MNSAA Accreditation January 2014 New School Training The Whole Learning School Sarah W. Mueller Executive Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Advertisements

ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.” Accountability 2.0 and the World’s Best Workforce—What Does it Mean? World’s.
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
School Improvement Plan 6 Main Areas
Campus Improvement Plans
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
WELSSA – Advancing the Gospel of Jesus Christ First Lutheran Lake Geneva, WI.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
WE’RE ACCREDITED….NOW WHAT? MAINTAINING ACCREDITATION AND SUSTAINING QUALITY Presented by: Julie Leslie & Kim St. Marie.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Session Materials  Wiki
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Session 2: Strategic Guidance Spring Term 2014 School Governor Induction.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
The Plan without End!!!. What is Middle States? Middle States is the Association of Colleges and Schools that was established in It is one of six.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
©2007 Dr. Karl Squier 1 The RISCA Toolkits Approach to Implementing Comprehensive School Counseling Programs.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Reviewer Training Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Reviewer Training 5/18/2012. Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs: NHDOE Representative:Bob McLaughlin.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
School Name Visiting Team Exit Report Month, days, year Insert School’s logo or photo of school building.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
2009 Shelby County Schools District Accreditation Thompson High School.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Board Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Performance-Based Accreditation
School Self-Evaluation 
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Presentation transcript:

MNSAA Accreditation January 2014 New School Training The Whole Learning School Sarah W. Mueller Executive Director

Candidate Application The Whole Learning School Provided The Whole Learning School Provided  Statement “Why Seeking Accreditation?”  Statement of governing authority’s support  Projected timeframe (Spring 2015)  Programs seeking accreditation (Grades 3-12)  Signed by school & governing authority  Payment of application fee

Candidate Application Essential Standards Readiness Essential Standards Readiness  Mission & Philosophy statements  Curriculum Standards  Assessment of Student Learning  Health & Safety Requirements  Personnel  Governance  Financial Sustainability

Achieving NEW Accreditation A Model for The Whole Learning School A Model for The Whole Learning School  Year 1 – Develop Self Study Profile & Narrations  Year 2 - SSP and Visit Define visionary plan for future Host onsite visit  Year 3-7 – Implement Plan File Annual Progress Reports Maintain Strategic Plan as living document

Accreditation Status Conditions on Accreditation May Apply Conditions on Accreditation May Apply  Public Statement  Provisional Conditions One or more essential compliance components Additional accountability required Timelines and support provided  Provisional Conditions Deficiency detracts from total Failed to meet requirements Violated policy

Steps to Accreditation Outline to Walk Through Process Outline to Walk Through Process  Set up for Renewing schools  TWLS already completed Steps 1-2  Next Up Develop Self-Study Communicate Plan

Standards & Indicators HANDBOOK – Section B  1: Mission & Philosophy  2: Teaching & Learning  3: Climate for Learning  4: Communications & Relations  5: Personnel  6: Leadership & Governance  7: School Strategic Plan

MNSAA’s Quality Standards Take a LOOK at the Standards  MNSAA has 7 quality standards  Each standard is comprised of several criteria  Each criteria requires a Reflective Narration  Narration supported by Performance Indicators

Essential Performance Indicators Italicized Means Required! Written Mission & Philosophy statements; Written Curriculum Standards; Subject Area Philosophies Written Process of Curriculum Evaluation; Philosophy of Assessment Policy Handbooks; Faculty & Student Handbooks; Annual State-of-the School Report; Etc.  Legal Requirement noted LR

School Self-Study Report HANDBOOK – Section C  The School Profile  Reflective Standard Narrations  The School Strategic Plan

Getting Organized  Understand the Self-Study Requirements (Profile, Standards Narrations, School Strategic Plan)  Establish a Steering Team (See Handbook C-1)  Develop Sub-Committees (See Handbook C-1)  Community-wide Ownership The School Self-Study Report

Part 1: The School Profile

Tells your school’s story (Who you are; Who you serve; What’s been happening?)  Opens self-study report  Summary statement (3-5 pages)  History highlights  Demographic Study Overview of students, families, and community served  Stakeholder perceptions** Survey provides documented evidence  Student enrollment trends

Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey  Consider inexpensive electronic survey  Connect stakeholders to MNSAA standards  Invite honesty, but do not open door to inappropriate responses  Summarize data gathered in The Profile Part 1: The School Profile

