1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 2: Describing Carriers and Identifying Works Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RDA Test Train the Trainer Module 2: Structure [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Advertisements

Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 6: Identifying Families [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Bibliographic Relationships and Bibliographic Families.
RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS: A COBEC WORKSHOP JANUARY 29, 2014 GUY FROST VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY RDA Toolkit, Basic Cataloging.
MARC 21, FRBR, RDA Review terminology (especially for non-native English speakers) Conceptual models Elements Attributes Future: Probably not a bib record,
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
Module B: Identifying works User task = identify.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
Module 17 Describing Serials and Integrating Resources RDA Training University of Nevada, Reno February 2013.
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
LC reference staff briefing Nov. 30, 2010 Judy Kuhagen Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 4: Identifying Works and Expressions [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
5: Describing Carriers and Content 1.Content type 2.Media type 3.Carrier type 4.Extent 5.Describing content 6.Other content attributes 5-1.
Books and Ebooks in RDA Kathryn Lybarger RDA Camp 2013.
RDA, FRBR & MARC RDA Cataloguing Seminars September 2012.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 7: Identifying Corporate Bodies [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Descriptive Cataloging Using RDA Other Elements of Manifestations and Items Describing Carriers Describing Content Cooperative and Instructional Programs.
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 2: Describing Carriers and Identifying Works Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division,
Cataloging Electronic Resources using RDA. Direct Access Resources CD-ROMs.
LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 6: Authorities II Part 4: FRBR Group One and NARs Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division.
Moving Images with RDA. Credits: RDA & Moving Images / Kelley McGrath (2012) RDA: Special Formats Training / Jim Soe Nyun (San Diego 2013) Credits: RDA.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
Music Library Association SDC Open Meeting Feb. 18, 2005 AACR3: Summary of Part I Draft ( and a glimpse into Parts II and III) Kathy Glennan University.
1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 3: Identifying Expressions and Describing Content Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division,
11 RDA & CJK Materials Workshop Session two—Comparison between AACR2 & RDA Part 4—MARC21 tags: changes Prepared by Charlene Chou.
Cataloguing Electronic resources Prepared by the Cataloguing Team at Charles Sturt University.
Cataloging Sound Recordings with RDA
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Introduction to Description and AACR II University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.
New MARC Fields with RDA Bibliographic and Authority Formats Bibliographic and Authority Formats.
Module 8 Series in AACR2 and RDA: What’s the same? What’s different?
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 5: Identifying Persons [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Module 8: Changes to RDA LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, in general and for serials.
Module 3: Identifying works and expressions LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
RDA in NACO Module 6.a RDA Chapter 11: Identifying Corporate Bodies—Overview Recording the Attributes.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
RDA in NACO Module 4.a Module 4.b Module 4.c RDA Chapter 9: Identifying Persons— Overview Recording the Attributes.
Cataloguing integrating resources with RDA OLA Preconference workshop, January 29, 2014 Emma Cross Cataloguing Librarian, Carleton University Library.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard ACOC Seminar, September 2007.
Carrier Description & Illustrative Content Part 2 Descriptive Cataloging with RDA Illustrative Content (continued)
Module 3: Identifying works and expressions Library of Congress RDA Preconference for MLA/DLA May 4, 2011.
APPLYING FRBR TO LIBRARY CATALOGUES A REVIEW OF EXISTING FRBRIZATION PROJECTS Martha M. Yee September 9, 2006 draft.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 2: Identifying Works and Expressions Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division, Library.
Carrier Description & Illustrative Content Part 2 Descriptive Cataloging with RDA Illustrative Content (continued)
RDA Update Background Implementation plan Basics FRBR New MARC fields in CruzCat UCSC training plan (A number of slides are from Lori Robare’s “RDA For.
AACR2 versus RDA Presentation given at the CLA Pre-Conference Session From Rules to Entities: Cataloguing with RDA May 29, 2009 by Tom Delsey.
1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 2: Describing Carriers and Identifying Works Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division,
1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 2: Describing Carriers and Identifying Works Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division,
Module 4 Key differences from AACR2 Structure This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License
Book Cataloging with RDA. RDA Instructions & Guidelines General things: – Core elements (required) – Alternative guidelines and instructions – Optional.
RDA for Law Catalogers Cataloging New Editions of Monographs presented at the AALL Annual Meeting 2012 July 21, 2012 (revised July 31, 2012) George Prager.
Key differences from AACR2 Structure 1. Learning Outcomes Understand similarities between RDA and AACR2 Understand the structural differences between.
1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 2: Identifying Works and Expressions Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division, Library.
Queensland University of Technology FIT School of Information Systems MM 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description Objectives –Comments.
Key differences from AACR2 Recording Data 1. Learning Outcomes Differences between AACR2 and RDA: Transcription changes ISBD changes Changes from GMD.
RDA for Law Catalogers Serials and Integrating Resources Melissa Beck UCLA Law Library.
LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access
RDA for Law Catalogers:
RDA Training at EAL Session three— Carriers & Works
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

