GFS Forecast Verification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Weather Prediction Readiness for NPP And JPSS Data Assimilation Experiments for CrIS and ATMS Kevin Garrett 1, Sid Boukabara 2, James Jung 3,
Advertisements

© The Aerospace Corporation 2014 Observation Impact on WRF Model Forecast Accuracy over Southwest Asia Michael D. McAtee Environmental Satellite Systems.
Data Assimilation Andrew Collard. Overview Introduction to Atmospheric Data Assimilation Control Variables Observations Background Error Covariance Summary.
Review of NCEP GFS Forecast Skills and Major Upgrades
Fanglin Yang I.M. Systems Group, Inc. Environmental Modeling Center National Centers for Environmental Prediction AGU Fall Meeting December 15-19, 2014;
Verification of NCEP SFM seasonal climate prediction during Jae-Kyung E. Schemm Climate Prediction Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA.
Convection-permitting forecasts initialized with continuously-cycling limited-area 3DVAR, EnKF and “hybrid” data assimilation systems Craig Schwartz and.
The NCEP operational Climate Forecast System : configuration, products, and plan for the future Hua-Lu Pan Environmental Modeling Center NCEP.
Presented by: Mark Iredell based on work done by Global Climate and Weather Modeling Branch 2014 NCEP Production Suite Review GLOBAL MODELING 1.
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model Previous called the Aviation (AVN) and Medium Range Forecast (MRF) models. Global model and 64 levels Relatively primitive.
1 An Overview of the NARCCAP WRF Simulations L. Ruby Leung Pacific Northwest National Laboratory NARCCAP Users Meeting NCAR, Boulder, CO April ,
Numerical Weather Prediction Division The usage of the ATOVS data in the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) Sang-Won Joo Korea Meteorological Administration.
UMAC data callpage 1 of 16Global Ensemble Forecast System - GEFS Global Ensemble Forecast System Yuejian Zhu Ensemble Team Leader, Environmental Modeling.
Warm Season Precipitation Predictions over North America with the Eta Regional Climate Model Model Sensitivity to Initial Land States and Choice of Domain.
ECMWF – 1© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Developments in the use of AMSU-A, ATMS and HIRS data at ECMWF Heather Lawrence, first-year.
Slide 1 Bilateral meeting 2011Slide 1, ©ECMWF Status and plans for the ECMWF forecasting System.
Data assimilation of polar orbiting satellites at ECMWF
The Impact of GPS Radio Occultation Data on the Analysis and Prediction of Tropical Cyclones Bill Kuo UCAR.
GSI Hybrid EnKF-3DVAR Upgrade Components –GPS RO bending angle rather than refractivity –Inclusion of compressibility factors for atmosphere –Retune SBUV.
UKmet February Hybrid Ensemble-Variational Data Assimilation Development A partnership to develop and implement a hybrid 3D-VAR system –Joint venture.
Operational Global Model Plans John Derber. Timeline July 25, 2013: Completion of phase 1 WCOSS transition August 20, 2013: GDAS/GFS model/analysis upgrade.
Rongqian Yang, Ken Mitchell, Jesse Meng Impact of Different Land Models & Different Initial Land States on CFS Summer and Winter Reforecasts Acknowledgment.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
Sensitivity of NCEP GFS Forecast of Hurricane Sandy to Model Configuration and Supplemental Radiosondes Fanglin Yang IMSG -- Environmental Model Center.
Recent and future changes in the NCEP Global Forecast System Glenn White Global Climate and Weather Modeling Branch Environmental Modeling Center National.
The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom 陳登舜 ATM NCU Group Meeting REFERENCE : Liu., H., J. Anderson, and Y.-H. Kuo, 2012: Improved analyses.
1 NCEP data assimilation systems status and plans John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA With input from: Many others.
GFS Surface Temperature (T2m) Cold Bias over CONUS East Mitigation Experiments Detailed verification at Fanglin’s websites
Impact of Targeted Dropsonde Data on Mid-latitude Numerical Weather Forecasts during the 2011 Winter Storms Reconnaissance Program Presented by Tom Hamill.
GFS Forecast Review NCEP EMC GCWMB Bi-weekly Briefing Fanglin Yang, August 25, 2011.
ATM 401/501 Status of Forecasting: Spring Forecasting at NCEP Environmental Modeling Center Ocean Prediction Center.
On Improving GFS Forecast Skills in the Southern Hemisphere: Ideas and Preliminary Results Fanglin Yang Andrew Collard, Russ Treadon, John Derber NCEP-EMC.
