Implementing the Common Core and PARCC Assessments Michael Cohen February 15, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Advertisements

Madison School District Governing Board Meeting March 19, 2013.
Ohio Department of Education OCTEO Conference March 23,
Parent Workshop Dr. Carol Baker, Language Arts/Social Studies Supervisor Mrs. Sandra Pollock, Math/Science Supervisor April 11, 2013.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
DC CAS Kickoff Tamara Reavis Director Standards, Assessment, and Accountability.
CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.
The Parent’s Guide to The Common Core and PARCC Assessment Keansburg School District February 2015.
Why the Common Core?: How these Standards are Different.
Common Core Standards Presentation Edgewater - Leonia BOE Meeting January 31, 2013 Lorraine Cella and Joanne Megargee Superintendents Adapted from Dr.
PARCC Update Mathematics NCSM Presentation April 25, 2012 Carrie Piper Senior Adviser, PARCC Mathematics Achieve.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers Outline of PARCC Information *Parent/Student Resources, are noted at the end of this.
1. Oklahoma C 3 Standards, Including Common Core 2 The Oklahoma C 3 Standards, including the Common Core, lay the foundation toward ensuring that students.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core Summer Institutes 1.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers PARCC 1.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Common Core State Standards and Assessments of Student Mastery 1.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward
April 11, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Why the Common Core?: How these Standards are Different.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association Legislative Conference March 21, 2014 New Jersey Department of Education.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Common Core State Standards – The Shifts and What they May Mean for Summer Learning Sandra Alberti, Ed.D. Student Achievement Partners
 Common Core State Standards Or College and Career State Standards CCSS.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers.
Overview Dr. Karen Russo 1 As of October 1, 2014.
Ohio’s New Learning Standards English Language Arts Math Science Social Studies Fine Arts World Language Financial Literacy Physical Education Entrepreneurship.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) January 2013.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Getting to Know the PARCC Assessment: A Workshop for Parents January, 2015.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) December
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Oklahoma REAC 3 H Summit Laura McGiffert Slover April 4, 2012.
10/11/2015MSDE1 PARCC Assessment Update PARCC Assessment Update Day 3, Session 4.
PARCC Assessments Overview ISBE/SSoS Data and Assessment Content Specialists.
Reac 3 h Hub Network Training Resources April 5, 2012.
Understanding PARCC and Disciplinary Literacy November
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Common Core Standards Implementation ELA/Literacy and Mathematics Understand the Change Be the Change How to Change.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
DO NOW On your handout, Identify what you know about the common core state standards and Questions you have about the common core.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Common Core State Standards ELA and Literacy 2012 Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Publisher Meeting Today: Common Core State Standards Oregon Shifts 1 ODE.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
Illinois State Board of Education A New Vision for Illinois Assessment: Problems Worth Solving Tests Worth Taking November, 2013.
Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning October 2011.
1 Common Core Standards. Shifts for Students Demanded by the Core Shifts in ELA/Literacy Building knowledge through content-rich nonfiction and informational.
Overview of CCSS and PARCC Cindy Weinrich. Common Core Curriculum State Standards for Math have Two Parts: Content Standards: What students need to know.
California Common Core State Standards for School Counselors.
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
Common Core State Standards and Assessments of Student Mastery 1.
MODEL CURRICULUM Tracey Severns, Ed.D Chief Academic Officer NJDOE.
Assessment Transition to the Common Core Georgia Performance Standards (CCGPS)
California Common Core Standards
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
Presentation transcript:

Implementing the Common Core and PARCC Assessments Michael Cohen February 15, 2012

46 States + DC Have Adopted the Common Core State Standards 2 * Minnesota adopted the CCSS in ELA only

Key Advances of the Common Core in Mathematics 3 MATHEMATICS Focus, coherence and clarity: emphasis on key topics at each grade level and coherent progression across grades Balance between procedural fluency and conceptual understanding Promote rigor through mathematical practices that foster reasoning and application across discipline ANCHORED IN COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS

Focus in Mathematics Providing Greater Depth 4 Grade Priorities in Support of Rich Instruction and Expectations of Fluency and Conceptual Understanding K-2Addition and subtraction--concepts, skills, and problem solving 3-5 Multiplication and division of whole numbers and fractions – concepts, skills, and problem solving 6Ratios and proportional relationships; early expressions and equations 7Ratios and proportional relationships; arithmetic of rational numbers 8Linear algebra

