Orbiter Inspection and Repair Summary DA8/Paul S. Hill 9 September 2003 JSC Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS STEAM PRO? Thermoflow, Inc.
Advertisements

Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
Ninth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 pm, Thursday, September 13
Mission Success Starts with Safety The Similarities and Differences of Reliability Engineering and Probabilistic Risk Assessment RAMS VII Workshop November.
TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING (TLS): APPLICATIONS TO ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE HERITAGE PRESERVATION – PART 1.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
AAT Injector Nozzle Test Chamber P15681 Calibration Fluid Exhaust System Zach Huston, Hayden Cummings, Adam Farnung, Tim Nichols, Robert Moshier, Andrew.
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
Return to Flight Status of Launch Window Changes Manager, Space Shuttle Systems Integration (Operations) – John Shannon Chief, Ascent/Descent Dynamics.
1 Air Launch System Project Proposal February 11, 2008 Dan Poniatowski (Team Lead) Matt Campbell Dan Cipera Pierre Dumas Boris Kaganovich Jason LaDoucer.
Mars EDL CubeSat Mission Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic Exploration Laboratory School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) Arizona.
The shield block is a modular system made up of austenitic steel SS316 LN-IG whose main function is to provide thermal and nuclear shielding of outer components.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
7/24/031 Ben Blazey Industrial Vision Systems for the extruder.
Design Review Three Micro Air Vehicle Project: P Sponsored by Impact Technologies The Boeing Company Mark Baybutt Electrical Engineering.
SQM - 1DCS - ANULECTURE Software Quality Management Software Quality Management Processes V & V of Critical Software & Systems Ian Hirst.
Systems Engineering Management
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
Testing of Advanced Conformal Ablative TPS
Development of New Ground Inspection Techniques for the Inspection of Orbiter RCC Components Jose M. Hernandez Engineering Directorate NASA- Johnson Space.
International Cryogenic Materials Conference Tucson, AZ Mark Haynes and Paul Fabian June 29, 2015 SOFI/Substrate Integrity Testing For Cryogenic Propellant.
Modeling And Visualization Of Aboriginal Rock Art in The Baiame Cave
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
Recent and Future Research for Bird-like Flapping MAVs of NPU Prof. B.F.Song Aeronautics School of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
Presented by: 15 Oct 2001 Neptec Laser Camera System Preliminary Post Flight Results Neptec Design Group.
October 30th, 2007High Average Power Laser Program Workshop 1 Long lifetime optical coatings for 248 nm: development and testing Presented by: Tom Lehecka.
Bronze C Theory The Principles of Flight. Terms Wing Section Chord line Mean Camber line Airflow Relative Airflow Boundary layer Stagnation point Angle.
Testing Basics of Testing Presented by: Vijay.C.G – Glister Tech.
Space Systems Laboratory University of Maryland test.col.pp4 HERA: Hubble End-of-life Robotic Augmentation – A Robotic Alternative for SM-4 David L. Akin.
3.1 Optomechanical systems (1) Scientific and engineering resources are available to carry out the optomechanical work on DECam. The highly distributed.
OBTAINING QUALITY MILL PERFORMANCE Dan Miller
Assessing the influence on processes when evolving the software architecture By Larsson S, Wall A, Wallin P Parul Patel.
Space Shuttles By Frederick. Launching Space Shuttles To lift the 4.5 million pound (2.05 million kg) shuttle from the pad to orbit (115 to 400 miles/185.
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
TESTING LEVELS Unit Testing Integration Testing System Testing Acceptance Testing.
How to startpage 1. How to start How to specify the task How to get a good image.
1 DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. 88ABW , 23 May Integrity  Service  Excellence ADT 101: Introduction.
STS-114 Mission Objectives Test and evaluate new inspection and repair techniques Deliver supplies and cargo to the Space Station via the Raffaello MPLM.
1 Encotech Steam Path Audits Presentation. 2 Overview What is a Steam Path Audit? Benefits Cost Chronology of a Steam Path Audit STPE Results.
Case Study Example using SFPE Guidelines for Substantiating a Fire Model for a Given Application Stephen M. Hill, P.E. Craig E. Hofmeister, P.E., LEED.
EMASMAX ® – New Developments FAA Technology Transfer Conference April 21-23, 2010 Atlantic City, NJ Presenters: Dr. Hong Zou – R&D Director Ms Silvia Valentini.
1 Stan Graves Vice President, Science & Engineering ATK Propulsion Systems March 23 – 24, 2011 NASA Technology Roadmaps.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Technology Commercialization Technology Commercialization, 2011 Sanjay Dhole, Technology Programs Coordinator Maricopa SBDC.
Software Quality Assurance and Testing Fazal Rehman Shamil.
February Monthly Status Review (MSR) Note: No presentation this month
Hypervelocity Impact Technology Facility (HITF)/SN3 NASA Johnson Space Center GLAST ACD Meteoroid/Debris Shielding Initial Test and Analysis Results NASA.
LAT Transport Container1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review 8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review.
EVA: Don’t Leave Earth Without It
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
1 The PISCES Project Don J. Pearson JSC/DM Flight Design & Dynamics Division May 2002
1 of 175 Focus 3D X 130 and X 330 Laser Scanners SCENE 5.3 September 2014.
1 Use or disclosure of this information is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. Flight Symbology to Aid in Approach and Landing.
MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory NASA MSFC Huntsville, Alabama Preliminary Advanced Colloids Experiment – 2.
Visual Survey of HREP Ricardo C. Rodriguez POD Office Lead for HREP POIWG External Payload Splinter 25 Jul 2012 Approved for Public Release, Distribution.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
William Prosser April 15, Introduction to Probability of Detection (POD) for Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) This briefing is for status only and.
February 5, 2015 Dmitriy Yavid, Broad Shoulder Consulting LLC Broad Shoulder Consulting LLC Electronics, Mechanics, Optics, Software.
Phil Dempsey ISS Vehicle Office July 15, 2014 Inspection Considerations from the ISS Program NASA In-Space Inspection Workshop 2014.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Enterprise Architectures Course Code : CPIS-352 King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Radiation Environment Monitor Kevin Hargrave EO
Software Quality Engineering
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
Engineering Processes
Delivering Advanced Inspection Solutions
Jeff Dutton/NASA COR August 26, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Orbiter Inspection and Repair Summary DA8/Paul S. Hill 9 September 2003 JSC Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 2 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Introduction The Orbit Flight Techniques Panel has been investigating TPS inspection and repair since late February. –OFTP has now had 15 meetings on inspection and repair. –Top options are apparent in all areas, and in many cases the single preferred option stands out. –Some return to flight solutions are not without issues and concerns. –There is still considerable developmental work in several areas. –As a solution to a specific facet of the problem is shown to be feasible, it is handed off to the normal processes for detailed development and implementation. This presentation covers: –Status in each technical area –Significant open work