A Comparison of the Northern American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) to an Ensemble of Analyses Including CFSR Wesley Ebisuzaki 1, Fedor Mesinger 2, Li Zhang.
Non-hydrostatic Numerical Model Study on Tropical Mesoscale System During SCOUT DARWIN Campaign Wuhu Feng 1 and M.P. Chipperfield 1 IAS, School of Earth.
Modification of GFS Land Surface Model Parameters to Mitigate the Near- Surface Cold and Wet Bias in the Midwest CONUS: Analysis of Parallel Test Results.
Rongqian Yang, Kenneth Mitchell, Jesse Meng NCEP Environmental Modeling Center (EMC) Summer and Winter Season Reforecast Experiments with the NCEP Coupled.
Outline Background Highlights of NCAR’s R&D efforts A proposed 5-year plan for CWB Final remarks.
P1.85 DEVELOPMENT OF SIMULATED GOES PRODUCTS FOR GFS AND NAM Hui-Ya Chuang and Brad Ferrier Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP, Washington DC Introduction.
Verification of Global Ensemble Forecasts Fanglin Yang Yuejian Zhu, Glenn White, John Derber Environmental Modeling Center National Centers for Environmental.
Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation Dr. Louis W. Uccellini Director, NCEP COPC Meeting Offutt Air Force Base, NE May 2, 2007.
1 EMC’s Current and future GSI development John C. Derber Environmental Modeling Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA With input from: Many others.
1 JRA-55 the Japanese 55-year reanalysis project - status and plan - Climate Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency.
Data assimilation and forecasting the weather (!) Eugenia Kalnay and many friends University of Maryland.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2008 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
1 Results from Winter Storm Reconnaissance Program 2007 Yucheng SongIMSG/EMC/NCEP Zoltan TothEMC/NCEP/NWS Sharan MajumdarUniv. of Miami Mark ShirleyNCO/NCEP/NWS.
1 Hyperspectral Infrared Water Vapor Radiance Assimilation James Jung Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies Lars Peter Riishojgaard.
Evaluation of impact of satellite radiance data within the hybrid variational/EnKF Rapid Refresh data assimilation system Haidao Lin Steve Weygandt Ming.
EWGLAM Oct Some recent developments in the ECMWF model Mariano Hortal ECMWF Thanks to: A. Beljars (physics), E. Holm (humidity analysis)
Impacts of Improved Error Analysis on the Assimilation of Polar Satellite Passive Microwave Precipitation Estimates into the NCEP Global Data Assimilation.
A JHT FUNDED PROJECT GFDL PERFORMANCE AND TRANSITION TO HWRF Morris Bender, Timothy Marchok (GFDL) Isaac Ginis, Biju Thomas (URI)
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS AIRS Profile Assimilation - Case Study results Shih-Hung Chou, Brad Zavodsky Gary Jedlovec,
AIRS, HIRS and CSBT Experiments Plus Other FY05/06 Results by James A. Jung Tom H. Zapotocny and John Le Marshall Cooperative Institute for Meteorological.
Evaluation of radiance data assimilation impact on Rapid Refresh forecast skill for retrospective and real-time experiments Haidao Lin Steve Weygandt Stan.
Statistical Post Processing - Using Reforecast to Improve GEFS Forecast Yuejian Zhu Hong Guan and Bo Cui ECM/NCEP/NWS Dec. 3 rd 2013 Acknowledgements:
CTB computer resources / CFSRR project Hua-Lu Pan.
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
Impact of Blended MW-IR SST Analyses on NAVY Numerical Weather Prediction and Atmospheric Data Assimilation James Cummings, James Goerss, Nancy Baker Naval.
Suru Saha and Hua-Lu Pan, EMC/NCEP With Input from Stephen Lord, Mark Iredell, Shrinivas Moorthi, David Behringer, Ken Mitchell, Bob Kistler, Jack Woollen,
OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.
The development of the NSST within the NCEP GFS/CFS
Indirect impact of ozone assimilation using Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI) data assimilation system for regional applications Kathryn Newman1,2,
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
Impact of Traditional and Non-traditional Observation Sources using the Grid-point Statistical Interpolation Data Assimilation System for Regional Applications.
Improving the Land Surface Component of the CFS Reanalysis
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model
Lidia Cucurull, NCEP/JCSDA
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
Global Forecast System (GFS) Model
Observational Data Source Impacts In The NCEP GDAS
Presentation transcript:

