NMR Enabled Sample Design Kent Mathis – JEA Craig Williamson – Energy Insights.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Determining and Forecasting Load Reductions from Demand Side Programs September 11-12, 2007 Presented by: Bill Bland, V.P. Consulting, GoodCents Liza Thompson,
Advertisements

NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
Dynamic Distribution Grids © 2012 San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. All rights reserved. Neal Bartek.
AMI & Grid Data Analytics & Analysis Management Platform Page  1 What does this platform offer? Our tool is a next generation grid management software.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
SmartGridCity™: A blueprint for a connected, intelligent grid community Presented to the Utah Public Service Commission May 13, 2009.
The ESKOM Pilot Testing and Findings of the Residential Time-of-Use Tariff (Homeflex) Project by Vashna Singh and Marcus Dekenah 17 October 2006.
South Carolina Finance Workshop for Small Water Systems June 4, 2013 Water Partnerships: Financial Advantages and Challenges SC Case Study: Lowcountry.
City of Leesburg AMI Project Paul Kalv, Leesburg Electric Director Doug Handley, Utility Consulting Services Advanced Metering Infrastructure – AMI.
RiversidePublicUtilities.com Arts & Innovation RiversidePublicUtilities.com Challenges and Solutions for Large-Scale PV Integration on RPU’s Distribution.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
Overview – Non-coincident Peak Demand
1 Overview of Allocating Revenue Requirements Based on Shares of Marginal Costs May, 2012.
1 Department of Water and Power City of Los Angeles Automatic Meter Infrastructure Program Mariko Marianes and John Yu.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
Leveraging JDA technology to support a Shelf Connected Supply Chain Amy Higgins VP, Space Management & Analytics Sears Holdings Corporation 1.
Big Sandy Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Energy Assessment Tools and Methods National Environmental Partnership Summit 2007 May 8, 2007 Cam Metcalf Executive Director John Sparks TDI Coordinator.
SPP.org 1. SPP: Demand Response and Advanced Metering in Arkansas.
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
SMART METERING SOLUTIONS TO SHAPE OUR ENERGY FUTURE Empowering the Customer Experience Marketing Executives Conference Cranwell Resort Lenox, Massachusetts.
Partnering with Our Customers in Demand Side Management Mark Wallenrod Director DSM Program Operations Southern California Edison Southern California Energy.
Stockton BC Corporate and Social Inclusion Select Committee Ian Taylor NEPO Director.
Centralized Management Services Dawn Malinowski Wisconsin Public Power Inc Sun Prairie, WI.
NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE | Association for Financial Professionals March 2012.
1 Resurrecting A Load Research Program Susan Romer NSTAR 2006 AEIC Load Research Conference September 2006.
1 ENCO Utility Services How Could a Boulder Municipal Utility Run Its Electric Distribution System? June 1, 2011 Boulder, Colorado
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
1 American Public Power Association Session 6 (PMA) September 24, 2007 Uses, Costs, and Implementation of AMR/AMI Herman Millican Austin Energy.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
Kirk Schneider American Electric Power Tulsa, Oklahoma AEIC Annual Load Research Conference Reno, Nevada September 10-13, 2006 System Load Calculation.
Using PI as a Transitioning Tool to RTPM A presentation by Calpine Geothermal for the 2004 OSI Users Conference A presentation by Calpine Geothermal for.
Washington’s Water Use Efficiency Rule May Require Increased Coordination for Many Utilities Dan Sander, P.E. Senior Engineer.
2009 APPA National Conference Dealing with Customers’ Inability to Pay in Tough Economic Times June 16, 2009, 1:30 – 2:30 pm William A. Johnson.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Author name Country ID Session X – Block Y – Question Z Barcelona May Geographic information system (GIS) and their role in power utility.
Smart Grid Workforce Education Presentation Smart Grid – A Framework for Change Brad Gaskill, CEO - Poudre Valley REA May 29, 2009.
PUBLIC POWER UTILITIES IN IDAHO Presented to Legislative Generation Sub-Committee by Idaho Energy Authority (IDEA) and Idaho Consumer Owned Utilities Association.
Improving Customer Service at BTU Through Benchmarking APPA National Conference Anaheim, California - June 20, 2005.
Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning Fourth Edition Chapter One Business Functions and Business Processes.
Using Load Research Data Analysis to Determine Number of Electric Heating Customers AEIC Load Research Committee Meeting Marco Island, Florida June 10,
Load Research Status Presentation to the Load Research/Forecasting Working Group June 3rd, 2010.
Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning Fourth Edition
Settlement Accuracy Analysis Prepared by ERCOT Load Profiling.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
Power Association of Northern California Maintaining Grid Reliability In An Uncertain Era May 16, 2011 PG&E Conference Center Jim Mcintosh Director, Executive.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Licking Valley Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by : East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis.
LOAD RESEARCH Irrigation Load Study Utah Cost of Service Task Force August 25, 2005.
More Than Smart – A Distribution System Vision © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Dave Geier – VP Electric.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com A System Operator’s Resilience Wish List Tom Bowe Executive Director Reliability and Compliance PJM Interconnection
SERC Reliability Corporation 1 SERC RELIABILITY CORPORATION MID-AMERICA RELIABILITY CONFERENCE June 21, 2006 COLUMBUS, OHIO.
M OVING FROM E NVIRONMENTAL D ATA TO R ESILIENCE : Forging Public-Private Partnerships in the Energy Sector NOAA NATIONAL CENTERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Black Start Service in New England System Operator’s Perspective Robert B. Burke ISO New England Inc. July 23, 2002 IEEE - Chicago, Illinois.
JEA’s Initiatives and Capital Improvements Program
Irvine Ranch Water District Distributed Energy Storage Case Study
SMECO Demand Response filing
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Presentation transcript:

NMR Enabled Sample Design Kent Mathis – JEA Craig Williamson – Energy Insights

JEA (formerly Jacksonville Electric Authority) Originally a municipal electric authority In 1997 JEA took over water and sewage for the city Now we’re just “JEA”. We have about 2300 permanent employees. Customer base: 405,000 electric 300,000 water 223,000 sewer Service Territory 900 square miles Several counties in NE Florida

JEA’s Electric System JEA owns and operates three generating plants and all transmission and distribution facilities. A fourth power plant, the St. Johns River Power Park (SJRPP), is owned jointly by JEA and the Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) and operated by JEA. JEA and FPL are also joint owners of Unit 4 at Georgia Power Company's coal-fired Robert W. Scherer Plant (Plant Scherer), which is located in Macon, Georgia. JEA produces 3.2 MW from a methane-fueled generating facility at the Girvin Road Landfill. JEA's net generating capability is 2,361 MW, gross capacity is just under 3,000 MW

The Ascent of JEA NMR-Enabled Load Research Craig Kent Future Craig Kent Present

Cellnet Nomenclature

Establish Team Corporate Data Integration (CDI) Randy Boswell VP CDI Richard Vento Director CDI Dennis Fleming Adv NMR Engineer Tonya Bell LR Analyst Kent Mathis LR Manager Don Wucker DSM Specialist

Initial Corporate Data Integration Goals Develop Team Knowledge, Skills & Abilities Training (LR, DSM, NMR & Tools) Hire LR & DSM Consulting Experts Meet Customers & Discuss Needs Load Research (LR) Demand Side Management (DSM) Advanced NMR

Develop Team Knowledge, Skills & Abilities Training Joined AEIC and pursuing membership in LR committee  LR Workshops, Conferences & Classes NMR  Understand how the system works Software  SAS  AnalyzeIT & VisualizeIT Hire Load Research Expert Surveyed Options Traditional consultant vs subscription services  Energy Insights

Meet Prospective Customers and Discuss Their Needs Over a 3 month period (March, April, May) met with customers Rates, System Planning & Forecasting, Distribution Engineering Marketing, Customer Service, Account Executives, DSM Operations, System Reliability, Power Quality Billing & Metering, Collections Needs Centered Around Load Research Demand Side Management  Analyze Winter Peak & Develop Programs to reduce peak  TOU Advanced NMR Functions  Distribution System Loading  Optimized Theft Detection  Customer Load Information & Notification

