January 13, 2005 The Landscape of Arkansas' K-12 Education System: Responses to Questions Posed by the Koret Task Force University of Arkansas College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of NCLBs Highly Qualified Teacher Requirements November 2003.
Advertisements

ACE-Achieving Classroom Excellence.  2005: Achieving Classroom Excellence Act (SB 982) ◦ Established the ACE Task Force and guiding principles  2006:
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Kentucky Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Kentucky is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Tennessee Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Tennessee is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
1 Florida Formula for Student Achievement: Lessons for Improving Student Learning John L Winn.
ORIENTATION FRESHMAN CLASS CAMDEN CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL April 8, 9, 2013.
© North East Independent School District, 2014 High School Graduation Requirements First time 9th-grade students in and thereafter.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
The persons whose photographs are depicted in the slides are professional models. They have no relation to the issues discussed. Any characters they are.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Oklahoma Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Oklahoma is On the Move Progress Report 2008 Challenge.
Achievement Gaps in the SEDL Region: What Data Tell Us Closing the Achievement Gap: School Resources and Beyond SEDL Policy Forum 2004 September 27-28,
OEP is a research center within the College of Education and Health Professions at the University of Arkansas that specializes in Education Research and.
Grand Blanc Community Schools Staff Presentation on High School Redesign January, 2007 Jeremy M. Hughes, Ph.D. Deputy Supt./Chief Academic Officer.
February GRADES Reading: Grades 3 – 8 Math: Grades 3 – 8 Writing: Grades 4 & 7 Science: Grades 5 & 8 Social Studies: Grade 8 2 HIGH SCHOOL.
Certification and HQT Christina Linder, Director Certification and Professional Standards Teacher Quality
High School Graduation Survey Office of Academic and Professional Standards March 2007.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
Teacher Quality In New Mexico Information Session on New Mexico’s 3-Tiered Teacher Licensure System James Ball, SDE Larry Martinez, SDE Kersti Tyson, SDE.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Georgia Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Georgia 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Analysis of Expenditure Changes post-Act 59 – Initial Findings Prepared for the Arkansas Senate Office for Education Policy University of Arkansas
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Getting Your Secondary Teachers to HQT in a Personalized Learning School APLUS+ Conference October 2010 Diane Grotjohn
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Mississippi Challenge to Lead Goals for Education Mississippi is Moving Ahead Progress Report 2010.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Profile of Virginia’s Instructional School Personnel Presented to the Special Education Advisory Committee on September 29, 2011 Mrs. Patty S. Pitts Assistant.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
Utah Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High School.
11/5/2015 Michigan’s School Accreditation System : From Education YES to MI-SAS.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind Education Week
0 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) FY13 February 2012.
February 15, 2006 Highly Qualified Requirements for Exceptional Student Education Teachers What’s New?
From the Board Room To the Classroom PDK Panel Discussion September 19, 2002.
HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHERS No Child Left Behind 11/23/09.
Hawaii Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Pennsylvania Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%)
Title I, Part A Program Title I, Part A provides educational services to schools with high percentages of children from low-income families by providing.
Arkansas State Report Card Are We 5 th or 49 th ? July 8, 2013 Arkansas Rural Ed Association.
RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.
FRESHMAN YEAR Transitioning into Westfall High School.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Arkansas Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Arkansas 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
Virginia Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
Vermont Profile of Adult Learning Adults with No High School Diploma (%) Age Age Speak English Poorly or Not at All – Age 18 to 64 (%) High.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Opening Frame The Issue Labels Traditional Cert Pathways
Parents and Schools Partners in Education
Council on Accreditation and School Improvement
Graduation Requirements Effective
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Demonstrates In-Field Status Overview
Jessieville School District
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
What Parents Need to Know
Challenge to Lead: Texas
What Parents Need to Know
Presentation transcript:

January 13, 2005 The Landscape of Arkansas' K-12 Education System: Responses to Questions Posed by the Koret Task Force University of Arkansas College of Education and Health Professions

Slide 2 of 19January 13, 2005 Presentation Overview VI.Teacher Preparation and Certification VII.Implementation of NCLB: AYP VIII.Transparency of Results IX.School Choice X.Rural Education Challenges I.Economic and Demographic Background II.Overview of K-12 System III.School Funding and Resources IV.Academic Standards V.Testing and Accountability

Slide 3 of 19January 13, 2005 I. Economic and Demographic Background Educational Attainment of the Population: Arkansas and U.S., 2002 % of Population (aged 25+) Arkansas (%) United States (%) Arkansas Rank (of 51) High School Diploma or more79.9%82.6%40 Bachelor’s Degree or more19.7%25.9%47 Source: U.S. Bureau of Census, American Community Survey 2002 figures

Slide 4 of 19January 13, 2005 I. Economic and Demographic Background Source: Education Week (2004), U.S. Census Bureau (2004), National School Lunch Program (2004) CategoryAmount Median Household Income$32,000 (U.S. = $42,000) Poverty Rate18.8% (2 nd highest in U.S.) Students in Title I Schools66.1% Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Price Lunch 48.4% (U.S. = 59%)

