Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Measuring Teacher Effectiveness in Untested Subjects and Grades.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Measuring Teacher Effectiveness in Untested Subjects and Grades.
Quality of New Assessments By Mark Teoh, Susan Volbrecht and Michael Savoy, Winter 2015 Funded by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust.
Teacher Evaluation Models: A National Perspective Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Principal Investigator for Research and Dissemination,The National.
How can we measure teachers’ contributions to student learning growth in the “non-tested” subjects and grades? Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS,
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Linking Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth IEL Washington Policy Seminar April 22, 2013  Washington, D.C. Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist,
Teacher Evaluation Systems: Opportunities and Challenges An Overview of State Trends Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
The Power Of Partnership: Maryland’s Historic Memorandum of Understanding on the Use of Student Learning Objectives Webinar with David Volrath,
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Measuring Teacher Effectiveness in Untested Subjects and Grades.
Kentucky Integrated Strategy September 29, College & Career Readiness Agenda—Literacy/Mathematics Design Collaborative Tools Offer tools for the.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: Decisions for Districts Laura.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Measures of Teachers’ Contributions to Student Learning Growth Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, Understanding Teaching Quality Research Group, ETS.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data Overview of the SLO Process April 7,
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Models of Comprehensive Teacher Evaluation Systems Laura Goe,
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
Teacher Evaluation in Rural Schools Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS, and Principal Investigator for the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher.
Evaluating the “Caseload” Educators Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS, and Principal Investigator for the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher.
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Models for Evaluating Teacher/Leader Effectiveness Laura Goe, Ph.D. Eastern Regional SIG Conference Washington, DC  April 5, 2010.
DRAFT 4.0 PRESENTED TO THE OREGON STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION MAY 17, 2012 Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems.
Measures of Teachers’ Contributions to Student Learning Growth August 4, 2014  Burlington, Vermont Laura Goe, Ph.D. Senior Research and Technical Assistance.
Measuring teacher effectiveness using multiple measures Ellen Sullivan Assistant in Educational Services, Research and Education Services, NYSUT AFT Workshop.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: Some Models to Consider Laura.
Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: Selecting Measures Laura Goe, Ph.D. SIG Schools Webinar August 12, 2011.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Using Student Growth as Part of a Multiple Measures Teacher Evaluation.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.
An Introduction to AFT’s Continuous Improvement Model for Teacher Development and Evaluation January 22, 2011.
Models for Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness Laura Goe, Ph.D. California Labor Management Conference May 5, 2011  Los Angeles, CA.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Student Learning and Achievement in Measuring Teacher Effectiveness.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness Laura Goe, Ph.D. Presentation to National Conference of State Legislatures July 14, 2011  Webinar.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Teacher Evaluation Systems 2.0: What Have We Learned? EdWeek Webinar March 14, 2013 Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Sr. Research and Technical.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Office of Service Quality
COMMON CORE STANDARDS Information for Families. WHAT ARE ACADEMIC STANDARDS? 2  Standards are what students need to learn in each grade and subject area.
Models for Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness Laura Goe, Ph.D. CCSSO National Summit on Educator Effectiveness April 29, 2011  Washington, DC.
Weighting components of teacher evaluation models Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, ETS Principal Investigator for Research and Dissemination, The National.
EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.
Measures of Teachers’ Contributions to Student Learning Growth Laura Goe, Ph.D. Research Scientist, Understanding Teaching Quality Research Group, ETS.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Evaluating Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Laura Goe, Ph.D.
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
Why set Student Growth Objectives (SGOs)?  Currently the Aldine Growth Model used to measure student growth can only be applied to teachers in content.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Welcome! PreK-3 Principal Leadership Series
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Teacher Evaluation: The Non-tested Subjects and Grades
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Measuring Teacher Effectiveness in Untested Subjects and Grades Laura Goe, Ph.D.

Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. About the National Association of Secondary School Principals In existence since 1916, the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP) is the preeminent organization of and national voice for middle level and high school principals, assistant principals, and aspiring school leaders from across the United States and more than 45 countries around the world. The mission of NASSP is to promote excellence in school leadership. Check us out

Copyright © 2009 National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. All rights reserved. Dr. Laura Goe  Taught 7 th grade Special Education in the Mississippi Delta and middle school Language Arts in Memphis  Research Scientist in the Performance Research Group at Educational Testing Service in Princeton, NJ, and is Principal Investigator for Research and Dissemination for The National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality  Has observed hundreds of teachers around the country for various projects  Learn more about Laura’s work at

The goal of teacher evaluation The ultimate goal of all teacher evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE TEACHING AND LEARNING 4

Evaluation System Models Austin (Student learning objectives with pay-for-performance, group and individual SLOs assess with comprehensive rubric) Delaware Model (Teacher participation in identifying grade/subject measures which then must be approved by state) Georgia’s CLASS Keys (Comprehensive rubric, includes student achievement—see last few pages) System: Rubric: pdf?p=6CC6799F8C1371F6B59CF81E4ECD54E63F615CF1D9441A9 2E28BFA2A0AB27E3E&Type=D pdf?p=6CC6799F8C1371F6B59CF81E4ECD54E63F615CF1D9441A9 2E28BFA2A0AB27E3E&Type=D 5

Evaluation System Models (cont’d) Hillsborough, Florida (Creating assessments/tests for all subjects) Rhode Island Model (Student learning objectives combined with teacher observations and professionalism) 20Group% Teacher Advancement Program (Value-added for tested grades only, no info on other subjects/grades, multiple observations for all teachers) Washington DC IMPACT Guidebooks (Variation in how groups of teachers are measured—50% standardized tests for some groups, 10% other assessments for non-tested subjects and grades) MPACT+(Performance+Assessment)/IMPACT+Guidebooks 6

Questions to ask about measures and the models that incorporate them 1.Rigorous. Are measures “rigorous,” focused on measuring students’ progress towards college and career readiness? 2.Comparable. Are measures “comparable across classrooms,” ensuring that students are being measures with the same yardstick? 3.Growth over time. Do the measures enable student learning growth to be assessed “between two points in time”? 4.Standards-based. Are the measures focused on assessing growth on important high-quality grade level and subject standards? 5.Inclusive (all teachers, subjects, grades). Do evaluation models allow teachers from all subjects and grades (not just 4-8 math & reading) to be evaluated with evidence of student learning growth? 6.Improve teaching. Does evidence from using the measures contribute to teachers’ understanding of their students’ needs/progress so that instruction can be planned/adapted to ensure success? 7

Validity (measures and models)  Validity is ensured when the instrument/test accurately measures what it is intended to  Validity cannot be fully established until you collect and analyze evidence; evidence on these models/measures is incomplete/non-existent  Focus on models and measures that meet the 6 priorities (Rigorous, Comparable, Growth over time, Standards- based, Inclusive, Improve teaching)  When data is collected, determine whether the measures are differentiating among stronger and weaker teachers (correlate results from multiple measures)  Evaluate how the model and measures are working often 8

Maximize Your edWeb experience For anyone: School Leadership Network: For NASSP members:

Care About Education and School Leaders? Get Involved! Join NASSP’s Federal Grassroots Network (you don’t need to be an NASSP member) 1) Mary Kingston, NASSP Government Relations Manager at 2)Join our edWeb group at edweb.net/federalgrassroots edweb.net/federalgrassroots