Speaker: Dr. Dipak De Professor Department of Extension Education, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Statistical Systems: Advice from the UIS Technical Guide National training workshop Amman, Jordan October 2010.
Advertisements

4 th Meeting of the EC International Dialogue on Bioethics Copenhagen, June 19 th, 2012 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centred.
Group II Priorities for Knowledge Sharing & Promotion of Innovation.
The CTCN Services UNEP – March 5th, 2014, Nairobi, Kenya.
Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Near East Plant Protection Network for Regional Cooperation & Knowledge Sharing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations An Overview on.
Sarajevo, October 17,   The institution of the Unit was in line with the strategy adopted by the Italian Government in the Region and its work.
Marco de Referencia para orientar la Formulación de la ECADERT Proceso de Consultas Primera Fase Julio – Agosto, 2009 Proceso de Consultas Primera Fase.
Centre for Environment Education ENVIS Centre on Environmental Education (EE)
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
Entrepreneurship youth
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of Rural Development LEADER+ TYPE MEASURE IN POLAND International Conference: „Future of European.
Intangible Cultural Heritage Section
LOCAL SYSTEM OF INNOVATION CENTERED ON AUDIOVISUAL PRODUCTION Marcelo Matos Fluminense Federal University and RedeSist - IE/UFRJ.
Improving the Energy Efficiency of the Heat and Hot Water Supply Presenter: Bayramgul Garabaeva, Programme Officer Decentralization and Community Development.
The Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances How can the Treaty support the economic sustainability of the audiovisual sector? Benoît MULLER, attorney,
1 Content and Products of the NCD Observatory CARMEN Policy Observatory Meeting (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, March 2005)
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
IFLA/UNESCO Multicultural Library Manifesto Understanding the Manifesto: A Workshop.
UNESCO INSTITUTE for STATISTICS Statistics and Cultural Policy Simon Ellis Head of Culture Science and Communications.
- Sustaining creative diversity through cultural goods and services - A UNESCO Pilot Project
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN ZIMBABWE Kathy Matsika(Ms) National University of Science and Technology.
The European Agenda for Culture The OMC and the Structured dialogue with civil society.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION FRAMEWORK NATIONAL TARGETED PROGRAM FOR NEW RURAL DEVELOPMENT MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT Prepared by Mr.Tăng.
1 ITU/EBU Meeting of High-Level Experts on Competitive Platforms for the Delivery of Digital Content Participative web: User-created content Graham Vickery.
Building Inclusive Knowledge Societies Session organized by the UNCT in India and other UN entities.
ACCESSIBILITY IN POLICIES DOCUMENTS WORKING GROUP1 WP: 3 Author: Sashka Parvanova Place and date: Budapest 29 March 2012 Project partner: REGVRATSA BG.
RESOURCE EFFICIENCY IN LATIN AMERICA: ECONOMICS AND OUTLOOK 1.
Architecture Architecture is recognised as an important element of European culture and of the environment in which Europeans live. The European Union's.
Identify the institutions which have a stake in the
1 Empowering Persons with Disabilities through ICTs Mr Abdul Waheed Khan Assistant Director-General for Communication and Information UNESCO Open Source.
Major Challenges for the Safeguarding of ICH Information and Networking, Including Through the Web HUH Kwon 許權 Director-General ICHCAP.
THE IMPORTANCE OF IP FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE CREATIVE INDUSTRIES
Armenia and Diaspora Armenia’s investment climate and Diaspora’s participation in development policies. Hayk Sargsyan, Johns Hopkins University.
IFAP Special Event: Information and Knowledge for All, Emerging Trends and Challenges Major trends Access to the public domain information: Russian experience.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions Adopted 20 October 2005 Entry into force 18 March 2007.
Media Projects Marija Gaćeša and Violeta Ćorić Belgrade, 1 st October Ministry of Finance.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Digital Divide: Challenge of Leadership? Presentation by Dr. Gillian M Marcelle, Principal Consultant, Technology for Development and Bureau Member UN.
1 Business Information Universe Module 2: Seeking for business information – Web-based information resources Part E: Markets, marketing and international.
1 Enabling environments for technology transfer under the UNFCCC Daniele Violetti Programme Officer, Technology Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC) UNFCCC.
REPORT IN MALAYSIA. NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL INFORMATION VU THUY LIEN DEVISION OF RURAL.
COMBINING ACCESS TO CULTURAL HERITAGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Brussels November 2010 Victor Vazquez Senior Legal Counsellor, Digital Future.
Looking Forward the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) UNSD-DFID Project on National Development Indicators: Country Director's Meeting, New.
Building Knowledge Societies Abdul Waheed Khan Assistant Director-General for Communication and Information Durban ::: 19 August 2007 E-Learning: Universities.
The European Heritage Network HEREIN
IP RIGHTS and USER NEEDS in a DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT A Publishing view by Hugh Jones Copyright Counsel to The Publishers Association and International STM.
Establishing National Technology Development and Transfer Systems
National Information Communication Technologies Strategy Vasif Khalafov “National strategy” working group - Web -
Challenge in developing CSA: missing issues Marion LIBREROS Consultant.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Faculty Councils Brad Whittaker Director, Research Services and Industry Liaison Strategic Research Plan.
The MESICIC Experience & Civil Society Participation.
1 Abdul Waheed Khan Communication and Information Sector UNESCO Building Knowledge Societies.
MAZOWSZE 2007 – 2013 Operational Program Human Capital Regional Component Ministry of Regional Development.
Ministerial Task Teams: Local Content Conditions Framing Local Content in Arts and Culture Jyoti Mistry 28 May 2014.
E-Strategy Sudan National Information Society Strategy.
World summit on the information society 1 WSIS: Building the Information Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium Tim Kelly, Claudia Sarrocco.
Developing reporting system for SDG and Agenda 2063, contribution of National Statistical System, issues faced and challenges CSA Ethiopia.
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Priorities and coordination of capacity building in Azerbaijan
IPR’s: new challenges and opportunities
SYLVIA ROBERTS Communication librarian
Setting a common vision of culture in Jordan –
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
State support for creative arts and organizations of art creators in Lithuania. Presentation of the system of state pensions for artists and the program.
The GATS Waiver – some key issues
Presentation transcript:

