Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Advertisements

School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Presentation on recent IAEA activities on RWM Y. Kumano WES / NSRW
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
MODULE “STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT”
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
ToR of GEOSAF2 WG on Operational Safety Review of WG2.
Working Group 1 Reference and Graded Approaches for Assessing the Impact of Radioactive Discharges.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.5. Control of effluents Approach to regulatory control, establishing authorized discharge levels.
Update on progress with development of DS459
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
IAEA Safety Publications Related to Regulatory Infrastructure Safety Fundamentals SF 1 Safety Requirements GSR Part 1, GSR Part 3 School of Drafting.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Performance Assessment Issues in Waste Management and Environmental Protection Annual Meeting of the Baltimore-Washington Chapter of the Health Physics.
TM Technical Meeting on the Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste
Segment SCD 4.3 Module SCD 4: Safety Case Segment SCD 4.3 Documentation and use of the safety case.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.4. Pre-disposal waste management Safety Standards.
Integrated Risk Management Charles Yoe, PhD Institute for Water Resources 2009.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive Waste TM September 24, 2012 Presented by: L. Bailey on behalf of.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Nicolas Solente Workshop on Regulatory Requirements to Ensure Safe Disposal of Disused Sealed Sources for Operators and Regulators Amman, JORDAN 7-11 April.
IAEA ANSN RWMTG National Workshop: Application of IAEA Methodology and Tools for the Safety Case and Safety Assessment for Predisposal Management of Radioactive.
Sessions VI and VII Conclusions and summary Francois Besnus Session Chair Cape Town July 6, 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Lucy Bailey HIDRA Human Intrusion in the context of Disposal of RadioActive waste Closing Summary for.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part VI Planned Exposure Situations - Generic Requirements Module VI.3 Requirements for public exposure in.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Safety-related Issues for the Disposal of Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) Dr. Jürgen Wollrath Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS) Department Safety.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Siting Strategies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Monika Kinker Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management Unit Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Requirements for.
SITEX WP2.1 NEEDS FOR TECHNICAL GUIDANCE F. Lemy - F. Bernier - 1GEOSAF II TM – SITEX WP2.1 – 28/05/2014.
Role and Development of the Safety Case Components of the Safety Case.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency MANAGEMENT OF THE REVIEW PROCESS Luc Baekelandt Safety of radioactive waste management.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
Danyl Pérez Sánchez CIEMAT-SPAIN
International Atomic Energy Agency V. Nys Definition and practical application of demonstration of operational and long-term safety for predisposal RWM.
New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.
OVERVIEW OF THE MEDITERRANEAN PROJECT INT/9/176 "STRENGTHENING CRADLE-TO-GRAVE CONTROL OF RADIOACTIVE SOURCES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION” Soumia ZEROUAL.
The Safety Case Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management Unit
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
The pathological effects of ionising radiation
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Safety Case Components and Documentation
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Module SCD 2: Safety Requirements for Safety Assessment and Safety Case General Safety Requirements for Safety Assessment NSD 1.1.
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
Status of the IAEA safety standards and Relation to the CRAFT project
Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24 March 2010 Leriba Lodge Centurion, Gauteng

Introduction Application of Safety Assessment Process (IAEA Glossary, 2007)  Facilities and activities (existing and new, utilized for peaceful purposes) General term encompassing any human activity that may cause people to be exposed to radiation risks arising from naturally occurring or artificial sources Nuclear facilities Irradiation installations Mining and raw material processing facilities; Radioactive waste management facilities; and Any other places where radioactive material is produced, processed, used, handled, stored or disposed of — or where radiation generators are installed …on such a scale that consideration of protection and safety is required… Occupational (worker ) and public safety assessments Operational and post closure phases

Introduction Application of Safety Assessment Process (IAEA Glossary, 2007)  Facilities and activities (existing and new, utilized for peaceful purposes) General term encompassing any human activity that may cause people to be exposed to radiation risks arising from naturally occurring or artificial sources Nuclear facilities Irradiation installations Mining and raw material processing facilities; Radioactive waste management facilities; and Any other places where radioactive material is produced, processed, used, handled, stored or disposed of — or where radiation generators are installed …on such a scale that consideration of protection and safety is required… Occupational (worker ) and public safety assessments Operational and post closure phases

