Uses of Safety Performance Functions and Potential for Safety Improvement Values David L. Piper, P.E. Illinois Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roadway Safety for Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation.
Advertisements

Robert Herling, Planner Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Council A Quantitative Assessment Method For System Safety.
Presented by Nazir Lalani P.E TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATIONS (Pedestrians and Bicyclists)
 Crashes at rural STOP controlled Intersections  Primary cause where drivers stopped before entering:
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
HSM Implementation Tools Safety Analyst
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
Incorporating Safety into the Transportation Planning Process 62 nd Illinois Traffic Engineering and Safety Conference October 23, 2013.
May 13 th, 2014 City of Akron, Ohio Intersection Safety Study State Route 59 / Main Street / Howard Street.
March 2014 Water Resource Permitting Purpose & Need.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Driving Zero Fatalities to a Reality: Partnering for Safety Priscilla Tobias, PE State Safety Engineer, Bureau Chief Illinois Department of Transportation.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways Predicting Crash Frequency and Applying CMF’s for Two-Lane Rural Highway Intersections - Session #6 6-1.
Roadway Safety For Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation.
Investigation of Varied Time Intervals in Crash Hotspot Identification Authors: Wen Cheng, Ph.D., P.E., Fernando Gonzalez, EIT, & Xudong Jia; California.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Implementation Plan.
ALDOT HSIP FUNDING OPPORTUNTIES ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF SAFETY OPERATIONS SONYA BAKER TIMOTHY BARNETT MAY 13, 2015.
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Session 10 Training Opportunities Brief Overview of Related Courses in USA / Canada Geni Bahar, P.E. NAVIGATS Inc.
NE 203 rd Street & NE 215 th Street Intersection Improvements between US 1 & West Dixie Highway Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Upcoming Project Development.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Using Data To Drive Down Fatalities Roseanne Nance Bureau of Safety Engineering Illinois Department of Transportation.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
SPFs Applications by State DOTs John Milton Ph.D., P.E., Washington State Department of Transportation National Safety Performance Function Summit July.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.
Jason J. Siwula, PE – Safety Engineer DOES 24+0=22+2? AN INTRO TO HSM METHODS.
Role of SPFs in SafetyAnalyst Ray Krammes Federal Highway Administration.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
The Highway Safety Manual: A New Tool for Safety Analysis John Zegeer, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc. HSM Production Team Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
An Examination of “Fault,” “Unsafe Driving Acts” and “Total Harm” in Car-Truck Collisions Forrest Council (HSRC) David Harkey (HSRC) Daniel Nabors (BMI)
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Unsignalized Intersections Safety at Unsignalized Intersections.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
July 29 and 30, 2009 SPF Development in Illinois Yanfeng Ouyang Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Data-Driven Approaches to Crime and Traffic Safety (DDACTS)
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
1 Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Initiative Jack Ference United States Department of Transportation 2006 ITS World Congress 8-12 October 2006.
Route 12B Safety Improvement Project New York State Department of Transportation Mark Silo, P.E. Thomas J. Madison, Jr. Regional DirectorCommissioner.
US 25 Corbin to London Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting December 2011.
Robert Herling, Planner Duluth-Superior Metropolitan Interstate Council A Quantitative Assessment Method For System Safety.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
Impact of Intersection Angle on Safety HSIS Annual Liaison Meeting David Harkey, Bo Lan, Daniel Carter, Raghavan Srinivasan, Anusha Patel Nujjetty May.
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
Session 2 History How did SPF come into being and why is it here to stay? Geni Bahar, P.E. NAVIGATS Inc.
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
Road Safety Audits Road School, 2011 Rick Drumm, P.E. Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration.
TRAFFIC SAFETY Presented By Sgt. Debra Newsome Canton Police Department.
HSM Applications to Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections - Session #9.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Evgeniya Tyson University of Wyoming.  Elk Mountain ( Mileposts, 77)  Evanston – Sisters (6-29 Mileposts, 23 total)  Rock Springs – Green River.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Comparing Systemic Approaches: A Kentucky Example
Data Driven Safety Analysis in the Project Development Process: State Practices Integrating Safety Performance into ALL Highway Investment Decisions.
Crash Analysis of Lincoln Way and Dakota Ave. Ames, IA
Statewide Lane Reconfiguration Screening
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Doug Harwood Midwest Research Institute
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Presentation transcript:

Uses of Safety Performance Functions and Potential for Safety Improvement Values David L. Piper, P.E. Illinois Department of Transportation

Applications of SPF and PSI Using the HSIP Five Percent Report Safety Analysis in Phase I Quantitative Site Analysis July 29 and 30, 20092

Using the HSIP Five Percent Report Is my location a “5%” site? – Map – Illinois Roadway Information System (IRIS) location July 29 and 30, 20093

Five Percent Reporting July 29 and 30, PSI = 152 Fixed Object and Overturn = 51% Rear End and Same Direction Sideswipe = 35%

Five Percent Reporting July 29 and 30, Driving too fast for conditions = 45%

Listing of Crashes July 29 and 30,

Using SPF and PSI Information in Phase I Creation of the 5% Report requires a look at 100% of sites. Weighting of PSI supports goal to reduce K’s and A’s Substantive safety measure at project level Breakdown by segments and intersections within the project 7

Using SPF and PSI Information in Phase I Suggested triggers for Road Safety Assessment if: – PSI is 10 or higher – Segment or intersection in top 33% of its peer group – If segment or intersection has PSI 50% higher than adjacent similar location(s) July 29 and 30, 20098

Quantitative Site Analysis Is this intersection performing poorly? 9 Thru AADT = 2575 Stop AADT = 2650 Experience = 7 crashes in 5 years. (‘04 – ‘08) 1.4 crashes per year 1 Fatal Crash Recent PDO crash in 12/08, and A-Injury crash in 01/09 HSM: N spf 4ST = exp[ xln(AADT maj ) xln(AADT min )] = 2.61 crashes/year (No night crashes) IDOT SPF: N K+I = exp(-8.05)*((AADT major )^0.674)*((AADT minor )^0.272) = 0.55 K+I crashes per 5 years.

Quantitative Site Analysis Countermeasures Completed – Lighting – Improve sight distance (hedge clearing) – Relocated utility sign Countermeasures Under Consideration – Improved warning signs – Police private signs on ROW July 29 and 30,

Quantitative Site Analysis Is this intersection performing poorly? July 29 and 30, Thru AADT = 2300 Stop AADT = 650 Experience = 10 crashes in 5 years. (‘04 – ‘08) 2.0 crashes per year 1 Fatal Crash 3 A-Injury Crashes 2B-Injury Crashes HSM: N spf 4ST = exp[ xln(AADT maj ) xln(AADT min )] = 1.04 crashes/year IDOT SPF: N K+I = exp(-8.05)*((AADT major )^0.674)*((AADT minor )^0.272) = 0.34 K+I crashes per 5 years.

Quantitative Site Analysis Countermeasures Completed – Removed trees in sight triangle Countermeasures Under Consideration – Improved warning signs – Police private signs on ROW – Lighting Overall – Quantitative analysis supports actions taken, and informs future decisions. July 29 and 30,

Summary SPF/PSI Products Support – Identification of safety opportunities – IDOT goal to reduce K’s and A’s – Office review of 5% locations – Focus of resources to best effect – Credibility of analysis SPF/PSI Products will Support – SafetyAnalyst – Highway Safety Manual July 29 and 30,

Thank you July 29 and 30,