1 A Friction Differential and Cable Transmission Design for a 3-DOF Haptic Device with Spherical Kinematics 2011 IEEE IROS, September 28, 2011 Reuben Brewer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 20 Dimitar Stefanov. Microprocessor control of Powered Wheelchairs Flexible control; speed synchronization of both driving wheels, flexible control.
Advertisements

FRC Robot Mechanical Principles
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
Xxx Roller Gearing and Transmission Technology Pál Bogár sincroll - drive technologies ltd London xxx.
WEDGES AND FRICTIONAL FORCES ON FLAT BELTS
Chapter 9 Rotational Dynamics.
Chapter 4 Machines, Work, and Energy
Introduction University of Bridgeport 1 Introduction to ROBOTICS.
University of Bridgeport
Kinematics & Grasping Need to know: Representing mechanism geometry Standard configurations Degrees of freedom Grippers and graspability conditions Goal.
Constrained Near-Optimal Control Using a Numerical Kinetic Solver Alan L. Jennings & Ra úl Ordóñez, ajennings1,
Physics 101: Lecture 15, Pg 1 Physics 101: Lecture 15 Rolling Objects l Today’s lecture will cover Textbook Chapter Exam III.
ME 4135 Fall 2011 R. R. Lindeke, Ph. D. Robot Dynamics – The Action of a Manipulator When Forced.
Introduction to Robotics
POWER TRANSMISSION with BELTS & CHAINS
Mechanisms Instructor: Shuvra Das Mechanical Engineering Dept.
CSCE 641: Forward kinematics and inverse kinematics Jinxiang Chai.
3D orientation.
Foundations of Technology Mechanical Advantage
Final Review Powerpoint
Rolling. Rolling Condition – must hold for an object to roll without slipping.
Advanced Graphics (and Animation) Spring 2002
Definition of an Industrial Robot
"Tell me and I'll forget Show me and I may remember Let me do and I'll understand" RA Moffatt WELB A Mousetrap Powered Racer This project looks to be an.
February 21, 2000Robotics 1 Copyright Martin P. Aalund, Ph.D. Computational Considerations.
1 CMPUT 412 Motion Control – Wheeled robots Csaba Szepesvári University of Alberta TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete.
Simple Machines Device that makes doing work easier is a machine Machines increase applied force and/or change direction of applied force to make work.
Mechanical Actuation System Lecture 6 (Chapter 8).
Transfer of energy is accomplished through three basic means: The gear, the belt, and the chain. Statics deals with forces and their effect on a body at.
Motion Control Locomotion Mobile Robot Kinematics Legged Locomotion
+44 (0) Roller Gearing and Transmission Technology sincroll - drive technologies ltd Energy efficiency.
Sci 701 Unit 6 As learned in Unit 5: Speed, Power, Torque, and DC Motors, a motor can generate a set amount of power. Introduction to Gears Since there.
Lecture 2: Introduction to Concepts in Robotics
Chapter 2 Robot Kinematics: Position Analysis
Robot Dynamics – Slide Set 10 ME 4135 R. R. Lindeke, Ph. D.
BIPEDAL LOCOMOTION Prima Parte Antonio D'Angelo.
1 Haptic Systems Mohsen Mahvash Lecture 2 9/1/06.
Mousetrap powered cars!. Why?? Mousetrap powered cars! Physics: Potential and kinetic energies and kinetic friction. Critical Skills: Critical thinking.
9 Torsion.
MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory — Research Directions Legged Robots Gill Pratt.
1 Haptic Systems Mohsen Mahvash Lecture 3 11/1/06.
Review: Differential Kinematics
M. Zareinejad 1. 2 Grounded interfaces Very similar to robots Need Kinematics –––––– Determine endpoint position Calculate velocities Calculate force-torque.
Kinematics. The function of a robot is to manipulate objects in its workspace. To manipulate objects means to cause them to move in a desired way (as.
Lagrangian Mechanics A short overview. Introduction Previously studied Kinematics and differential motions of robots Now Dynamic analysis Inertias, masses,
Drivetrain and Framing Possible configurations of a robot base, and pros and cons of each. Robotics 101.
Garage Door Design Analysis
PERCROScuola Superiore S. Anna1 “Detailed Workplan for 2005” Pisa – April 11-12, 2005 HAPTEX 2 nd Technical Meeting PERCRO.
Design of a Compliant and Force Sensing Hand for a Humanoid Robot Aaron Edsinger-Gonzales MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
Presentation on gears.
Machines make doing work easier or faster by changing the force needed to do the work. Section 1: Work and Machines K What I Know W What I Want to Find.
Hardware and Locomotion
Chapter 4 Dynamic Analysis and Forces 4.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapters …….  The dynamics, related with accelerations, loads, masses and inertias. In.
Foundations of Technology.  Common components (levers, inclined planes, wedges, wheels and axles, pulleys, screws, gears, cams, linkages, shafts, couplings,
KAASHIV INFOTECH – A SOFTWARE CUM RESEARCH COMPANY IN ELECTRONICS, ELECTRICAL, CIVIL AND MECHANICAL AREAS
Space Robotics Seminar On
Chapter 7 Review.
1 Rotational Dynamics The Action of Forces and Torques on Rigid Objects Chapter 9 Lesson 2 (a) Translation (b) Combined translation and rotation.
Gaits Cost of Transportation Wheeled Mobile Robots Most popular locomotion mechanism Highly efficient Simple mechanical implementation Balancing is.
Birla Vishvakarma Mahavidyalaya Vallabh Vidhyanagar KINEMATICS OF MACHINES(: ) Prepared GANVIT RONAK [ ]
Chapter 4 Mechanisms.
Introduction What is mechanisms Features of Mechanisms
Robotics and Automation Control
POWER TRANSMISSION with BELTS & CHAINS
Direct Manipulator Kinematics
Analytical and Applied Kinematics
Haptics – Don’t Lose Touch with Virtual Reality
ME 202 Mechanical Engineering for Civil Engineers
Vehicle Dynamics Modeling and Control
Rigid Body in Equilibrium
Presentation transcript:

1 A Friction Differential and Cable Transmission Design for a 3-DOF Haptic Device with Spherical Kinematics 2011 IEEE IROS, September 28, 2011 Reuben Brewer 1, Adam Leeper 1, and J. Kenneth Salisbury 1,2,3 Departments of Mech. Engineering 1, Computer Science 2, and Surgery 3 Stanford University, USA

2 Motivation Need a haptic device that is  Compact, with single-link connection to the user’s hand. More elegant. Easier to stow in a base, haptic workstation, or table-top.  Scalable.  Useful for general, as well as specific (laparoscopic) rendering. Solution: Spherical Coordinates  Concentrate motors in base for slim form-factor with single link to hand. Base

3 Prior Work “Spherical” can mean any combination of yaw, pitch, roll, and radial (prismatic). Non-spherical, suitable for general rendering Spherical, not suitable for general haptic rendering with translation 2-DOF yaw and pitch 3-DOF yaw, pitch, and roll about hand

4 yaw, pitch, and radial (flown)yaw, pitch, and radial (grounded, cable in flexible sleeve)

5 yaw, pitch, roll, and radial (flown, friction rollers) yaw, pitch, roll, and radial (all grounded, complicated cabling)

6 Overall Device Spherical coordinates yaw, pitch, and prismatic radial

7 Device Kinematics Spherical coordinates  Pitch Φ on range [-50°, 30°].  Yaw γ on range [-25°, 25°].  Radial ρ (prismatic) on range [195.5mm, 282mm], for a length of 86.5mm.

8 Our Device, Overview Main design contributions:  All grounded, simple, and robust 3-DOF (active) spherical design.  Aluminum-aluminum friction differential.  Novel cabling of radial DOF.  2-DOF sensed gimbal with same friction differential.

9 Design: Aluminum Friction Differential Benefits  Parallel structure.  Motors easily grounded.  Differential is hollow.  Zero backlash.  Fewer parts.  Safe slipping, not breaking. Main design issues  Wheel profile.  Material.

10 Wheel Profile Point contact essential for efficiency and predictable gear ratio.  If line contact, energy loss and unknown gear ratio.