GFS Forecast Verification Fanglin Yang NEMS/GFS Modeling Summer School 2013 July 29th – August 1st, 2013 Environmental Modeling Center National Centers for Environmental Prediction College Park, Maryland

Outline An Introduction to EMC Global NWP Model Deterministic Forecast Verification Package Review of GFS Historical Performance AC and RMSE Hurricane Track and Intensity Precipitation Comparison with Surface and Rawinsonde Obs

NCEP-EMC Global NWP Model Verification Package The main purpose of this package is to aid model developers in diagnosing forecast errors and in assessing model forecast skills. It is designed to be portable for different computer platforms, to be easy to set up for evaluating various experiments with minimum input from users, and to have a web interface for quick review of results. Credit and Acknowledgment: All scripts and Fortran programs except for those listed below were written and maintained by Fanglin Yang. Binbin Zhou and Geoff DiMego provided the script and code for grid-to-grid database computation. Jack Woolen and Suranjana Saha provided the script and code for making fit-to-obs maps. Perry Shafran and Geoff DiMego provided the Grid-to-Obs Fortran programs. All third-party codes and scripts have been modified before being included in this package. A few "NWPROD" libraries were adopted from the GFS para system Shrinivas Moorthi updated and built on Zeus for running on different platforms. A few changes made by Jim Jung to the grid-to-grid Fortran source code were taken to make the program compatible with Linux compilers. Shrinivas Moorthi helped with adding the script to port forecast data from different machines. Glenn White, Steve Lord and Xu Li made suggestions for creating and improving the significance test for AC dieoff curves and RMSE growth curves. Russ made a suggestion to include consensus analysis for verification. Helin Wei provided assistance for including the grid-to-obs verification. Many users have provided valuable comments and suggestions that helped improving the usability and portability of this package. Where to obtain the package: (1) For NCEP CCS and WCOSS users: copy the driver /global/save/wx24fy/VRFY/vsdb/vsdbjob_submit.sh and parameter setting script setup_envs.sh. (2)For NOAA Zeus users: copy driver vsdbjob_submit.sh and parameter setting script setup_envs.sh from /scratch2/portfolios/NCEPDEV/global/save/Fanglin.Yang/VRFY/vsdb/. (3) For those who has access to NCEP/EMC SVN, find https://svnemc.ncep.noaa.gov/projects/verif/global/tags/vsdb_v16. (4) For users who have no access to NCEP computers and wish to install the entire package, please get vsdb_exp_v16.tar by ftp from http://ftp.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gc_wmb/wx24fy/VRFY/.

