2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Program Review: Curriculum & Institutional Culture Julie Bruno, Sierra College David.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Student Learning Outcomes at PCC Adapted from a presentation to the PCC Board of Trustees in 2007.

Advertisements

A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.

Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment

Mark Renner and Dave Bazard O VERVIEW OF 2014 A CCREDITATION I NSTITUTE P RESENTED BY : A CADEMIC S ENATE OF CCC, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH ACCJC AND C OMMUNITY.

An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.

2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES: SLOs IN CORs? Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Lesley Kawaguchi,

Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.

Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.

Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements

Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.

Robert Cormia Dolores Davison Isaac Escoto WELCOME TO THE FOOTHILL ACADEMIC SENATE.

Accreditation Challenges in Multi-College Districts ASCCC Accreditation Institute Friday, February 20, 2015, 3:45 pm - 5:00 pm Bill Scroggins, President,

FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)

1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.

August 3,  Review “Guiding Principles for SLO Assessment” (ASCCC, 2010)  Review Assessment Pulse Roundtable results  Discuss and formulate our.

2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 The Basic Map: Course Outlines High quality course outlines are the foundations of.

Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.

Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.

Proficiency and Beyond! The ACCJC Rubric for Institutional Effectiveness in SLOs Julie Bruno, Facilitator Kristina Allende, Mt. San Antonio College Eric.

PRESIDENT’S REPORT Academic Senate Carol Kimbrough, MA, MFT November 25, 2014.

IMPROVE STUDENT LEARNING for Institutional Effectiveness THE REASON: Improvement of Student Learning and Institutional Support Services THE OCCASION: Regional.

When Bad Shift Happens To Good Colleges… Keeping Faculty Leadership Involved in Times of Crisis Julie Bruno, Sierra College Dolores Davison, Foothill College.

1 How and Why to Share Governance at a College A Faculty Council of Community Colleges Presentation By Tina Good, FCCC President.

Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.

KATIE TOWNSEND-MERINO, PALOMAR COLLEGE KEVIN BONTENBAL, CUESTA COLLEGE JOHN NIXON, ACCJC ASCCC ACCREDITATION INSTITUTE, 2012 Implementing Improvement Plans.

Accreditation Hot Topics Marcy Alancraig - Cabrillo College Janet Fulks - Bakersfield College.

Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.

Self-Study Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Final Discussion and Approval Academic Senate Executive Committee June 13 and 20, 2011.

ACCREDITATION, SELF-STUDIES, AND FACULTY ROLES

Accreditation Kevin Bontenbol Julie Bruno Michelle Grimes-Hillman 1.

Incorporating SLOs and Assessment into Program Review, Planning and Resource Allocation in a Time of Budget Reduction Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator.

Creating a Process to Rapidly Respond to Urgent Issues Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Kale Braden, Cosumnes River College Debbie Klein, Gavilan.

Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.

Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.

Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”

2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Cul de Sac? PROGRAM REDUCTION AND DISCONTINUANCE Julie Bruno, Sierra College Sidney.

SLO + Assessment: Guiding Principles, Roles & Processes David Morse, Long Beach City College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Joseph Bielanski, Peralta / Berkeley.

Student Success  What is it?  How can we assess it?  Whose responsibility is it?  What role do you play?

Accreditation Overview Winter 2016 Mallory Newell, Accreditation Liaison Office.

Budgets, Dialog and Sustainability Chris Hill, Grossmont College Virginia May, Sacramento City College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College.

Accreditation 101 Julie Bruno, Sierra College Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College, facilitator Susan Clifford, ACCJC,

2010 Fall SLO Regional November 5, 2010 Sierra College.

The Substantive Change Process: What is it and why should you care? ASCCC Accreditation Institute February 11, 2012.

Evaluating Governance Processes (including multicollege districts) Standard IV Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Maggie Taylor, Fresno City College.

Judy Beachler, Cosumnes River College Julie Bruno, Sierra College Richard Mahon, Riverside City College The Accreditation Team(s)

2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Curriculum, Budgets, and Enrollment Management Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Ian.

HOW INSTITUTIONS MAKE MEANINGFUL CHANGE WITH OUTCOME ASSESSMENT MARCH 21, 2014 MIRAMAR COLLEGE: A CULTURE OF IMPROVEMENT.

January, 2010 Betsy Ott, Charlotte Creason Co-Chairs, Assessment Committee Molly McCoy Assistant Director, Institutional Effectiveness 1.

Navigating the PCAH and the Curriculum Reference Guide Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Marie Boyd, Chaffey College Erik Shearer, Napa Valley College.

Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.

 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.

CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.

ACCREDITATION ISSUES Presented By Claudette H. Williams.

Local Senates and Boards

Navigating the PCAH and the Curriculum Reference Guide

Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review

Curriculum and Emotions – Solving Problems and Managing Conflict

Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here

Integrated Budget Process as Evidence of Institutional Effectiveness

SLOs and Course Objectives

Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.

Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: Understanding Standard I WITH GUIDANCE ON I.B.3 AND I.B.6 Stephanie Droker, Vice.

For Excellence in Accreditation… “Moorpark it”

The Chancellor’s Office Task Force on Accreditation Report

The Course Outline of Record

Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College

Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair

Inquiry into Effective Practices of SLO Assessment AScCC Educational policies committee Anna Bruzzese ASCCC South Representative; ASCCC Educational Policies.

Update from the Academic Senate

Presenters Lesley Agostino, Diablo Valley College

Presentation transcript:

2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 Program Review: Curriculum & Institutional Culture Julie Bruno, Sierra College David Morse, Long Beach City College

Overview Program Review: What is it and why is it important? Important elements of program review Integration of SLOs into program review Connections to planning, budgeting, etc. Clear definition of goals Considerations in developing program review processes Local questions, issues, and problems

Program Review Definition—What is program review? Why is program review important?

Important Elements of Program Review Connection to budget and planning Incorporating and using SLO data Information feeds up through levels Clear definition of goals Build in feedback to college throughout process Broad involvement of all appropriate constituent groups Coherent and accessible system for tracking and recording information and data

SLOs and Program Review ACCJC expects that SLO data will be included and used in program review processes. Local colleges can decide exactly how to most usefully incorporate that data, which leads to the following important questions:  How will SLO data be included and recorded?  How will SLO data be used in decision-making?

Connecting Program Review to Budget and Planning Without this connection, most will not see program review as meaningful. Colleges should therefore consider questions such as the following:  How does information move forward for inclusion in budgeting decisions?  How do such aspects of planning as college goals, the college president’s agenda, and board goals connect to or interact with program review?  How is information on decision-making communicated back to the college?

Clear Definition of Goals Make sure goal statements are concrete and realistic and that they lead to specifically observable outcomes Differentiate between goals, activities, resource requests, and mission statements

Developing Program Review Processes David’s and Julie’s experiences in developing new processes: Include all necessary elements and constituencies in development. Include avenues for feedback and buy-in from the college as a whole. Develop the process first, then the recording mechanism (software, etc.) in order to make sure the tool does not shape the process.

Resources Program Review: Setting a Standard (Academic Senate Paper 2009) The 2002 Accreditation Standards: Implementation (Academic Senate Paper 2004) Data 101: Guiding Principles for Faculty (Academic Senate Paper 2010) “SLO Regional Meetings Address Collaborating for High Standards in Program Review” (Senate Rostrum May 2009)

Questions and Issues What questions or problems have come up on local campuses? What has worked well in your program review processes? What do you need more information on?