Downtown Pittsburgh IDA Member Image Study Wave I Summary July 2007 Prepared by: STRATEGIC METRICS GROUP www.strategicmetricsgroup.com 412.480.4332.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interpreting the People Skills Report. Why a multi-rater? Helps you understand others’ perceptions of your behavior. These are neither “right” or “wrong”—they.
Advertisements

2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
Missouri Brand Awareness & Destination Audit Study Fall 2003 Presented to: Missouri Association of Convention & Visitors Bureaus June 8, 2004.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
Improving Your Business Results Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec Six Sigma Qualtec – All Rights Reserved June 26, 2002 BEYOND SIX SIGMA: A HOLISTIC.
COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY BAYSIDE CITY COUNCIL JUNE RESEARCH REPORT - Coordinated by the Department of Planning and Community Development On.
Third Party Advertising Evaluation: American Express eStatement Topline July 2008.
SE 450 Software Processes & Product Metrics Survey Use & Design.
1 Q3: How do we get there? Cohort B 2 GOALS AND ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS INSTRUCTIONAL TIME DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION/ ORGANIZATION.
Jon Last Vice President, Corporate Marketing & Research Golf Digest Publications.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
HRLC Employee Engagement. HRLC Employee Engagement Report HRLC Employee Engagement Agenda 1.Engagement Capital Overview 2.Employee Engagement Executive.
Website Design. Designing and creating different elements involved in developing a website for e- commerce can help you identify and describe the components.
TNS Proprietary: © Linking Employee Compensation to Survey Metrics High-Level Considerations and Best Practices January, 2006.
Rice University: Image and Reputation Survey Administrators Forum Feb. 12, 2008.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
The Design and Use of a Career Portfolio to Promote Student Career Development Jill Lumsden Katie Meyer Robert Reardon James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Step 1: Understand the Report
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
“Achieving a Guest Obsessed Culture”
2014 ROTARY INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION Preparing Your Club for the Future: Club Assessment & Club Visioning Moderator Steve Wilcox.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Indicators of Family Engagement Melanie Lemoine and Monica Ballay Louisiana State Improvement Grant/SPDG.
1 Ss. Colman-John Neumann Basketball Survey 2009/2010.
NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems
Presented to the SME Member Council December 20,
Leadership Pulse™ Business Drivers and their Importance Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report July, 2007 the measure of your success.
 RESEARCH TOPIC  Read and analyze FUTURE SCENE  I. IDENTIFY CHALLENGES  II. SELECT AN UNDERLYING PROBLEM  III. PRODUCE SOLUTION IDEAS  IV. SELECT.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
IAF Certification/ Registration Bodies’ Member Satisfaction Program September 19, 2003 Final Report Summary.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
The Usage and Value of Local Search Sources comScore study findings / marketer application Stuart McKelvey, CEO - TMP Directional Marketing Search with.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
Prepared for: Vancouver Police Department Resident and Business Survey Prepared by: NRG Research Group April 4, 2007.
Community Health Assessment: Primary Data Collection LHD TA Project – Learning Collaborative 1 Community Health Assessment Second Learning Session Sheena.
Brand Image: Does it meet clients’ needs? Susan McNew.
Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008.
NWCPHP Summer Institute August 3, Coalition Steering Committee.
Copyright, © 2004, Theresa M. Welbourne, Ph.D. 1 HR Confidence June Leadership Pulse Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report June 16, 2004.
Teacher Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Indian and Northern Affaires indiennes Affairs Canada et du Nord Canada First Nation and Inuit Community Well-Being : Describing Historical Trends ( )
The General Plan UPDATE City Council Meeting September 19, 2011.
Membership Survey Survey Prepared by Bristol Omnifacts Research Lunenburg Yacht Club February 2008.
2005 All-Staff Survey: Survey Results Summary Presentation
Software Architecture Evaluation Methodologies Presented By: Anthony Register.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Peak Season Market Research Onsite Guest Intercept Surveys August 11, 2015 prepared by:
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
Sample Brand Q2 Facebook Report April - June 2015.
Vaga Associates Enquires: The North West is on the move … Cumbria is at the forefront! Story Board Progress on developing a Strategy for Sport.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Marketing Research Sample Report Outline Stephan Sorger NOT A TEMPLATE: PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THIS PPT, CROSS OUT SHISEIDO, AND ENTER.
MMPR30023 Research Project Artefact 1 N Tanya Wood.
© 2007 Arkenford Ltd Hastings and 1066 Country Visitor Study Rye Destination Profile.
2011 RTD Customer Satisfaction Research Results: Executive Summary – Ops Committee March 2013.
[School Name]’s Student Perception Survey Results This presentation is a template and should be customized to reflect the needs and context of your school.
Tourist Perceptions of Environmentally Friendly Innovations Kathleen Andereck Department of Recreation & Tourism Management Arizona State University.
© 2007 Arkenford Ltd Hastings and 1066 Country Visitor Study Bexhill on Sea Destination Profile.
Understanding the Values and Priorities of Central Floridians Prepared for the Central Florida Partnership August 26, 2016.
Redwood City School District
CAMPAIGN TEST NORTHERN LIGHTS CAMPAIGN GERMANY WINTER 2012
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
Shapley Value Regression
Natalie Baker and Stephanie McKenzie December 2007 – January 2008
HFFA Membership Study Results Wave 2
Presentation transcript:

Downtown Pittsburgh IDA Member Image Study Wave I Summary July 2007 Prepared by: STRATEGIC METRICS GROUP

2 METHODOLOGY Online survey sent via to approximately 1,200 IDA members on in June, Brief questionnaire solicited perception of Downtown Pittsburgh on an overall basis as well as on 18 specific attributes. A total of 139 respondents completed the questionnaire.

3 RESPONDENT PROFESSIONAL POSITION The vast majority of survey respondents have high-level positions in their respective downtown organizations.

4 KEY FINDINGS Overall Perception of Pittsburgh is good. –On a 1-9 scale of appeal, 51% gave a score of 7-9 and 73% gave a score of 6-9. The mean was 6.1. Pittsburgh is associated with being a “Sports Center” more so than any other attribute measured. The six attributes with the most potential to impact overall perception of Pittsburgh are: –Vibrant, Clean, Youthful, Innovative, High-tech and Energetic “Arts and Culture Center”, “Education Center”, “Unique” and “Corporate HQ” are among the attributes that are highly descriptive of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh is not considered to be “High-Tech”, “Edgy”, “Youthful” or “Green / Environmental.” These are the region’s best kept “secrets.” Any visit to Pittsburgh within the past 10 years is positively correlated to perceptions of Downtown.

5 SUMMARY OF VERBATIM COMMENTS N= 79 Respondents 116 Coded comments When you hear “Downtown Pittsburgh” what is the first thing that comes to mind? The legacy of steel manufacturing in Pittsburgh continues to define the city for many. Many comments related to buildings, bridges and other architectural aspects emerge as a common theme. Most comments were of a positive nature.

6 OVERALL PERCEPTION OF DOWNTOWN PITTSBURGH Not appealing at all Very appealing Please indicate your overall perception of Downtown Pittsburgh. Use a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 = “Not appealing at all” and 9 = “Very appealing” to indicate your response. Mean 6.16

7 SUMMARY OF DESCRIPTIVE ATTRIBUTES Top 3 Box % Predominant Attribute Highly Descriptive Moderately Descriptive Not at all Descriptive

8 Sorted By Difference Between Top 3 and Bottom 3 Box % Predominant Attribute Highly Descriptive Moderately Descriptive Not at all Descriptive Top 3 Box % Bottom 3 Box % SUMMARY OF DESCRIPTIVE ATTRIBUTES

9 MOST DESCRIPTIVE ATTRIBUTES Using a scale from 1 to 9 where 1 = ”Does not describe at all” and 9 = ”Describes very well”, indicate how well the following phrases describe Downtown Pittsburgh. Sports CenterArts and Culture Friendly Corporate HQ Mean 7.10 Mean 6.44 Mean 6.09 Mean 6.14

10 MOST DESCRIPTIVE ATTRIBUTES Using a scale from 1 to 9 where 1 = ”Does not describe at all” and 9 = ”Describes very well”, indicate how well the following phrases describe Downtown Pittsburgh. UniqueAttractive Education Center Mean 5.94Mean 5.75 Mean 5.91

11 MODERATELY DESCRIPTIVE ATTRIBUTES Using a scale from 1 to 9 where 1 = ”Does not describe at all” and 9 = ”Describes very well”, indicate how well the following phrases describe Downtown Pittsburgh. SafeBeautiful FunVibrant Mean 5.68 Mean 5.75 Mean 5.74 Mean 5.50

