Performance Measurement and Evaluation Basics 2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing Effective Action for Change
Advertisements

Overview of Performance Measurement. Learning Objectives By the end of the module, you will be able to: Describe what performance measurement is, and.
Performance Measurement and Evaluation 2/8/2014 Performance Measurement and Evaluation 1 Performance Measurement and Evaluation What are they? How are.
High Quality Performance Measures What is Performance Measurement? What makes a high quality performance measure? Copyright © 2012 by JBS International,
High Quality Performance Measures What is Performance Measurement? What makes a high quality performance measure?
Theory of Change 2/8/2014 Theory of Change 1 Theory of Change What is it? How to use it?
Alignment and Quality 2/8/2014 Alignment and Quality 1 What is it? What do I need to look for?
Performance Measurement: Defining Results Tutorial #1 for AmeriCorps
REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
Using Data to Measure and Report Program Impact Anne Basham, MFA MEMconsultants.
How to Develop a Program Logic Model. Learning objectives By the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Describe what a logic model is, and how.
How to Evaluate Your Health Literacy Project Jill Lucht, MS Project Director, Center for Health Policy
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training Assessing Need, Theory of Change, and Logic Model.
A plain English Description of the components of evaluation Craig Love, Ph.D. Westat.
Developing a Logic Model
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
Program Evaluation Spero Manson PhD
Evidence: What It Is And Where To Find It Building Evidence of Effectiveness Copyright © 2014 by JBS International, Inc. Developed by JBS International.
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
Types of Evaluation.
+ Monitoring, Learning & Evaluation Questions or problems during the webinar?
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
High Quality Performance Measures What is Performance Measurement? What makes a high quality performance measure? Copyright © 2012 by JBS International,
Theory of Change and Evidence
LOGIC MODELS AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENT United Way Community Investment Process Training.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Daniel Barutta and Sarah Yue, Program Officers
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
How to Focus and Measure Outcomes Katherine Webb-Martinez Central Coast and South Region All Staff Conference April 23, 2008.
2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training
Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.
Theory of Change Designing Effective Action for Change How a Theory of Change helps you clarify the cause-and-effect relationship at the heart of your.
2015 AmeriCorps Logic Model A presentation for AmeriCorps grant applicants.
Theory of Change and Evidence
The Evaluation Plan.
Logic Models Handout 1.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Rethinking Homelessness Their Future Depends on it!
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Performance Measurement 201: Best practices in performance measure design & implementation Ia Moua, Deputy Director, Grants & Program Development Patrick.
Overview of Evaluation Designs. Learning objectives By the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Explain evaluation design Describe the differences.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
Tell the Story: Why Performance Measures Matter Cat Keen, M.S.W., M.B.A National Service Programs Director.
Foster Grandparent Program Performance Measures. Performance Measurement Performance Measurement is: –The ongoing monitoring and reporting of program.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
AmeriCorps Grantee Training Evaluation and Research September 11, 2014.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation
Performance Measurement 101. Performance Measurement Performance Measurement is: –The ongoing monitoring and reporting of program accomplishments and.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Introduction to Program Evaluation
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Using Logic Models in Project Proposals
What is a Logic Model? A depiction of a program showing what the program will do and what it is to accomplish. A series of “if-then” relationships that.
Presentation transcript:

Performance Measurement and Evaluation Basics 2014 AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training

 Theory of Change  Logic Models  Performance Measurement and Evaluation Basics 2 Topics

3 Theory of Change Theory of Change Elements Community Problem/Need Specific Intervention Intended Outcome

 Cause and effect relationship between intervention and outcome  If…then… logic 4 Theory of Change

5 Theory of Change Elements Community Problem/Need Specific Intervention Intended Outcome Evidence Guides choice of intervention Supports cause-effect relationship Evidence Guides choice of intervention Supports cause-effect relationship Statistics documenting the need Theory of Change

 A likelihood that the proposed intervention (design/dosage) will lead to the outcome  The stronger the evidence, the stronger the relationship between intervention and outcome Evidence Demonstrates… Theory of Change 6

Community Problem/Need 7 Statistics on the number of students at below grade level in program’s service area; Research on why reading proficiency by 3 rd grade is important. Children reading below grade level in 3 rd grade Example: Riverton Literacy Corps Theory of Change

