WRF namelist.input Dr Meral Demirtaş

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Weather Research & Forecasting: A General Overview
Advertisements

A NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF LOCAL ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES A.V.Starchenko Tomsk State University.
UU Unitah Basin WRF Model Configuration (same as DEQ) See Alcott and Steenburgh 2013 for further details on most aspects of this numerical configuration:
The WRF Model: 2012 Annual Update
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
WRF Physics Options Jimy Dudhia. diff_opt=1 2 nd order diffusion on model levels Constant coefficients (khdif and kvdif) km_opt ignored.
Md. Mizanur Rahman Simulation of Seasonal Monsoon Rainfall over the SAARC Region by Dynamical Downscaling using WRF Model SAARC Meteorological Research.
Recent performance statistics for AMPS real-time forecasts Kevin W. Manning – National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR Earth System Laboratory Mesoscale.
AHW Ensemble Data Assimilation and Forecasting System Ryan D. Torn, Univ. Albany, SUNY Chris Davis, Wei Wang, Steven Cavallo, Chris Snyder, James Done,
Eta Model. Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
Nesting. Eta Model Hybrid and Eta Coordinates ground MSL ground Pressure domain Sigma domain  = 0  = 1  = 1 Ptop  = 0.
John J. Cassano - University of Colorado Wieslaw Maslowski -Naval Postgraduate School William Gutowski - Iowa State University Dennis Lettenmaier – University.
IS WRF REALLY IMPROVING? A COMPREHENSIVE VERIFICATION OVER THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
This is the footer Running WRF on HECToR Ralph Burton, NCAS (Leeds) Alan Gadian, NCAS (Leeds) With thanks to Paul Connolly, Hector.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
How to set up and run WRF model. Outline n How to download and compile the WRF code? n Namelist n Input and output files.
WRF Physics Options Acknowledgements: Slides by Jimy Dudhia (NCAR) Dr Meral Demirtaş Turkish State Meteorological Service Weather Forecasting Department.
Introduction to the Weather Research & Forecast (WRF) System, a High-Resolution Atmospheric Model Introduction to the Weather Research & Forecast (WRF)
1 Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Modeling System A Brief Overview WMO, Training Course, September 2011 Alanya, Turkey Dr Meral Demirtaş Turkish.
Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorological Division / NCAR How to Set Up and Run WRF (real.exe & wrf.exe)? Wei Wang June 29, 2004.
1 WRF PreProcessing System (WPS) A Brief Overview WMO, Training Course, September 2011 Alanya, Turkey Dr Meral Demirtaş Turkish State Meteorological.
Introduction to the WRF Modeling System Wei Wang NCAR/MMM.
Introduction to Running the WRF in LES Mode Jeff Massey April 1, 2014 University of Utah WRF Users Group.
ASSIMILATION OF GOES-DERIVED CLOUD PRODUCTS IN MM5.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
WRF Physics Options Part 2
Atmospheric Modeling in an Arctic System Model John J. Cassano Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences and Department of Atmospheric.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
Improvements of WRF Simulation Skills of Southeast United States Summer Rainfall: Focus on Physical Parameterization and Horizontal Resolution Laifang.
CCAM Numerical Weather Prediction Dr Marcus Thatcher Research Scientist December 2007.
Initialization for Real Data Cases Dave Gill
Convective Parameterization Options
How to set up and run WRF model. Outline n How to download and compile the WRF code? n Namelist n Input and output files.
winter RADIATION FOGS at CIBA (Spain): Observations compared to WRF simulations using different PBL parameterizations Carlos Román-Cascón
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
ASR Preliminary Meeting Boulder, Colorado Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio David H. Bromwich,
Higher Resolution Operational Models. Operational Mesoscale Model History Early: LFM, NGM (history) Eta (mainly history) MM5: Still used by some, but.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
Justin Glisan Iowa State University Department of Geological and Atmospheric Sciences RACM Project Update: ISU Atmospheric Modeling Component: Part 1 3rd.
Ensemble Prediction with Perturbed Initial and Lateral Boundary Conditions over Complex Terrain Jinhua Jiang, Darko Koracin, Ramesh Vellore Desert Research.
A Portable Regional Weather and Climate Downscaling System Using GEOS-5, LIS-6, WRF, and the NASA Workflow Tool Eric M. Kemp 1,2 and W. M. Putman 1, J.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
Are Numerical Weather Prediction Models Getting Better? Cliff Mass, David Ovens, and Jeff Baars University of Washington.
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
How to set up and run WRF model
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
Computation and analysis of the Kinetic Energy Spectra of a SI- SL Model GRAPES Dehui Chen and Y.J. Zheng and Z.Y. Jin State key Laboratory of Severe Weather.
Modeling and Evaluation of Antarctic Boundary Layer
Evaluation of regional climate simulations with WRF model in conditions of central Europe Jan Karlický, Tomáš Halenka, Michal Belda, (Charles University.
___________________________________________________________________________WRF-SI ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
Installing and Running the WPS Michael Duda 2006 WRF-ARW Summer Tutorial.
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
1 RUC Land Surface Model implementation in WRF Tanya Smirnova, WRFLSM Workshop, 18 June 2003.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Vincent N. Sakwa RSMC, Nairobi
Test Cases for the WRF Height Coordinate Model
1 Xiaoyan Jiang, Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin 03/20/2007 Feedback between the atmosphere,
Higher Resolution Operational Models
Real-data WRF: Setup and run ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1.
Serena Falasca (1,2) and Gabriele Curci (1,2)
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
Status of the COSMO-Software and Documentation
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations and Analysis
RegCM3 Lisa C. Sloan, Mark A. Snyder, Travis O’Brien, and Kathleen Hutchison Climate Change and Impacts Laboratory Dept. of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
Presentation transcript:

