Successfully Implementing High-Level Math Tasks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

Go Math!/Common Core State Standards for Mathematics K-5 Leadership Training.
Stephanie Burba, Noyce Graduate Tyler Ghee, Noyce Scholar Shelby Overstreet, Noyce Scholar Kathryn Crawford, Noyce Graduate Hope Marchionda, PhD Using.
Building Content Knowledge Education Transformation Office
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support 2012 Mathematical Practice 3: Construct Viable Arguments and Critique the Reasoning of Others Mathematics.
Developing Mathematical Practices for Geometry, Algebra II and Beyond Developed by Education Development Center, Inc. with support from the Massachusetts.
Developing Number and Operations through Reasoning, Sensemaking and Connections Minnesota Council of Teachers of Mathematics April 27, 2013 Linda Gojak,
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Don’t Be So Symbol Minded Problem Solving, Reasoning, and Sense Making in the Core Standards Environment Jim Rubillo
Jefferson County Schools K-5 Math Back to School Conference
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
History & Vision.  The new standards are rigorous, research- based, and designed to prepare every student for success in college and the workforce. 
Number Talks Math Institute Summer Activating Strategy Discussion: Which common errors would you expect to see? =
Overview 1 © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Mathematics General Overview.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
South Dakota Common Core State Standards Phase I - Mathematics July 7, 2011 K
Math Foundational Services SHIFT 1: Focus October 9, 2014 Cindy Dollman & Joe Delinski The PROE Center.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Mathematics FPS Implementation Wednesday October 10,
Mathematical Practices.  Goals today: ◦ Become familiar with the Mathematical Practices and what they mean and look like in instruction ◦ Addition.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
The Common Core State Standards August Common Core Development Initially 48 states and three territories signed on Final Standards released June.
A Deep Dive into the Secondary Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day Southwind High School August 5, 2015.
Sunnyside School District
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Transitioning to California Common Core State Standards Secondary Math Training Presented by: Elk Grove Unified School District.
Elementary Math: 2 nd Grade Professional Development January 2012.
+ Sunnyside District Day One Math Training Focus 1 & 2; Mathematical Shifts & Practices; June 2014.
Common Core Mathematics. Learning Norms 2 Restrooms Parking Lot evaluation connections General comments.
Sunnyside School District
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
Sunnyside School District Math Training Conceptual Lessons.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Common Core Standards for Mathematics Standards for Mathematical Practice Carry across all grade levels Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert.
Integrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice with the Standards for Mathematical Content Part One – K-5 Math Oct. 23,
. Do one problem “Meal Out” or “Security Camera”.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Mathematics Common Core State Standards Thursday, August 16 th, 2012.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
TIPM3 K-1 April 4, Number Lines Number lines are not appropriate for children before grade 2. Why? Explain the difference between number lines,
Successfully Implementing High- Level Tasks Based on work by Dr. Margaret S. Smith, University of Pittsburgh.
Insights About the Grade 1 Learning Expectations in the CCSS Topic #1: The meaning of the equal sign Presented by the Office of Curriculum, Instruction.
Effective Practices and Shifts in Teaching and Learning Mathematics Dr. Amy Roth McDuffie Washington State University Tri-Cities.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Engaging In and Analyzing Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Did You Know? ??????????????????. Mathematics Educators to the Career and College Ready Conference A Quick Look at Critical Topics in Mathematics Reform.
A Deep Dive into the Mathematics Curriculum District Learning Day August 5, 2015.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
PUTTING THE COMMON CORE MATH STANDARDS INTO ACTION Sandy Christie Craig Bowman 2012.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Grade 2 Math. Math Content Standards Organized by grade level math topic These primarily guide instruction Math Practice Standards Intended to develop.
Standards for Mathematical Practice Creating Student Friendly Language.
Southern Regional Education Board An Introduction to the Mathematics Design Collaborative (MDC) Jason Adair
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
Presentation transcript:

Successfully Implementing High-Level Math Tasks Presented by Jennifer Montgomery and Grace Greenleaf Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes Workshop Description and Title: Successfully Implementing High-Level Math Tasks Workshop Description w/attention getter statement: As we continue our district focus on problem solving, site teams will engage in 21st century learning skills as they solve math tasks correlated to the common core state standards for mathematics. Participants will learn about and use the thinking through a lesson protocol as a guide to successfully implement high-level math tasks in the classroom. Throughout our discussions we will focus on the importance of building conceptual understanding and English language competence simultaneously.