MATHEMATICAL PRACTICES 5 Mathematically proficient students: 1.Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them 2.Reason abstractly and quantitatively 3.Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others 4.Model with mathematics 5.Use appropriate tools strategically 6.Attend to precision 7.Look for and make use of structure 8.Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

Key Advances of the Common Core in ELA/Literacy 6 ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Balance of literature and informational texts; focus on text complexity Emphasis on argument, informative/ explanatory writing, and research Literacy standards for history, science and technical subjects ANCHORED IN COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS

Non-Text Dependent vs. Text Dependent Questions Examples from a lesson on Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address 7 Non-Text Dependent QuestionsText Dependent Questions Have you ever been to a funeral? What does Lincoln mean by “four score and seven years ago”? Who are “our fathers”? (L ; RI ; RI ) Why did the North fight the South in the Civil War? Beyond what students may or may not know about the Declaration of Independence, what does Lincoln tell us in this first sentence about what happened 87 years ago? What is the impact of Lincoln referring to such a famous date? (RI ; RI ; RI ; RI ) Lincoln says that the nation is dedicated to the proposition that “all men are created equal.” Why is equality an important value to promote? How does Lincoln use the idea of “unfinished work” to assign responsibility to his listeners? (RI ; RI ; RI )

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) 8

PARCC Priorities 9 1.Create high-quality assessments 2.Build a pathway to college and career readiness for all students 3.Support educators in the classroom 4.Develop 21 st century, technology-based assessments 5.Advance accountability at all levels 6.Build assessment system that is sustainable and affordable

PARCC Assessment Design English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics, Grades End-of-Year Assessment Innovative, computer- based items Performance-Based Assessment (PBA) Extended tasks Applications of concepts and skills Summative, Required assessment Interim, optional assessment Diagnostic Assessment Early indicator of student knowledge and skills to inform instruction, supports, and PD ELA - Speaking And Listening Assessment Locally scored Non-summative, required Optional Assessments/Flexible Administration Mid-Year Assessment Performance-based Emphasis on hard-to- measure standards Potentially summative

Claims Driving Design: ELA/Literacy Students are on-track or ready for college and careers Students read and comprehend a range of sufficiently complex texts independently Reading Literature Reading Informational Text Vocabulary Interpretation and Use Students write effectively when using and/or analyzing sources. Written Expression Conventions and Knowledge of Language Students build and present knowledge through research and the integration, comparison, and synthesis of ideas. 11

ELA/Literacy Performance-Based Assessment Grades 3-5 Research Simulation Task Read one informational text, recount the key details and main idea (Grade 3) or write a summary (Grade 4/5) Read three additional shorter texts, incorporate evidence from multiple texts in an analytic essay 6-9 reading comprehension questions Engaging With Literature Task Read one short piece of literature and one extended piece of literature, answer reading comprehension questions Write a narrative using one piece of literature as a stimulus Write an analytic essay analyzing one or both texts Grades 6-8 Research Simulation Task Read one informational text and write a summary distinct from personal opinions or judgments (Grade 6) or an objective summary (Grades 7/8) Read three additional shorter texts and incorporate evidence from multiple texts in an analytic essay 6-9 reading comprehension questions Literature Analysis Task Read one short piece of literature and one extended piece of literature; answer 4-6 reading comprehension questions Write a narrative using one piece of literature as a stimulus Write an analytic essay analyzing one or both of the texts Grades 9-11 Research Simulation Task Read one informational text and write objective summary Read three additional shorter texts and incorporate evidence from multiple texts in an analytic essay 6-9 reading comprehension questions Literary Analysis Task Read one short piece of literature and one extended piece of literature OR literary non-fiction Answer 4-6 reading comprehension questions Write a narrative using one piece of literature as a stimulus Write an analytic essay analyzing one or both of the texts 12

ELA/Literacy End-of-Year Assessment Grades 3-11 Students read approximately 6 texts, including multimedia texts The percentage of literature to informational/disciplinary literacy texts changes to reflect the shift in text emphasis in the standards Students answer approximately 50 machine-scorable questions 13

