmental Impact Statement

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Activities which are deemed not to affect the human and /or physical environment (i.e. environmental studies, planning, or administrative activities) No publication requirements Document finding in the environmental review record and proceed with project Exempt Activities

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division 2 Classes ▪58.35(a) – activities SUBJECT TO other federal laws or authorities ▪58.35(b) – activities NOT SUBJECT TO other federal laws or authorities May Convert to Exempt Categorically Excluded

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Environmental Assessment is required if project activities are not determined to be Exempt or Categorically Excluded. Most CDBG funded projects require an Environmental Assessment. Environmental Assessment

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Use current form on DCA website Cite Authoritative Sources of Information See HUD Tool Describe mitigation measure for any identified negative impacts Evaluate all alternatives CEO must sign FONSI Environmental Assessment

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Publish Concurrent Notice (FONSI-NOI/RROF FONSI: 15 day local comment period No Earlier then 16 th day, submit public notice (proof of publication) and Request for Release of Funds and Certification (RROF/C) to DCA/OCD. Process for Environmental Notices

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Process for Environmental Notices Notice allows for an additional 15 days for public objection of RROF to DCA. This begins when DCA receives the RROF. DCA will release funds via a letter. Keep a copy in your ERR. Do not obligate choice limiting funds until release date such as acquisition or construction funds. 18

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Environmental Assessment Documentation Sources ogram_offices/comm_planning/environment /atechttp://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/pr ogram_offices/comm_planning/environment /atec HUD Webinar Series

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Limited number of CDBG Grantees have Section 106 related Special Condition DNR/HPD Review Comments

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division 1.Determine if project area is located in a floodplain or wetland 2.Publish “early” notice of proposal to allow public to consider and comment on action (15 day comment period) 3.Evaluate practicable alternatives to locating project in a floodplain or wetland 4.Identify potential direct and indirect impacts associated with project occupancy and modification of floodplain or wetland Floodplains and HUD “8 Step” Process

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division 5.Design or modify actions to minimize adverse impacts and preserve floodplain 6.Reevaluate whether proposed action is practicable/feasible in light of flood hazards and costs of minimization 7.Publish final notice of decision, identify why there is “ no practicable alternative” and mitigation measures adopted (can be combined with FONSI notice.) 8.Obtain approval (receive RROF/C) and implement action with mitigation 8-Step Process, cont.

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Important Tips Change of scope in project might require additional review. DON’T SPEND A DIME – until your ER is complete and you have received Release of Funds from DCA ▪Exception for Admin and Design Costs When in doubt – contact DCA/CDBG staff!

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division New Requirements Phase One for Certain Projects Tribal Consultation for Certain Project Locations ▪See NEW CPD Notice in Appendix ▪Process is very similar to Section 106 process? ▪Note the revised RROF/Certification

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Tool for Tribal Consultation ▪Notice ▪Determine what tribes to Consult ▪Address Tool ▪Sample Letter

Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division Contacts Michael Casper Pam Truitt