Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory A MW Class Target System for Muon Beam Production AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July 14-18, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
Advertisements

The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.
KT McDonald Target Studies Weekly Meeting July 10, Power Deposition in Graphite Targets of Various Radii K.T. McDonald, J. Back, N. Souchlas July.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Plans and Status MUTAC Review FNAL March 17, 2006.
K. McDonald LEMC Workshop 22 Apr 2008 From MERIT to a Muon Collider (Front End) K.T. McDonald Princeton U. Low Emittance Muon Collider Workshop Fermilab,
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory MERIT Experiment Status NFMCC Collaboration Meeting FNAL March 17-20, 2008.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
K. McDonald 2 nd Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop 6 Nov 2008 High-Power Targets for Superbeams and Neutrino Factories (and Muon Colliders) K.T. McDonald.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory High-Power Targets H.G. Kirk Applications of High-Intensity Proton Accelerators FNAL October 20, 2009.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The MERIT High-Power Target Experiment Muon Collider Design Workshop BNL December 3-7, 2007.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
Primary Target Systems for a Muon Collider / Neutrino Factory. What has the experimental effort taught us thus far. N. Simos, H. Kirk, S. Kahn, P. Thieberger,
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
Above: Energy deposition in the superconducting magnet and the tungsten-carbide shield inside them. Approximately 2.4 MW must be dissipated in the shield.
T2K Target & Secondary Beamline - progress towards a neutrino Superbeam? Chris Densham.
May 17-19, 2000 Catalina Island, CA Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting 1 Target Support Facility for a Solid Target Neutrino Production.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
K. McDonald EURO Meeting 26 Mar 2009 High-PowerTargets for Neutrino Beams and Muon Colliders K.T. McDonald Princeton U. EURO Meeting CERN, March 26, 2009.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Above: Power deposition in the superconducting magnets and the tungsten-carbide + water shield inside them, according to a FLUKA simulation Approximately.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Recent Results from MERIT NUFACT09 Illinois Institute of Technology July 22, 2009.
Above: On-axis field profiles of resistive, superconducting and all magnets, and bore-tube radius r = 7.5 (B/20T) −½ cm. Above: Hoop strain ε θ in resistive.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Calculations 1 st Princeton/Oxford High-Power Targets Workshop Oxford May 1-2, 2008.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
The MERIT experiment at the CERN PS Leo Jenner MOPC087 WEPP169 WEPP170.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
The Front End MAP Review Fermi National Accelerator Lab August 24-26, 2010 Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The High-Power Target Experiment at CERN Muon Collaboration Meeting LBNL February 16, 2005.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The High-power Target Experiment at CERN NUFACT’04 Osaka, Japan July 27, 2004.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
Target and Absorbers L2 Manager: K McDonald, Princeton U March xx, 2013 Presenter’s Name | DOE Mini-Review of MAP (FNAL, March 4-6, 2013)1 Mission Target:
A powder jet target for a Neutrino Factory Ottone Caretta, Chris Densham (RAL), Tom Davies (Exeter University), Richard Woods (Gericke Ltd)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Concept for a Neutrino Factory EMCOG Meeting CERN November 18, 2003.
Target R&D Kirk T McDonald Princeton University Feb. 19, 2014 February 19, 2014 KT McDonald | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1 Scope of.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
Next generation of ν beams Challenges Ahead I. Efthymiopoulos - CERN LAGUNA Workshp Aussois, France, September 8,2010 what it takes to design and construct.
T2K Secondary Beamline – Status of RAL Contributions Chris Densham, Mike Fitton, Vishal Francis, Matt Rooney, Mike Woodward, Martin Baldwin, Dave Wark.
KT McDonald MAP Winter Meeting (SLAC) December 5, Solid Target Options for an Intense Muon Source K. McDonald Princeton U. (December 5, 2014) MAP.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Concept for a Neutrino Factory Muon Meeting BNL January 26, 2004.
K. McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 29, Materials for the Target System Internal Shield K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 27, 2010) Iron Plug Proton.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Considerations for Nufact and Superbeams ISS Meeting RAL April 26, 2006.
KT McDonald MAP Tech Board Meeting Oct 20, The MAP Targetry Program in FY11 and FY12 K. McDonald Princeton U. (Oct 20, 2011) MAP Technical Board.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
BNL E951 BEAM WINDOW EXPERIENCE Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Neutrino Working Group Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Post-Irradiation Properties of Candidate Materials for High-Power Targets PAC05 Knoxville, TN May 16-20,
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Target and Pion Collection System and Support Facility
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The High-Power Target Experiment at CERN High-Power Targetry Workshop Oak Ridge, TN October 10, 2005.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The High-Power Target Experiment at CERN Report to MUTAC LBNL April 25, 2005.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Targetry Program Collaboration Meeting Columbia University June 11, 2003.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory The E951 Targetry Program Targetry Meeting CERN September 19, 2003.
High Power Target Experience with T2K Chris Densham T2K Beamline Collaboration including RAL / KEK / Kyoto.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Muon Production and Capture for a Neutrino Factory European Strategy for Future Neutrino Physics CERN October.
BNL solenoid capture workshop: magnet challenges are not trivial Summarized by Tengming Shen
KT McDonald MAP Spring Meeting May 30, Target System Concept for a Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory K.T. McDonald Princeton University (May 28, 2014)
ENERGY FLOW AND DEPOSITION IN A 4-MW MUON-COLLIDER TARGET SYSTEM
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
MERIT Scientific goals and importance
Tungsten Powder Test at HiRadMat Scientific Motivation
Accelerator R&D for Future Neutrino Projects
Meson Production Efficiencies
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory A MW Class Target System for Muon Beam Production AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July 14-18, 2014