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 3 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Summary Repair materials and tools are development items: –Tile repair solutions are in detailed testing and appear understood. –RCC repair is still in an early investigation stage, but materials have been identified for testing. Inspection: –An inspection capability exists in most areas during ISS flights without depth measurement, but enhancement is required for the leading edges. »Expect the Orbiter pitch maneuver at 600’ for tile photography. –A boom and laser are in development for use on the end of the SRMS to ensure all TPS surfaces can be inspected at the critical threshold, including depth. –Orbiter stand-alone inspection will be provided by the boom and laser. EVA access for repair: –Feasible during docked ISS ops through 1J with current equipment. –Some form of a boom and worksite stabilization are in work to provide EVA access after 1J and during Orbiter stand-alone flight.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 4 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Damage Criteria The following preliminary thresholds are based on entry heating: –0.25 inch for the wing leading edge lower surface –0.5 inch threshold for nose cap –1 inch major dimension around TPS seals and the wing leading edge upper surface –3 inch threshold for all other TPS surfaces –+/ depth resolution required for damage determination. The goal of all TPS repairs is to return the TPS to near-specification capability. Engineering is working to relax some of the constraints through test and analysis.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 5 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office The goal is to inspect at critical damage level and minimize crew time using a combination of SRMS, SSRMS and digital still images. –Overall, high resolution video during ISS approach would be the minimum crew time impact, particularly for the leading edges – we don’t have that camera yet. –Without a laser scanner, there will be some damage areas which will require EVA inspection to quantify depth, although the goal is to use a relatively benign technique for this like SAFER. Current imaging resolutions, with all on-board, downlink and processing losses: –Existing imaging capabilities are very close to detecting critical damage in all areas on ISS flights but not adequate in free flight. Inspection

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 6 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office SRMS and SSRMS Inspection

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 7 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office White areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is within critical damage size criteria Black areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is not acceptable + + Area where black mesh gridlines merge on curved surface appear black. Area resolvable within critical damage size criteria. + Note: Black mesh gridlines in white areas are artifacts of mapping program and are within critical damage size criteria. Based on imagery captured with a CTVC at max zoom, recorded to DVcam digital video tape and downlinked over the Shuttle DTV system. Shuttle RMS Inspection Capability (Bottom View)

