IFTA and IRP A History Lesson!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IFTA / IRP Audit Process Mileage Audit
Advertisements

Oregon’s Road User Fee Pilot Program Presented to International Fuel Tax Agreement Managers’ Workshop September 2006 PowerPoint Presentation provided by:
MVS Express International Registration Plan Account Renewal
Arizona Department of Transportation IFTA RECORD KEEPING REQUIRMENTS.
Unified Carrier Registration (UCR) Update August 24, 2006.
American Trucking Associations National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors March 2007 Ray Kuntz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Watkins and.
1 Motor Carrier Registration Motor Fuels Tax Division Rev. 08/09.
KC Transportation Inc. v. Dep’t. of Treasury, 2013 Mich. App. LEXIS 1197 (Mich. Ct. App. 2013) By: Sukanya Mukherjee Comptroller of Maryland.
International Registration Plan
IFTA/IRP Joint Session Encouraging Cooperation Between IRP and IFTA Processes Joy Prenger, Missouri Mary Jo Pointer, Missouri.
The Coalition for Transportation Productivity Making Roads Safer, Protecting the Environment and Strengthening the Economy Through Vehicle Weight Limit.
COMPLETING AN IFTA TAX RETURN
Presentation for the American Society of Safety Engineers The Missouri Department of Transportation Motor Carrier Services.
Alabama Public Service Commission Presented By: Commissioner Jeremy H. Oden, Alabama Public Service Commission Helping Helping Small Business Owners.
Randy Mullett Vice President - Government Relations & Public Affairs, Con-way Inc. FHWA Talking Freight Webinar February 16, 2011 Riding the U.S. and Global.
KANSAS The official Web site for TruckingKS.org CVISN Commercial Vehicle Information Systems and Networks (CVISN)
Motor Carrier Industry Overview April 2007 Tavio Headley Economist American Trucking Associations.
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT STUDY COMMITTEE ON CRITICAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING Trucking in Georgia: Big Numbers, Big Impact October 1, 2015.
USDOT Numbers USDOT 123. What is a USDOT #? The USDOT # is the number that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) assigns to each commercial.
1 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Rulemaking National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Informal Document No. WP th session, June.
Oregon’s Road Usage Charge Program - SB810 Implementation 2015 AASHTO Audit Conference July 21, 2015.
Vehicle Information. Must: Title and Register vehicle before legally driving on roads. >Title-Proof of ownership Must: Always have documents available.
Airport Shuttle Agreements Presented by: John McCarthy GO Airport Express.
Economic & Industry Update March 8, 2011 Bob Costello Chief Economist & Vice President American Trucking Associations.
IFTA, INC. STRATEGIC PLAN IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING JULY 19, 2008 New Orleans, LA Edgar Roberts (NV) IFTA, Inc. Board of Trustees.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
The History of IFTA and IRP An awe inspiring look at how we got here…and the importance of keeping what we’ve got.
IRP Update IFTA 2006 Managers Workshop and Law Enforcement Seminar.
6 th largest LTL (Less than truckload) -Founded Service Centers – 11,000 FT Employees –OD Domestic - Multi-regional, inter-regional, 48 state.
Household Goods Carriers “Household Goods Carrier” means a carrier handling: (a)personal effects and property used or to be used in a dwelling; (b)furniture,
Tracking the Trucking Industry… 2004 and Beyond Presented by Dan Murray American Transportation Research Institute.
Transportation Services Budget February 4, 2010 Josh Davis, Director 1.
