Sharing Lessons Learned Sister Patricia Garrahan, S.N.D. NCEA, Baltimore April 12, 2007 Available at www.xbss.org www.xbss.org Resources and Links.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

Strategic Visioning Process Pleasant Valley District #62
© Pathways Forward Transitional Ministry Consulting 2010 An Introduction to Transitional Ministry A Resource for Churches in Transition.
USE OF REGIONAL NETWORKS FOR POLICY INFLUENCE: THE HIS KNOWLEDGE HUB EXPERIENCE Audrey Aumua and Maxine Whittaker Health Information Systems Knowledge.
A Strategic Plan to Address Key Result Areas (KRAs) from the Port Kells Assessment.
Catholic Identity Who are we?. EiCE Domain 1 - Catholic Life and Religious Education 1.5 RELIGIOUS LIFE OF THE SCHOOL (Elements- Nurturing The Story;
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Formation: Intentionally Passing on Mercy Culture.
Revised criteria for the Order of the Ministry. The personThe work  Qualifications ◦ 10 qualities anticipated in persons engaged in ministry in the CCDOC.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Succession Planning at Providence Health Care Carl Roy, President & CEO CHAC Presentation May 6, 2006.
Core principles in the ASX CGC document. Which one do you think is the most important and least important? Presented by Casey Chan Ethics Governance &
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
St John Bosco Academy Presentation. 6 key areas: Why Change? What is a MAC? What are the main benefits to our schools in becoming a multi academy? What.
District Accreditation February 20, 2015 Colleen Rohowsky Office of the Director, DoDDS-Europe,
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL LEADERS DR. Robert Buchanan Southeast Missouri State University.
Understanding Boards Building Connections: Community Leadership Program.
Successful Partnerships between Faith Communities and Faith Based Nonprofits Keeping Services Faithful.
Exemplary Youth Ministry in Congregations Outcomes: Evidence of Mature Christian Faith in Youth.
Exploring Governance Structures of Community Sponsored Schools: Lessons for Everyone NCEA Convention 2007 ▫ Baltimore Brother Lawrence Harvey, CFX Xaverian.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
A Guide for Navigators 1National Disability Institute.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 College of St. Scholastica Board of Trustees Retreat October 28, 2010 Minnesuing Acres Sponsorship Presentation Sister Kathleen Hofer.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Leadership Workshop Winnetka Congregational Church, March 10, 2013.
1 Vision-Based Mission Planning Monson, Krejci and Associates.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Developing Educational Leaders for Catholic Schools Alice Hession Xaverian Brothers Sponsored Schools.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Marin Lutheran Church Constitution Task Force Forum 3: Proposed Structure.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
2 Tree of Life Christian Fellowship Strategic Planning September 23, 2007 Tree of Life Christian Fellowship —where hope grows!
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
The Successful President What is success and who gets to decide when it’s been achieved?
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Africa nazarene university Board of Trust and University Council Planning Retreat and Annual Meeting October 29-31, 2012.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
Faculty/Staff Formation Alice I Hession, Director of Formation
Faculty/Staff Formation Alice I. Hession Director of Formation Xaverian Brothers Sponsored Schools.
Solano County Office of Education Jay Speck Solano County Superintendent of Schools.
Collaboration and Coalition Building Presented by Prevention Services of ETP Inc. and DMHAS’ Prevention Unit.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Exploring Governance Structures of Community Sponsored Schools: Lessons for Everyone NCEA Convention 2006 ▫ Atlanta, GA Brother Lawrence Harvey, CFX Xaverian.
Working Together in Mission LaSallian Association of Secondary School Chief Administrators February 21, 2016.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Stewards of the Promise The Faith Role of Catholic School Trustees
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Sharing Lessons Learned Sister Patricia Garrahan, S.N.D. NCEA, Baltimore April 12, 2007 Available at Resources and Links

This session “Managing your organization by the evidence” Religious community sponsorship lessons Sharing ideas as to how these might apply in your own situation

McKinsey & Company Mission: To help leaders make distinctive, lasting and substantial improvements in performance and constantly build a great firm that attracts, develops and retains exceptional people.

McKinsey & Company Managing your organization by the evidence Managing your organization by the evidence Analyzed: 230 businesses worldwide  looking a wide range of management practices to improve organizational capacity (ability to unite around common goals, execute efficiently and renew itself over the longer term)

Findings (over 100,000 questionnaires) Simplistic solutions don’t work High performing companies have a basic proficiency with all available practices A combination of energy focused on 3 practices is most effective at creating high levels of near-term organizational performance and longer term organizational health

Least effective practices— when used alone Carrot and stick incentive Focus on key performance indicators and targets Command and control (telling people what to do and checking up) Relying on detailed strategy and plan

Combination of practices consistently the best for a clear record of success Clear roles within the structure along with accountability A leader who articulates a compelling vision of the future Strong culture within the organization that encourages openness, trust and challenge.