1 LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 2: Describing Carriers and Identifying Works Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division, Library of Congress 2012

2 About This Material  This training material has been created for a primary audience of Library of Congress staff. Other audiences are welcome to utilize it as they see fit.  However, it should be understood that they reflect policies for LC staff, and should not necessarily be interpreted to either prohibit or require specific practices for persons external to LC.

3 Learning Objectives for Module 2 -- Describing Carriers and Identifying Works o Describing Carriers o Other Elements of Manifestations and Items o Introduction to Works o Elements for Works

4 Unit 1: Describing Carriers oRDA Chapter 3 oWill not discuss specific elements for resources of special formats (films, maps, scores, etc.) oExamples available in RDA, in MARC documentation, and in LC compilation of examples

5 Replacement for GMD $h  Three new MARC fields - developed with ONIX publishing community: Content type -- RDA MARC 336 field Media type -- RDA MARC 337 field Carrier type -- RDA MARC 338 field

6 MARC for Content, Media, Carrier  In each of the three fields for these elements ( ): $a term $b code $2“rdacontent” or “rdamedia” or “rdacarrier” as appropriate $3 materials specified - give if appropriate

7 Controlled Vocabularies for Content, Media, Carrier Types  Closed lists in RDA , ,  If more than one term appropriate, two choices: LC policy: Give all: repeat field Pick the term representing the predominant or most substantial content, media, carrier  If the information is unknown, record “unspecified”  If no term is appropriate, record “other” and notify LC via a message to

8 Content Type  CORE ELEMENT  RDA 6.9  “ … the fundamental form of communication in which the content is expressed and the human sense through which it is intended to be perceived”  Terms from Table 6.1  Instead of recording all, you may record the content type that applies to the predominant or most substantial parts of the resource  MARC 336 field Examples:cartographic image notated music performed music still image text

9 Media Type  LC/PCC CORE ELEMENT  RDA 3.2  “… the general type of intermediation device required to view, play, run, etc., the content of a resource”  Terms from Table 3.1  Instead of recording all, may record the media type that applies to the predominant or most substantial parts of the resource  MARC 337 field Examples: audio computer microform unmediated video

10 Carrier Type  CORE ELEMENT  RDA 3.3  “ … the format of the storage medium and housing of a carrier in combination with the type of intermediation device required … ”  Terms listed in  Instead of recording all, may record the carrier type that applies to the predominant or most substantial parts of the resource  MARC 338 field Examples: audio disc computer disc microfiche sheet volume videodisc

11 Example: MARC Fields Book: 336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent 337 $a unmediated $b n $2 rdamedia 338 $a volume $b nc $2 rdacarrier

12 Voyager Templates: MARC Fields

13 Extent  LC CORE ELEMENT  RDA 3.4  “The number and type of units and/or subunits making up a resource” Unit = a physical or logical constituent of a resource (e.g., a volume) Subunit = a physical or logical subdivision of a unit (e.g., a page of a volume)  MARC 300 $a

14 Recording Extent  Give if the resource is complete or if the total extent is known  RDA  Give number of units and appropriate term: Sometimes a term from carrier type list (RDA ) Another term to designate the type of unit (RDA ) if term not in list, or prefer a term in common use Several categories covered by exceptions (e.g., text, still images, notated music, cartographic resources)

15 Extent of Text  Single Volume with Numbered Pages, Leaves, or Columns ( ) 327 pages 216 leaves xi, 192 pages 39 pages, 52 leaves  Single Volume with Unnumbered Pages, Leaves, or Columns ( ) Entirely unnumbered: RDA lists three options  a) 93 unnumbered pages  b) approximately 600 pages  c) 1 volume (unpaged) LC-PCC PS : For LC original cataloging, usually follow method c) 1 volume (unpaged)