Opener Sometimes when we subtract one number from another number we “regroup”, and sometimes we don’t. For example, if we subtract 8 from 375, we can “regroup by converting a ten to 10 ones: Page 1 of 2 --- see handout Opener 20 minutes with discussion

Opener Find a 3-digit number to subtract from 375 so that: You don’t have to use regrouping (decompose). You would naturally use regrouping from the tens to the ones place. You would naturally use regrouping from the hundreds place to the tens place. You would naturally use regrouping in all places. In each case, explain how you chose your numbers and complete the problem. Page 2 of 2--- see handout Opener = 20 minutes with discussion Participants work for about 10 minutes on the task (or while we wait for the majority of the group to be present). As participants work, presenter reminds participants to explain their thinking in words. Participants may begin working together at any time. The presenter jots down a few key individuals to share their thinking with the entire group and asks them to go up in a particular order. Presenter asks questions to help participants use the correct vocabulary and explain completely. How is this task different from a practice page of subtraction problems? How will teachers support their English Learners on this task? Is this a good task for ELL’s why or why not? Pass out entire handout with sample solutions. Discuss the illustrative math project which is where this came from. The illustrative math project is a website where all of the k-12 math standards can be found with sample illustrations (tasks) for teachers to use with students. Teachers submit sample tasks for specific standards and others can comment on the sample tasks. The site is constantly adding and updating their tasks. These problems will be used again laster in the presentation. 4.NBT.B.4 (Numbers and Operations in Base Ten) – Fluently add and subtract multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm.

A good teacher makes you think even when you don’t want to. (Fisher, 1998, Teaching Thinking) Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Objectives Participants will…. Use the thinking through a lesson protocol to successfully plan for and implement a high-level math task to all students, including English Learners to bridge to CCSS implementation. Create an implementation site plan for Fall 2013 Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes Participants will…. Implement key aspects of problem solving lessons in the classroom daily Analyze the thinking through a lesson protocol as a guide to successfully plan for and implement high-level math tasks to all students, including English Learners. Engage in a PLC to practice using the thinking through a lesson protocol Discuss the stages of a PLC and determine site next steps to move to the next stage

Agenda Opener The CCSS for Mathematics Example of a Problem Solving Lesson: A Pencil and a Sticker Problem Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol Group Practice PLC Process Reflection Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Common Core State Standards For Mathematics Slides 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Common Core State Standards Emphasize the 21st Century Learning Skills Full implementation in 2014-15 with a new assessment Students in grades 3-8 and grade 11 will be tested in 2014-15 Test includes constructed and selected response questions focused mostly at DOK levels 3 and 4 Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes Review the 21st Century Learning Skills (The 5 Cs) Creativity Communication Collaboration Critical Thinking and Problem Solving And the CA addition Making Connections DOK (Depth of Knowledge) How complex a task is: (not difficult) Level 1 – Recall and Reproduction (Routine) Level 2 - Basic Application of Skills/Concepts (two or more steps) (Routine) Level 3 - Strategic Thinking (Non-Routine) (Often more than one solution or pathway to get to the solution) Level 4 - Extended Thinking (non-routine) (Investigation, Students put their words into a presentation--- takes time)

Common Core State Standards Mathematics has two set of standards Standards for Mathematical Practice which occur throughout all grade levels Content Standards that are specific for each grade level Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Standards for Mathematical Practice Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes This is available electroncially.

Student Friendly Language CCSS for Mathematical Practice Student-friendly Language Make sense and persevere in solving problems. I can try many times to understand and solve a math problem. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. I can think about the math problem in my head, first. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. I can make a plan, called a strategy, to solve the problem and discuss other students’ strategies too. Model with mathematics. I can use math symbols and numbers to solve the problem. Use appropriate tools strategically. I can use math tools, pictures, drawings, and objects to solve the problem. Attend to precision. I can check to see if my strategy and calculations are correct. Look for and make use of structure. I can use what I already know about math to solve the problem. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. I can use a strategy that I used to solve another math problem. Adapted from NCTM article– Slide Handout Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Math Solutions-Look Fors as Classroom Indicators What students should be doing for each practice What teachers should be doing for each practice Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes Handout