WRF namelist.input Dr Meral Demirtaş Turkish State Meteorological Service Weather Forecasting Department WMO, Training Course, 26-30 September 2011 Alanya, Turkey

Outline Why do we need a namelist? Sections of namelist.input: time_control domains physics dynamics

Why do we need namelist? The namelist.input file helps users to design their model run. A Fortran namelist contains a list of runtime options for the code to read in during its execution. Use of a namelist allows one to change runtime configuration without the need to recompile the source code. Before running real.exe and wrf.exe, edit namelist.input file for runtime options. The most up-to-dated namelist.input instructions are given in the WRF User’s Guide. Full list of namelists and their default values may be found in Registry files: Registry.EM (ARW), Registry.NMM and registry.io_boilerplate (IO options, shared). Use related documents to guide the modification of the namelist values given in: run/README.namelist test/em_real/examples.namelist

Fortran 90 namelist has very specific format, so edit with care: &namelist-record - start / - end As a general rule: Multiple columns: domain dependent Single column: value valid for all domains

&time_control interval_seconds: Time interval between WPS output times, and LBC update frequency history_interval: Time interval in minutes when a history output is written frame_per_outfile: Number of history times written to one file. restart_interval: Time interval in minutes when a restart file is written. By default, restart file is not written at hour 0. A restart file contains only one time level data, and its valid time is in its file name, io_form_history/restart/input/boundary: IO format options 1. binary; 2. netCDF (recommended option); 4. PHDF5 5. Grib-1; 10. Grib-2 debug_level: 0. for standard runs, no debugging. 1. netCDF error messages about missing fields. 50,100,200,300 values give increasing prints. Large values trace the job's progress through physics and time steps.

&domains time_step: Time step for model integration in seconds. ARW: 6*dx (dx is the grid distance in km) NMM: 2.25*dx time_step_fract_num, time_step_fract_den: Fractional time step specified in separate integers of numerator and denominator. e_we, e_sn, e_vert: Model grid dimensions (staggered) in x, y and z directions. num_metgrid_levels: Number of metgrid data levels. num_metgrid_soil_levels: Number of soil data levels in the input data dx, dy: grid distances: in meters for ARW; in degrees for NMM.