16 Extent of Text  Single Volume with Unnumbered Pages, Leaves, or Columns ( ) Both numbered and unnumbered sequences: either ignore the unnumbered ones or RDA lists three options for recording them  a) 33 leaves, 31 unnumbered leaves  b) vii, approximately 300, 75 pages  c) 27 pages, unnumbered sequence of leaves LC-PCC PS : For LC original cataloging, usually follow method c) if it’s necessary to record unnumbered sequence 27 pages, unnumbered sequence of leaves

17 Extent of Text  Complicated or Irregular Paging ( ) RDA lists three options  a) 1000 pages in various pagings 256 leaves in various foliations  b) 560, 223 pages, 217 variously numbered pages 366, 98 pages, 99 unnumbered pages  c) 1 volume (various pagings) LC-PCC PS : For LC original cataloging, usually follow method c) 1 volume (various pagings)

18 Changes From AACR2 Related to Extent  Do not use abbreviations for terms (e.g., “pages,” “volumes”, not “p.,” “v.”)  Use “approximately” (rather than “ca.”) and “that is” (rather than “i.e.”)  Use “unnumbered”, rather than square brackets enclosing the numeral  Be aware of changes in vocabulary from AACR2, e.g.: “computer disc” is used for both “computer disk” and “computer optical disc”; “audio disc” used instead of “sound disc”

19 Dimensions  LC CORE for resources other than serials and online electronic resources  RDA 3.5  “Measurements of the carrier or carriers and/or the container of a resource”  Rounded up to next whole centimeter  “cm” and “mm” are symbols, not abbreviations use ISBD full stop after symbol only if a 490 field appears in the record  MARC 300 $c

20 LC Practices: Dimensions  LC practice for Alternative: Use inches for discs (RDA ) and for all audio carriers; otherwise, follow the RDA instruction as written  LC Practice for serials: Note that dimensions is not a Core Element for serials and online resources. But you may record it if you wish

21 Examples: MARC 300 $a, Book: 300 $a 123 pages, 28 unnumbered pages 336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent 337 $a unmediated $b n $2 rdamedia 338 $a volume $b nc $2 rdacarrier Music CD: 300 $a 1 audio disc or: 1 CD 336 $a performed music $2 rdacontent 337 $a audio $2 rdamedia 338 $a audio disc $2 rdacarrier $b is optional

22 Examples: MARC 300 $a, DVD: 300 $a 1 DVD or: 1 videodisc 336 $a two-dimensional moving image $2 rdacontent 337 $a video $2 rdamedia 338 $a videodisc $2 rdacarrier Online PDF: 300 $a 1 online resource (39 pages) 336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent 337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia 338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier

23 Example: MARC 300 $a, Website (with maps, text, and photographs): 300 $a 1 online resource 336 $a text $2 rdacontent 336 $a cartographic image $2 rdacontent 336 $a still image $2 rdacontent 337 $a computer $2 rdamedia 338 $a online resource $2 rdacarrier LC policy: If copy cataloging includes repeated subfields $a, rather than multiple fields, accept them as is: 336 $a text $a cartographic image $a still image $2 rdacontent

24 Example: MARC 300 $a, Book with accompanying CD of lecture: $3 and $e 300 $a 244 pages... + $e 1 CD 336 $3 book $a text $2 rdacontent 336 $3 CD $a spoken word $2 rdacontent 337 $3 book $a unmediated $2 rdamedia 337 $3 CD $a audio $2 rdamedia 338 $3 book $a volume $2 rdacarrier 338 $3 CD $ audio disc $2 rdacarrier Instead of $e, can repeat 300 field 300 $a 244 pages $a 1 CD... Instead of $e, can give a note 500 $a Accompanied by a CD. * The use of $3 in this example is optional.