School Profile Template  Available under School Resources on website  Template not required, but components are  Consider it an outline for posting your findings  Take a look! Take a look  Download from MNSAA website: Part 1: The School Profile

Part 2: Standard Narrations

Part 2: Standards Narrations Demonstrates readiness for accreditation  The heart of your school’s self-study  Defines what is currently happening at your school  Honesty matters! May find not all criteria are in place at your school  Equally important to find areas not in compliance

Quality of the Reflective Narrations  Do NOT merely restate the standard  Sets the stage for the onsite team  Professional document crafted by well-trained and highly skilled educators  Published!  Quality evaluated by team Part 2: Standards Narrations

Identifying Strengths & Challenges  Use findings to build summary for each standard  Process =  Subcommittee writes draft  Whole group reviews and adds ideas  Identify key strengths & challenges  CHALLENGES – Become the focus of the school improvement plan Part 2: Standards Narrations

Self-Study Narrations Template  MNSAA requires use of template  Personalize the template for your school  Available under School Resources on website Part 2: Standards Narrations

Don’t Forget Standard 7!  Not completed until after strategic plan written  Can be forgotten  Set a reminder to return to this before publishing  Essential component of the Self-Study

Indicators of Compliance  Onsite team looks for supporting evidence for each narration.  Ask the questions: “How do we comply?” “How can we provide evidence?”  MNSAA requirements & ideas  Team observations & interviews

Part 3: School Strategic Plan

Summarizes challenges identified  A roadmap for school improvement  Provide strategic direction + a plan of action  Needs to be a collaborative process  Key component of Annual Progress Report  Maintained as a “Living Document”

MNSAA SSP Quality Expectations  Valid  Valid – Reflective of current needs of school Connected  Connected – To self-study report Supported  Supported – By wide body of stakeholders Visionary  Visionary – Not a checklist Reasonable  Reasonable – Timeline manageable Focused  Focused – On your students! Part 3: School Strategic Plan

Specific Framework Required! Objectives  Objectives – Where the school wants to be Strategies  Strategies – How the school plans to get there Action Steps  Action Steps – What specifically the school is going to do Part 3: School Strategic Plan

SAMPLE Objective: Objective: The school will provide a safe learning facility. Strategy 1 Strategy 1: A crisis management plan will be developed. Action Steps Action Steps: 1.A taskforce will be established. 2.The task force will review state guidelines and resources. 3.The task force will interface with local authorities. 4.Draft a crisis management plan for consideration. 5.Seek approval from board. 6.Implement crisis management plan. 7.Evaluate and adjust as needed. Strategy 2 Strategy 2: Explore extended day program. Action Steps: 1.Survey families for need. 2.Determine space for program. 3.Research state laws. 4.Etc. – Continue to add action steps to reach goal.

MNSAA Template Required!  Complete on electronic template  Download from MNSAA website  Word table - Able to revise  Ability to report progress to MNSAA  Take a look! Take a look Part 3: School Strategic Plan

Samples Available Take a look Take a look at the Sample on the MNSAA Template! Be sure to checkout our website for more resources: Part 3: School Strategic Plan

INVOLVE STAKEHOLDERS!  Communicate Self-Study Findings  Solicit Input  Build Buy-In  Finalize with full school community Part 3: School Strategic Plan

The Onsite Visit HANDBOOK – Section D  Guidelines & Responsibilities  The Onsite Visiting Team  The Team Report Template

The Onsite Visit Purpose of the Onsite Team Visit  To Validate  To Evaluate  Quality Expectations of MNSAA  Provide Objective Outside Feedback  Bottom Line

Thinking Ahead of the Visit  Budget considerations  Facility considerations  Technology considerations  Interview considerations  Team meet and greet  Organize your indicators  Clear your calendar  Advise stakeholders The Onsite Visit

The Team Report  The Team will determine: Sufficient Indication of Compliance Compliance with Concerns Insufficient Indication of Compliance  Recommendations for Improvement  Commendations for Excellence  Take a look!Take a look The Onsite Visit

The School Responds  Visit closure  Communicate findings with stakeholders  Written response to recommendations  Template provided  Submit revised SSP The Onsite Visit

The Appendix HANDBOOK – Section E  Sample Timeline for Process  Curriculum Standards Requirement  SSP Sample  Fee Structure

MNSAA Accreditation January 2014 New School Training The Whole Learning School Sarah W. Mueller Executive Director