2014-15 Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends 2014-15 Riverside Community Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Advertisements

Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
PRESENTED BY THE DEMAREST ADMINISTRATIVE TEAM Annual State of the Schools Assessment Report.
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan Prioritized Needs.
Fall 2014 MAP NWEA Score Comparison Alliance Dr. Olga Mohan High School October 22, 2014.
Beyond the Classroom: The Use of Essential Skills for Remediation and Extension Christine Koch November 2008.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
“National Standards & Benchmarks for Effective Catholic Elementary and Secondary Schools” Momentum Feb/ Mar
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
Springville CSD Where every child will become a successful reader ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2008.
Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan ITBS/ITED Results for
Benchmark Data. World History Average Score: 56% Alliance: 96%
BOARD ENDS POLICY REVIEW E-2 Students will demonstrate a strong foundation in academic skills by working toward the Kansas Standards of Excellence in reading,
Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.
Lincoln Public Schools Testing Year Scores New England Common Assessment Program Grades 3-8 and 11 Reading Math Writing.
Berlin Elementary School Spring 2014 Assessments and Initiatives March 26, 2014.
BOE Presentation Assessment Update Trend Data for USD261 SOE.
Running Creek Elementary School School Improvement Plan Damon L. Rhodes, Principal Mandy Dry, SIT Chair.
GRINNELL HIGH SCHOOL IOWA ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FRESHMEN, SOPHOMORE, JUNIOR SEMINARS April 1, 2015.
Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
Vision Statement All children have the right to a rigorous, high-quality education which meets their individual needs. UCS will respect, encourage and.
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
SCHOOL LEADERSHIP TEAM MEETING JANUARY 22, 2015 Sedgefield Elementary.
GRINNELL HIGH SCHOOL IOWA ASSESSMENT INFORMATION FRESHMEN, SOPHOMORE, JUNIOR SEMINARS January 22, 2014.
2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient State Performance Targets.
Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.
2008 CRCT Domain Summary Beecher Hills Elementary School Numbers Represent the Average % Correct in Each Domain SRT-1.
Merrymount Elementary School PTO Assessment Presentation December 4, 2014.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.
Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
North Carolina Read to Achieve. The Goal “The goal of the State is to ensure that every student read at or above grade level by the end of third grade.
Math Department Data. Algebra II 1 st Period LEVEL I LEVEL II LEVEL III LEVEL IV # of students 1850 % PROFICIENT: 33% % NONPROFICIENT: 67%
Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.
B a c kn e x t h o m e BARTON SCHOOL STATE OF THE SCHOOL ADDRESS April 11, 2007.
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3 Revised: October 30, 2009 Official WASL Results AYP Status.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Iowa Demographics While total K-12 enrollment in Iowa is decreasing, high school ag ed enrollment and FFA membership has continued to increase since the.
December 2015 STATE OF SCHOOL REVIEW Everett Public Schools Compiled by the Center for Educational Effectiveness.
Minnesota Assessments June 25, 2012 Presenter: Jennifer Dugan.
FES State of the Schools. Reading – 85% of FES students will meet or exceed state standards on the MCA-II in reading. We will improve scores on DIBELS.
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
Next Generation Iowa Assessments.  Overview of the Iowa Assessments ◦ Purpose of Forms E/F and Alignment Considerations ◦ Next Generation Iowa Assessments.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
Oklahoma State University Can Mathematics State Test Scores Improve in Four Minutes a Day? Justine Celoni, M.S., Carrol Smith, M.S., and Katye Perry, Ph.D.
California Standards Tests (CSTs) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Grade 10 Census Report Data to inform the evaluation of the district’s.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Legislative Requirement 2013
Cedar Falls Board of Education October 2017
WELCOME.
School-Wide Achievement Mathematics
Closing The Achievement Gap Task Force
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Meredith cargilL director of curriculum, instruction, and technology
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Hedenkamp Elementary School
Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
Celebration using Galileo Data
5/16/2017 Inspiring excellence!
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
Salem Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Data Riverside Community Schools

Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools

Schoolwide Reading Trends

Schoolwide Math Trends

Schoolwide Science Trends

Schoolwide Social Studies Trends

Schoolwide Written Expression Trends

Gradewise Proficiencies Riverside Community Schools

Gradewise Proficiencies - Reading

Gradewise Proficiencies - Math

Gradewise Proficiencies - Science

Gradewise Proficiencies – Social Studies

Gradewise Proficiencies – Written Expression

District Proficiency Levels Riverside Community Schools

Reading Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=435) 20% or 435, or 87 students in 2 nd -11 th grade, are non-proficient in reading. In 2014, we had 18% of 438, or 78 students in 2 nd -11 th grade, that were non-proficient in reading. In 2013 we had 24% of 442, or 106 students, that were non-proficient in reading.

Math Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=435) 14% of 435, or 61 students, in 2 nd -11 th grade were non-proficient in math. In 2014, 15% of 438, or 65 students, were non-proficient in math. In 2013, 20% of 442, or 88 students were non-proficient in math.

Science Proficiency Levels Grades 2-11 (n=435) In 2015, 18% of 435, or 78 student, in 2 nd -11 th grades were non-proficient in science. In 2014, 17% of 438, or 75 students were non-proficient in science. In 2013, In 2013, 20% of 442, or 88 students were non-proficient in science.

District Proficiency Levels - FAY Riverside Community Schools

Reading Proficiency Levels Grades FAY (n=410)

Math Proficiency Levels Grades FAY (n=410)

Science Proficiency Levels Grades FAY (n=410)

Class Proficiency Trends Riverside Community Schools

Class of 2025 – 2nd Graders

2 nd Grade

Class of 2024 – 3rd Graders

3 rd Grade

Class of 2023 – 4th Graders

4 th Grade

Class of 2022 – 5th Graders

5 th Grade

Class of 2021 – 6 th Graders

6 th Grade

Class of 2020 – 7 th Graders

7 th Grade

Class of 2019 – 8 th Graders

8 th Grade

Class of 2018 – 9 th Graders

9 th Grade

Class of 2017 – 10 th Graders

10 th Grade

Class of 2016 – 11 th Graders

11 th Grade

Grade Level Proficiency Trends Riverside Community Schools

2 nd Grade Proficiency Trends

3 rd Grade Proficiency Trends

4 th Grade Proficiency Trends

5 th Grade Proficiency Trends

6 th Grade Proficiency Trends

7 th Grade Proficiency Trends

8 th Grade Proficiency Trends

9 th Grade Proficiency Trends

10 th Grade Proficiency Trends

11 th Grade Proficiency Trends

Gaps Riverside Community Schools

SES Gaps Riverside Community Schools

SES - Reading Proficiency Gaps

SES - Math Proficiency Gaps

SES - Science Proficiency Gaps

Gender Gaps Riverside Community Schools

Gender - FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps

Gender – Math Proficiency Gaps

Gender – Science Proficiency Gaps

IEP Gaps Riverside Community Schools

IEP – Reading Proficiency Gaps

IEP – Math Proficiency Gaps

IEP – Science Proficiency Gaps

FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

SES - FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

SES FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps N =148N =262 Gap=18%

SES FAY – Math Proficiency Gaps N =148N =262 Gap=17%

SES FAY – Science Proficiency Gaps N =148N =262 Gap=14%

Gender - FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

Gender FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps N =217N =193 Gap =13%