25 Examples: MARC 300 $a, Oral history CD: 300 $a 1 CD 336 $a spoken word $b spw $2 rdacontent 337 $a audio $b s $2 rdamedia 338 $a audio disc $b sd $2 rdacarrier Playaway audiobook: 300 $a 1 Playaway or 1 audio media player or 1 digital media player 336 $a spoken word $2 rdacontent 337 $a audio $2 rdamedia 338 $a other $2 rdacarrier

26 Example: MARC 300 $a, Kit (contains a book about a fireman, a CD narrating the book, and a fireman’s hat): 300 $a 1 CD, 1 book, 1 plastic helmet 336 $a spoken word $a text $a three- dimensional form $2 rdacontent 337 $a audio $a unmediated $2 rdamedia 338 $a audio disc $a volume $a object $2 rdacarrier * The use of multiple subfields $a in the 336 field is acceptable if this is a copied record, but for LC cataloging, you would record separate 33X fields

27 Examples: MARC 300 $a, Score: 300 $a 1 vocal score (xii, 300 pages) 336 $a notated music $b ntm $2 rdacontent 337 $a unmediated $b n $2 rdamedia 338 $a volume $b nc $2 rdacarrier Map: 300 $a 1 map 336 $a cartographic image $2 rdacontent 337 $a unmediated $2 rdamedia 338 $a sheet $2 rdacarrier

28 Unit 3: Other Elements of Manifestations and Items Acquisition and Access Information  Terms of availability (RDA 4.2)  Contact information (RDA 4.3)  Restrictions on access (RDA 4.4)  Restrictions on use (RDA 4.5)  Uniform Resource Locator (RDA 4.6)

29 Terms of Availability  RDA 4.2  LC-PCC PS: Generally do not provide prices or other availability information except for rental scores or rental performance materials Example: 020 $a : $c Rental material

30 Contact Information  RDA 4.3  Record contact information for a publisher, distributor, etc., if it is considered to be important for acquisition or access  MARC 037, 270, 852 fields Examples: Alabama Department of Archives and History. 624 Washington Avenue, Montgomery, AL

31 Restrictions on Access  RDA 4.4  Record all restrictions on access to the resource, including the nature and duration of the restriction, as specifically as possible. The absence of restrictions may also be noted if it is considered to be important  MARC 506 field Example: Access restricted to subscribers via a username and password or IP address authentication.

32 Restrictions on Use  RDA 4.5  MARC 540 field Example: This film is restricted to classroom use. Reproduction and use in any form requires written Permission of the donor. Certain restrictions on use or copying of materials may apply.

33 Uniform Resource Locator  LC CORE ELEMENT  RDA 4.6  Address of the remote access resource being cataloged  LC-PCC PS LC practice: If there is more than one Uniform Resource Locator for the resource, record all  MARC 856 field

34 Uniform Resource Locator  Changes Requiring the Addition, Revision, or Deletion of a Uniform Resource Locator  LC-PCC PS provides LC practice for two situations: When the original URI is no longer active When the original URI is still active, but the original resource is no longer available

35 Other Characteristics  Font size Closed list  giant print  large print Optionally, specify the dimensions of the type measured in points. Add the dimensions, in parentheses, following the font size  giant print (36 point) MARC 340 $n 340 ## $n large print $2 rda

36 Other Characteristics  Sound resources Type of recording Recording medium Playing speed Groove characteristic Track configuration Tape configuration Configuration of playback channels Special playback characteristics New MARC 344 field

37 Other Characteristics  MARC Sound characteristics (R) 344 ## $a analog $c 33 1/3 rpm $g stereo 344 ## $a digital $b optical $g surround $h Dolby Digital 5.1 $2 rda 344 ## $a digital $g stereo $2 rda

38 Other Characteristics  Moving image resources Presentation format (film) Projection speed (film) Video format (videorecording) Broadcast standard (videorecording) New MARC 345 and 346 fields

39 Other Characteristics  MARC Projection characteristics of moving image (R) 345 ## $a 3D $b 48 fps $2 rda 345 ## $a Cinerama $b 24 fps $2rda  MARC Video characteristics (R) 346 ## $a Beta $b PAL $2 rda 346 ## $a VHS $b NTSC $2 rda

40 Other Characteristics  Electronic resources (digital files) File type Encoding format File size Resolution Regional encoding Transmission speed Date resource viewed Equipment or system requirement – 3.20 New MARC 347 field

41 Other Characteristics  MARC Digital file characteristics (R) 347 ## $a audio file $b CD audio $2 rda 347 ## $a text file $b PDF $c 1.45 MB $2 rda 347 ## $a video file $b Blu-Ray $2 rda 347 ## $a video file $b DVD video $e region 4 $2 rda 347 ## $a image file $b JPEG $d 3.1 megapixels $2 rda 347 ## $a audio file $b MP3 $f 32 kbps $2 rda