Community Problem/Need Statistics on the number of students at below grade level in program’s service area; Research on why reading proficiency by 3 rd grade is important. Children reading below grade level in 3 rd grade 8 Students are able to read at 3 rd grade level (as measured by 3 rd grade reading exam) Example: Riverton Literacy Corps Intended Outcome Theory of Change

Community Problem/Need Statistics on the number of students at below grade level in program’s service area; Research on why reading proficiency by 3 rd grade is important. Children reading below grade level in 3 rd grade Students are able to read at 3 rd grade level (as measured by 3 rd grade reading exam) Intended Outcome 9 Specific Intervention Evidence: Research on building block skills leading to reading proficiency. Research on design, frequency, duration of tutoring sessions. Individualized tutoring 3 times/week for 20 min on five “building block” literacy skills through reading, writing and verbal communication activities Example: Riverton Literacy Corps Theory of Change

 A visual summary or snapshot of your program that communicates how your program works, the resources you have to operate your program, the activities you plan, and the outcomes you hope to achieve  A well-specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the proposed process, product, strategy, or practice and describes the relationships among the key components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally (NOFO p. 18)  The purpose of a logic model is to describe how a program will create change (theory of change) Logic Models 10

How a Logic Model Works 11 Resources/ Inputs ActivitiesOutputs Outcomes/ Impacts Long-Term Goal Certain resources are needed to operate your program If you have access to them, then you can use them to accomplish your planned activities If you accomplish your planned activities, then you will hopefully deliver the amount of product and/or service that you intended If you accomplish your planned activities to the extent you intended, then your participants will benefit in certain ways If these benefits to participants are achieved, then certain changes in organizations, communities, or systems might be expected to occur Figure 1: How to Read a Logic Model  Your Planned WorkYour Intended Results Logic Models

 Applicants required to use the logic model template developed by CNCS  Criteria for assessing completeness and quality of logic model will be addressed in the next training module 12 AmeriCorps Logic Model Logic Models

13 CNCS Template Logic Models

 Inputs – Resources, including AmeriCorps members  Activities (Interventions) – Services provided by members and/or volunteers  Outputs – Units of service delivered (# of beneficiaries served, etc.)  Outcomes  Short Term (Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes, Opinions)  Medium Term (Behavior)  Long-Term (Condition) Applicant Logic Models Logic Models 14

Performance Measurement & Evaluation What is Performance Measurement?  Performance measurement is the ongoing and systematic monitoring and reporting of program accomplishments, particularly progress towards pre-established targets  Monitors the vital signs of a program 15

Evaluation is the use of social science research methods to assess program design, implementation, and effectiveness. What is Evaluation? Performance Measurement & Evaluation 16

17 Comparing Performance Measurement & Evaluation  Performance measurement data can show that a change occurred but not why  Evaluation results can show whether the change that occurred can be attributed to the intervention  The more scientifically rigorous the evaluation design, the greater the certainty re: causality Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Performance MeasurementEvaluation What is it?A system of tracking progress in accomplishing specific pre-set targets (activities, outputs, and/or outcomes) A formal scientific process for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data about how well a program was implemented (process evaluation) or how effectively the program accomplished desired outcomes/impacts (outcome/impact evaluation) Why is it typically used?To gauge program delivery, quality, participant satisfaction and engagement; to improve products, services, and efficiency; to inform/enhance decision making, and support planning and program development To assess program effectiveness and determine whether the program is responsible for changes found How does it work?Monitors a few vital signs related to program performance objectives, outputs, and/or outcomes Comprehensively examines programs using systematic, objective, and unbiased procedures in accordance with social science research methods and research designs Who typically does it?Program staffAn experienced researcher (often external to the program) who has formal training in evaluation When is it done?Ongoing BasisPeriodically Comparing Performance Measurement & Evaluation Performance Measurement & Evaluation 18

Performance Measurement 19 Outputs  Amount of service provided (people served, products created, or programs developed) Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Performance Measurement 20 Outcomes  Reflect the changes or benefits that occur  Can reflect changes in individuals, organizations, communities, or the environment  Address changes in attitudes/beliefs, knowledge/skills, behavior, or conditions Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Attitude/BeliefKnowledge/SkillBehaviorCondition Thought, feeling Understanding, know-how Action Situation, circumstance 21 Types of Outcomes Performance Measurement & Evaluation