Initial Load Research Goals Develop Toolset Get NMR Interval Data Flowing – July 2006 Figure out Process Switching Meters On Initial Sample Design Collect & Analyze Summer Peak – Late September 2006 Completed Load Curves System Load Distribution – Ongoing Estimate Rate Class Load Shapes – Long term Design, Select & Install Sample Collect & Analyze Data

Develop Toolset Load Research Toolset Complete Connectivity between Systems Currently using temporary database (MSPR) SAS Purchased in March AnalyzeIT & VisualizeIT Purchased in April Excel

Meter Data Management System (MDMS) NMR Business Intelligence Load Research System PlanningMarket Research Energy Management Other Data Sources (FFDS, FMS, CAIR, etc.) (FFDS, FMS, CAIR, etc.) Other Data Sources (FFDS, FMS, CAIR, etc.) (FFDS, FMS, CAIR, etc.) ITRONS MV90 Primary Meter Data Other Meter Data Field Force Dispatch DispatchSystem(FFDS) Field Force Dispatch DispatchSystem(FFDS) Data Marts External Customers Web Access to ExternalCustomers ExternalCustomers NMR(Cellnet)NMR(Cellnet) Customer Information System (CAIR) JEA Internal Customers Customers Meter Data Management System Flow Making changes to MDMS and creating Data Marts to allow LR data to pass thru

Initial Sample Design Summary Examined Sample Design Population 124 Report & CAIR Rate Name Report Studied 5 rate classes (Res, GS, GSD, GSLD, Int/Cur) Designed samples for Res, GS, and split the population for GSD into two subgroups Consumption Data Cleaned and organized data (frequency distributions in 50 kWh buckets) Developed 2-D Stratification (reduce variability) Delanius Hodges – Produced Breakpoints For Res and GS, we used a 3x2 design of 6 strata, with 3 winter strata (low, medium, high), and two summer strata (low, high), plus one extreme stratum (very high summer or very high winter or both), producing 7 ‘buckets’ For each subgroup in GSD, we used a 2x2 design, with 2 winter strata (low, high), and two summer strata (low, high), plus one extreme stratum (very high summer or very high winter or both), producing 5 ‘buckets’

Residential Sample Implementation

GS Sample Implementation

GSD Sample Implementation

Sample design moving forward We will use the variances and means from the data for August 4 th to calculate required sample sizes and allocate sample points for the summer peak We will use the means and variances for the MV-90 data to calculate the required sample sizes and allocate sample points for the winter peak for GS and GSD, and use judgment for Residential winter peak accuracy We will carefully consider the implications of the expected percent of meters that can’t deliver interval data Current sample will be randomly reduced or increased where necessary We will include interval data from MV-90 customers that are chosen in the sample

Lessons Learned Expectation Toolset will be completed within 2 to 3 months Reality Time to build toolset is longer than promised

Lessons Learned Expectation It’s easy to keep things straight… Reality No connectivity without toolset Each system uses different keys GIS – Transformer ID MV90 – Recorder ID CAIR – Account ID MSPR – SPIDs Difficult to do what should be an easy task

Lessons Learned (cont) Expectation Over 99% of our NMR meters are enabled Reality Over 99% of NMR meters are deployed Only about 90% of NMR meters are active Of the 90%, even a lower % have acceptable Packet Success Ratios (PSRs) None of the above issues are evenly distributed among rate classes

Lessons Learned (cont) Expectation Defining the population will be easy Reality Defining the population is hard No accurate list of customers and their rates exist

“Ahas” Originally afraid JEA faced a long, slow, expensive learning curve - Purchasing Energy Use Strategic Service continues to be high value for cost; purchase did not require formal bidding process Having an NMR system is enabling our LR group to expand beyond traditional LR applications and uses

Going Forward Complete COS Sample Design Complete LR Toolset Collect & Analyze Winter Peak Develop System Load Snapshot Skills Develop Customer Base & LR Products

Contact Information Craig Williamson Program Director, Energy End Use Research tel Kent Mathis Load Research Manager tel