42 Other Characteristics  Cartographic resources Layout Digital file characteristics – 3.19 Longitude and latitude – Horizontal scale – Vertical scale – Additional scale information – Projection of cartographic content – 7.26

43 Other Characteristics  Music resources Form of musical notation (scores) Format of notated music (scores) Medium of performance of musical content

44 Unit 4: Introduction to Works  Where are the instructions?  Naming the work  LC decisions on … Bibliographic or authority? Core elements to distinguish Language and script  Terminology  Sources  Authorized access points for works

45 Where are the Instructions?  Generally, the instructions for identifying works and expressions are in chapter 6.  You will also need to consult the related instructions in: Chapter 19, “Persons, Families, and Corporate Bodies Associated with a Work” Chapter 20, “Persons, Families, and Corporate Bodies Associated with an Expression”

46 “Naming the Work”  Just like ‘naming’ persons and corporate bodies (and now, families)  Similar to AACR2 concept of “main entry”  MARC has four possibilities for where this information can be coded 1XX XX

47 LC Decisions on … Bibliographic or Authority Data?  RDA does not prescribe if attributes about the work and the access points are to be recorded as bibliographic data or authority data  LC Policy: Always identify the work by giving the access point in the bibliographic record Sometimes identify the work by making a title or name/title authority record -- no changes from policy in DCM Z1

48 LC Decisions on … Core Elements to Distinguish  If elements are being recorded to distinguish one work from another or from the name of a person, family, or corporate body, RDA gives choices for recording the elements (RDA 0.6.3):  LC policy always give as additions to the authorized access point cataloger judgment to also give as separate elements in authority records

49 LC Decisions on … Language and Script  Title for a work in the language and script in which it appears in the resource (RDA 5.4) U.S.: in authorized and variant access points: apply the alternative to give a romanized form For some languages (see LC-PCC PS 5.4), can also give variant access points (MARC 4XX) in original language/script in authority records

50 Terminology Related to “Works”  Title of the work (RDA ) “word, character, or group of words and/or characters by which a work is known”  Preferred title for the work (RDA ) the form of title used when constructing the authorized access point  Variant title for the work (RDA ) the form of title used when constructing a variant access point aka “see references”

51 Sources of Information – Sources for Preferred Titles ( )  Commonly-known title  For a work created after 1500 From resources embodying the work or from reference sources Sometimes: title proper of the first manifestation received  For a work created before 1501 From modern reference sources If this evidence is inconclusive, use (in this order):  a) modern editions  b) early editions  c) manuscript copies

52 Sources of Information – Sources for Other Elements (6.1.1)  For all other identifying attributes of works and expressions  Take the information from any source

53 Authorized Access Points for Works ( )  How to put together the elements to construct an authorized access point Preferred title is the basis Authorized access point for the creator precedes the preferred title, as applicable Additions to the preferred title as instructed under  Links back to the instructions on recording each of the specific elements

54 Unit 5: Elements for Works  Entities Responsible for a Work  Preferred Title for the Work  Compilations vs. Collaborations  Additions to Access Points for Works  Variant Access Points for Works  MARC Authority Fields for Works

55 Entities Responsible for a Work  RDA  “when creating the authorized access point for the work, precede the preferred title for the work, if appropriate, by the authorized access point representing the person, family, or corporate body responsible for the intellectual or artistic content of the work”

56 Entities Responsible for a Work – Where are the Instructions?  Creator is a relationship to a work; it isn’t an attribute of the work.  So we will find the instructions about creators in Chapter 19, not Chapter 6. “contributors” are responsible for an expression discussed in Chapter 20 (and covered in Module 3)

57 Entities Responsible for a Work – Sources  Preferred sources of information  Other statements appearing prominently in the resource Use cataloger judgment  Information appearing only in the content  Other sources

58 Creator (19.2)  CORE ELEMENT  “person, family, or corporate body responsible for the creation of a work”  If more than one entity is responsible for the work as a whole: The creator having principal responsibility named first in the resource is required If principal responsibility is not indicated, only the first-named creator is required LC-PCC PS 19.2 says to use cataloger judgment in deciding whether to provide authorized access points for additional creators, beyond the core

59  “ … contributing to the realization of a work through an expression”  Editors, translators, illustrators, arrangers of music, performers, writers of commentary, and others  Covered in next module on Expressions What About Contributors?