NCEP-EMC Global NWP Model Verification Package It performs the following verifications for NWP forecasts: AC, RMSE, BIAS etc: model forecast statistics are first computed and saved in VSDB format; verification maps are then made to compare stats among different experiments and/or with operational forecast (up to 10 experiments) QPF: precipitation threat skill scores over CONUS are first computed , then ETS score maps are made with Monte Carlo significance tests included. 2D MAPS: make maps of lat-lon distributions and zonal mean vertical cross-sections of forecast s, analyses and certain observations, such as U,V,T,Q,RH,O3, T2m, Precip, etc. Fit-to-Obs: compare forecasts and analyses against rawinsonde observations Grid-to-Obs: verifying forecasts against surface station observations (e.g. T2m and 10-m wind) and upper-air RAOBS transfer maps and web templates to web servers for display. Example: http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/wx24fy/para/t2mbias/exp2012/ and http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/STATS_vsdb/

Outline Major GFS Changes in the Past 30 Years Review of GFS Historical Performance AC and RMSE Hurricane Track and Intensity Precipitation Comparison with Surface and Rawinsonde Obs

Annual Mean 500-hPa HGT Day-5 Anomaly Correlation 0.1/10yrs CDAS is a legacy GFS (T64) used for NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis circa 1995 CFSR is the coupled GFS (T126) used for reanalysis circa 2006

Annual Mean 500-hPa HGT Day-5 Anomaly Correlation GFS minus CDAS Best Year, For both NH and SH

Annual Mean NH 500hPa HGT Day-5 AC ECMWF, GFS and CMC were better in 2012 than in 2011. GFS has the largest gain. UKM and FNOMC were slightly worse in 2012 than 2011.

Annual Mean SH 500hPa HGT Day-5 AC 2012 was a difficult year to forecast, namely, both CFSR and CDAS scores dropped. Most models, except for GFS and CMC, had lower scores in 2012 than in 2011.

Die-off Curves of Annual Mean NH 500hPa HGT AC 0.6 – useful forecast For 2012 GFS: 8.0 day ECMWF: 8.2 day CDAS: 6.4 day ECMWF ‘s useful forecast in 2012 was not as good as in 2010 and 2011. GFS had no change in past three years.

Die-off Curves of Annual Mean SH 500hPa HGT AC 0.6 – useful forecast For 2012 GFS: 7.6 day ECMWF: 8.2 day CDAS: 6.5 day

GFS GFS useful forecasts (AC>0.6) increased about one day in the past decade. All Models

AC Frequency Distribution Twenty bins were used to count for the frequency distribution, with the 1st bin centered at 0.025 and the last been centered at 0.975. The width of each bin is 0.05. More GOOD forecasts GFS NH Jan 2000: T126L28  T170L42 May 2001: prognostic cloud Oct 2002: T170L42  T254L64 May 2005: T254L64  T382L64; 2-L OSU LSM 4-L NOHA LSM May 2007: SSI  GSI Analysis; Sigma  sigma-p hybrid coordinate July 2010: T382L64  T574L64; Major Physics Upgrade May 2012: Hybrid-Ensemble 3D-VAR Data Assimilation

AC Frequency Distribution GFS SH Jan 2000: T126L28  T170L42 May 2001: prognostic cloud Oct 2002: T170L42  T254L64 May 2005: T254L64  T382L64; 2-L OSU LSM 4-L NOHA LSM May 2007: SSI  GSI Analysis; Sigma  sigma-p hybrid coordinate July 2010: T382L64  T574L64; Major Physics Upgrade May 2012: Hybrid-Ensemble 3D-VAR Data Assimilation

AC Frequency Distribution ECMWF NH

AC Frequency Distribution ECMWF SH

Jan 2000: T126L28  T170L42 May 2001: prognostic cloud Oct 2002: T170L42  T254L64 May 2005: T254L64  T382L64; 2-L OSU LSM 4-L NOHA LSM May 2007: SSI  GSI Analysis; Sigma  sigma-p hybrid coordinate July 2010: T382L64  T574L64; Major Physics Upgrade May 2012: Hybrid-Ensemble 3D-VAR Data Assimilation

2012 is the first year for which GFS has no “BAD” forecast in the Northern Hemisphere Jan 2000: T126L28  T170L42 May 2001: prognostic cloud Oct 2002: T170L42  T254L64 May 2005: T254L64  T382L64; 2-L OSU LSM 4-L NOHA LSM May 2007: SSI  GSI Analysis; Sigma  sigma-p hybrid coordinate July 2010: T382L64  T574L64; Major Physics Upgrade May 2012: Hybrid-Ensemble 3D-VAR Data Assimilation