Introduction Application of Safety Assessment Process (IAEA Glossary, 2007)  Facilities and activities (existing and new, utilized for peaceful purposes) General term encompassing any human activity that may cause people to be exposed to radiation risks arising from naturally occurring or artificial sources Nuclear facilities Irradiation installations Mining and raw material processing facilities; Radioactive waste management facilities; and Any other places where radioactive material is produced, processed, used, handled, stored or disposed of — or where radiation generators are installed …on such a scale that consideration of protection and safety is required… Occupational (worker ) and public safety assessments Operational and post closure phases

Introduction Safety Assessment (IAEA Glossary, 2007)  Assessment of all aspects of a practice that are relevant to protection and safety; for an authorized facility, this includes siting, design and operation of the facility  Analysis to predict the performance of an overall system and its impact, where the performance measure is the radiological impact or some other global measure of the impact on safety Safety Standards (Regulation No. 388)  Systematic process to ensure that all the relevant safety requirements are met by the proposed (or actual) design. Safety assessment includes, but is not limited to, the formal safety analysis

Introduction The Scientific Committee 87-3 established by the National Council on Radiation Protection (NRCP) (Kennedy, 1997)  Portrayed a post-closure safety assessment as a multidisciplinary, iterative process focussed on regulatory compliance rather than an analysis of a disposal system for the purpose of predicting its actual behaviour  With this in mind, they defined a post-closure safety assessment as: ‘the iterative process involving site-specific, prospective evaluations of the post-closure phase of the system’ with the primary objectives to  determine whether reasonable assurance of compliance with quantitative performance objectives can be demonstrated,  identify data, design and other needs to reach defensible decisions about regulatory compliance

Introduction The NRCP Scientific Committee 87-3 Definition  Iterative process: expect that a safety assessment will have to be repeated two or more consecutive times  Site-specific prospective evaluations: include data from the actual system assessed Not with the intent to predict its actual behaviour in the future, but rather to understand the behaviour of the system better and to reflect on the importance of specific components with respect to the compliance criteria  Reasonable assurance: emphasizes the inexact nature of the procedure Reach defensible decisions on the extent to which the disposal system may comply with the regulatory criteria  A decision tool to determine the conditions for which reasonable assurance of compliance with safety objectives can be provided; not a method to predict the actual behaviour of a disposal system into the future

Introduction Safety Assessment in the Context of a Safety Case  Definition of Safety Case (IAEA Glossary, 2007) A collection of arguments and evidence in support of the safety of a facility or activity This will normally include the findings of a safety assessment and a statement of confidence in these findings For a repository, the safety case may relate to a given stage of development. In such cases, the safety case should acknowledge the existence of any unresolved issues and should provide guidance for work to resolve these issues in future development stages  IAEA PRISM and GEOSAF Projects

Safety Assessment and Exact Sciences An exact science is any field of science capable of accurate, quantitative expression or precise predictions and rigorous methods of testing hypotheses, especially reproducible experiments involving quantifiable predictions and measurements  Unlike purely scientific areas of study, the radiological public safety assessment process cannot be considered what one would describe as an exact science  The assessment process draws from the fundamental principles of exact sciences, and parts of the assessment methodology are sometimes amenable to normal scientific approaches  The time scales, space scales, uncertainties in boundary conditions, and uncertainties in future human behaviour make it impossible to test and verify (or falsify) the overall assessment

Safety Assessment and Exact Sciences  The inherent nature of the assessment methodology - from the release of radioactive contaminants, the migration of these contaminants into the environment, the subsequent uptake of radionuclides into the human body to pose a radiological exposure - in itself is not an exact science  Safety assessment is a process to develop an understanding of the limits of potential radiological exposure to members of the public for an assumed set of conditions and parameter values  By examining a range of potential conditions of concern, it is possible to develop confidence that the public will be protected from radiation, even though exact statements about future exposures cannot be made