Slide 5 of 19January 13, 2005 I. Economic and Demographic Background Student Demographics: Racial minorities: 29% (U.S. = 39%) Students with disabilities: 12.7% English-language learners: 3.4%

Slide 6 of 19January 13, 2005 II. Overview of AR K-12 System CategoryValueRank # of Pre-K–12 Students450,98534 # of Public Schools1,129 # of Districts312 Average ACT Composite Score (2002)* Average Per-Pupil Spending (2001)$6, Average Teacher Salary ( )$37, * Source: Southern Regional Education Board (2003), NEA Research (2003)

Slide 7 of 19January 13, 2005 Math: Grade 4 % Proficient Math: Grade 8 % Proficient Reading: Grade 4 % Proficient Reading: Grade 8 % Proficient AR U.S II. Overview of AR K-12 System NAEP Results: Math & Reading (2003)

Slide 8 of 19January 13, 2005 III. School Funding & Resources Funding Sources: state (60%), local (30%), federal (10%) School Funding Scheme: Foundation Foundation Amount per pupil: $5,400 Additional Categorical Funding Levels: $3,250/student in alternative learning programs & vocational centers $195/student for English language learners $480/student in districts with 70% or less students who qualify for free/reduced lunch (FRL) program $960/student in districts with 70-90% of students in FRL $1440/student in districts with > 90% of students in FRL $50/student for professional development of staff

Slide 9 of 19January 13, 2005 Content Strands Content Standards Student Learning Expectations IV. Academic Standards Detailed exercises specific to each grade level  Language Arts: 3 strands for K-8 (i.e., “Oral & Visual Communications”)  Math: 5 strands for K-8 (i.e., “Geometry & Spatial Sense”)

Slide 10 of 19January 13, 2005 IV. Grades on Standards YearEnglish/Language ArtsMath 2005 CF 2000 DD F Overall Grade on Standards & Accountability (Fordham Foundation)

Slide 11 of 19January 13, 2005 V. Testing & Accountability Arkansas Comprehensive Testing Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP) : Math & Reading: Grades 4, 6, 8 Algebra I, Geometry, Literacy: High school : Math & Reading: Grades 3, 5, : Science benchmark tests (primary & middle school) : Biology end-of-course tests (high school)

Slide 12 of 19January 13, 2005 YearGradeState Ranking 2005C (76) C+ (79) B- (80) D+ (68) D (66)35 Overall Grade on Standards & Accountability (Education Week) V. Testing & Accountability

Slide 13 of 19January 13, 2005 VI. Teacher Prep and Certification In addition to B.A. & state certification, AR teachers must demonstrate subject-area competency through either: Passing licensure assessment; At least 5 years teaching experience in subject taught; 90 hours of approved professional development credit in subject taught; Advanced degree (M.A., Ed. Specialist, etc.) in subject taught; National Board Certification in subject taught; or Completion of program described in SEA’s Additional Licensure Plan (which includes state licensure assessment) in subject taught

Slide 14 of 19January 13, 2005 VII. Implementation of NCLB: AYP As of , each district and individual school must increase the proficiency of students by 10% each year In , 305 of Arkansas’ schools did not make AYP: Year 1 School Improvement: 231 schools Year 2 School Improvement: 69 schools Year 3 School Improvement: 4 schools Year 4 School Improvement: 1 school

Slide 15 of 19January 13, 2005 VIII. Transparency of Results AR issues annual state report card detailing results for each school Report Card Features ( ): 150 data fields including 120 on results of state and standardized tests 3 years of data on each school & district 3 years of data at state level 2,000,000 total calculations

Slide 16 of 19January 13, 2005 Example Report Card from 2003: Exams, Advancement, Discipline & Safety, Demographics, Taxpayer Information

Slide 17 of 19January 13, 2005 IX. School Choice CategoryValue Ranking in Heritage Foundation’s Educational Freedom Index (2001) 32 # Students in magnet, charter, vocational schools, etc. 34,000 (7%) # Students home-schooled15,000 (3%) # Private schools Ranking the “strength” of our Charter Law by the Center for Education Reform 182 (26,000 students) 35

Slide 18 of 19January 13, 2005 X. Rural Education Challenges AR District average enrollment = 1,421; US average = 3,333 AR High School average enrollment = 401; US average = 785 Two-thirds of AR HS enroll < 400 Rural Districts (n=210) 2.3 schools (633 students per district) City Districts (n=49) 7.8 schools (4,084 students per district)

Slide 19 of 19January 13, 2005 Final Thoughts: Openness to Reform Is Arkansas open to school reform? There is an active interest group that is … The state did have an accountability law in 1999 mandating ACTAAP … However, there are many who fought against ACT 35 last session … We may learn more on January 31 – February in Little Rock! Any Further Questions: Contact