Presented by IFTA Managers’ Workshop and Law Enforcement Seminar September 21-24, 2005 Ron Hester Tax Administration Manager ON Ministry of Finance Lt.
IFTA/IRP Managers and Law Enforcement Workshop September 2012.
NAFTA Teamwork At Its Finest. Team Members Border State Representatives – Arizona, California, New Mexico, Texas – Both IFTA and IRP US Department of.
Special Committee on Intermodal Transportation and Economic Expansion Workshop October 23, 2009 Patrick E. Quinn Co-Chairman & President U.S. Xpress Enterprises.
Full Reciprocity Plan IRP Board Meeting February 2-4, 2010 San Antonio, Texas.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
Consumer Taxation Program Branch IFTA Fraud Part 1 - Administrative Focus September 22, 2005.
IFTA ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING DISCUSSION OF IFTA FULL TRACK BALLOTS AND
ACTIVITY IN A NON-REGISTERED JURISDICTION During the audit, you find that an apportioned & IFTA-decaled unit traveled in a jurisdiction that the carrier.
CDL changes 2015 In this presentation we will talk about the changes that will be taking place this year as part of Federal Regulation changes with a.
Prepared by Michele Mascia “This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) as.
Presented By: Allen Cummings, California Jay Starling, Alabama IFTA/IRP Audit Workshop Impact of Plan Rewrite on Auditors January 2008.
Why Large Motor Carrier Fleets May Change Their IRP Bases Bob Pitcher Vice President, State Laws ATA.
IRP, Inc. Report IFTA, Inc. Annual Business Meeting New Orleans, LA July 18, 2008.
MVS Express Electronic Filing IFTA & IRP IRP - Add a vehicle
Tennessee Department of Revenue Business Tax 2015.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc.
Presented by Anthony Madsen – Washington Diana Kay – Florida Bob Gattinella – Rhode Island Stacey Hammock - Wyoming Auditor 101_301.
INTERNATIONAL FUEL TAX AGREEMENT Celebrating 30 Years of Cooperation and Trust Bob Pitcher VP, State Laws American Trucking Associations
August 12-13San Antonio, Texas 2015 Annual Business Meeting 2015 ABM August 12, 2015 San Antonio, TX.
International Fuel Tax Agreement An Overview. What is IFTA? Fuel Tax Collection Agreement between the 48 contiguous states. Non- IFTA = Yukon Territory,
Clark Snelson Assistant Attorney General State of Utah (With thanks and recognition to Ted Spangler, Assistant Attorney general, Idaho, retired) For presentation.
Trucking Industry Perspectives on Transportation Funding Greg Owen Head Coach Ability/Tri-Modal Talking Freight – December 16, 2009.
IRP, Inc. Report IFTA Annual Business Meeting July 2010.
Town Hall Meeting 2011 Issues. FOR THE JURISDICTIONS THAT SELL OVERWEIGHT/OVER DIMENSIONAL PERMITS TO VEHICLES ENTERING AND USING THEM IN YOUR JURISDICTION,
Chapter 9 Vehicle Information. Do Now: What is a title?
IRP Update IFTA 2006 Annual Business Meeting Las Vegas, NV Dave Saddler Presented by: Dave Saddler Executive Director IRP, Inc.
 (i) has two Axles and a gross Vehicle weight or registered gross Vehicle weight in excess of 26,000 pounds (11, kilograms), or  (ii) has three.
The Transportation Logistics Company Indiana Logistics Summit Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities September 26, 2007.
IFTA BALLOT #3 Overview of changes. Overview of Changes The new Language in Ballot #3 introduces 5 new requirements and defines “should” as a conditional.
13 March 2014 By a California Country Mile The Business Case for Road Usage Charging Matthew J. Dorfman and Travis P. Dunn D’Artagnan Consulting, LLP.
IFTA CHRONICLES SUCCESS STORY
IT’S TIME FOR THE TOWN HALL!
IFTA Chronicles -Yesteryear
THE REAL INTERSTATE DRIVER'S EQUITY ACT
Promoting Cooperation Between Audit and Operations
New Commissioners’ Meeting IFTA BASICS
NAFTA Teamwork At Its Finest.
Presentation transcript:

IFTA and IRP A History Lesson! Donna Burch – Ryder System, Inc John Jabas – Frozen Food Express Tom Klingman – UPS Sandy Johnson & Bill Taylor– Total Trucking Mgmt

Your IFTA/IRP Instructors Donna Burch - Started with Fuel Tax issues in 1974 – 33 Years John Jabas – Involved with Registration and tax issues for over 31 years Tom Klingman – Handled Registration and Fuel Tax issues for UPS for over 33 years Sandy Johnson – Involved since 1984 – 22 years - from both a Government and Industry perspective Bill Taylor has an extensive background in Management and Training in both the public and private sectors

The Lesson Plan Professor Burch - The Economics of IFTA! Professor Jabas – What could be – Theories form the Past and for the Future ! Professor Klingman – The Trucking Industry - Today and Yesterday ! Professors Johnson and Taylor– Government and Industry – Alternative Relationships

IFTA – The Cost to the Industry! Donna Burch

First, a little history… 20 Years Ago – Fuel Use Taxes Were a Crisis For the Trucking Industry: Non-uniform Burdensome Expensive to Administer & Comply With

The Cost to the Industry Administrative Cost Non - Uniformity Purchase of Fuel Tax Permits /Decals Bonding Expense Multiple Tax Filings Lack of coordination of Refunds Multiple Audits

The Cost to the Industry Operational Cost Installation of over 25 Decals and License Plates Coordination of Expiration Dates Cash Out while waiting for refunds – Over Payments vs. Under Payments Pulling same records for different audits

Audit & Administration Non-Uniformity Vehicles Registration Credentials Bonding Leases Tax Reports Credits & Refunds Audit & Administration

Vehicles Reported > all commercial vehicles > 2 axles > 7,000 lbs. empty wt. > 10,000 lbs. empty wt. > 18,000 lbs. GVW or 7,500 lbs. empty wt > 16,000 lbs. GVW > 30 gallon fuel tank capacity & at least 16 other definitions

Credentials (DECALS!) 1 per vehicle – or 2? On left side, right side – or front? Display dates? Annual, biennial – or permanent? Fees? Charged by 22 states – TOTAL ANNUAL FEES PER TRUCK: $331.70

Recap: Fuel Use Taxes in 1986 Non-uniform? Definitely Burdensome? For carriers of all sizes Expensive? US DOT estimated up to $1 billion a year in administrative costs for motor carriers

Reduced Administrative Cost Answer IFTA = Uniformity and Reduced Administrative Cost

A Message from the Past Base State Agreements: From the Perspective of and Interstate Motor Carrier FTA Fuel Tax Section Mtg - 1992

IRP – Theories that will work! John Jabas

HISTORICAL REVIEW OF ESTIMATED MILES FOR IRP WHY NOT THE DALLAS PLAN! HISTORICAL REVIEW OF ESTIMATED MILES FOR IRP

TEXAS PLAN DALLAS PLAN FULL PRIVILEDGE PLAN LET’S ATTEMPT A NEW PLAN, WHAT COULD BE!!!

IRP MODIFIED PLAN: A. UTILIZE THE BASE JURISDICTION’S ESTIMATED MILEAGE CHART FOR ALL JURISDICTIONS FOR INITIAL IRP APPLICATION.

IRP MODIFIED PLAN: B. AT RENEWAL USE THE SCHEDULE (B) MILES AND ADJUST THE FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE TO ACTUAL AND NET ADJUSTMENTS.

IRP MODIFIED PLAN: C. THIS BECOMES AN AUDIT.

IRP MODIFIED PLAN: D. A POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE TO SUBSEQUENT YEAR ESTIMATES OVER 100%.

The Trucking Industry Today and Yesterday Tom Klingman

First, a little history… 20 Years Ago – Fuel Use Taxes Were a Crisis For the Trucking Industry: Non-uniform Burdensome Expensive to Administer & Comply With

Audit & Administration Non-Uniformity Vehicles Registration Credentials Bonding Leases Tax Reports Credits & Refunds Audit & Administration

Registration Annual, biennial, or permanent registration? Fees – one time or annual? Fees per fleet or per vehicle? Licenses for each place of business? Renewable in October, December, January, March, April, or July? Vehicle-specific cab cards? Account numbers on the vehicle?

Bonding Required by 19 states Various amounts and limits Required for refunds in c. 10 more states Alternative security rarely allowed

Leases Who must report? Copy of lease required in vehicle? Lessee? Lessor? Party buying fuel? Vehicle operator? Up to the parties? State permission needed? Depend on term of the lease? Copy of lease required in vehicle?

Tax Reports Postmark honored? Vehicles covered? Formula? State MPGs? Frequency: monthly, quarterly, annually Due date: 20th, 25th, 30th, last of month Postmark honored? Format Computation of tax Vehicles covered? Formula? State MPGs? Individual vehicle MPGs? Supporting documentation required? Payment in certified funds?

Credits & Refunds Credits carry over? How long? Refunds available? Minimum amount? Audit first? Documentation? Other restrictions?