22 Different Theories of Change Have Different Outcomes Attitude/BeliefKnowledge/SkillBehaviorCondition Increased interest in school Improved math ability Increased school attendance Successful completion of high school Performance Measurement & Evaluation

NEED: 35% of young veterans (18-24 year olds) are unemployed (Department of Veteran Affairs, 2011). Economists cite a lack of marketable civilian skills and the need for education degrees, vocational certifications… INTERVENTION: National service participants support veterans in completing training programs by assisting in locating appropriate programs, securing financial aid, and by providing tutoring resources and internship placements. 1.Veterans report increased confidence about finding employment. (attitude) 2.Veterans demonstrate new technical skills. (knowledge/skills) 3.Veterans are placed in jobs. (condition) Which Type of Outcome? Practice: Choosing an Outcome Performance Measurement & Evaluation 23

If AmeriCorps members support veterans to enroll in and complete training programs, then veterans will gain technical skills If veterans gain technical skills, then they will be more likely to find jobs 24 Following the Logic Performance Measurement & Evaluation

Evaluation and Theory of Change  Theory of change (as expressed in a logic model) is key to evaluation  Based on a program’s theory of change, evaluation tests assumptions/hypotheses about how a program works and whether or not it is achieving what it intended to accomplish Performance Measurement & Evaluation 25

Two levels/Types of Evaluation: 1.Implementation (Process)  Is the program operating as intended? 2.Outcomes (Short-, Intermediate, and Long-Term)  What difference did the program make? Levels/Types of Evaluation Performance Measurement & Evaluation 26

 Is the program operating as designed, and, if not, how and why?  Do program staff clearly understand the program’s goals and objectives?  Do staff need additional training to implement the program correctly?  How consistent is the program’s implementation across sites?  Is the program reaching the intended target population?  Who are the individuals receiving/participating in the program?  Is the target population receiving the appropriate services? Why or why not?  What is the quality of services provided by the program?  How satisfied are participants with their program experiences?  Do staff believe that the program is effective? Why or why not?  Which program elements are or are not working well? Why? Implementation Evaluation: Types of Questions Performance Measurement & Evaluation 27

Outcomes/Impact Evaluation: Types of Questions  What did the program accomplish?  What impact did the program have on its participants?  Was the benefit greater with this program as compared with another program?  Did all types of students or clients benefit from the program or specific subgroups?  Did the program increase participants’ awareness, knowledge and skills? Performance Measurement & Evaluation 28

Internal Validity  The degree to which measured effects may be due to program vs. factors other than the program  High internal validity allows for more plausible causal attribution statements  Attaining moderate and strong evidence requires that a study has high internal validity Performance Measurement & Evaluation 29

Evaluation Study Designs Comparison Ability to make statements about causal attribution Experimental Design Studies Randomly Assigned Groups Quasi-Experimental Design Studies Statistically Matched Groups Non-Experimental Design Studies Not Statistically Matched Groups or Group Compared to Itself Evaluation Study Designs & Causal Impact Performance Measurement & Evaluation 30

Children receiving nutrition, fitness and counseling services through an after school program delivered by AmeriCorps members are compared to children attending an after school program that does not include the AmeriCorps nutrition, fitness and counseling program. Children in the two groups are matched based on demographic characteristics and baseline measures of nutrition, fitness and obesity. What kind of evaluation design is it? Practice Questions Practice Question I 31

This is a quasi-experimental design because it compares beneficiaries to a statistically matched group of individuals not receiving the AmeriCorps intervention. 32 Answer Practice Questions

High school students enrolled in a career preparation program delivered by AmeriCorps members are compared to high school students who wanted to the program but were not selected. 100 students wanted to join the program, but there were only 50 spots. 50 students were randomly selected for the program. The other 50 were placed on a waiting list to join the program. What kind of evaluation design is it? 33 Practice Question 2 Practice Questions

This is an experimental design because individuals were assigned to the beneficiary group or the control group through random assignment. 34 Answer Practice Questions

Students receiving academic mentoring services from AmeriCorps members take a survey that asks their view about the importance of education before participating in the AmeriCorps mentoring program and after participation in the program. What kind of evaluation design is it? 35 Practice Question 3 Practice Questions

This is a non-experimental design because it looks at changes in the beneficiaries’ attitudes over time. There is no comparison group or control group. 36 Answer Practice Questions

To check for understanding and verify that you have completed this orientation session, please complete the Assessment at the following link: 37 Next Steps Practice Questions