Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Focus on Teaching and Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
The Teacher Work Sample
Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades 6–12: Focus on Teaching and Learning.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Planning for Student Engagement with Problem Solving Nicole Beck.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Focus on Teaching and Learning.
Excellence in Teaching and Learning Every Student Counts: Connections to Assessment.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM Rigor Breakdown Part 2: Procedural Skill and Fluency.
 Mathematics Progressions – Common Core Elizabeth Gamino, Fresno Unified Public Schools Denise Walston, Council of the Great City Schools.
Summer Institutes 2013 Change Teacher Practice Change Student Outcomes.
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
The Research and Practice of Classroom Assessment Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
 Honor the challenge in this work and set the tone for teachers as learners  Build conceptual knowledge of fractions, and acknowledge most of us come.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
UNWRAPPING THE MATH BUNDLES DIANE FOLEY, NETWORK LEADER CFN 204 Paul Perskin
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades K-5: Focus on Content Standards.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Universal Design for Learning
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Focus on Teaching and Learning.
Section 2 Systems of Professional Learning Module 2 Grades 6-12: Focus on Content Standards.
Sharing and Building Ideas Fayette Long Walden University Sherry Lambertson Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology, EDUC-6714 D-2 November.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Tiffany Harrell “The goal for every student is to learn, but not every child learns in the same way.” (Firchow, 2011)
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Section 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Focus on Teaching and Learning.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Diving Deeper: understanding the UDL Guidelines your application of UDL theory.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus- Grade 3.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Where does it fit? 2016.
Creative Intervention Planning through Universal Design for Learning MariBeth Plankers, M.S. CCC-SLP Page 127.
2016 Where does it fit? Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Section 5 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Focus on Teaching and Learning.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades 6–12: Focus on Teaching and Learning.
Stephanie L. Craig, M.Ed. University of Kansas
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Principles and Strategies of Formative Assessment
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Universal Design for Learning
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Guided Math.
Presentation transcript:

Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 3 Grades K–5: Focus on Teaching and Learning

Section 1 Page 7 6

Section 1 In Module 2 you: Examined the implications of the language of the content standards for teaching and learning. Analyzed the progression of topics in the content standards both within and across grade levels. Identified and modified CCS-aligned tasks that combine both the content and practice standards. Explored strategies for supporting teachers as they make changes to their classroom practices. 7

Section 1 8 “Conceptual understanding refers to an integrated and functional grasp of mathematical ideas.” Adding it Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics (2001)

Section 1 9 “ Procedural skill and fluency is demonstrated when students can perform calculations with speed and accuracy.” Achieve the Core “Fluency promotes automaticity, a critical capacity that allows students to reserve their cognitive resources for higher-level thinking.” EngageNY

Section 1 The Standards call for students to use math flexibly for applications. Teachers provide opportunities for students to apply math in authentic contexts. Teachers in content areas outside of math, particularly science, ensure that students are using math to make meaning of and access content. 10 Frieda & Parker (2012) Achieve the Core (2012)

Section 1 In Module 2 you: Examined the implications of the language of the content standards for teaching and learning. Analyzed the progression of topics in the content standards both within and across grade levels. Identified and modified CCS-aligned tasks that combine both the content and practice standards. Explored strategies for supporting teachers as they make changes to their classroom practices. 11

Section 1 12 Source:

Section 1 13 For more Information:

Section 1 In Module 2 you: Examined the implications of the language of the content standards for teaching and learning. Analyzed the progression of topics in the content standards both within and across grade levels. Identified and modified CCS-aligned tasks that combine both the content and practice standards. Explored strategies for supporting teachers as they make changes to their classroom practices. 14

Section 1 Scaffolding Open Questions Parallel Tasks C-R-A 15

Section 1 Illustrative Mathematics 16 Achieve the Core Smarter Balanced Mathematics Assessment Project

Section 1 In Module 2 you: Examined the implications of the language of the content standards for teaching and learning. Analyzed the progression of topics in the content standards both within and across grade levels. Identified and modified CCS-aligned tasks that combine both the content and practice standards. Explored strategies for supporting teachers as they make changes to their classroom practices. 17

Section 1 18 Group 1: Journals Group 2: Mathematical Language Group 3: Fluency Group 4: Group Work & Decision Making 1.How can this strategy/resource support the CCS-Math content and practice standards? 2.Generate at least one new idea for the use of the strategy/resource with students.