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 8 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office White areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is within critical damage size criteria Black areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is not acceptable Note: Black mesh gridlines in white areas are artifacts of mapping program and are within critical damage size criteria. + Area where black mesh gridlines merge on curved surface appear black. Area resolvable within critical damage size criteria. Based on imagery captured with a CTVC at max zoom, recorded to DVcam digital video tape and downlinked over the Shuttle DTV system. Shuttle RMS Inspection Capability (Top View)

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 9 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office White areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is within critical damage size criteria Black areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is not acceptable + Note: Black mesh gridlines in white areas are artifacts of mapping program and are within critical damage size criteria. + Area where black mesh gridlines merge on curved surface appear black. Area resolvable within critical damage size criteria. + Station RMS, Lab Inspection Capability (Bottom View) Based on imagery captured with an MSS camera at max zoom, recorded to TEAC Hi-8 and downlinked through the ISS VBSP.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 10 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office White areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is within critical damage size criteria Black areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is not acceptable Note: Black mesh gridlines in white areas are artifacts of mapping program and are within critical damage size criteria. + Area where black mesh gridlines merge on curved surface appear black. Area resolvable within critical damage size criteria. + + Station RMS, Lab Inspection Capability (Top View) Based on imagery captured with an MSS camera at max zoom, recorded to TEAC Hi-8 and downlinked through the ISS VBSP.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 11 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office White areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is within critical damage size criteria Black areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is not acceptable Note: Black mesh gridlines in white areas are artifacts of mapping program and are within critical damage size criteria. + Area where black mesh gridlines merge on curved surface appear black. Area resolvable within critical damage size criteria. + + Station RMS, WS4/WS5 Inspection Capability (Bottom View) Based on imagery captured with an MSS camera at max zoom, recorded to TEAC Hi-8 and downlinked through the ISS VBSP.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 12 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office White areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is within critical damage size criteria Black areas indicate ANALYTICAL resolution is not acceptable Note: Black mesh gridlines in white areas are artifacts of mapping program and are within critical damage size criteria. + Area where black mesh gridlines merge on curved surface appear black. Area resolvable within critical damage size criteria. + Station RMS, WS4/WS5 Inspection Capability (Top View) Based on imagery captured with an MSS camera at max zoom, recorded to TEAC Hi-8 and downlinked through the ISS VBSP.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 13 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office ISS approach, R-bar pitch-around at 600’ Provides adequate tile inspection resolution except for depth. Estimated to use ~ lbm propellant. Relatively simple piloting task and inherently safe due to orbital mechanics. Employs normal rendezvous timing, with a possibility of up to 10 minutes R-bar station keeping to optimize lighting. Detailed procedure development complete and now being flown in generic, integrated simulations.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 14 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Example of SVLCS Coverage (30 x 30 deg FOV at 5m) Leading Edge of Port Wing Leading Edge of Stbd Wing Top of Stbd Tail Underbelly Stbd Wing Aft Example Boom on the SRMS for TPS Viewing

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 15 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Laser Testing at JSC Scan from 4.5 meters at 0 degree incidence

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 16 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Laser Testing at JSC Intensity Image – from 2.5 m & 30deg FOV Exposed substrate can be identified Range Image – from 1.2 m & 5 deg FOV Texture and RCC layers can be identified

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 17 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Inspection, continued Conclusions: –Development was approved by the 31 July PRCB to resolve the inspection “gaps” and RCC inspection in particular: »Goal is to fly a boom in active latches to support TPS inspection with no EVA. »A laser scanner and camera will be attached to the boom tip. »An EVA digital still camera is in development as a backup. »This is being expedited with an intent to make STS-114. »Final down-selection and integration impacts are in work now through the Vehicle Engineering Office. »This boom is intended to evolve into EVA support on later flights. –Low contrast damage due to light level or material color (white tile, RCC) will be difficult to see, and we’re pursuing optical filters to improve detection in these cases. –Tests are in work to confirm the oblique viewing angle image resolutions using real TPS materials. –External assets are not yet quantified and being worked outside the OFTP.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 18 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Inspection Sequence of Events Flt DayInspectionBackup 2SRMS: Crew compartment, OMS pods, vert stabSSRMS SRMS + boom and laser scanner: Lower leading edges EVA SRMS + boom and laser scanner: All remaining RCCSSRMS 3DCS-760, 400mm during approach: fwd and mid-body acreage tileSRMS, SSRMS DCS-760, 400mm during approach: aft acreage tileSRMS + boom DCS-760, 400mm+2X during approach: NLG, L-MLG door sealsSRMS, SSRMS DCS-760, 400mm+2X during approach: R-MLG, ET door seals, elevon coveSRMS + boom Inspection data will be downlinked in real-time or during the same crew day by play-back. Detailed ground analysis process has not yet been developed, but assume for today: –1 day to process imagery, –1 day to evaluate data in MER, –MMT review on 3 rd day after each inspection. The timeline and imagery analysis process will be developed over the next several months. –Directly influenced by the decision on RCC scanning techniques. –The goal with laser scanning data is to use software to automate and speed the analysis.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 19 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Tile Repair Material An existing silicone based, cure in-place ablator (MA-25S) has shown promise in development testing at Boeing, Lockheed and JSC. –In feasibility testing, we have demonstrated controls for the problems in the 1979 and 1980 tests. –The material has been shown to bond to tile, tile-adhesive and aluminum and cures in vacuum. –Suited 1g tests and the first round of KC-135 are complete. Arc jet tests at JSC: –Good performance in near-normal entry heating conditions. –The highest heating condition tested yielded mix results, but the heat profile was more severe than actual. –Further testing in tile is in work. Forward work: –Follow-on stagnation and channel flow arc jet tests. –Various thermal-vac, air bearing floor and KC-135 tests through November. –Human thermal-vac RTV application and cure tests in October/November. Detailed MA-25S validation has been handed off to the Vehicle Engineering Office. –Formal material acceptance test plans are in work. –A tile repair DTO is in development for STS-114. Porous 2700 deg F Dense 2700 deg F Porous 2300 deg F Model #1806 BNA CIP

