Continuous Improvement of Evaluation: Fifth Year With the Framework for Teaching Laura Dancer, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
Advertisements

Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1. On an index card, please jot down facts you already know about the Danielson FfT. Turn to someone sitting near you and share what you have written.
C HARLOTTE D ANIELSON ’ S F RAMEWORK FOR T EACHING Overview for Arkansas TESS Teacher Training.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Cinnaminson Township Public Schools November 6, 2012 INTRODUCTION TO THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE FOR TEACHERS.
Danielson Rubric Kim Oakes Staff Development Specialist E2CCB/IES Kim Oakes Erie2 BOCES - Adopted ©2010 McKay Consulting, LLC.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching
Quote The whole art of teaching is only the art of awakening the natural curiosity of young minds for the purpose of satisfying it afterwards. Anatole.
M EASURING T EACHER E FFECTIVENESS (MTE). H OW DID WE GET HERE ? Video from the Arizona School Administrators PUSD Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Committee.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
QUALITY TEACHING & EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Presented By Dr. PERUMAL UMA, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Computer Science Academic Campus for Girls
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
A Summary of Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System for West De Pere.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
BHS Administration “Back to Basics – This is Our time” Part I
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/21/14 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must be.
James P. B. Duffy School #12 State of the School Address November, 2012.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
SESC Mathematics Leadership Network
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
ENHANCING PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE Framework for Teaching Aug. 27 th Title II Day.
The Effective Teacher Chapter 1 James M. Cooper. Do Now In your notes answer the following question: –What makes a teacher effective?
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria. Connected to:  Beginning teacher evaluation  Experienced teacher evaluation  Induction / Mentoring  Professional.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
Teacher Evaluation Overview
1 WI Educator Effectiveness System Understanding Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
1 Teacher Performance Assessment Lynn Sawyer Director of Professional Development P.O. Box Reno, NV December.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PRIORITIES PREPARED & PRESENTED S. SUPERVISOR HELENA MOHAMMAD Ministry of Education ELT General Supervision
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/26/2015 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Make It Happen The Power of Communication and Thinking
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

Continuous Improvement of Evaluation: Fifth Year With the Framework for Teaching Laura Dancer, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources Virginia Doran, Executive Director, Washoe Education Association Lynn Sawyer, Director of Professional Development Neil Schott, Principal, Rollan Melton Elementary School Washoe County School District Reno, NV

About Washoe County Schools 88 schools K-12 3,750 teachers 58,909 students 138 site administrators Encompasses entire county (1 of 17) Average of 500 new teachers each year

Purposes of Performance Assessment Quality assurance Professional learning Continuous growth Fulfill the law

Where We Began System had been in place for at least a decade Bureaucratic checklist Just get through it, growth optional The “dog and pony” show System lent itself to “drive-by” observations

The Task Force WEA appointees (all three levels) HR & Student Support Services WCEAA admin appointees (all three levels) Board of Trustees representative Task force worked from

Task Force Consensus of Where We Were Going Self assessment and goal-setting Growth in specific areas Increased interaction between teacher and evaluator Inclusion of artifacts, “natural harvest”

Task Force Processes Surveyed entire district to confirm areas/issues regarding evaluation process Identified and scrutinized appraisal models from other districts

Teachers’ Perspective First years of teaching/effects of evaluation Self-directed professional growth Shared locus of control System only as good as the users

Four Domains of Teaching with 23 components and 68 Elements Domain 1: Planning and Preparation a.Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy b.Demonstrating Knowledge of Students c.Selecting Instructional Goals d.Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources e.Designing Coherent Instruction f.Assessing Student Learning Domain 3: Instruction a.Communicating Clearly and Accurately b.Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques c.Engaging Students in Learning d.Providing Feedback to Students e.Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness f.Using Student Assessment Data Domain 2: The Classroom Environment a.Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport b.Establishing a Culture for Learning c.Managing Classroom Procedures d.Managing Student Behavior e.Organizing Physical Space Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities a.Reflecting on Teaching b.Maintaining Accurate Records c.Communicating with Families d.Contributing to the School and District e.Growing and Developing Professionally f.Showing Professionalism

Key Features Used teacher performance standards Provided fairly detailed descriptions of actual performance criteria Complied with requirements of state law

Key Features, continued… Encompassed the effectiveness factors from existing system Comprehensive overview of the “knowledge base on teaching” Well researched Correlated to other professional teaching standards

Essential Factors Rubrics/specific expectations and feedback Self-assessment leads to growth Portfolios and artifacts Conversations about learning goals

Essential Factors, continued… Fosters reflection on practice Self-assessment & self-directed inquiry Comprehensive and specific Defensible definition of the “knowledge base on teaching” Instruments and procedures that provide evidence of teaching and increased objectivity Built upon end goal of student achievement Foundation for improvement plan, if needed

Process Steps Teacher completes “self evaluation” 30 minute year long goal setting with evaluator, 2-3 goals per domain Pre-observation meeting, observation, post- observation meeting Teacher/Admin discuss final appraisal

Professional Growth Options for Satisfactory Post-Probationary Teachers Action research Mentoring a new teacher Peer coaching National Board Certification process Self-directed professional growth Lead teacher for student intern

Customizing and Maximizing the Framework Over 100 teacher applicant interviews based on 4 domains UNR College of Ed using framework with student interns & admin candidates WCSD mentors/mentees Workshops on domains piloted Counselors, nurses, librarians, occupational and physical therapists Special education teachers being developed Principals being developed

Other Information Available Framework for all licensed employee groups Procedures manual for administrators Professional development courses for each domain Continuing to refine content & process

Results Increase in collegial conversation Improved staff development decisions Data in useable form Common, specific language about expectations Process done with teachers, not to them Improved performance

Continued Challenges Time Professional development –Administration –Teachers –Specialists

Field test findings Teachers reported feedback increased their awareness of areas for improvement Increased meaningful dialogue between the teacher and evaluator concerning teaching.

Continuous feedback Currently surveying all teachers and principals regarding perceptions and attitudes of evaluation system. Exit survey