Understanding Language: Judit Moschokovich University of CA, Santa Cruz Slides 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Language Functions in the Standards for Mathematical Practice Read, locate and highlight language functions in the standards for mathematical practice. Use the margins to make any inferences you make. Note: A language function refers to the purpose for which speech or writing is being used. Slides 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Standards for Mathematical Practice What standards for mathematical practice did you use as you solved the opening problem? Explain your thinking. How are the standards for mathematical practice helpful for English Learner’s? Using the handouts ask participants the questions on the slide: Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes The bulk of the time should be spent on this discussion slide

Content Standards The standards for mathematics: Are focused, coherent, and rigorous Aim for clarity and specificity Stress conceptual understanding of key ideas Balance mathematical understanding and procedural skill Are internationally benchmarked Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes Handout that is black and white

Reading the Content Standards Content standards define what students should understand and be able to do. Clusters are groups of related content standards. Domains are larger groups of related content standards that progress across grade levels. Standard from Grade 3 Opening and CCSS Slides: Numbers 3 – 18 = 20 minutes

High-Level Math Tasks as the Center of All Instruction Problem Solving High-Level Math Tasks as the Center of All Instruction Slides 17- 20 = 15 minutes Daily!

Problem Solving “When students do computation, their thinking should be high-level, critical thinking--- including the same math strategies that many adults in the United States employ in their daily lives.” “Small Steps, Big Changes: Eight Essential Practices for Transforming Schools Through Mathematics” Chris Confer and Marco Ramirez” Slides 17- 20 = 15 minutes

Try Solving This Problem “You are shopping at a grocery store. You have a twenty-dollar bill in your pocket. You find a frozen pizza for $10.00, a bag of apples for $5.55, and a box of cereal for $4.65. Do you have enough money to buy everything?” Slides 17- 20 = 15 minutes Ask the group. Did you solve the problem mentally or did you use pencil and paper? What would you do at the grocery store? Participants explain the ways that they solved the problem mentally. This type of discussion is what the common core standards are all about. Our math program must change for students experience problem solving on a daily basis.

“Problem Solving requires a degree of intellectual struggle “Problem Solving requires a degree of intellectual struggle. Good math problems make students want to do that kind of mental exercise. Good math problems encourage students to think back to similar problems they’ve done in the past, and try out tools and models that could help them. Most important of all, intellectual struggle develops persistence.” “Small Steps, Big Changes: Eight Essential Practices for Transforming Schools Through Mathematics” Chris Confer and Marco Ramirez” Slides 17- 20 = 15 minutes This is SMP 1

Math Task – A Pencil and a Sticker Solve the problem in as many ways as you can. Math Task and Presentations 30 minutes = Slides 21 and 22

A Pencil and a Sticker A pencil costs 59 cents, and a sticker costs 20 cents less. How much do a pencil and a sticker cost together? Math Task and Presentations 30 minutes = Slides 21 and 22 Model the five steps for orchestrating productive discussions here: Anticipant Solutions (Create a chart with the headers of anticipated solutions, participants and order) The headers for this problem might include: Using a diagram, base ten blocks, number line, hundred chart or manipulative Subtract then add using our traditional algorithm Subtract then add using a non-traditional algorithm Other Monitor Participants (Ask and answer questions, but don’t give away the solution or lead to the solution in any way) No telling! 3. Select Participants (Ask participants to share a particular piece of the work that they’ve done) Sequencing the Participants and having them present Making connections between each of the presentations

Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol Focused Lesson Planning BREAK - 10 minutes TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes

Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol (TTLP) Provides a framework for developing lessons that uses students’ mathematical thinking as the critical ingredient in developing their understanding of key disciplinary ideas. Helps teachers anticipate what students will do and generate questions to ask that will promote student learning. TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes Additional Notes: Developed by Margaret S. Smith, Victoria Bill and Elizabeth Hughes who are all college professors at the Universities of Pittsburgh and Northern Iowa. Intended for teachers to use as a process to further the use of cognitively challenging tasks.