Gender FAY – Math Proficiency Gaps N =217N =193 Gap =1%

Gender FAY – Science Proficiency Gaps N =217N =193 Gap =0%

IEP - FAY Gaps Riverside Community Schools

IEP FAY – Reading Proficiency Gaps N =48N =362 Gap=41%

IEP FAY – Math Proficiency Gaps N =48N =362 Gap=41%

IEP FAY – Science Proficiency Gaps N =48N =362 Gap=20%

Gap Trendlines Riverside Community Schools

SES Schoolwide Gap Trends- Reading

SES Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

SES Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Reading

IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

IEP Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Reading

Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Math

Gender Schoolwide Gap Trends - Science

Collapsed Grade Levels Riverside Community Schools

Reading Proficiencies by Collapsed Grade Levels

Math Proficiencies by Collapsed Grade Levels

Science Proficiencies by Collapsed Grade Levels

Reading Proficiencies by Collapsed Grades Over Time

Math Proficiencies by Collapsed Grades Over Time

Science Proficiencies by Collapsed Grades Over Time

Goals Riverside Community Schools

Long-Range Goals Goal 1: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in reading comprehension, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 2: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in mathematics, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 3: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in science, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 4 All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in social studies, prepared for success beyond high school. Goal 5: All K-12 students will use integrated technology as part of their typical experiences in reading, mathematics, and science classes/courses. Goal 6: All students will feel safe at and connected to school. Goal 7: All K-12 students will use integrated 21st century skills as part of their typical experiences in reading, mathematics, and science classes/courses. Goal 8: All K-12 students will achieve at high levels in written expression, prepared for success beyond high school.

Elementary School Annual Goals for Reading Goal: 25% of FAY students from 2 nd grade ( ) will show proficiency on IA TIER in 3 rd grade ( ). How We Did: We had 80% of our students be proficient on the FAST Reading Assessment in the 3 rd Grade class. Math Goal: 25% of FAY students from 2 nd grade ( ) will show growth on NSS in 3 rd grade ( ) in Math. How We Did: We had 55% of our 3 rd grade students showed growth on the NSS Math assessment. Science Goal: 25% of FAY students from 2 nd grade ( ) will show growth on NSS in 3 rd grade ( ) in Science. How We Did: 47% of the FAY 3 rd grade students showed growth on the NSS Science assessment.

Intermediate School Annual Goals for Reading Goal: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Reading How We Did: We had 36 out of 44 FAY students show growth which was 80%. Math Goal: Math: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Math How We Did: We had 31 out of 36 FAY students show growth which was 86%. Science Goal: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Science How We Did: We had 47 out of 53 FAY students show growth which was 88%. Social Studies Goal: 20% of the FAY students in the 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Social Studies. How We Did: We had 21 out of 28 FAY students show growth which was 75%.

Jr./Sr. High School Annual Goals for Reading Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Reading. How we did: 29 out of 38 students, so 76% of non-proficient students made growth on the Reading Iowa Assessments. Math Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Math. How we did: 32 out of 35 students, so 91% of non-proficient students made growth on the Math Iowa Assessments. Science Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Science. How we did: 37 out of 44 students, so 84% of non-proficient students made growth on the Science Iowa Assessments. Social Studies Goal: 25% of the FAY students in the classes of 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Social Studies. How we did: 39 out of 47 students, so 83% of non-proficient students made growth on the Social Studies Iowa Assessments

Elementary School Annual Goals for Reading Goal: FAY 3 rd Grade students ( ) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Reading score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In there were 10 students who were non proficient. (12 students around the bubble of proficiency) Math Goal: FAY 3 rd Grade students ( ) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Math score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In there were 13 students who were non proficient. (10 students around the bubble of proficiency) Science Goal: FAY 3 rd Grade students ( ) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Science score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In there were 13 students who were non proficient. (5 students around the bubble of proficiency) Social Studies: FAY 3 rd Grade students ( ) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Social Studies score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In there were 20 students who were non proficient. (5 students around the bubble of proficiency) Written Expression: FAY 3 rd Grade students ( ) as measured by the IA Assessments NSS Written Expression score will maintain or increase the number of students who are proficient. In there were 12 students who were non proficient. (12 students around the bubble of proficiency)

Intermediate School Annual Goals for Reading: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Reading. Math: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Math. Science: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Science. Social Studies: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Social. Written Expression: 20% of the FAY students in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade performing in the non- proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Written Expression.

Jr./Sr. High School Annual Goals for Reading: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Reading. Math: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Math. Science: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Science. Social Studies: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Social Studies. Written Expression: 30% of the FAY students in the classes of 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 performing in the non-proficient range on the Iowa Assessment will show growth on the test in Written Expression.