&domains p_top_requested: Pressure value at the model top. Constrained by the available data from WPS. Default is 5000 Pa eta_levels: Specify your own model levels from 1.0 to 0.0. If not specified, program real will calculate a set of levels ptsgm (NMM only): Pressure level (Pa) at which the WRF-NMM hybrid coordinate transitions from sigma to pressure (default: 42000 Pa)

&physics: Physics options mp_physics: microphysics 0. No microphysics 1. Kessler scheme 2. Lin et al. scheme 3. Single-Moment (WSM) 3-class simple ice scheme 4. Single-Moment (WSM) 5-class scheme 5. Ferrier scheme 6. WSM 6-class graupel scheme 7. Goddard GCE scheme (also use gsfcgce_hail and gsfcgce_2ice) 8. Thompson graupel scheme (2-moment scheme in V3.1) 9. Milbrandt-Yau 2-moment scheme 10. Morrison 2-moment scheme  13. Stonybrook University scheme

Radiation related flags ra_lw_physics: longwave radiation 1. RRTM scheme 3. CAM scheme 4. rrtmg scheme 5. New Goddard longwave scheme (Since V3.3) 99. GFDL scheme (Schwarzkopf and Fels ) ra_sw_physics: shortwave radiation 1. Dudhia Scheme 2. Goddard Shortwave scheme 99. GFDL Scheme (Lacis and Hansen).

sf_sfclay_physics: surface layer 0. No surface-layer scheme 1. Monin-Obukhov Similarity scheme 2. Monin-Obukhov-Janjic Similarity Scheme 3. Global Forecasting System (GFS) scheme (NMM only)  4. QNSE  5. MYNN  7. Pleim-Xiu (ARW only), only tested with Pleim-Xiu surface and ACM2 PBL 10. TEMF surface layer sf_surface_physics: land surface 0. No surface temperature prediction 1. Thermal Diffusion scheme 2. Unified NOAH Land-Surface Model 3. RUC Land-Surface Model 7. Pleim-Xiu scheme (ARW only)

sf_urban_physics 1. Urban Canopy Model 2. Building Environment Parameterization 3. Building Energy Model

num_soil_layers: number of soil layers in land surface model 2. Pleim-Xu land-surface model 4. Noah land-surface model 5. Thermal diffusion scheme 6. RUC Land Surface Model bl_pbl_physics: planetary boundary layer 0. no boundary-layer 1. Yonsei University scheme (use with sf_sfclay_physics=1) 2. Mellor-Yamada-Janjic TKE Scheme (use with sf_sfclay_physics=2) 3. NCEP Global Forecast System scheme (use with sf_sfclay_physics=3) 4. QNSE (use with sf_sfclay_physics=4) 5. MYNN 2.5 level TKE (use with sf_sfclay_physics=1,2 and 5) 6. MYNN 3rd level TKE (use with sf_sfclay_physics=5) 7. ACM2 (Pleim) scheme (use with sf_sfclay_physics=1, 7) 8. Bougeault and Lacarrere (BouLac) TKE (use with sf_sfclay_physics=1,2) 9. CAM UW PBL 10. Total Energy - Mass Flux (TEMF) 99. MRF scheme (to be removed)

Flags related with cloud parameterization cu_physics: cumulus parameterization 0. No cumulus parameterization. 1. Kain-Fritsch scheme 2. Betts-Miller-Janjic scheme 3. Grell-Devenyi ensemble scheme 4. Simplified Arakawa-Schubert scheme (NMM only)   5. New Grell 3D scheme (G3)  6. Tiedtke scheme 7. CAM Zhang-McFarlane scheme 14. New Simpified Arakawa-Schubert

&dynamics Diffusion, damping, advection options rk_ord:  time-integration scheme option:  2. Runge-Kutta 2nd order  3. Runge-Kutta 3rd order (recommended) diff_opt:  turbulence and mixing option:  0. no turbulence or explicit spatial numerical filters (km_opt IS IGNORED).  1. evaluates 2nd order diffusion term on coordinate surfaces. uses kvdif for vertical diff unless PBL option is used. may be used with km_opt = 1 and 4. (Note that option 1 is recommended for real-data cases.)  2. evaluates mixing terms in physical space (stress form) (x,y,z). turbulence parameterization is chosen by specifying km_opt. km_opt:  eddy coefficient option  1. constant (use khdif and kvdif)  2. 1.5 order TKE closure (3D)  3. Smagorinsky first order closure (3D) (Note: option 2 and 3 are not recommended for dx > 2 km) 4. horizontal Smagorinsky first order closure (recommended for real-data case)

&bc_control: Boundary control spec_bdy_width: Total number of rows for specified boundary value nudging. & namelist_quilt: Specifies asynchronized I/O for MPI applications. nio_tasks_per_group: Default value is 0, means no quilting; value > 0 quilting I/O nio_groups: Default is 1, do NOT change.

