Accountability 2008 - 2009 State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

OGISD Board of Trustees September 19, 2011 Orange Grove Elementary Accountability Report.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Courtney Mills. ESEA (Formerly AYP)  Federal Accountability  August  0 – 100, A – F  One per school (includes a breakdown by grade band)  Two Components:
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP). AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS  Reading/ELA  Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate  Participation: 95% Participating.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Performance-Based Monitoring and Interventions April 3, 2008.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Accountability 101. State Accountability Federal Accountability # Students Met Standard # Students Tested If the Standard is not met: Apply Required.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
RECOGNIZED 2009 Accountability Rating. Basic Indicators EXEMPLARY: for every subject, at least 90% of the tested students pass the test RECOGNIZED**:
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Public Hearing & Presentation of MISD Annual Accountability Report 2009 MILLSAP ISD Prepared by Lois Johnson in compliance with Texas Education Code
Presented by: Rick Kirk Assistant Superintendent of Assessment and Accountability Presentation to the Board of Trustees January 11, 2010 Pete Pape Chief.
Texas Projection Measure. What is TPM? TPM is a method for… – projecting future student scores -OR- – determining whether a student is likely to pass.
2010 CST DATA ANALYSIS 4 th Grade. 4 TH Grade Across the years- ELA.
Sample ISD District Overview Name Position. What makes Sample ISD unique? Mission Statement Vision Statement Unique Programs.
Student Answer Documents: Accuracy & Accountability.
OLMOS ELEMENTARY. WHOOOO WE ARE SCHOOL FACTS: ENROLLMENT: 657 RATING: IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED GRADES: PK-5 SPECIAL PROGRAMS: PK, BILINGUAL/DUAL, ALE CAMPUS.
10/21/20151 STATE ASSESSMENTS UPDATE Goose Creek CISD Principal Academy August 6, 2012.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
Understanding the Texas Accountability System. – 1979 Texas Assessment of Basic Skills (TABS) – 1985 Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills (TEAMS)
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
The Basics of Federal Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress AYP.
Annual Report and Public Hearing January 19, 2010.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Remington Point TAKS Summary RECOGNIZED TAKS Highlights Reading- All Subgroups > 90% Math- 3 out of 5 Subgroups >90% Writing- All Subgroups > 90%
– 2008 Analysis of TAKS Results Data by Student Groups.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
2012 Adequate Yearly Progress Preliminary Answers & other Important Information…
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Explaining Sample ISD’s [Budget/Financial Position] As presented at: Region One Finance Advisory Council Meeting Friday, October 15,2010.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Accountability Rating
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Texas State Accountability
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1

State Accountability 35 Indicators ◦ 25 are Academic  (Combined grades 3-11) ◦ 5 are completion rate  High Schools only (Grades 9-12) ◦ 5 are dropout rate  Junior Highs (Grades 7-8) ◦ Elementary accountable only for academic indicators 2

State Accountability 25 Academic Indicators ◦ Standards for Accountability ratings 3

Reading: Grades Spanish State Accountability 4

Writing: Grades 4,7 + Spanish State Accountability 5

Social Studies: Grades 8,10,11 + TAKS-Accom State Accountability 6

Math: Grades Spanish State Accountability 7

Science: Grades 5,8,10,11 + TAKS-Acc + Spanish State Accountability 8

State Accountability District Rating ◦ Academically Unacceptable  Cohort group entering 9 th grade in 2004  Graduating Class of 2008  Standard = 75%  Economically Disadvantaged Subpop  103 Students of 344 = 67.7% (-1.4%) 9

State Accountability Good News for Completion Rate (9-12) ◦ All other subpops increased  All students by 3% (82% to 85%)  African American %  Hispanic %  White – 2.9% 10

State Accountability Good News for Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-8) ◦ All subpops improved:  All Students --.7% to.1%  African American --.9% to 0%  Hispanic --.6% to.2%  White --.8% to.1%  EcoDis --.8% to.1% 11

Campus State Accountability Lee HS & Midland HS ◦ Unacceptable due to Completion Rate  Economically Disadvantaged Subgroup  Standard = 75%  LHS = 74.5% MHS = 73.5% Lamar Elementary ◦ Unacceptable in math in one subgroup Travis Elementary ◦ Unacceptable in science performance across campus 12

Federal Accountability 26 Indicators (remember State has 35) ◦ 24 are Academic  (Combined grades 3-10 & 11) ◦ 1 is completion rate  High Schools only(Grades 9-12) ◦ 1 is dropout rate  Junior Highs (Grades 7-8) All TAKS Tests included in calculations: (TAKS, TAKS-Accom, TAKS-M, TAKS-Alt, LAT) 13

Federal Accountability District – Meets Standard Campuses: MHS – Does not meet standard ◦ Participation in ELA TAKS 92% (95% st.) Travis Elementary – Does not meet standard ◦ Math scores in 3 subpops Milam Elementary – Does not meet standard ◦ Math scores in one subpop 14

District Academic Focus for Limited English Proficient Students ◦ Bilingual (K-5); ESL (6-12) and Parent Denials (K-12) African American Students Special Education Students Economically Disadvantaged Students ◦ Specifically grades 9-12