Examples of what we ask students to write about from today’s tests Example #1: Most people have a special activity or hobby that they enjoy. Some people collect things while others like to read or play games. What activity do you like to do? Write a composition describing what you enjoy doing. Explain why that activity is special to you. (Grade 3-5, New Jersey) Example #2: Think about what a perfect day would be for you. What would you do? Where would you be? Who would be with you? In a well-developed composition, describe your perfect day and explain why it would be perfect for you. (Grade 7, Massachusetts) Example #3: Who are our heroes? The media attention given to celebrities suggests that these people are today’s heroes. Yet ordinary people perform extraordinary acts of courage every day that go virtually unnoticed. Are these people the real heroes? Write an essay in which you define heroism and argue who you think our heroes really are–mass media stars, ordinary people, or maybe both. Be sure to use examples of specific celebrities, other people you have heard or read about, or people from your own community to support your position. (Grade 12, NAEP) 14

Students solve problems involving the major content for their grade level with connections to practices Students solve problems involving the additional and supporting content for their grade level with connections to practices Students express mathematical reasoning by constructing mathematical arguments and critiques Students solve real world problems engaging particularly in the modeling practice Student demonstrate fluency in areas set forth in the Standards for Content in grades 3-6 Claims Driving Design: Mathematics Students are on-track or ready for college and careers 15

Focus will be on: Sub Claim A – major content Sub Claim C – reasoning Sub claim D – modeling/applications PBA will be scored in time to be incorporated into the summative score PARCC will release all PBA tasks along with item analysis and item-level scores Mathematics Performance-Based Assessment Grades

Grades 3-11 Will be comprised of computer ‐ based machine-scorable items. Will focus on Sub Claims A (major content), B (supporting content), and E (fluency). High school States will select between traditional or integrated mathematics sequence; and each complete sequence will measure the full range of high school mathematics standards. There is interest in creating a modularized version of the EOC exams, to allow greater customization of sequencing and pacing Mathematics End-of-Year Assessment 17

Higher Demands for the Same Content… 18

…With a Much Sharper Focus 19

PARCC Assessment System: Tools & Resources Purpose: Identify the “big ideas” in the CCSS for each grade level; determine focus for assessment components; support development of blueprints; provide guidance to district- and school-level curriculum leaders in the development of aligned instructional materials Audience: State and district curriculum directors (primary audience) ; teachers Model Content Frameworks Purpose: Provide educators examples to concretely demonstrate a variety of means to implement the CCSS in the classroom; allow for the development and sharing of ideas for instructional implementation of the CCSS; encourage PARCC tool development for PARCC implementation and assessment transition Audience: Teachers; local and state curriculum directors Model Instructional Units Purpose: Develop models of innovative, online-delivered items and rich performance tasks proposed for use in the PARCC assessments. Audience: Broad audience: teachers, schools, districts, states (for CCSS implementation and PARCC assessment preparation) Item and Task Prototypes 20

Tools & Resources (continued) Purpose: Develop expertise on the CCSS and PARCC and help them to become state and peer leaders; Increase size and impact of state educator leader cadres; build and expand the number of educators who understand, support, and feel ownership for implementing the CCSS and PARCC Assessments Audience: State teams of K-12 teachers, school and district leaders, local and state curriculum directors, and postsecondary representatives Educator Leader Cadres Purpose: Develop professional development modules focused on assessments to help teachers, school and district leaders, and testing coordinators understand the new assessment system Audience: Teachers; instructional staff; school and district administrators Professional Development Modules Purpose: Develop a set of college readiness tools aligned to the CCSS and PARCC assessments Audience: Teachers; school leaders; higher education College- Ready Tools 21

Tools & Resources (continued) Purpose: Develop diagnostic assessments in reading, writing, and mathematics for use by classroom teachers throughout the year to assess the extent to which students are “on track;” inform instruction throughout the school year Audience: Teachers Diagnostic Assessments Purpose: Measure student knowledge and skills across the full range of the CCSS; produce results that identify appropriate interventions or enrichment activities; support measures of growth Audience: Teachers; schools; districts; states K-2 Formative Tools Purpose: Provide an online warehouse of all the tools PARCC is developing and additional resources being developed independently and collectively by PARCC states and districts, and national organizations Audience: Broad audience: teachers; principals; students; parents; states; general public Partnership Resource Center 22

23 Sign up for PARCC Information at Enter your to receive the newsletter and updates.