2012 Annual Mean Tropical [20S-20N] Wind RMSE

Tropical Wind RMSE, 850-hPa Day-3 Forecast July2010 T574 GFS Implementation

Tropical Wind RMSE, 200-hPa Day-3 Forecast GFS matched UKM after Hybrid EnKF Implementation

Outline Major GFS Changes in the Past 30 Years Review of GFS Historical Performance AC and RMSE Hurricane Track and Intensity Precipitation Comparison with Surface and Rawinsonde Obs

2012 Atlantic Hurricanes www.nhc.noaa.gov/ First storm formed May 19, 2012 Last storm dissipated October 29, 2012 Strongest storm Sandy – 940 mbar (hPa) (27.77 inHg), 110 mph (175 km/h) Total depressions 19 Total storms Hurricanes 10 Major hurricanes (Cat. 3+) 1 Total fatalities 316 direct, 12 indirect Total damage At least $68.48 billion (2012 USD) www.nhc.noaa.gov/ http://www.wikipedia.org

2012 Eastern Pacific Hurricanes First storm formed May 14, 2012 Last storm dissipated November 3, 2012 Strongest storm Emilia – 945 mbar (hPa) (27.92 inHg), 140 mph (220 km/h) Total depressions 17 Total storms Hurricanes 10 Major hurricanes (Cat. 3+) 5 Total fatalities 8 total Total damage $123.2 million (2012 USD) www.nhc.noaa.gov/ http://www.wikipedia.org

2012 Atlantic Hurricane Track and Intensity Errors 00Z and 12Z cycles AVNO = GFS EMX = ECMWF

2012 Eastern Pacific Hurricane Track and Intensity Errors 00Z and 12Z cycles AVNO = GFS EMX = ECMWF

Sandy Track Forecasts Global Deterministic NWP Models Formed October 22, 2012 Dissipated October 31, 2012 (extratropical after October 29) Highest winds 1-minute sustained: 110 mph (175 km/h) Lowest pressure 940 mbar (hPa); 27.76 inHg Fatalities 253 total Damage At least $65.6 billion (2012 USD) (Second-costliest hurricane in US history) www.wikipedia.org www.livescience.com

Mean Track Errors: 22OCt2012 – 30Oct2012

GFS and ECMWF Rainfall Forecasts for Sandy, 5 days before landfall

GFS and ECMWF Rainfall Forecasts for Sandy, 3 days before landfall

Hurricane Track and Intensity Forecast Errors NCEP GFS : 2001 ~ 2012

Fcst Hour

Fcst Hour

Outline Major GFS Changes in the Past 30 Years Review of GFS Historical Performance AC and RMSE Hurricane Track and Intensity Precipitation Comparison with Surface and Rawinsonde Obs

2012 Annual Mean CONUS Precipitation Skill Scores, 0-72 hour Forecast BIAS=1 is perfect Larger ETS is better ECMWF has the best ETS, but it tends to underestimate heavy rainfall events. GFS’s ETS score is only better than NAM; however, GFS has better BIAS score than most of the other models..

GFS CONUS Precipitation Skill Scores, Annual Mean, 2003 ~ 2012 In the past three years (2010~2012), GFS annual mean ETS was improved; BIAS was reduced, especially for medium rainfall events.

GFS CONUS Precipitation Skill Scores, Summer ( JJA) Mean, 2003 ~ 2012 In the past two years (2011~2012), GFS summer QPF scores were degraded for light rainfall events (lower ETS and larger BIAS). This degradation was caused by excessive evaportranspiration in warm season. A soil table (Minimum Canopy Resistance and Root Depth Number) was changed in May-2011 Implementation. This table has been reversed back to its older version since 09/05/2012. See slide 9 for the improvement of light rainfall QPF scores.