Harold G. Kirk 2 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July High-power Targetry Challenges High-average power and high-peak power issues l Thermal management n Target melting n Target vaporization l Radiation n Radiation protection n Radioactivity inventory n Remote handling l Thermal shock n Beam-induced pressure waves l Material properties

Harold G. Kirk 3 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July PRODUCTION OF INTENSE MUON BEAMS Muon beams produced as tertiary beams : p  π  μ

Harold G. Kirk 4 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July The Capture Solenoid A Neutrino Factory and/or Muon Collider Facility requires challenging magnet design in several areas: l Target Capture SC Solenoid (15T with large aperture) l Stored Energy ~ 3 GJ l 10MW, 5T resistive coil in high radiation environment Possible application for High Temperature Superconducting magnet technology

Harold G. Kirk 5 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Choice of Target Materials We consider proton beam powers of 1-,2- and 4-MW Solid and liquid targets considered: High-Z, eg. W, Hg, PbBi Mid-Z, eg. Ga, Cu, Ni Low-Z, eg. Be,C

Harold G. Kirk 6 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Choice of Target Materials II High Z (e.g. Hg) Mid Z (e.g. Ga) Low Z (e.g. Carbon) A 25% advantage of using high-Z Hg compared to low-Z Carbon Low-z Carbon is attractive due to it’s simplicity and robustness Proton Beam: KE = 6.75 GeV Normalization: For Hg Σ(μ + + μ - )/proton ≈ 30% X. Ding, UCLA

Harold G. Kirk 7 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Captured Muon Spectra For p + Hg Total Captured Muons per incoming protons μ + /p = 14.6% μ - /p = 14.8% For 6.75GeV protons 1MW  protons

Harold G. Kirk 8 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Stainless-steel target vessel (double-walled with intramural He-gas flow for cooling) with graphite target and beam dump, and downstream Be window. 15 T superconducting coil outsert, Stored energy ~ 3 GJ, ~ 100 tons 5 T copper-coil insert. Water-cooled, MgO insulated He-gas cooled W-bead shielding (~ 100 tons) Proton beam tube Upstream proton beam window A Graphite Target Core Last Final-Focus quad

Harold G. Kirk 9 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Optimization of Carbon Target Dimensions Target Radius 6cm < R < 12cm Target/Solenoid Axis Angle 50 mrad < θ < 80 mrad ~15% advantage for tilted target Gaussian beam radius constrained to ¼ target radius X. Ding, UCLA

Harold G. Kirk 10 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Energy Deposition in a Graphite Targets Graphite targets of various radii (0.8 to 40cm). Proton beam has an rms radius of 2mm at the center of the target and β* = 80 cm.. N.Souchlas, PBL Largest power deposition for R=8mm case is 4 cm into target, but at ~60cm in targets with large radii... B = 0 T B = 20 T

Harold G. Kirk 11 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Total power absorbed in the target. The steady-state power increases with magnetic field For R=8mm total power is 150kW for 4MW protn beam