Section 1 19 Sharing Implementation Experiences 1.Each participant will discuss with their table group one Positive Highlight, one Challenge, and one Lesson Learned from their personal implementation of the Content Standards thus far. 2.Each table group will then determine two Positive Highlights, one common Challenge, and one common Lesson Learned that they will present to the larger group. 3.Participants will record notes and “New Ideas” generated from the discussion. Guide Pages 8-9 Positive Highlights Challenges Lessons Learned Pages 7–8

Section 2 Page 10

Section 1 What instructional strategies were discussed in Module 1 and Module 2? How does the use of these strategies benefit student learning? 21

Section 1 Universal Design for Learning is a scientifically valid framework for guiding educational practices. 22 CAST (2011)

Section 1 Universal Design for Learning principles include guidance on providing flexibility in: The way information is presented The ways students respond or demonstrate knowledge and skills The ways students are engaged AND….. 23 CAST (2011)

Section 1 Universal Design for Learning principles also include guidance on: Reducing barriers in instruction Providing appropriate accommodations, supports, and challenges Expectations for all students including students with disabilities and students who are limited English proficient 24 CAST (2011)

Section 1 25 CAST (2011) Providing options for: Perception Language, mathematical expressions, and symbols Comprehension Resourceful, knowledgeable learners Recognition Networks

Section 1 26 CAST (2011) Providing options for: Physical action Expression and communication Executive functions Strategic, goal-oriented learners Strategic Networks

Section 1 27 CAST (2011) Providing options for: Recruiting interest Sustaining effort and persistence Self-regulation Purposeful, motivated learners Affective Networks

Section 1 28 Access in-depth information about the UDL Principles here: With your group explore your assigned UDL Guideline and determine the following: How you would explain this guideline to teachers? Create 2–3 examples of beginning strategies that teachers can incorporate into their lessons to address this guideline.

Section 1 29 UDL can support teachers implementation of the CCS-Math Standards. The strategies that have been discussed for implementing the CCS-Math Standards overlap with the strategies that can be used to meet the UDL Guidelines and Checkpoints. Think about, plan for, and implement the UDL strategies strategically. Begin with those that will have the greatest impact on YOUR students.

Section 1 30

Section 3 Page 16

Section 1 32 Page 16

Section 1 5.NF.1 Add and subtract fractions with unlike denominators (including mixed numbers) by replacing given fractions with equivalent fractions in such a way as to produce an equivalent sum or difference of fractions with like denominators. 5.NF.2 Solve word problems involving addition and subtraction of fractions referring to the same whole, including cases of unlike denominators, e.g., by using visual fraction models or equations to represent the problem. Use benchmark fractions and number sense of fractions to estimate mentally and assess the reasonableness of answers. 33

Section 1 Tito and Luis are stuffed with pizza! Tito ate one- fourth of a cheese pizza. Tito ate three-eighths of a pepperoni pizza. Tito ate one-half of a mushroom. Luis ate five-eighths of a cheese pizza. Luis ate the other half of the mushroom pizza. All the pizzas were the same size. Tito says that he ate more pizza than Luis because Luis did not eat any pepperoni pizza. Luis says they each ate the same amount of pizza. Who is correct? Show all of your mathematical thinking. 34

Section 1 Provide students with different versions of the task as needed Read the task Clarify language Clarify mathematics Clarify facts Check for understanding of problem situation Activate prior knowledge and address possible misconceptions Activate problem solving Clarify expectations Provide a process Provide graphic organizer and checklist 35

Section 1 Step 1: With your group, determine what standard(s) you want to address in your lesson. Step 2: Find a task that you will use as the main lesson task from those provided on Illustrative Mathematics. Step 3: Use the planning questions provided to outline your lesson. Step 4: Present your lesson outline. 36

Section 1 37

Section 4 Page 25

Section 1 Identify a Key Idea about UDL. Set 1 or 2 implementation goals that support the Key Idea. Determine the steps to take in order to help teachers meet the goal(s). 39

Section 1 Identify a Key Idea about UDL. 40 Key Idea: UDL focuses on providing a variety of options that allow all students to be successful.

Section 1 Set 1 or 2 implementation goals that support the Key Idea. Implementation Goal 1: Teachers will have students work in groups in order to foster collaboration and community (P3, G8, C8.3). 41

Section 1 Determine the steps to take in order to help teachers meet the goal(s). Help teachers to create a peer coaching environment that allows students to discuss individual solution strategies in order to get assistance and feedback. Help teachers to understanding how to group students for maximum impact. Help teachers develop guidelines that students can use during group work. 42

Section 1 Identify a Key Idea about UDL. Set 1 or 2 implementation goals that support the Key Idea. Determine the steps to take in order to help teachers meet the goal(s). 43 Page 25

Section 1 Center for Applied Special Technology National Center on Universal Design for Learning The Universal Design for Learning Implementation and Research Network NYC Tasks, Units, & Student Work ibrary/tasksUnitsStudentWork/default.htm 44 Page 27

Section 1 What questions and/or concerns do you anticipate coming from the teachers you work with? What are teachers doing now that you want to build off of as you introduce UDL? 45 Page 27

Section 5 Page 29

Section 1 47 Page 29 Maria cuts 12 feet of ribbon into three equal pieces so she can share it with her two sisters. How long is each piece? Maria has 12 feet of ribbon and wants to wrap some gifts. Each gift needs 3 feet of ribbon. How many gifts can she wrap using the ribbon?