Speaker: Dr. Dipak De Professor Department of Extension Education, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

India is a nation painted with rich and diverse hues & colors of cultures, traditions, values, climate, flora, fauna, religions, languages, dialects, dressing patterns, lifestyle and rituals. This very presence of diversity of different cultures in the present digital era, calls for their protection and promotion by means of formulating such cultural policies which will favour the integration of digital technologies like the internet.

 Cultural goods and services encompass artistic, aesthetic, symbolic and spiritual values. The characteristics of cultural goods and services differ from other products because their system of valorisation, which includes a characteristic irreproducible, is linked to its appreciation or pleasure (Throsby, 2001).

 Cultural goods convey ideas, symbols and ways of life, some of which may be subject to copyrights.  Cultural services do not represent material cultural goods in themselves but facilitate their production and distribution. For example, cultural services include licensing activities and other copyright- related services, audio-visual distribution activities, promotion of performing arts and cultural events, as well as cultural information services and the preservation of books, recordings and artefacts (in libraries, documentation centres, and museums). Most of these goods and services are subject to copyright( UNESCO Framework for cultural statistics, 2009 ).

As per the Article 4 of the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, 2005, the terms like Cultural activities, goods and services, Cultural industries, Cultural policies and measures and Protection are defined.

“Cultural activities, goods and services” refers to those activities, goods and services, which at the time they are considered as a specific attribute, use or purpose, embody or convey cultural expressions, irrespective of the commercial value they may have. Cultural activities may be an end in themselves, or they may contribute to the production of cultural goods and services.

 Do the students really perceive cultural goods and services as these stand for?  Should the cultural goods and services be brought in the digital ambit?

