A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Test Beam at IHEP,CAS ZHANG Liang sheng, Test Beam Group Introduction BEPC/BES Ⅱ will be upgraded as BEPC Ⅱ / BES Ⅲ, it is necessary to do beam test for.
NA48/3 - The Strange Penguin Experiment by James Barnard.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
RF Bucket Area Introduction Intense muon beams have many potential applications, including neutrino factories and muon colliders. However, muons are produced.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) Experiment
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK.
Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London. Neil Bliss, Norbert Collomb, Alan Grant, STFC/DL, Daresbury. Costing Methodology and Status of the Neutrino Factory.
J. Pasternak Recent Studies on the PRISM FFAG Ring J. Pasternak, Imperial College London/RAL STFC on behalf of the PRISM Task Force , Geneva,
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Muons, Inc. AAC Feb M. A. C. Cummings 1 Uses of the HCC Mary Anne Cummings February 4, 2009 Fermilab AAC.
Tracking Studies of Phase Rotation Using a Scaling FFAG Ajit Kurup FFAG07 12 th – 17 th April 2007.
Ajit Kurup, C. Bontoiu, M. Aslaninejad, J. Pozimski, Imperial College London. A.Bogacz, V. S. Morozov, Y.R. Roblin Jefferson Laboratory K. B. Beard, Muons,
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
PRISM and Neutrino Factory in Japan Y. Kuno KEK, IPNS January 19th, 2000 at CERN.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
Fermilab, Proton Driver, Muon Beams, Recycler David Neuffer Fermilab NufACT05.
1 Muon Physics Project X Workshop Fermilab 17 November 2007.
Belarus activity in COMET experiment Dz. Shoukavy, IP NAS of Belarus Gomel, Belarus, July 27 - August 7, 2015.
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
Update of the DeeMe spectrometer design and its performance Nguyen Duy Thong, Masaharu Aoki, Doug Bryman C, Satoshi Mihara A, Yohei Nakatsugawa A, Hiroaki.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
Particle Production in the MICE Beamline IPAC10 Linda Coney, UC Riverside, Adam Dobbs, Imperial College London, Yordan Karadzhov, Sofia University The.
RAL Muon Beam Line Properties. ISIS 70 MeV H- injection Ring accelerates up to 800 MeV in about 10 ms 50 Hz cycle - Dual Harmonic System ~ 2 x 1.5 MHz;
Hadron Spectroscopy with high momentum beam line at J-PARC K. Ozawa (KEK) Contents Charmed baryon spectroscopy New experiment at J-PARC.
MANX at MTA Andreas Jansson Fermilab. 2/14/2007LEMC Workshop, February 12-16, 2007A. Jansson 2 Foreseen MCTF Experimental R&D Low energy proton beam to.
Measuring the charged pion polarizability in the  →    −  reaction David Lawrence, JLab Rory Miskimen, UMass, Amherst Elton Smith, JLab.
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
NEUTRINO DETECTORS Cutting-Edge Accelerator Research for a Neutrino Factory and Other Applications Ajit Kurup for the FETS and UKNF Collaborations Cutting-Edge.
COMET Target Design (COherent Muon to Electron Transition) Satoshi MIHARA.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.
Μ→e search using pulsed muon beam μ -  e - νν nuclear muon capture Muon Decay In Orbit  π - +(A,Z)→(A,Z-1)*, (A,Z-1)* →γ+(A,Z-1), γ→e + e - Prompt.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
G-2, EDM, COMET muon particle physics programmes at J-PARC Mu_01 Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK FKPPL-FJPPL workshop, Yonesei Univ.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
COMET and DeeMe. Mu-e conversion search at J-PARC COMET Target sensitivity 10 C.L. using aluminum target – SINDRUM II 7x – MEG 2.4x
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
Giovanni Onorato Fermilab University of Rome “Guglielmo Marconi” INFN Lecce Mu2e general presentation.
LER Workshop, October 11, 2006LER & Transfer Line Lattice Design - J.A. Johnstone1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Introduction The.
Physics with the COMET Staging Plan Satoshi MIHARA IPNS, KEK.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
COMET μ-e conversion search at J-PARC. μ-e conversion physics SUSY-GUT, SUSY-seesaw (Gauge Mediated process) – BR = = BR(μ→eγ) × O(α) – τ→lγ SUSY-seesaw.
PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT The KARMEN Time Anomaly: Search for a Neutral Particle of Mass 33.9 MeV in Pion Decay 1 PSI, Paul-Scherrer-Institut, CH-5232 Villigen-PSI,
Mu to e Meeting BNL, June 2006 Extinction requirement relaxation (Kevin O’Sullivan) Stopping Target Geometry (Cenap Ozben, David Morse) Yannis Semertzidis.
Parametrisation of PRISM Ring and Design Options J. Pasternak Imperial College London/RAL STFC PRISM-FFAG Task Force phone meeting,
Dhevan Gangadharan UCLA STAR Collaboration DNP meeting 10/25/08 1.