Section 1 48

Section 1 49

Section 1 Assessments designed to provide information regarding the level of student, school, or program success at an end point in time. 50 “Summative”

Section 1 In other words: Assessments that happen after learning is supposed to have occurred to determine if it did. Stiggins, et al. (2007) 51 “Summative”

Section 1 “Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievements of intended instructional outcomes.” CCSSO (2012) 52 “Summative” “Formative”

Section 1 When the cook tastes the soup that is formative; when the guest tastes the soup that is summative. R. Stake 53

Section 1 “Few interventions have the same level of impact as assessment for learning. The most intriguing result is that while all students show achievement gains, the largest gains accrue to the lowest achievers. ” Stiggins, et al. (2007, p. 37) 54

Section 1 “ …formative assessment does improve student learning. The gains in achievement appear to be quite considerable, …, among the largest ever reported for educational interventions.” Black & Wiliam, Assessment in Education (1998, p. 61) 55

Section 1 “ The effect of assessment for learning on student achievement is some four or five times greater than the effect of reduced class size. ” Ehrenberg, Brewer, Gamoran & Willms (2001) 56

Section 1 “The FAST SCASS regards formative assessment practices as essential tools for teachers in supporting students to meet the rigorous demands of the Common Core State Standards, which emphasize higher levels of thinking for all students.” CCSSO (2012) 57

Section 1 58 Page 32

Section 1 59 Learning targets: Focus on what students will learn, not what they will do. Success Criteria: Observable and measurable behaviors to be reached.

Section 1 60 Informal assessment activities can be conducted by the teacher, by peers, or may involve self-reflection by the student. Evidence of learning can be elicited in a variety of ways. Can be planned for or done spontaneously.

Section 1 61 Gaps or misunderstandings in student’s prior knowledge may be discovered. Interpreting evidence is not just the job of the teacher. Instructional plans may need to be adjusted.

Section 1 62 Teachers provide timely, descriptive feedback that is actionable. Instructional plans may need to be adjusted. Students can also receive feedback through self- assessment or peer- assessment.

Section 1 63

Section 1 At your table groups, create a web of ideas for eliciting evidence of learning on poster paper. 64 Eliciting Evidence

Section 1 65 An assessment functions formatively to the extent that evidence about student achievement is elicited, interpreted, and used by teachers, learners, or their peers to make decisions about the next steps in instruction that are likely to be better, or better founded, than the decisions they would have made in absence of that evidence. Dylan Wiliam (2011, p. 43)

Section 1 66

Section 6 Page 35

Section 1 “… what students learn as a result of our instruction is unpredictable.” “Assessment is, indeed, the bridge between teaching and learning.” Wiliam (2011) 68

Section 1 Activating students as learning resources for one another Activating students as owners of their own learning Wiliam (2011) 69

Section 1 The learning environment must provide for group goals—students are working as a group, not merely working in a group. There is individual accountability— there are no “passengers” within the group. 70

Section 1 Read the “Practical Techniques” for accomplishing this on page 35 in your Participant Guide. Discuss with your group, the pros/cons of the various techniques. Which would you most like to see your teachers implement back in your school/district and why? 71 Activating students as learning resources for one another

Section 1 Students take an active part in monitoring and regulating their learning. To maximize learning, the focus needs to be on personal growth rather than on a comparison with others. Wiliam (2007) Techniques: Traffic lights, Learning portfolios 72 Activating students as owners of their own learning

Section 7 Page 38

Section 1 Read the instructions on top of the Needs Identification worksheet on page 38. Record on “stickies” up to three common needs for each stakeholder and place these on the appropriate chart paper. 74

Page 40

Section 1 By the end of this session you will have: Strengthened your working relationship with peer Core Standards Coaches. Deepened your understanding of the Practice and Content standards specified in the CCS-Math. Articulate a common understanding of UDL. Identified the importance of incorporating UDL practices into lessons. Described the alignment of instructional practices and learning expectations of the CCS-Math. 76

Section 1 By the end of this session you will have: Planned for implementing UDL strategies within classroom lessons. Measured progress towards learning targets using the formative assessment process. Explored strategies for supporting teachers as they make changes to their classroom practices. Made plans for next steps in your CCS-Math implementation. 77

Section 1 Where Are You Now? Assessing Your Learning. Please complete an online Session Evaluation. Your feedback is very important to us! 78