60 Creator – Changes from AACR2  No “rule of three” to identify the work only by its preferred title when there are more than three creators  Performer of works by different composers presented in a sound recording is not automatically considered a creator

61 Compilers and Modifiers as Creators ( )  An entity responsible for compiling an aggregate work may be considered a creator of the compilation if the selection, arrangement, editing, etc., of content for the compilation effectively results in the creation of a new work;  An entity responsible for modifying a previously existing work in a way that substantially changes the nature or content of the original is considered a creator of the new work.

62 Corporate Bodies as Creators  Categories of works (RDA ) Similar to AACR2 21.1B2  Corporate body takes precedence over a first-named person or family as creator  LC-PCC PS, similar to LCRI for 21.21B2  RDA on government and religious officials as creators

63 Preferred Title for the Work  CORE ELEMENT  General instructions  Specific instructions

64 General Instructions on Recording Titles (6.2.1)  Scope: “… by which a work is known”  Sources: “… from any source”  Capitalization  Numbers  Diacritics  Articles  Spacing  Abbreviations

65 Instructions on Recording Preferred Titles (6.2.2)  Scope and sources –  Choosing preferred titles –  Recording preferred titles –

66 Preferred Title for the Work – Specific Categories  some musical works (6.14.2)  some legal works (6.19.2)  some religious works (6.23.2)  some official communications (6.26.2)

67 Preferred Title – Parts of a Work ( )  Other than musical or religious works  RDA makes a distinction depending on the number of parts one ( ) two or more ( )

68 Parts of a Work – One Part ( )  “Record the preferred title for the part, applying the basic instructions on recording titles of works given under ” Preferred title for a part of J.R.R. Tolkien’s The lord of the rings:  Two towers Preferred title for a part of the television program The Simpsons:  Streetcar named Marge

69 Parts of a Work – Two or More Parts ( )  Consecutively numbered, with only a general designation “Record the designation of the parts … followed by the inclusive numbers of the parts”  e.g., preferred title for the first six books of Homer’s Iliad: Book 1–6  Two or more unnumbered or non-consecutively numbered parts “Record the preferred title for each of the parts”  e.g., preferred title for a part of Divina commedia in a compilation also comprising the part Paradiso: Purgatorio But see next slide……….

70 Two or More Parts LC Policy for the Alternative  LC practice (LC-PCC PS ) “Instead of recording the preferred title for each of the parts, record the conventional collective title Selections as the preferred title for the parts.” e.g., preferred title for the parts of the work in a compilation comprising books 1 and 6 of Homer’s Iliad  Selections

71 Authorized Access Point for Part(s) of a Work (6.27.2)  Generally: preferred title for part(s) preceded by authorized access point for the creator, if appropriate

72 Authorized Access Point for Part(s) of a Work -- Exceptions  Applies to non-distinctive titles serials and integrating resources television/radio programs consecutively-numbered parts  Instruction preferred title for part(s) preceded by authorized access point for the work

73 Compilations and Collaborations  Important distinction  Determines how each is ‘identified’  Compilations RDA  Collaborations RDA We will first discuss compilations

74 How to Decide?  Clues that you have a compilation: Indication of who created what From the preferred source, table of contents, preface, program notes, home page, other components in the resource  Assume it is a collaboration if: you have no indication who created what you are in doubt

75 Multiple Works by One Creator  Must be treated as a compilation i.e., there are no collaborators  Identified by Creator + Preferred title

76 Preferred Title – Compilations of One P - F - CB ( )  Has compilation become known by a title? Not usually But, e.g., Leaves of grass is an example of a compilation known by a title  If not, use a conventional collective title (doesn’t matter if title proper is distinctive): Complete works = use “Works” Complete works in a single form = use term chosen by cataloger Other compilations of two or more (but not all) works in same form or different forms = add “Selections” to the conventional collective title

77 Preferred Title – Compilations of One P - F - CB (cont.)  Major changes from AACR2!  Under RDA, LC catalogers will no longer need to: Determine if the creator created works only in a single form Determine if the title proper of the compilation is “distinctive”

78 Example: Compilation of 2 Works by the Same Creator AACR2:use the 1st work as the preferred title (but this misidentifies the compilation) 100 1# $a Miller, Arthur, $d $a Archbishop’s ceiling $a Two plays / $c Arthur Miller # $a The Archbishop’s ceiling -- The American clock $a Miller, Arthur, $d $t American clock.

