Strategy/Initiative/Program Evaluation Tool. The Evaluation Tool has 5 Sections and a Set of Conclusions 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

David M. Callejo Pérez & Sebastían R. Díaz West Virginia University Collecting, Organizing, and Documenting Student ProgressTeaching Again.

Advertisements

Welcome to Volunteer Management

1 Module 4: Partners demand and ownership Towards more effective Capacity Development.

One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Plan Stage Develop Improvement Plan.

Workshop based on QCDA Co- Development Folder Led by Brian Pengelly Primary Curriculum Conference 19 th November 2009.

The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.

Conference March 12 th 2009 Stourport Manor Effective Practice in CPD Leadership.

Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski

- McKinsey & Co. Report Thought to ponder… “It’s a system thing, not a single thing.” -McKinsey & Co. Report.

School Improvement Work Day. Continuous School Improvement The Model of Process Cycle for School Improvement provides the foundation to address school.

NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.

Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM)

The Academic Assessment Process

Program Evaluation and Improvement Planning The MDE Program Evaluation Student Achievement Strategy/Program/Initiative Implementation Impact.

Project-Based Learning

2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff

Comparative Evaluation of the Impact of e- participation in Local Climate Change Policy Programs The Effectiveness of E-Participation.

1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.

1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.

Session Materials  Wiki

Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.

Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.

Year Seven Netbook Project. Aims of the Project To evaluate the impact on learning and teaching of using portable technologies both within and outside.

The MDE Program Evaluation Tool & Process Nicole Gasper & Jane Dezinski May 2014.

Delta Schoolcraft ISD Presents The Program Evaluation Tool.

School Improvement Facilitators Network May 7,

Families as Partners in Learning Principals and teaching staff Why are partnerships important?

Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development

Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.

ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.

ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation

MDE Program Evaluation Tool January 13, 2015 MAISD.

Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)

Carrie E. Markovitz, PhD Program Evaluation: Challenges and Recommendations July 23, 2015.

These four modules were developed by the Human Development Center, LSU Health Sciences Center and the Jefferson Parish Families Helping Families with the.

March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.

Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.

How to Get Where You’re Going (Part 1)

Presentation Reprised from the NASFAA 2014 Conference By Pamela Fowler University of Michigan Ann Arbor Getting a Seat at the Table 1.

Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.

Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.

Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.

Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.

AN INTRODUCTION Managing Change in Healthcare IT Implementations Sherrilynne Fuller, Center for Public Health Informatics School of Public Health, University.

Hammarskjold Middle School Supporting Students Interventions.

ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.

The linking learning SET CPD activity Benchmark Reflecting on evidence Self Evaluation Tools (SET)

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

S UPPORT S ERVICES D EPARTMENT - L EADERSHIP T EAMS Involving Everyone in continuous improvement! Session 4 – April15 th, 2011.

The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.

ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.

1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Stage 3 Plan: Develop School Improvement Plan.

Office of Service Quality

Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.

Misty Zyvoloski  To provide/equip staff, community members and students with current knowledge and equipment necessary to effectively utilize the current.

- CAT 1 - Developing the Organization: By Recognizing the Importance and Relevance of Student Voices in Developing a Positive School Climate.

Practice Key Driver Diagram. CQN ADHD Learning Session 1 Nancy Adams MSM January 6, 2016 Where Do We Go From Here?

Using LibQUAL+ to Rethink Public Services June 2003.

Overview of System or Process Design and Improvement 1.

Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI) Overview.

Reading Discussion – s519 by Peter Hall – 1/21/09 Ryan, J., McClure, C. R., & Bertot, J. C. (2001). Choosing measures to evaluate networked information.

RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.

PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle

Implementation in a Transition Year

Implementation in a Transition Year

Sprint Planning April 2018.

Implementation in a Transition Year

Implementation in a Transition Year

Pati Kravetz Associate Director for Experiential Learning and Student Employment Main title: 40 pt. Arial Presenter Name: 16 pt. Arial Presenters Title:

Presentation transcript:

Strategy/Initiative/Program Evaluation Tool

The Evaluation Tool has 5 Sections and a Set of Conclusions 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/initiative/program? 2. Do participants have the KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS to implement the strategy/initiative/program? 3. Is there OPPORTUNITY for implementation? 4. Is it being IMPLEMENTED AS INTENDED? 5. What is its IMPACT ON STUDENTS? Conclusions: SHOULD THIS STRATEGY/INITIATIVE/PROGRAM BE CONTINUED/INSTITUTIONALIZED? SHOULD IT BE ADJUSTED/DISCONTINUED?

Each section begins with a description of an ideal program: 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/initiative/program? IN AN IDEAL PROGRAM, stakeholders are well-prepared to implement the program. They have read and can articulate the research foundation, and regularly use the terms in conversation with each other, students, and with parents. Staff, students and parents express a high level of interest in, support for and commitment to the program. Specific concerns have been identified and solutions have been planned/ implemented. Staff is able to seamlessly integrate the program within the context of other building/district initiatives.

Each section has 3-5 questions that ask for relevant evidence: For instance: 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/initiative/program? a)What evidence do you have that stakeholders can articulate and believe the research behind the decision to implement the strategy/initiative/program? b)What evidence do you have that stakeholders are committed to the strategy/initiative/program with both hearts and minds? c)What evidence do you have that stakeholder (staff, parent, student) concerns about the strategy/initiative/program have been identified and addressed? d)What evidence do you have that staff are able to integrate this strategy/initiative/program with other existing initiatives?

Each section suggests possible data sources For instance: 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/initiative/ program? a)What evidence do you have that stakeholders can articulate and believe the research behind the decision to implement the strategy/initiative/program? b)What evidence do you have that stakeholders are really committed to the strategy/initiative/program with both hearts and minds? Possible Evidence: data analysis work meeting agendas/minutes books/papers about the program staff surveys SI Plan elements Prof Dev materials Conference/workshop attendance data collection plan stakeholder survey results suggestion box ideas collected SI team agendas Focus group interviews

After the user reflects on the evidence, the section asks for a self-assessment: For instance: 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/initiative/ program? Stakeholders are fully prepared. Support and commitment are generally high, but some concern or work remains. Some promising factors are mixed with major gaps in knowledge or confidence. Interest and/or commitment are low so far.

Finally, the section asks what “action steps” the data suggest: For instance: 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/initiative/ program? Stakeholders are fully prepared. Support and commitment are generally high, but some concern or work remains. Some promising signs are mixed with major gaps in knowledge or confidence. Interest and/or commitment are low so far. What action steps are needed to increase readiness to undertake the strategy/initiative/program?