Safety Assessment Methodologies Developed and improved significantly since 1980s Radioactive waste management  Geological disposal  Near surface disposal Mining and mineral processing facilities  Difference in characteristics and timescales IAEA Coordinated Research Projects  NSARS  ISAM, ASAM  PRISM  GEOSAF

Safety Assessment Methodologies

Regulatory Framework System Description  Process, site, waste, facilities and human behavior  Incremental contribution to radiation exposure (historical perspective)  Source identification and description Primary and secondary sources  Pathway analysis Atmospheric pathway Aquatic (groundwater and surface water) pathways Definition and justification of exposure conditions and scenarios

Safety Assessment Methodologies Model Development  Conceptual and mathematical models  Comprehensive and transparent Approach to System Modeling  Complex systems Introduce simplifying assumptions Decouple system processes Combination of above  Compartmental approach  Coupled modeling approach Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis  Improve confidence in the assessment

Monitoring and Control Programme What is the Purpose of a Monitoring Programme?  Environmental monitoring (IAEA Glossary, 2007) The measurement of external dose rates due to sources in the environment or of radionuclide concentrations in environmental media Safety Standards (Regulation No. 388)  An appropriate environmental monitoring and surveillance programme must be established, implemented and maintained to verify that the storage, disposal or effluent discharge of radioactive waste complies with the conditions of the nuclear authorization  Source monitoring (IAEA Glossary, 2007) The measurement of activity in radioactive material being released to the environment or of external dose rates due to sources within a facility or activity

Monitoring and Control Programme What is the purpose of a monitoring programme?  Demonstrate compliance with the conditions of the nuclear authorization System behave as designed  Determine the current status of the system  System characterization  Input data for the safety assessment process  Validation of system models used in safety assessment  Develop stakeholder confidence

Monitoring and Control Programme Use safety assessment as a tool to developed the monitoring programme  Safety assessment helps to understanding system behavior Understand environmental pathways of concern (Historical perspective)  Atmospheric pathway  Aquatic (surface water and groundwater) pathways  Requirements for the atmospheric pathway monitoring different from the groundwater pathway  Recognize the differences between a radioactive waste disposal facility and a mining and mineral processing operation Different pathway of concern Slow migration processes Contribution from facilities and activities, but also natural background radiation  Background reference site

Safety Case and Safety Assessment The Safety Case and Safety Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal (IAEA Draft Safety Guide DS355)  Safety case...is the collection of scientific and technical arguments and evidence in support of the safety of a disposal facility covering the suitability of the site and the design, construction and operation of the facility, the assessment of radiation risk and assurance of the quality of all the safety related work associated with the disposal facility  Safety assessment...a systematic assessment of radiation hazards, is an important component of the safety case. It involves the quantification of radiation dose and risk that may arise from the disposal facility for comparison with dose and risk criteria, and provides an understanding of the behaviour of the disposal facility under normal and disruptive conditions, considering the timeframes over which the radioactive waste remains hazardous

Safety Case and Safety Assessment Stakeholder Confidence in Facilities and Activities  The NEA (NEA, 1999) defines confidence as “…to have reached a positive judgement that a given set of conclusions are well-supported…”

Safety Case and Safety Assessment Stakeholder Confidence in Facilities and Activities  Stakeholders (target audience) Regulatory authorities, local, regional and national government Public and environmental interest groups Management  Confidence in the safety assessment Confidence in the safety assessment methodology, approach and results Identification and handling of unresolved issues  Confidence in the management and performance of the facilities or activities Monitoring and surveillance programme Supporting arguments

Safety Case and Safety Assessment PRISM Proposal for Discussion Purposes ONLY  Safety assessment is part of a process  Monitoring programme in support of confidence building and safety arguments  Integration of safety arguments in support of the safety case for the facilities and activities

Conclusion Safety Assessment Process is not an Exact Science Integration and Assessment of the Environmental Pathway into the Assessment Process Focus on the Safety Case and not on the Safety Assessment  Monitoring programme in support of safety arguments  Stakeholder confidence

Thank You for Your Attention!