79 Example (cont.) 2 Works by the Same Creator 100 1# $a Miller, Arthur, $d , $e author $a Plays. $k Selections $a Two plays / $c Arthur Miller # $a The Archbishop’s ceiling -- The American clock $i Contains (work): $a Miller, Arthur, $d $t Archbishop’s ceiling. * $i Contains (work):$a Miller, Arthur, $d $t American clock. RDA:apply the alternative to use a conventional collective title * 2 nd 700 not a core requirement but helpful to the user

80 Multiple Works by Multiple Creators -- Compilations vs. Collaborations  Compilation Preferred title Without a creator, because there is no single creator of the individual works  Collaboration Creator (principal or first-named) + Preferred title

81 Preferred Title – Compilations of Works by Different Creators  Compilation of separate works  Identify the compilation by its preferred title ( )  Either … Title by which the compilation has become known (uncommon), or The title proper of the manifestation  e.g., Best of Broadway (for a set of five CDs with selections from original cast recordings of various musicals by various composers) But see next slide ………

82 What if Such a Compilation Lacks a Collective Title?  RDA and LC-PCC PS 25.1 How to treat: 1. For the preferred title, use the title proper of the first work in the compilation, and 2. Provide an analytical authorized access point for the predominant or first work in the compilation, when it represents a substantial part of the resource. Generally, d o not devise a title to use as a preferred title.  LC does not apply the alternative to A work that is part of a larger work is considered a whole-part “related work”

83 Example: Compilation of Works by Different Creators (No Collective Title) 100 1# $a Polk, Sharon $a Community band concerts $a Community band concerts / $c Sharon Polk. Fall harvest festivals / Terri Swanson $a Swanson, Terri. $t Fall harvest festivals. AACR2:use the 1st work as the preferred title (but this misidentifies the compilation)

84 Example (cont.): Compilation of Works by Different Creators (No Collective Title) RDA: u se the title proper of the first work as the preferred title (do not devise a title) $a Community band concerts / $c Sharon Polk. Fall harvest festivals / Terri Swanson $a Polk, Sharon. $t Community band concerts. * $a Swanson, Terri. $t Fall harvest festivals. * 2 nd 700 not a core requirement but helpful to the user

85 Collaborative Works – Single Work, Multiple Creators  Principally-responsible, or first-named creator  Exceptions listed in moving image resources some resources involving both corporate bodies and persons some musical collaborations treaties most serials (per LC-PCC PS; proposal to revise RDA)

86 Example: Multiple Creators -- Principal Responsibility 100 $a Sweet, Martha. 245 $a Georgia history / $c by Martha Sweet and Linda Bruce with contributions by Gus Peterson and Marilee James. *700 $a Bruce, Linda. *700 $a Peterson, Gus. *700 $a James, Marilee. * number of access points for other creators: LC-PCC PS 19.3 = cataloger judgment No change from AACR2, except for ‘added entries’

87 Example: Multiple Creators -- No Principal Responsibility 245 $a Architecture / $c by Susan Brown … [et al.]. * 700 1_ $a Susan Brown AACR2: ‘enter’ under title, with no 1XX field Other authors (Melanie Carlson, Stephen Lindell, Kevin Ott, and Janet Wilson) listed on source, but not recorded in 245.

88 Example: Multiple Creators -- No Principal Responsibility 100 1_ $a Brown, Susan, $e author $a Architecture / $c by Susan Brown, Melanie Carlson, Stephen Lindell, Kevin Ott, and Janet Wilson. *700 1_ $a Carlson, Melanie, $e author. *700 1_ $a Lindell, Stephen, $e author. *700 1_ $a Ott, Kevin, $e author. *700 1_ $a Wilson, Janet, $e author. access points for other creators: cataloger judgment (LC-PCC PS 19.3) RDA:precede preferred title by first-named creator

89 Commentary, etc., Added to a Previously Existing Work ( )  If presented as the work of the entity responsible for the commentary, etc. construct the authorized access point by combining  the authorized access point representing the entity responsible for the commentary, and  the preferred title for the commentary.  Example: Akram, Malik M. Comprehensive and exhaustive commentary on the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (Resource described: A commentary by Akram that includes the text of the law and its amendments)