Outline Major GFS Changes in the Past 30 Years Review of GFS Historical Performance AC and RMSE Hurricane Track and Intensity Precipitation Comparison with Surface and Rawinsonde Obs

US Northern Plains, T2m Verified against Surface Station Observations Early Morning Late afternoon For 2012, ECMWF had almost perfect forecast of surface temperature in the afternoon, but was slightly too warm in the morning. GFS had good T2m forecast in the morning, but was too cold in the afternoon in the warm season.

US T2m Verified against Surface Station Observations Northwest Northeast GFS and ECMWF were similar in the west GFS is too cold in the east Southwest Southeast

Temperature Bias , Verified against Rawinsonde Observations, 2012 Annual Mean NH SH Compared to RAOBS GFS was too warm in the upper troposphere and too cold at the tropopause and lower stratosphere. ECMF was too cold in the stratosphere. ECMWF was better than the GFS in the troposphere but worse in the stratosphere. Tropics

Temperature Bias Verified against RAOBS, Northern Hemisphere, 120hr Fcst 50 hPa 150 hPa It seems GFS cold bias near the tropopause was reduced after the May-2012 Hybrid EnKF implementation. No seasonal variation in the upper troposphere. ECMWF cold bias in the stratosphere was the worst in the first few months. 300 hPa

Configuration of Major Global High-Res NWP Models (2013) System Analysis Forecast Model Forecast Length and Cycles upcoming NCEP GFS Hybrid 3DVAR (T382) + EnkF (T254) Semi-implicit Spectral T574L64 (23km, 0.03 hPa) 4 cycles 16 days semi-lag T1534 ECMWF IFS 4DVAR T1279L91 (T255 inner loops) Semi-Lag Spectral T1279L137 (16km, 0.01 hPa) 2 cycles 10 days T7999 (2.5km) convection permitting? UKMO Unified Model Hybrid 4DVAR with MOGREPS Ensemble Gridded, 70L (25km; 0.01 hPa) 6 days CMC GEM 3DVAR Semi-lag Gridded (0.3x0.45 deg; 0.1 hPa ) Non-hydrostatic; 4DVAR JMA GSM 4DVAR Semi-lag spectral T959 L60 (0.1875 deg; 0.1 hPa) 9 days (12Z) NAVY NOGAPS NAVDAS-AR 4DVAR Semi-implicit Spectral T319L42 (42km; 0.04hPa) 7.5 days NAVGEM T359L50 semi-lag

Major GFS Changes 1980’s 08/1980: R30L12 , first NMC operational NWP model 10/1983: R40L12 04/1985: R40L18 - GFDL physics 06/1986: R40L18 - convection extended to the tropopause 08/1987: T80L18 –triangular truncation, with diurnal cycle, moisture at all layers 01/1988: T80L18 - interactive clouds 03/1991: T80L18 to T126L18, mean orog, new SST, marine stratus, reduced horizontal diffusion 06/1991 SSI (Spectral Statistical Interpolation) analysis 08/1993 Arakawa-Schubert deep convection, 28 layers 10/1995 Satellite radiances instead of T retrievals; ERS-1 winds 01/1998 - TOVS-1b radiances; vertical diffusion in free atmosphere; 3-D Ozone

Major GFS Changes 3/1999 AMSU-A and HIRS-3 high resolution data from NOAA-15 satellite 2/2000 Resolution change: T126L28  T170L42 (100 km  70 km) Next changes 7/2000 (hurricane relocation) 8/2000 (data cutoff for 06 and 18 UTC) 10/2000 – package of minor changes 2/2001 – radiance and moisture analysis changes 5/2001 Major physics upgrade (prognostic cloud water, cumulus momentum transport) Improved QC for AMSU radiances 6/2001 – vegetation fraction 7/2001 – SST satellite data 8/200 – sea ice mask, gravity wave drag adjustment, random cloud tops, land surface evaporation, cloud microphysics…) 10/ 2001 – snow depth from model background 1/2002 – Quikscat included