Being a religious community sponsored school doesn’t guarantee these qualities but over time we have developed some structures and practices which can help to facilitate these.

Clear Roles and Responsibilities GOVERNANCE issues:  Who defines expectations (sets policies)  Who grants power  Who verifies performance (accountability )

Traditional model Religious congregations were owners and operators of schools and served as primary link with the Church, maintaining Catholic Identity. Schools were our “family businesses.”

Defining Sponsorship Sponsorship of an apostolate or ministry is a formal relationship between a recognized Catholic organization and a legally formed entity entered into for the sake of promoting and sustaining the Church’s mission in the world. Francis G. Morrisey, OMI Sponsorship usually entails three important elements 1. Use of one’s name 2. Exercise of certain governance responsibilities 3. Accountability to Church authorities

Restructured Relationships “Members” Group—reserved powers with regard to mission fidelity (both canonical and civil responsibilities) Board of Trustees and Chief Executive Officer—management of the institution (Board of Limited Jurisdiction)

Accountability “Members” spell out expectations for mission fidelity Congregation provides resources for mission formation Boards use mission criteria in decision making and report on mission effectiveness progress

Articulate a Compelling Vision Most congregations have a set of foundational documents, core values, educational principles All have “heroes” in education, stories of obstacles overcome, wider connections to other times and places.

These can serve as “hooks” for hanging Catholic identity

Creative Fidelity Context of the larger mission of Catholic education Links to Catholic Social Teaching Serving students with diverse needs Financing schools Global solidarity

Strong culture that encourages openness, trust and challenge Religious congregations have traditions of education, spirituality and formation that helped them to form abstract concepts like mercy and justice into practical guides for action. Don’t tire people out with the stories of the founder but use them as the starting point for conversations about what does it mean to be an educator today in that tradition.

On-going conscious efforts at adult faith formation as part of the culture of the school Adult faith formation is not exclusively about information; it is primarily about providing opportunities, within a faith context, for adults to talk with other adults about things that matter. As such, the best process for adult faith formation is not lecture but conversation.

What is Xaverian Sponsorship? Governance structures Formational Programs Networking Opportunities Guiding Principles through which the Xaverian Brothers and our collaborators have come to ensure that the schools that bear our name live up to who we say they should be and who they as an institution claim to be.

Governance Structure Congregational Leadership MembersMembers Board of Directors Board Hold Reserve powers Canonical powers Appoint Members Hold reserve powers to protect and ensure mission 1.Appoint Directors 2.Real Property 3.Corporate Documents 4.Approve Debt 5.Associated Legal Entities AlienationMission

Guiding Principles Calls & Goals Call to stewardship for the Xaverian Educational mission and participation in the Church’s ministry of Catholic Education. Call to stewardship for the Xaverian Educational mission and participation in the Church’s ministry of Catholic Education. Call to become centers of faith that articulate, transmit, and live Christian values. Call to become centers of faith that articulate, transmit, and live Christian values.

Guiding Principles Call to provide a challenging academic program that promotes the full development of each person’s giftedness Call to provide a challenging academic program that promotes the full development of each person’s giftedness Call to be centers of Christian concern for justice and peace Call to be centers of Christian concern for justice and peace

Guiding Principles Call to affirm and celebrate life Call to affirm and celebrate life in community in community Call to value and support the dignity and self worth of those directly involved in the Church’s ministry of education Call to value and support the dignity and self worth of those directly involved in the Church’s ministry of education

Vision of Xaverian Sponsorship Enduring personal relationships Enduring personal relationships Sense of Christian stewardship Sense of Christian stewardship Centrality of religious instruction, spiritual formation, worship & prayer Centrality of religious instruction, spiritual formation, worship & prayer Character and value development Character and value development Challenging educational program Challenging educational program Spirit of harmony Spirit of harmony A passion for justice and peace A passion for justice and peace

Formational Programs Teacher Orientation Teacher Orientation New Board Member Orientation New Board Member Orientation Administrator Orientation Administrator Orientation XBSS Student Retreat XBSS Student Retreat Experienced Teachers Retreat Experienced Teachers Retreat Faculty/Staff Faith Formation Programs Faculty/Staff Faith Formation Programs Leadership Development Leadership Development

INDIVIDUAL FORMATION ONGOING FORMATION FORMATIONAL MODEL

But what can I do? Identify (or create) your own school’s heritage and make it visible and practical for your community Put priority on formation: faculty/staff, boards

But what can I do? Be sure that mission infuses discussion and decision making Try to understand and clarify governance issues

But what can I do? Network—find common elements; share resources Consider joining/forming networks of schools or a co-sponsorship arrangement

Sharing Lessons learned What are some other practical ideas you have seen or thought about? If you have any questions or feedback, please contact me at The following slides describe the XBSS Mission Criteria and process for adding schools to the network

XBSS Mission Criteria Be consistent with the mission of the Xaverian Brothers, which is “to serve the Church in its mission of evangelization, especially through the ministry of education.” Respond to identified mission needs or improvement opportunities for XBSS. Consider the impact on: Xaverian vision and valuesXBSS Members XBSS schools XBSS Staff Xaverian Congregation Consider the impact as well as the rights and responsibilities of individuals and groups directly or indirectly affected by the decision.