The Mu2e Experiment at Fermilab: Giovanni Onorato, Fermilab - INFN Lecce – Universita’ G. Marconi Mu2e Member Institutions: Boston University; Brookhaven.
The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab Finding a needle in a trillion haystacks Bertrand Echenard California Institute of Technology APS Meeting – April 2013.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
J. Pasternak PRISM Synergies between muon projects J. Pasternak, Imperial College London/RAL STFC on behalf of the PRISM Task Force , PASI Workshop,
Uses of the HCC Mary Anne Cummings February 4, 2009 Fermilab AAC
Mu2e : 10 Minutes in Questions
Search for CLFV at COMET experiment muon to electron conversion
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Muon Front End Status Chris Rogers,
NuSTORM - μ Storage Ring with Injection
Neutrino beams in China
The Hall C Heavy Gas Cerenkov
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
What is μ-e Conversion ? μ μ-+(A,Z)→e-+(A,Z) muon decay in orbit
Uses of the HCC Mary Anne Cummings February 4, 2009 Fermilab AAC
u c s b d n Hadron & Nuclear Physics Particle Physics Quarks Leptons
Presentation transcript:

A. Kurup, I. Puri, Y. Uchida, Y. Yap, Imperial College London, UK R. B. Appleby, S. Tygier, The University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute, UK R. D’Arcy, A. Edmonds, M. Lancaster, M. Wing, UCL, UK OPTIMISATION OF THE BEAM LINE FOR COMET PHASE-I ABSTRACT The COMET experiment will search for very rare muon processes that will give us an insight into particle physics beyond the Standard Model. COMET requires an intense beam of muons with a momentum less than 70 MeV/c. This is achieved using an 8 GeV proton beam; a heavy metal target to primarily produce pions; a solenoid capture system; and a curved solenoid to perform charge and momentum selection. It was recently proposed to build COMET in two phases with physics measurements being made in both phases. This requires re-optimising the beam line for a shorter curved solenoid. This will affect the pion and muon yield; the momentum distributions at the detector; and the collimator scheme required. This paper will present the beam line design for COMET Phase-I, which aims to maximise the yield for low momentum muons suppressing sources of backgrounds in the beam. MAGNETIC FIELD INTRODUCTION The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET) experiment aims to measure the conversion of muons to electrons in the presence of a nucleus. This process is forbidden by the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics. However, models that go beyond the SM such as supersymmetric theories predict this process to exist with a branching ratio that may be in the range – COMET aims to achieve a sensitivity of < and thus will be able to observe conversions at this level. It was recently decided to construct the COMET experiment in two stages, with the ability to search for muon to electron conversion in both stages. COMET Phase-I will also allow performance measurements of the beam line, which will be very important to understand sources of backgrounds for COMET Phase-II. Searching for muon to electron conversion in COMET Phase-I, however, requires re-optimising the beam line. The figure on the left shows the layout of COMET Phase-I. The beam line up to the end of the muon torus will be the same as COMET Phase-II. The muon torus in Phase-I only bends through 90 o whereas in Phase-II there are two 90 o sections. This means the separation of particles caused by the vertical dispersion of the bent solenoid will be less in Phase-I. Thus, the beam will contain more background particles that could fake the signal of muon to electron conversion. The number of background particles could be reduced by re-optimising the dipole field applied over the length of the muon torus and the beam collimator. On-axis solenoid field for COMET Phase-I (green line). The red line shows a simplified, hard-edged, version of the matching and stopping target solenoid fields. Pion production target Collimator Stopping target Pion production and capture solenoid Matching solenoid Stopping target solenoid Muon torus Negative PionsNegative MuonsPositive Muons Negatively charged particles Positively charged particles COLLIMATOR Pions MuonsElectrons R max Y min Collimator material Vacuum R min High-momentum particlesLow-momentum particles High-momentum particlesLow-momentum particles Dispersion of negatively charged muons after the muon torus with the default dipole field of 0.018T. Momentum of muons, pions and electrons just before the collimator (i.e. after the muon torus). Schematic diagram of the COMET beam collimator. Percentage of high-momentum (left) and low-momentum (right) particles that are absorbed by the tungsten collimator for different values of Y min. (Including the production of secondary electrons.) Momentum of muons after the tungsten collimator for different values of Y min. Percentage of high-momentum (left) and low-momentum (right) particles that are absorbed by the aluminium collimator for different values of Y min. (Including the production of secondary electrons.) Dipole field applied to muon torus section. Momentum distribution of negative pions and muons and positively charged muons at the end of the muon torus for different dipole fields. Numbers of high-momentum negatively charged (left) and positively charged (right) particles at the end of the muon torus as a function of dipole field. Ymin = -125 Ymin = -100 Ymin = -75 Ymin = -50