 To know the perception of students of Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, towards the challenges and opportunities involved in the aggrandizement of protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural goods and services in the present digital era.  To know their perception towards cultural policies in India, international co-operation and integration of new technologies in connection with the diversity of cultural goods and services in the era of digitalization.

 The study was conducted in the Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, which was purposively selected to conduct the survey because it’s one of the most reputed Agricultural Institute in Northern India and the investigator belongs to Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.  Also, due to limited time and resources the study was limited to IAS, BHU only.

 The students pursuing for Post-graduate and Doctoral program formed the universe of the study and the list for the same was obtained from Academic Office of IAS, BHU.  Out of the universe of 573 students, a total of 100 students were selected randomly for the purpose of study.  The data was collected through questionnaire of Michele Rioux (2014), with slight modifications during the month of December,  Statistical methods like frequency, percentage and ranking were used for precise and meaningful analysis of the collected data.

A. Challenges and opportunities for the diversity of cultural goods and services in the digital era

Digital technology, and in particular the Internet represents a challenge for the: Frequency S.No.TAPANeutralPDTD 1 Production/creation of cultural goods and services 72 (72.00) 15 (15.00) 12 (12.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 2 Distribution/broadcasting of cultural goods and services 72 (72.00) 15 (15.00) 12 (12.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 3 Consumption of/access to cultural goods and services 75 (75.00) 15 (15.00) 09 (9.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 4 Training/capacity building of cultural actors 70 (70.00) 15 (15.00) 14 (14.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 5 Education/public awareness to the importance of protecting and promoting the diversity of cultural expressions 75 (75.00) 15 (15.00) 09 (9.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00)

Since the advent of digital technology and the Internet in India, there is: Frequency S.No.TAPANeutralPDTD 1 An increase in the foreign cultural offer in India 80 (80.00) 01 (1.00) 11 (11.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 2 An increase in the national cultural offer 80 (80.00) 08 (08.00) 11 (11.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 3 An increased international visibility of national cultural goods and services 80 (80.00) 08 (08.00) 11 (11.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00) 4 An equilibrium between the national and foreign cultural content offer 72 (72.00) 12 (12.00) 15 (15.00) 01 (1.00) 0 (0.00)

S.No.StatementsFrequencyRank 1 An increased access to a wide variety of digital cultural goods and services 89 (89.00) I 2 A concentration of supply and a consistent consumption of imported cultural goods and services 41 (41.00) IV 3 A restructuring of cultural industries with new players and new supply networks 32 (32.00) V 4 The creation of new cultural business models related to the development of digital technologies 60 (60.00) III 5An increase in the free sharing of digital cultural content78 (78.00) II

S.No. Political authorities responsible for culture in India have taken any measures or adopted cultural policies integrating digital technologies FrequencyPercentage 1Yes No Don’t Know

S.No.MeasuresFrequencyPercentage 1 Support for artists and creators of digital cultural goods and services (creation phase) Development of mechanisms to support the production of digital cultural goods and services (production phase) Promotion of mechanisms for the distribution of cultural goods and services (distribution phase) Promotion of a balanced access to domestic and foreign digital cultural contents (consumption phase) Others00.00

S.No.Level of satisfactionFrequencyPercentage 1Totally satisfied Partially satisfied Neutral Partially dissatisfied Totally dissatisfied00.00

S.No.ResponseFrequencyPercentage 1Yes No Don’t Know

S.No.StatementsFrequencyRank 1 Guaranteeing a better share of income gained on digital networks to answer the financial needs of artists and content creators 65 (65.00) III 2 Adopt regulation to insure that Internet service providers (ISPs) contribute to funds dedicated to local productions 87 (87.00) I 3 Promote access to new digital broadcasting platforms to better export and promote the diversity of cultural expressions 72 (72.00) II 4 Adapt the concept of cultural exception to meet the challenges of the digital age and ensure access to local cultural goods and services, specifically in the context of the domination of Web giants 38 (38.00) V 5 Better manage the development and distribution of legal digital cultural goods and services to reduce piracy 51 (51.00) IV 6Provide grants and subsidies to support artists and cultural professionals in the new context of digital technologies 28 (28.00) VI

