West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ECOLOGICAL TRAINING INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION SURVEY SURVEY LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW FIELD SURVEY METHODS.
Advertisements

Executive Order Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Analysis of Dike 14 CDF to Public Greenspace. Who owns Dike 14? State of Ohio holds Dike 14 as a public trust land Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.
Environmental Project Commitments The Alberta Experience
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Management Consultant  September 4, 2014.
HUD Environmental Review Requirements November 30,2010.
MISSION: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
Beyond Fish and the Federal ESA Chris Maguire Terrestrial Biology Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation Local Government Environmental.
Major Federal & State Approvals Environmental Business Council of New England Land-Based Wind Energy May 29, 2008 Ruth H. Silman, Esq.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Devil’s Slide Tunnel Project: Home of the California red-legged frog Richard Vonarb District 4 Office of Biological Science and Permitting California Department.
1 Public Lands Advocacy HOW TO REVIEW A FEDERAL PLANNING DOCUMENT.
USDA Forest Service Agency Mission and Habitat Management
Legal Issues Affecting Wind Energy Federal Nexus: Public Lands. On public land, Federal funding, Federal permit, Federal power grid. On public land, Federal.
Environmental Legislation and Agencies Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
Endangered Species Act
Biological Reviews JOELLE L. GEHRING, Ph.D. Federal Communications Commission.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
Marine Corps Air Station Miramar
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Carrin Williams.  Purity of Waters Act  To assure supplies of clean drinking water  Clean Streams Law  To protect the streams from pollution.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming.
What does an Environmental Professional Do?
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Completing the NEPA Process for CatEx Projects: Part 3 to CE Closeout.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Jeopardy $100 Land + SeaTrash/MinesPollutionWater Miscellaneous $200 $300 $400 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
East Link Extension Migratory Bird Treaty Act Compliance.
Name that Legislatio n! Review. Sets a time table for phasing out ozone- depleting substances.
ENVIRONMENTAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL INVESTIGATIONS PERMITTING FOR UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AREA ENDANGERED.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
NEPA Environmental Procedure Pam Truitt, Grants Specialist  September 10, 2015.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 24 Environmental Law.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
Environmental Commitments/Tracking. Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Federal Environmental Requirements for Local Agency Transportation Projects Tom Holstein, , Donna Meyer, ,
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
ENVIRONMENTALS LAWS AND ACTS. 1 Established air pollution regulation for key pollutants enforced Set goals and standards for the quality and purity of.
Chapter 19 Environmental Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Guide to Permitting Electric Transmission Lines in Wyoming Wyoming Renewable Energy Coordination Committee Presented to Western Governors Association October,
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
Monterey County Grading and Erosion Control Requirements and Enforcement Methods 1.
Overview of Everything You Need to Know About Mitigation.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.
ACA Conference - September 2017
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Chapter 45 Environmental Protection and Global Warming
Presentation transcript:

West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division TxDOT

West Texas Legislative Summit 2 National Environmental Policy Act The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) establishes the decision-making process that FHWA/TxDOT must follow prior to the construction of transportation projects using Federal funding or requiring Federal approval.

West Texas Legislative Summit 3 Environmental Program at TxDOT Planning Environmental Design Right-of-way Construction NEPA Document Review and Approval Environmental Impact Statements Environmental Assessments Categorical Exclusions Other Permits and Approvals (to name a few) Endangered Species Act Clean Water Act National Historic Preservation Act Migratory Bird Treaty Act Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Clean Air Act Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Executive Orders Environmental Justice Floodplain Management Protection of Wetlands

West Texas Legislative Summit 4 NEPA Assignment  FHWA can “assign” to TxDOT responsibility for compliance with NEPA and other federal environmental laws  Program authority comes from MAP-21, Section 1313 Surface Transportation Project Delivery Program  TxDOT will assume legal responsibility and liability for environmental documents and decisions  Categorical Exclusion determinations  Environmental Assessment approvals  Environmental Impact Statements approvals

West Texas Legislative Summit 5 NEPA Assignment What changes under NEPA Assignment? Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) TxDOT – Review and Approval under National Environmental Policy Act (federally funded projects) TxDOT - Review and Approval for submittal to FHWA Benefits: Accelerated document approval Expedited decision-making Ownership/responsibility Compliance with all Environmental Laws, Regulations, and Policies Remains the same Timeline Preparation of application began in June 2013 Application was submitted to FHWA on May 26, 2014 NEPA Assignment MOU signed December 16, 2014

West Texas Legislative Summit NEPA Assignment 6 Still early but,… Review and approval time for projects processed as Environmental Assessment are trending lower by nearly half

West Texas Legislative Summit Other Laws – Clean Water Act (Section 404) 7 Section 404 of the Clean Water Act – requires a permit for the placement of fill into waters of the U.S. Border Highway West (El Paso)  Fill in arroyo (0.03 ac.) to extend culvert  Permit triggers reviews by State Historic Preservation Office

West Texas Legislative Summit 8 State Highway 151 at Loop 1604 (San Antonio)  Construction of an underpass, San Antonio  Received concurrence from US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) that project activities “may affect but are not likely to adversely affect” karst invertebrate species  During the first five months of construction, 25 karst features were found  One feature contained Cicurina venii, a federally listed spider  It was the 2 nd specimen ever collected, known only from one other location Other Laws – Endangered Species Act Endangered Species Act – intended to protect species and the ecosystems upon which they depend

West Texas Legislative Summit 9 State Highway 151 at Loop 1604  Project activities halted as consultation with USFWS was reinitiated  Using geophysics, underground features were able to be identified  To lessen the impacts on karst invertebrates, the project was redesigned as an overpass  TxDOT received a Biological Opinion and an Incidental Take Statement from USFWS and project construction resumed after 25 months. Case Study, continued Other Laws – Endangered Species Act

West Texas Legislative Summit 10 Migratory Bird Treaty Act – protects ~2,000 species of birds, their nests and eggs IH 20 at FM 1187 (Parker County)  Bridge structure widening as a part of intersection improvements  Project construction was unable to avoid nesting season, so contractor was instructed to take measures to prevent birds from nesting  Contractor attempted to remove nests before they became “active” by MBTA standards  Preventative measures were not effective  Concerned citizen contacted TxDOT and USFWS regarding possible MBTA violation Case Study Nest removal, nest disturbance (noise), vegetation clearing, and direct mortality of migratory bird eggs or young can result in a Migratory Bird Treaty Act violation. Swallow nests on a bridge Swallow nests Other Laws – Migratory Bird Treaty Act

West Texas Legislative Summit 11 IH20 at FM 1187 (Parker County)  TxDOT assessment of project confirmed active nests  Contractor instructed to stop implementing measures to prevent birds from nesting, as nests were established and active  USFWS Law Enforcement investigated but did not pursue action  All project activity within an established 100 foot buffer of the nesting area ceased and cannot resume until all the nests become inactive.  Swallow nests can remain active through September Case Study, continued Other Laws – Migratory Bird Treaty Act

West Texas Legislative Summit Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, TxDOT Environmental Affairs Division Questions?