Mission Criteria Explore the opportunity for collaboration with other Religious Communities, Dioceses, Catholic entities or educational endeavors. Explore how the opportunity helps XBSS to “continue our commitment to collaborating with lay colleagues in the sponsorship of schools that respond to the Calls of the General Chapter for a contemplative stance in the world and ministry among the poor and marginalized,” and how it “furthers the vision and unique Xaverian nature of each school” Provide opportunities for those who serve with XBSS to grow and develop. Consider the magnitude of the investment and return and acceptable levels of risk.

Preliminary Exploration – up to one year AIM: To explore compatibility of and mutual advantage for the entities involved (the school, Arch/diocese, XBSS network) and the ministry of the Xaverian Brothers in Catholic education. PEOPLE : Those with initiating authority: Bishop, Diocesan Personnel, Superintendent, Head of School, Board Chair, Xaverian Brothers Congregational Leadership, XBSS Sponsorship Office personnel. ACTIVITIES:  Begin initial conversation and data gathering. Establish compelling reasons for further investigation. Furthering ministry of Catholic education Common vision, values  Gather as much information as possible about potential sponsorship relationship

Preliminary Exploration QUESTIONS:  Why do we want to do this? What do we add to each other? What do we bring to each other? What value do we bring?  What is the potential benefit to the community?  What is the potential benefit to Catholic education in this community?  What would be the cost(s) of not doing this collaboration?  What are our non-negotiables?  In what ways are the organizations compatible? Who are the stakeholders?  What are the resources—human and financial—needed to pursue this collaboration?  How do we decide to continue or stop? Is this based on values and mission?  How do we evaluate our work in this phase?

Phase Two: Sponsorship Exploration 1 to 2 years AIM : To research and collect sufficient detailed information to make a decision regarding sponsorship. PEOPLE : Representatives from school administration, faculty, parents, alumni, Board, Diocese, Sponsorship Office, other XBSS representatives ACTIVITIES:  Assess school community’s understanding and perceptions of mission  Specifically assess finances, capital needs, debt structure, governance, and culture.  Determine compatibility and identify potential impediments to collaboration  Develop legal documents including bylaws  Develop transition plan including need and process for formation for all constituencies  Mutual visits by key stakeholders (e.g., board members, administrators, faculty) and XBSS

Phase Two: Sponsorship Exploration  Develop communication plan for internal and external publics  Obtain final approval for all constituencies  Plan and implement process for developing shared or compatible mission/vision  Develop ritual to finalize agreement QUESTIONS:  What are the benefits to each organization?  What are the mission/vision issues which must be included in the discussion?  What are the financial, legal and canonical issues?  What are the barriers to collaboration? What are the non- negotiables?  What are the elements of the transition plan and timeline?  What communication/formation do we need for key stakeholders?  What is needed for public relations? Who will be responsible for this?  How do we decide to continue or stop? Is this based on values and mission?  How will we evaluate our work in this phase?

Phase Three: Initial Integration first 12 to 24 months of sponsorship AIM: To integrate the school into XBSS network, structures, programs and culture. PEOPLE: Transition team works with all constituencies to monitor implementation of plan. ACTIVITIES:  Orient Board, Faculty, Staff, Parents and Students  Celebrate/ritualize collaboration  Develop and begin implementation of a consolidated strategic plan  Change symbols and signage  Continue revising, implementing communication plan QUESTIONS:  What strategies do we need for dealing with change?  Are the purposes and the benefits of sponsorship clear?  Is the formation/education plan effective?  Is planning underway for ongoing activities?  How will we evaluate our work in this phase?

Phase Four: Evaluation 3 to 5 years AIM : To assess implementation PEOPLE: Board of Directors/Trustees, Arch/diocese, Sponsorship Office ACTIVITIES:  Evaluate implementation of transition plan  Evaluate community benefit of co-sponsorship  Continue to evaluate and implement communications.  Conduct Mission Effectiveness Process QUESTIONS:  What issues have surfaced and need to be addressed?  How effectively has the school integrated its mission and that of XBSS?  What continuing formation is needed as a result?  What are the implications of the results of the Mission Effectiveness Process?