S.No.StatementsFrequencyRank 1 Adopt policies to support the creation of digital platforms that will improve online access to cultural goods and services 90 (90.00) I 2 Establish tax incentives to encourage the creation/production of digital cultural goods and services 81 (81.00) II 3 Develop digital strategies to increase public awareness of the local and global cultural offer 27 (27.00) VI 4 Strengthen the capacity of artists and cultural professionals to use digital tools/platforms/media, and promote increased sharing of ICT best practices 69 (69.00) III 5Establish policies to better showcase local cultural content 53 (53.00) IV 6Strengthen advocacy for the diversity of cultural expressions by building on existing structures and networks, including civil society groups 41 (41.00) V

C. International cooperation and the diversity of cultural goods and services in the digital age

S.No.StatementsFrequencyRank 1 Technical Assistance (technology transfer, transfer of expertise, training and capacity building) 71 (71.00) II 2 Financial assistance based on flexible selection criteria that take into account the specific context of the recipient countries 89 (89.00) I 3 A better articulation between cultural and trade concerns in the digital age. 36 (36.00) V 4 Adapt existing funding mechanisms (such as the International Fund for Cultural Diversity) to prioritize cultural projects related to digital content 59 (59.00) III 5 Sharing knowledge online (platform/ database) and centralizing information on partnerships and cultural policies 49 (49.00) IV 6Strengthening the role of civil society and its participation at UNESCO 21 (21.00) VI

D. New technologies and the diversity of cultural goods and services

S.No.StatementsFrequencyRank 1 Lack of infrastructure and telecommunications networks 92 (92.00) I 2Lack of a digital strategy for culture 77 (77.00) II 3 Decision-makers' lack of a long-term vision for cultural policies in the digital era 32 (32.00) V 4 Lack of a legislative and regulatory framework relating to cultural goods and services in the digital era 56 (56.00) IV 5Poor economic conditions for investment in cultural goods and services in the digital era 67 (67.00) III

Impact of the following policies on the diversity of cultural expressions Frequency S.No.NegativeNeutralPositive 1 Policies to increase access to digital infrastructure and equipment 0 (0.00) 08 (08.00) 92 (92.00) 2 Policies to promote the production, digitization and dissemination of local cultural content online 0 (0.00) 08 (08.00) 92 (92.00) 3 Policies to encourage the development and consumption of innovative digital cultural services 0 (0.00) 08 (08.00) 92 (92.00) 4Policies that favor the training and capacity building of cultural actors in digital technologies 0 (0.00) 08 (08.00) 92 (92.00)

S.No.Digital PracticesFrequencyRank 1 Publication and online consultation of cultural and artistic content (cultural calendar, directory of cultural sites or associations, ) 87 (87.00) I 2Multimedia or digitized creation 69 (69.00) III 3Downloading or streaming music/books/movies/software 60 (60.00) IV 4Visits to virtual museums or libraries 22 (22.00) VIII 5Online games or networking 34 (34.00) VII 6Viewing videos / TV online 51 (51.00) V 7Listening to radio broadcasts online 43 (43.00) VI 8Exchanges through dating sites, forums, social media, cultural networking 15 (15.00) IX 9Production and online consultation of relevant and reliable statistics on cultural industries 77 (77.00) II

 Cultural goods and services of a culturally rich nation like India definitely needs digitalization in the digital era for their protection, promotion, production and consumption and at the same time political authorities of India should Endeavour to formulate and implement such cultural policies in the near future which will help in the integration of latest technologies like the internet for the better health of cultural goods and services.  The efforts should also be made to gain international co-operation for this very purpose. The results of the paper clearly reflect that it’s the time for the cultural goods and services to go ‘digital’.

THANK YOU