Audit & Admin. Record requirements Official fuel receipts Original documents Frequent changes in requirements Rules inaccessible to taxpayers Multiple audits under different rules LOTS of Gotchas

IFTA NAGTC 5-Point Plan 1975 First implemented 1983 3 members Redrafted per NGA 1986 4 members Required by ISTEA 1991 14 members ISTEA deadline 1996 IFTA Recodified 1995-98 Today 58 members

Complaints? NO We’re not going back to the Good Old Days !! Uniform? YES Burdensome? Minimally Expensive? NO We’re not going back to the Good Old Days !!

Today’s Trucking Industry Deregulated Efficient Continuously changing Critical to the Economy

Size & Scope (U.S. - 2003) $610 Billion gross freight revenue 86.9% of the Nation’s freight bill 66.5% of US-Canada trade by value 68.9% of all freight tonnage moved 2.6 million heavy commercial trucks 524,309 companies on file with USDOT 95.9% operate 20 or fewer trucks 8.6 million trucking-related employment

U.S. GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT Bottom Line: TRUCKING REPRESENTS 5% OF THE TOTAL U.S. GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT - and then some -

Good Times for Trucking 2004-2005 - Great Years for Trucking Booming Economy Increases in Manufacturing, Imports No Excess Capacity Rate Increases Stick BUT …

Increasing Pressures Driver Shortage Fuel Insurance CDL Hazmat Background Checks Fuel Prices ULSD Insurance Tort Reform

Pressures, cont’d. Clean Air Regulations Productivity Taxes Diesel Engine Requirements Operational Restrictions Productivity Congestion, Bad Roads Increasing Freight Size & Weight Caps Taxes

A Changing Industry New Styles of Manufacturing & Retailing New Logistics Demands Just-in-Time Plus Supply-Chain Management Rolling Warehouses Economic Regulation & Categories Gone: Competition Intense Industry Must Be Flexible, Agile

WITHOUT TRUCKS AMERICA STOPS!

A Syllogism Economic Efficiency Benefits Everybody Trucking Is Key to Economic Efficiency IFTA Is Key to Motor Carrier Efficiency Hence … But Only If IFTA Remains Uniform, Minimally Burdensome & Inexpensive to Comply with

Government and Industry – Alternative Relationships Sandy Johnson

What’s important to each? Needs Gov’t Ind Fairness Equity Clarity Ease of Implementation Efficient Maximize Revenue Minimize Taxes Stability What else???  to both ind & gov’t to all carriers & gov’t Can’t be confusing Relatively easy/inexpensive Must not be burdensome Not constant change Each group has it’s own self interest. Government wants to maximize revenues & industry wants to minimize costs. That has to be worked out and this is a point of potential conflict.

Key Players Government Industry Policy makers Auditors Collectors Carriers Associations

How are the players involved? Could be high involvement or low involvement

Involvement 1 4 High Government Involvement 2 3 Low Low High Industry Involvement

Possible Scenarios Government Dictates Co-operation Industry 1 4 High Government Involvement 2 3 Industry Controls Conflict leading to Chaos Explain the slides. POSSIBILITIES… Low Low High Industry Involvement

Scenario 1 Gov’t Dictates Industry resists seeks influence through Political system Industry association Lobby Personal associations Could end up with systems that serve special interests Large enforcement bureaucracy

Scenario 2 Conflict leading to Chaos Control is unclear Reduced government revenues Unfair competition Unsafe practices Unhappy public Unhappy politicians These are not absolutes. These are possible outcomes.

Scenario 3 Industry Dictates Reduced government revenues Uneven playing field creating uneven competition Unsafe roads

Scenario 4 CO-OPERATION! Government retains responsibility and authority Consultation with industry results in legislation and regulation that meets the needs of both sides Both sides cooperate on implementation

Summary Government Dictates Co-operation Industry Conflict leading 1 4 High Government Involvement 2 3 Industry Controls Conflict leading To Chaos Low Low High Industry Involvement

What’s important to each? Needs Gov’t Ind Fairness Equity Clarity Ease of Implementation Efficient Maximize Revenue Minimize Taxes Stability What else???  to both ind & gov’t to all carriers & gov’t Can’t be confusing Relatively easy/inexpensive Must not be burdensome Not constant change Each group has it’s own self interest. Government wants to maximize revenues & industry wants to minimize costs. That has to be worked out and this is a point of potential conflict.