Why Lesson Planning? The effectiveness of a lesson depends significantly on the care with which the lesson plan is prepared. (Brahier, 2000) Good planning “shoulders much of the burden” of teaching by replacing “on-fly-decision making” during a lesson with careful investigation into the what and how of instruction before the lesson is taught. (Stigler & Hiebert, 1999, p.156) TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes 27

Why Lesson Planning? “During the planning phase, teachers make decisions that affect instruction dramatically. They decide what to teach, how they are going to teach, how to organize the classroom, what routines to use, and how to adapt instruction for individuals” (Fennema & Franke, 1992, p. 156). TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes 28

Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol (TTLP) Divided into three sessions: Part 1: Selecting and Setting Up a Mathematical Task Part 2: Supporting Students’ Exploration of the Task Part 3: Sharing and Discussing the Task Pass out handout of the TTLP TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes

Part 1: Selecting and Setting Up A Mathematical Task Teachers will… Identify the mathematical goals Select a high-level math task Anticipant student solutions Locate tools or resources that students will use Discuss how the task will be introduced and how they know that all students understand the context of the task TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes Have teachers read through part 1 and discuss together. What do they notice?

Part 2: Supporting Students’ Exploration of the Task Teachers will.. Monitor students (no telling) Anticipate questions that they will ask to get a group started or make progress on the task Generate questions that will focus students’ thinking on the key math ideas in the task TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes Have teachers read through part 2 and discuss together. What do they notice?

Part 3: Sharing and Discussing the Task Teachers will.. Strategically select and sequence students to present their ideas in an order that allows access for all Make connections between the presentations and to the math goals for the lesson TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 23-31 = 20 minutes Have teachers read through part 3 and discuss together. What do they notice?

Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol Planning Template Sample Standards and Goals Challenges for ELL’s Task and Possible Solutions and Strategies Questions the teacher may ask Ideal order of presentations and why Next Steps TTLP Introduction and Sample Slides 19 – 27 = 20 minutes Have teachers read through part 1 and discuss together. What do they notice? This sample was written from the Pencil and sticker problem they just experienced. Don’t read this question by question but highlight some of the essential pieces. One piece to include is the EL question in part one and the frayer model. See handout.

Group Practice In a small group begin to practice using the Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol You will be given a grade level standard and an optional corresponding task that you can choose to use or you may use your own materials. Be prepared to share your experience with the process, your questions and thoughts with the large group. Slide 32 = 30 minutes plus share out Standards and corresponding tasks are available for grades K, 2, 4 and 6. Handout – extra blank copy for group of the TTLP

Seven Stages of Teacher Collaboration Slides 33-35 = 15 minutes

Seven Stages of Teacher Collaboration Title 1 Filling the time 2 Sharing personal practice 3 Planning, planning, planning 4 Developing common assessments 5 Analyzing student learning 6 Adapting instruction to student needs 7 Reflecting on instruction Slides 33-35 = 15 minutes Handout… Describe each stage. Below is the paragraph below the chart in the book which describes the stages in more detail. In the first three stages teachers are trying to understand what they are supposed to accomplish as a team. They may need help bringing a focus to their work, setting up agendas, and learning to plan for the unit by unit work of them team (calendars, assignment, projects, timing of review days, etc.) Teams in stages 3 and 4 are coordinating common planning of instruction and assessment, developing common assessments and tasks and analyzing student results. Teams may not take collective action on those results, but they are coordinating the generation and use of common learning targets, mathematical tasks, and assessments. It is in the final two stages that teams are actually collaborating as members take collective responsibility for the learning of all students, differentiating instruction based on their collective understanding of students progress and designing assessments based on students need by reflection on the questions, “Which practices are most effective with our students?” If, after analyzing the data from the unit common assessment, your teams develop a differentiated lesson design to either extend the knowledge and reasoning of students who have mastered the learning target or to provide targeted support for struggling learners, then a more authentic and interdependent collaboration is under way. Collaborative teams achieve stage seven when they regularly make adjustments to instruction based on learner needs and discuss and implement instructional and assessment strategies that have the greatest impact on student learning. Common Core Mathematics in a PLC at work: Leaders Guide Tim Kanold and Matt Larson

Seven Stages of Teacher Collaboration In what stage do you think using the Thinking Through a Lesson Protocol would most appropriately fit? Why? What stages are the PLC teams typically functioning at your site? Why? What could be done to push them to the next stage? Slides 33-35 = 15 minutes Stage Five – As long as you are coming back and analyzing the students work.

Reflection As a team discuss the following related to today’s training and be prepared to share: What will you personally use next school year? What are the math needs at your site? Where should your site begin? Create an implementation plan for the thinking through protocol with as many details as possible, such as dates and topics for training, planning time, etc. Slide 36 Reflection – 10 min or remaining time