11 Friction Differential: Material Basic material properties: Cheap, strong, easily- machined, durable, and light-weight.  No exotic materials, plastics, or ceramics. Friction Coefficient μ.  Higher μ = higher force transfer. Loss Coefficient η  Lower η = less energy lost to elastic hysteresis. Aluminum: highest metal-metal μ, lowest metal η, cheap, easily-machined, durable, and light-weight η E

12 Design: Radial DOF Novel cable transmission routing from a grounded motor through the differential to actuate prismatic, radial DOF. Must route along path of zero arc-length change ΔS (through rotational axes, center).  Practically, ΔS = 0.02mm, for a max strain of 2.5x10 -5 and max internal tension increase of 0.98N. Tiny lever arm = negligible effect on any DOF.

13 Design: Radial DOF

14 Design: Radial DOF

15 Design: Gimbal 2-DOF sensed only. Same aluminum-aluminum friction differential, only smaller (1/5 th ). Magnet for automatic homing.

16 Device Physical Characteristics OmniOurs Weight1.8 kgf (4.0 lbf)2.5 kgf (5.5 lbf) FootprintSee Picture Workspace Bounding BoxNearly identical160mm x 120mm x 68mm

17 Maximum Isotropic Force What is the largest force that we are guaranteed to be able to exert in any direction at any configuration?  Motor saturation as limit, never the differential slipping.

18 ContinuousPeak F MAX, No Grav Comp1.60N*7.45N F MAX, Grav Comp0.82N6.79N *82% higher than max continuous force for Sensable Omni

19 Friction Torque (Nmm)F wrist, retracted (N)F wrist, extended (N) Pitch Yaw Radialn/a0.93 F pitch < F yaw < F radial  Pitch DOF has bearing friction only.  Yaw DOF adds in friction of the differential wheels rolling.  Radial DOF has friction of 9 redirect pulleys + linear slide. Anisotropic friction noticeable only in free-space, not in contact with virtual models. Russo radial DOF had friction of 9N, uncompensated, and 1N, compensated.

20 Dynamic Range No Grav CompWith Grav Comp Min (Z 0, radial stiction only) Max (X 0, pitch stiction only) Dynamic range D = Max peak isotropic force/stiction. Sensable Omni has dynamic range of 12.7 Dynamic Range, Our Device

21 Effective Mass Fairly isotropic  Maximum of 61% spread between min, max in Λ matrix.  Sensable Omni has effective mass that is 38% of our max effective mass.

22 Summary A more slender, compact, simple, and robust design for a spherical haptic device for general haptic rendering. Comparable forces, workspace, and physical properties to Sensable Omni.

23 Questions?

24 Prior Work: Details “Spherical” can mean any combination of yaw, pitch, roll, and radial (prismatic) Impulse Engine 2000 (Immersion Corporation)  2-DOF pitch and yaw, user’s hand on surface of fixed-radius sphere. L. Birglen, C. Gosselin, N. Pouliot, B. Monsarrat, and T. Lalibert´e, “Shade, a new 3-dof haptic device,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics an Automation, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 166–175,  3-DOF yaw, pitch, and roll torques centered about user’s hand. M. Smith, “Tactile interface for three-dimensionsal computersimulated environments: Experimentation and the design of a brakemotor device,” MS Thesis, MIT,  3-DOF yaw, pitch, and prismatic radial. Radial transmission was “flown” so that it moved with yaw and pitch. M. Russo, “The design and implementation of a three degree of freedom force output joystick,” MS Thesis, MIT,  3-DOF yaw, pitch, and prismatic radial. Radial DOF uses grounded motor and bike-cable type transmission. U. Spaelter, T. Moix, D. Ilic, H. Bleuler, and M. Bajka, “A 4-dof haptic device for hysteroscopy simulation,” IEEE/RSJ IROS, pp. 3257–3263,  4-DOF yaw, pitch, roll, and prismatic radial. Roll and radial DOF motors “flown”, and radial DOF actuated via friction rollers. P. Gregorio, N. Olien, D. Bailey, and S. Vassallo, “Interface apparatus with cable-driven force- feedback and four grounded actuators,” U.S. Patent ,  4-DOF yaw, pitch, roll, and prismatic radial. Grounds all 4 motors, but has very complicated cabling system.

25 Differential Transformation To go from motor angles and torques to pitch, yaw angles and torques:

26 FWD Kinematics, Jacobian

27 Gravity Compensation Active gravity compensation used to make device float, saving effort on the user’s part.