Major GFS Changes (cont’d) 11/2002 Resolution change: T170L42  T254L64 (70 km  55 km) Recomputed background error Divergence tendency constraint in tropics turned off Next changes 3/2003 – NOAA-17 radiances, NOAA-16 AMSU restored, Quikscat 0.5 degree data 8/2003 – RRTM longwave and trace gases 10/2003 – NOAA-17 AMSU-A turned off 11/2003 – Minor analysis changes 2/2004 – mountain blocking added 5/2004 – NOAA-16 HIRS turned off 5/2005 Resolution change: T254L64  T382L64 ( 55 km  38 km ) 2-L OSU LSM  4-L NOHA LSM Reduce background vertical diffusion Retune mountain blocking 6/2005 – Increase vegetation canopy resistance 7/2005 – Correct temperature error near top of model

Major GFS Changes (cont’d) 8/2006 Revised orography and land-sea mask NRL ozone physics Upgrade snow analysis 5/2007 SSI (Spectral Statistical Interpolation)  GSI ( Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation). Vertical coordinate changed from sigma to hybrid sigma-pressure New observations (COSMIC, full resolution AIRS, METOP HIRS, AMSU-A and MHS) 12/2007 JMA high resolution winds and SBUV-8 ozone observations added 2/2009 Flow-dependent weighting of background error variances Variational Quality Control METOP IASI observations added Updated Community Radiative Transfer Model coefficients 7/2010 Resolution Change: T382L64  T574L64 ( 38 km  23 km ) Major radiation package upgrade (RRTM2 , aerosol, surface albedo etc) New mass flux shallow convection scheme; revised deep convection and PBL scheme Positive-definite tracer transport scheme to remove negative water vapor

Major GFS Changes (cont’d) 05/09/2011 GSI: Improved OMI QC; Retune SBUV/2 ozone ob errors; Relax AMSU-A Channel 5 QC; New version of CRTM 2.0.2 ; Inclusion of GPS RO data from SAC-C, C/NOFS and TerraSAR-X satellites; Inclusion of uniform (higher resolution) thinning for satellite radiances ; Improved GSI code with optimization and additional options; Recomputed background errors; Inclusion of SBUV and MHS from NOAA-19 and removal of AMSU-A NOAA-15 . GFS: New Thermal Roughness Length -- Reduced land surface skin temperature cold bias and low level summer warm bias over arid land areas; Reduce background diffusion in the Stratosphere . 5/22/2012 GSI Hybrid EnKF-3DVAR : A hybrid variational ensemble assimilation system is employed. The background error used to project the information in the observations into the analysis is created by a combination of a static background error (as in the prior system) and a new background error produced from a lower resolution (T254) Ensemble Kalman Filter. Other GSI Changes: Use GPS RO bending angle rather than refractivity; Include compressibility factors for atmosphere ; Retune SBUV ob errors, fix bug at top ; Update radiance usage flags; Add NPP ATMS satellite data, GOES-13/15 radiance data, and SEVERI CSBT radiance product ; Include satellite monitoring statistics code in operations ; Add new satellite wind data and quality control. 09/05/2012 GFS : A look-up table used in the land surface scheme to control Minimum Canopy Resistance and Root Depth Number was updated to reduce excessive evaporation. This update was aimed to mitigate GFS cold and moist biases found in the late afternoon over the central United States when drought conditions existed in summer of 2012.

Sample of Upgrades GSI Hybrid EnKF-3DVAR Implementation (May 2012) By Daryl Kleist, Russ Treadon, Jeff Whitaker etc Day at which forecast loses useful skill (500-hPa Height AC=0.6) 3D-Var Operational GFS vs Hybrid-Ensemble GFS Parallels 1. Summer (retrospective parallel prd12q3i): 27 August 2011 ~ 16 October 2011 Operational Parallel parallel minus Operational Northern Hemisphere 7.68 7.79 0.11 (2.6 hrs) Southern Hemisphere 7.89 7.94 0.05 (1.2hrs) 2. Winter and Spring (real-time parallel prd12q3s): 8 January 2012 ~ 21 May 2012 Operational Parallel parallel minus Operational Northern Hemisphere 8.43 8.65 0.22 (5.3 hrs) Southern Hemisphere 7.62 7.73 0.11 (2.6 hrs)