12 MODERATELY DESCRIPTIVE ATTRIBUTES Using a scale from 1 to 9 where 1 = ”Does not describe at all” and 9 = ”Describes very well”, indicate how well the following phrases describe Downtown Pittsburgh. EnergeticClean Innovative Mean 5.54 Mean 5.34 Mean 5.23

13 LEAST DESCRIPTIVE ATTRIBUTES Using a scale from 1 to 9 where 1 = ”Does not describe at all” and 9 = ”Describes very well”, indicate how well the following phrases describe Downtown Pittsburgh. High TechEdgy YouthfulGreen/Environmental Programs Mean 5.09 Mean 4.71 Mean 4.72Mean 4.46

14 FAMILIARITY WITH PITTSBURGH 60% have visited Pittsburgh within the past 3 years or less.

15 INFLUENCE OF VISITS ON PERCEPTIONS Top 3 Box % Those who have not been to the area in a while are most likely to define Pittsburgh by one dimension, Sports. Recent visitors are more likely to see Pittsburgh as edgy and “green.” Bold items reflect highest % of top 3 box for the attribute

DESIRABILITY DRIVER ANALYSIS

17 OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY Reveal the key triggers to overall perception with a product or brand, or in this case, a downtown region. Break down traditional “perception” measures into a salient attribute set that can be traced and tracked over time Prioritize and design initiatives targeted to improve overall perception. Purpose of Desirability Driver Analysis Combines 2 respondent measurements: 1 - Performance = The % of respondents w/ high ratings 2 - Impact = The rate of change in performance Basics of the Analysis The 2 measures are plotted on the Desirability Driver Map, a tool that prioritizes which attributes of product / brand warrant attention The Management Tool

18 THE DESIRABLITY DRIVER MAP The DDA Map combines performance ratings (perception) and impact values to classify and prioritize evaluation criteria into 4 categories: 1. Maintain 2. Critical Maintenance 3. Improve 4. Critical Improvement “Critical Improvement”, the fourth quadrant of the map, contains the attributes which have the greatest impact on Downtown Pittsburgh’s overall rating, and which currently are performing (rated) the worst. Improving the performance of “Critical Improvement” attributes will most directly improve the overall rating and overall perception of Downtown Pittsburgh. This quadrant’s attributes warrant the most attention.

19 DESIRABILITY DRIVER MAP 1. Maintain 3. Improve 2. Critical Maintenance 4. Critical Improvement IMPACT VALUE PERFORMANCE

20 DESIRABILITY DRIVER MAP Inn = Innovative Youth = Youthful E = Energetic Safe Hi-T = High Tech Clean Edgy Vibr = Vibrant Fun Green Attr = Attractive Ed = Education Center B = Beautiful Arts = Art/Cultural Center Fr = Friendly HQ = Corporate Headqtrs Uniq = Unique Sport = Sports Center Arts HQ Sport Ed Safe Green Edgy Uniq Fr Fun E Hi-T Inn Youth Clean Vibr Attr B 1. Maintain 3. Improve 2. Critical Maintenance 4. Critical Improvement IMPACT VALUE PERFORMANCE

21 SUMMARY OF DDA GRID The Critical Improvement quadrant displays the satisfaction components which have a higher than average impact on Downtown’s overall image, but a lower than average performance score. Critical Improvement areas: Vibrant Clean Youthful Innovative High-tech Energetic The Critical Maintenance quadrant displays the attributes which have a higher than average impact on overall Pittsburgh Image and a higher than average performance score. Critical Maintenance applies to the following: Critical Maintenance areas: Fun Attractive Unique Friendly Beautiful Improving the perception and association of Downtown Pittsburgh with these attributes is the most direct way to improve Downtown Pittsburgh’s overall perception.

22 RECOMMENDATIONS Leverage strength of attributes that currently define Pittsburgh. –Continue to promote Arts and Cultural District assets. –Use the Sports Center connection as a hook, but try to help audiences see the region beyond that. Get the word out on Pittsburgh’s lesser-known attributes. –“High-tech” and “Youthful” – Greater potential for overall impact –“Edgy” and “Green” – Much lower potential for impact Improve attributes that matter the most –Focus on improving the perception of Pittsburgh on the attributes that fall in the Critical Improvement quadrant will have the most impact on overall perception.

23 Questionnaire