More options More are introduced here: IO options Vertical interpolation options SST update and other options for long simulations Adaptive-time step Digital filter Global runs Moving nest TC options IO quilting

Vertical interpolation options (1) Program real for ARW only, optional, &domains: use_surface: whether to use surface observations use_levels_below_ground: whether to use data below the ground lowest_lev_from_sfc: logical, whether surface data is used to fill the lowest model level values force_sfc_in_vinterp: number of levels to use surface data, default is 1 extrap_type: how to do extrapolation: 1 - use 2 lowest levels; 2 - constant t_extrap_type: extrapolation option for temperature: 1 - isothermal; 2 - 6.5 K/km; 3 - adiabatic

Vertical interpolation options (2) Program real for ARW only, optional: interp_type: in pressure or log pressure lagrange_order: linear or quadratic zap_close_levels: delta p where a non-surface pressure level is removed in vertical interpolation related namelists: examples.namelist constant pressure surfaces model surfaces ground

SST update for long simulations (1) Lower boundary update control: allow SST, seaice monthly vegetation fraction and albedo to be updated during a model run: sst_update: 0 – no SST update 1 – update SST Set before running real, and this will create additional output files: wrflowinp_d01, wrflowinp_d02, .. To use these files in wrf, in &time_control, add auxinput4_inname = “wrflowinp_d<domain>” auxinput4_interval = 360 sst_skin: diurnal water temp update tmn_update: deep soil temp update, used with lagday Lagday: averaging time bucket_mm: bucket reset value for rainfall bucket_j: bucket reset value for radiation fluxes spec_exp: exponential multiplier for boundary zone ramping

Adaptive time steps Adaptive-time-step is a way to maximize the model time step while keeping the model numerically stable New since V3. (Very efficient to use for real-time runs.) Namelist control: &domains use_adaptive_time_step: logical switch step_to_output_time: whether to write at exact history output times target_cfl: maximum cfl allowed (1.2) max_step_increase_pct: percentage of time step increase each time; set to 5, 51, (larger values for nests) starting_time_step: in seconds; e.g. set to 4*dx max_time_step: in seconds; e.g. set to 8*dx min_time_step: in seconds; e.g. set to 4*dx

Digital filter initialization (1) Digital filter initialization is a simple way to remove initial model imbalance: – May be introduced by simple interpolation, different topography, or by objective analysis, or data assimilation – It may generate spurious gravity waves in the early simulation hours, which could cause erroneous precipitation, numerical instability and degrade subsequent data assimilation Using DFI – can construct consistent model fields which do not exist in the initial conditions, e.g. vertical motion, cloud variables – may reduce the spin-up problem in early simulation hours DFI is done after real, or data-assimilation step, just before model integration.

Digital filter initialization (2)

Digital filter initialization (3) DFI is done after real, or data-assimilation step, just before model integration. Namelist control: &dfi dfi_opt: dfi options: 0: no DFI; 1: DFL; 2: DDFI; 3: TDFI (recommended) dfi_nfilter: filter options 0 - 8, recommended: 7 dfi_cutoff_seconds : cutoff period dfi_write_filtered_input : whether to write filtered IC dfi_bckstop_* : stop time for backward integration dfi_fwdstop_* : stop time for forward integration

Global applications Setup is mostly done in WPS: map_proj = ‘lat-lon’ e_we, e_sn: geogrid will compute dx, dy See template ‘namelist.wps.global’ for details. In the model stage: fft_filter_lat: default value is 45 degrees Caution: some options do not work, or have been tested with global domain. Start with template ‘namelist.input.global’

Acknowledgements: Thanks to earlier presentations of NCAR/MMM Division (Wei Wang), for providing excellent starting point for this talk!

Thanks for attending….