Harold G. Kirk 12 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Peak Energy Deposition Simulations for a 1.8g/cm 3 graphite target Peak energy deposition occurs 3 to 4 cm into the target. Peak energy deposition is 3600J/g for a 4-MW, 6.75 GeV proton beam 80cm graphite target with various radii N. Souchlas, PBL

Harold G. Kirk 13 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Energy Deposition on Carbon Target Beam PowerRep RatePeak EDSteady State ED MWHzJ/gkWatts Figure of Merit: T2K Graphite Target Peak ED Design Limit is 200 J/g

Harold G. Kirk 14 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Titanium target body Graphite ( ToyoTanso IG-43) The T2K Target Design Graphite to titanium diffusion bond Ti-6Al-4V tube and windows (0.5 mm thick) Graphite (purified) ( ToyoTanso IG-430) Aluminium support plate Isolators Stainless pipe + flange Titanium pipe + flange Remote connector + bellows + isolator (Al 2 O 3 ) IG43 Graphite L – 90cm R=13mm

Harold G. Kirk 15 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July The CERN CNGS Target 13 graphite rods, each 10cm long, Ø = 5mm and/or 4mm 2.7 interaction lengths Target magazine holds 1 target plus 4 spares Graphite Core Carbon-Carbon Support

Harold G. Kirk 16 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July AGS E951: Graphite & Carbon-Carbon Targets ATJCC X/U Y, GPa1054/5.3 α T, / 0 K 2.5~0 Tensile Strength, MPa 15182/44 Key Material Properties

Harold G. Kirk 17 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July GeV, 3 x protons/pulse AGS E951: Strain Gauge Measurements

Harold G. Kirk 18 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Consider High-Z Targets Advantages: 30% enhanced π/μ production If liquid then free jet mitigates shock damage Disadvantages: Enhanced energy deposition  liquid targets Enhanced radionuclide inventory

Harold G. Kirk 19 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July The MERIT Experiment The MERIT Experiment at the CERN PS l Proof-of-principle demonstration of a liquid Hg jet target in high-field solenoid l Demonstrated a 20m/s liquid Hg jet injected into a 15 T solenoid a with a 115 KJ/pulse beam! 1 cm

Harold G. Kirk 20 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Key MERIT Results Jet Disruption Length Filament Ejection Velocity

Harold G. Kirk 21 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Study with 4 Tp + 4 Tp at 14 GeV, 10 T Single-turn extraction  0 delay, 8 Tp 4-Tp probe extracted on subsequent turn  3.2 μs delay 4-Tp probe extracted after 2nd full turn  5.8 μs Delay Threshold of disruption is > 4 Tp at 14 Gev, 10 T.  Target supports a 14-GeV, 4-Tp beam at 172 kHz rep rate without disruption. PUMP: 8 bunches, 4  protons PROBE: 8 bunches, 4  protons

Harold G. Kirk 22 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July CERN ISOLDE Hg Target Tests Bunch Separation [ns] Proton beam 5.5 TP per Bunch. A. Fabich, J. Lettry, CERN

Harold G. Kirk 23 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Pump-Probe Test No loss of pion production for bunch delays of 40 and 350  s, A 5% loss (2.5-  effect) of pion production for bunches delayed by 700  s. Production Efficiency: Normalized Probe / Normalized Pump

Harold G. Kirk 24 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Key MERIT Results l Jet surface instabilities reduced by high-magnetic fields l Hg jet disruption mitigated by magnetic field n 20 m/s operations allows for up to 70Hz operations l 115kJ pulse containment demonstrated 8 MW capability demonstrated l Hg ejection velocities reduced by magnetic field l Pion production remains stable up to 350μs after previous beam impact l 170kHz operations possible for sub-disruption threshold beam intensities

Harold G. Kirk 25 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July SUMMARY l A solenoid capture system could be a source for intense muon beams l A solid graphite based target looks promising for 1-MW and 2-MW drive beam applications and may be possible at 4-MW for high-rep rates (50-60 Hz) l Liquid high-Z targets are more efficient in the production of π/μ beams and are suitable for low rep-rate, 4-MW class drive beams

Harold G. Kirk 26 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July Backup Slides

Harold G. Kirk 27 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July The Neutrino Factory Target Concept Maximize Pion/Muon Production l Soft-pion Production l High-Z materials l High-Magnetic Field Palmer, PAC97

Harold G. Kirk 28 AAC 2014 San Jose, Ca July The NF Study 2 Target System Neutrino Factory Study 2 Target Concept