90 Commentary, etc., Added to a Previously Existing Work ( )  If presented as an edition, treat it as an expression use the authorized access point representing the previously existing work  Example: Joyce, James, 1882–1941. Dubliners (Resource described: James Joyce’s Dubliners : an illustrated edition with annotations / [edited by] John Wyse Jackson & Bernard McGinley)

91 Additions to Access Points Representing Works  Formulating the Authorized Access Point Start with preferred title Precede by creator, if appropriate Addition(s) to make it distinct  RDA Each possible addition discussed in detail in earlier provisions of chapter 6

92 Additions to Access Points Representing Works  Form of work (6.3)  Date of the work (6.4)  Place of origin of the work (6.5)  Another distinguishing characteristic of the work (6.6) no priority order can give more than one if needed

93 LC Policy on Differentiating Works -- LC-PCC PS  Generally: “catalog” = the file against which cataloging is being done; may also take into account any resource which is known use the AAP whenever the resource is referred to in other AP’s (including subjects) or in notes citing relationships between resources resolve the conflict by making an addition to the AAP in the bibliographic record being created; do not also modify the existing record do not predict a conflict when a resource is republished or reproduced, the AAP for the original is used for any republication

94 LC Policy on Differentiating Works -- LC-PCC PS  “… with a parenthetical qualifier …”  Choice of qualifying term: Use judgment. corporate body date of publication descriptive data elements, e.g., edition statement place of publication any word(s) that will serve to distinguish the works more than one qualifier if needed list not prescriptive, not in priority order

95 LC Policy on Differentiating Works -- LC-PCC PS  Form of qualifying term: Corporate body: use the authorized access point Place of publication: use the authorized access point without any cataloger’s addition  Multiple qualifiers: separate the qualifiers with a space-colon-space within one set of parentheses

96 Additions to Access Points -- Examples Advocate (Boise, Idaho) Advocate (Nairobi, Kenya) Bulletin (New York State Museum : 1945) Bulletin (New York State Museum : 1976) use of two qualifiers (corporate body and date) Dublin magazine (1762) Dublin magazine (1965) distinguish with place distinguish with date

97 Additions to Access Points -- Form of Work (6.3)  CORE ELEMENT when needed to differentiate  “class or genre to which a work belongs”  Take from any source  No controlled vocabulary  Added after preferred title in parentheses 130 0# $a Chanson de Roland (Poem)

98 Additions to Access Points -- Date of Work (6.4)  CORE ELEMENT when needed to differentiate  “earliest date associated with a work” created, first published, or released  Take from any source  Year(s) alone  Added after preferred title in parentheses 110 2# $a Connecticut Commission on Children $a Annual report (2005)

99 Additions to Access Points -- Place of Origin of Work (6.5)  CORE ELEMENT when needed to differentiate  “the country or other territorial jurisdiction from which a work originated”  Take from any source  In form prescribed in Chapter 16  Added after preferred title in parentheses 130 0# $a Renaissance history (Boston, Mass.) $a Renaissance history : $b a re- examination.

100 Additions to Access Points -- Other Distinguishing Characteristic (6.6)  CORE ELEMENT when needed to differentiate  “a characteristic other than form of work, date of work, or place of origin of the work that serves to differentiate a work from another work or from the name of a person, family, or corporate body”  Take from any source  In established form  Added after preferred title in parentheses

101 Variant Access Points for Works  General principle: “use a variant title for the work as the basis for a variant access point.”  Example: Authorized access point for the work  Dickens, Charles, 1812–1870. Pickwick papers Variant access point for the work  Dickens, Charles, 1812–1870. Posthumous papers of the Pickwick Club

102 Variant Access Points for Works (cont.)  RDA also allows a variant access point, using just the preferred title, and formulated using other creators (e.g., collaborators not chosen as the principal creator).  Example: Authorized access point for the work:  100 0_ Christo, 1935– $t Wrapped Reichstag Variant access point for the work:  400 0_ Jeanne-Claude, 1935– $t Wrapped Reichstag (A work of art created jointly by Christo and Jeanne- Claude; variant access point considered important for subject access)

103 Variant Access Points for Works (cont.)  LC Policy: Apply cataloger judgment Consider user needs  LC does not create or maintain SARs LC-PCC PS

104 MARC Authority Fields for Works  046Date of work  370Place of origin of work  380 Form of work  381 Other distinguishing characteristics  382 Medium of performance  383 Numeric designation of a musical work  384 Key LC policy: cataloger judgment whether to include these fields in authority records