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 20 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Potential Packaging Concept Battery Block (if necessary) Component A Static Mixer Block Motor or pressure tank PLSS Mounted TPS Repair Kit Concept Component B Tile Repair Tools and Technique

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 21 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Tile Repair Tools and Technique, continued

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 22 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office RCC Repair Materials and Tools RCC repair material: –Much less mature than tile repair material study in general, but evaluating concepts across 6 NASA centers and with 11 contractors. –The key challenges to repairing RCC are: »Maintaining a bond to RCC coating during entry heating. »Meeting step requirements. »Ensuring the RCC damage will not propagate and fail outside of the repair during entry heating. –The options in work are: »cure in place ablators similar to the tile repair material, »variations of patches with some form of pre-preg, cure in-place resin and an epoxy-like ablator, »Sleeves and over-wraps that fit over a damaged RCC panel or a series of panels, »filled leading edge cavities. –Several facilities around the country will be used for initial screening, followed by more focused feasibility testing on the viable candidates. »Carbon-carbon test samples have been coated to match RCC and are being distributed to repair concept developers for screening tests. »As test samples become available, screening and concept feasibility tests will be performed in the JSC and ARC arc jet facilities, and in the JSC, LaRC and Lockheed-Martin radiant heat facilities. »Have evaluated other arc jet, radiant heat, plasma and rocket exhaust exposure facilities at LaRC, MSFC, GRC, Lockheed-Martin, Boeing, AEDC, University of Texas and CIRA PWT in Italy which will be used if necessary to avoid test delays. »Final validation testing will be performed in the JSC arc jet and radiant heat facilities. No predictions yet on material readiness to proceed with EVA tools, etc, and flight readiness.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 23 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office RCC Repair Materials and Tools, continued Thiokol is testing an existing cure in-place ablator that has been used on carbon-carbon Delta IV engine nozzles. –Targeted to repair 0.5 – 4.0 inch diameter through-holes. –Applies a coated, carbon-carbon patch with a molly-bolt-like fastener. –The backside is then filled with ablator as a redundant attachment and thermal patch. –This repair concept was tested using a propane-oxygen torch at 60 and 70 BTU/ft2/sec for over 600 sec with no flame penetration. –A test sample is expected in the JSC arc jet within a month. –EVA tool development is already in work. –Much test work is required to determine if this patch technique is viable on an RCC panel in entry conditions.

DA8/P.S. Hill - Orbiter Inspect & Repair Summary – 9 Sep Pg 24 Mission Operations Directorate Flight Director Office Repair Access Baseline: Grappled Unberth/SRMS positions Orbiter for the SSRMS –Within the normal envelope in all ISS and SRMS analyses. –Final analysis is in work through Sep/Oct -- structure-controller interaction and attitude control during SRMS motion –~4 hr robotic operation to reach repair position, and another 4 hr to redock. –Expect this to be a long day, with all robotics and EVA on the same day. –Not required for inspection. –Orbiter stand-alone and post-1J solution is focusing on a boom and the SRMS. –DTO candidates: undock and dock while grappled; boom and SRMS flex under EVA loads. From MAGIK AI-1689 report – Orbiter Port-Aft view of EVA Access to PLB with SSRMS on the LAB PDGF From MAGIK AI-1689 report – ISS Starboard-Zenith view of EVA Access to Orbiter with SSRMS on the LAB PDGF